Disaster Article 13 has passed : EU - Eurocucks - your memes have no home here. All amendments rejected.

Article 13 approved by European Parliament by 438 votes to 226
September 12, 2018







Tags: Article 13 europe safe harbour
european-commission-1500x500.jpg



MEPs have voted to pass the much-discussed Article 13 of the European Copyright Directive. Of the 751 politicians voting on the directive today in Strasbourg, 438 voted in favour, 226 against and 39 abstained.


View image on Twitter




Sylvie Guillaume

✔@sylvieguillaume




Soulagement après le vote sur la directive #droitdauteur. L'Europe de la diversité culturelle renforcée, une presse indépendante et la liberté d'expression préservées après le vote du rapport @AxelVossMdEP. Les négociations vont pouvoir enfin débuter avec le Conseil.

9:02 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






This section of the proposed legislation would make internet platforms liable for copyrighted content uploaded by their users:

“Article 13 creates an obligation on information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders and to prevent the availability on their services of content identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers”

This would remove the ‘safe harbours’ that have been a long-term bugbear for music rightsholders, who see them as responsible for the ‘value gap’ between the music royalties paid by platforms like YouTube, and those that do not benefit from safe harbours, like Spotify and Apple Music.

Critics of Article 13 argue that it would damage key principles of free expression online by forcing platforms to filter anything that might be copyrighted content, while also damaging the chances of small internet startups to compete with giants like Google/YouTube, who can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars building tools like the latter’s ContentID to comply with the legislation.

The news is already being celebrated by music rightsholders and their representative bodies, but will come as a blow to the technology companies and activists who had been campaigning against the proposal.

Independent body Impala was one of the first to hail the news, describing it as a “great result for creators”. Boss Helen Smith had published an opinion piece earlier this week defending the proposed legislation. “Nobody in our community is suggesting ‘tearing down the internet.’ What we are asking lawmakers to do is to make sure that it works for everyone,” she wrote.




IMPALA@IMPALAMusic




1f44f.png
1f44f.png
1f44f.png
MEP @AxelVossMdEP Proposal wins the vote, great result for creators #EuropeforCreators

8:59 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Paul Pacifico, boss of UK independent body AIM, hailed the vote as “a great day for music and culture in Europe” in a tweet shortly after the vote. He also published an opinion piece this week, criticising the lobbying tactics of companies and organisations who had opposed Article 13.




Paul Pacifico

✔@allstarspaul




A great day for culture and music in #europe as the #copyrightdirective is adopted by @Europarl_EN including #article13 - thank you #MEPs from all parties for your energetic and highly engaged approach to this very sensitive and important legislation.

9:06 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Google provided this statement to Music Ally following the vote. “People want access to quality news and creative content online,” said a spokesperson. “We’ve always said that more innovation and collaboration are the best way to achieve a sustainable future for the European news and creative sectors, and we’re committed to continued close partnership with these industries.”

[Also passed today was Article 11, which focuses more on the news side of things.)

MEP Julia Reda, who had been one of the prominent critics of the proposals, summarised the fears in a tweet posted after the vote was carried.


View image on Twitter




Julia Reda

✔@Senficon




Article 13 vote: The European Parliament endorses #uploadfilters for all but the smallest sites and apps. Anything you want to publish will need to first be approved by these filters, perfectly legal content like parodies & memes will be caught in the crosshairs #SaveYourInternet

8:57 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






We’ll be covering reactions to the news in the coming hours here, so check back on this story regularly for updates.
https://musically.com/2018/09/12/article-13-approved-by-european-parliament-by-438-votes-to-226/

EU approves controversial internet copyright law, including ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
3
Key provisions were amended to reduce potential harm, but critics say vote is ‘catastrophic’
By James Vincent@jjvincent Sep 12, 2018, 7:12am EDTSHARE
wjoel_180317_2415_002_social.0.0.jpg

The European Parliament has voted on changes to the Copyright Directive, a piece of legislation intended to update copyright for the internet age. In a session this morning, MEPs approved amended versions of the directive’s most controversial provisions: Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by critics as the “link tax” and “upload filter.”

Article 11 is intended to give publishers and newspapers a way to make money when companies like Google link to their stories, while Article 13 requires platforms like YouTube and Facebook to scan uploaded content to stop the unlicensed sharing of copyrighted material. Critics say these two provisions pose a dire threat to the free flow of information online, and will be open to abuse by copyright trolls and censors.

READ MORE: EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: WHAT’S AT STAKE
Defenders of the Copyright Directive and its controversial clauses say this is an unfair characterization. They point to existing laws and newly-introduced amendments that will block the worst excesses of this legislation (like, for example, a law that excuses parodies and memes from copyright claims). They say that the campaign against the directive has been funded by US tech giants eager to retain their control over the web’s platforms.

In remarks following the vote in Parliament this morning, MEP Axel Voss, who has led the charge on introducing Articles 11 and 13 thanked his fellow politicians “for the job we have done together.” “This is a good sign for the creative industries in Europe,” said Voss.

Opposing MEPs like Julia Reda of the Pirate Party described the outcome as “catastrophic.”

It’s important to note that this is far from the end of the story for the Copyright Directive and its impact on the web. The legislation approved today still faces a final vote in the European Parliament in January (where it’s possible, though very unlikely, it will be rejected). After that, individual EU member states will still get to choose how to put the directive in law. In other words, each country will be able to interpret the directive as they see fit.

Developing...
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

 
Last edited:
Leaf I may be, but at least I can still shitpost on the Internet without a license.

Canada still has Alberta, which is essentially like having one foot in the real world. I'm not sure Europe has the equivalent. Bavaria, maybe? I've seen BBC articles about the horriffic racism of rural Germany, and if they offend the BBC, they can't be all bad.
 
The only good thing about this is that the normies and the exceptional leftists might want to shut the fuck up and listen for once because it fucking effects them too. It effects their bank accounts and their freedom to have a good time. The remoaner brats who cried about Brexit might finally realise that championing for a shadow government who can do whatever they want without your say is fucking stupid.

I've talked with enough PRO-EU people from all kinds of countries to know their answer will just be "well OUR native government would do this too"
 
The link tax I think is very bad idea to try and save struggling old business platforms in Europe.

No one is going to pay link tax for Italian local paper. This was proven in Germany and Spain. It will end up hurting, not saving these old media forms.

Even worse, journalist will easily be swamped with copy right claims.


Imagine I am big company doing shady shit. Exposes comes out....I slap it with copyright claim. They might win, but I drag it out and material is pulled while court battle fights. I can just do this over and over. They use a statement from my PR department...copyright claim. They use my logo....copyright claim...they interview an employee....fuck it copyright claim.
 
Canada still has Alberta, which is essentially like having one foot in the real world. I'm not sure Europe has the equivalent. Bavaria, maybe? I've seen BBC articles about the horriffic racism of rural Germany, and if they offend the BBC, they can't be all bad.

that'd be Austria, Hungary and most of eastern Europe
 
US creators who want to preserve their Euro audiences are going to have to drastically adjust their content.
It's as simple as parking your servers in the US and, upon receiving any requests to remove content or whatever from the EU, sending them a form letter telling them that you won't, complete with the text of the SPEECH act, which makes it inadvisable for them to attempt to actually sue you.
 
I might as well post the France results.
5cadf056c8582a91277e1170d82df55f48a313850b2a8a4d59183e30205b0679.png
62701ab13d44c992492c8f28c5764a405db4b40e248270940e48537aa3916348.png
3912fd6b4ed21f1c2171dd7184807ef45319d5be1587232187b7281a0436919c.png
67266ee5e3a7f21cea89bb02ba0b0895b0318ff5fd717243fac97d7cfa7c48ab.png
f44b1e06bee8860a65e6816b9b35e3d76d60ee37cb646eda2326ed4ee7aa2b68.png
564f6a27e4e62b53841dd5468d912c1161c62684602928c3c815774086ced995.png
f4bc31ab23259915b5d0899c0c13c84261cba8ad661c76198ebc5f24ee164325.png


d83da36cc06e61709be154c85b189966e7dccbb9040d4e5a68bef7bd5295c751.png

The Communist Party is full of Traitors
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie-Pierre_Vieu
773d6afdc1d29613670ec7097c790667c5a8db618fbd0ad607269faf44431d6b.png

LFI too, fucking socdems
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younous_Omarjee

e3031e50d28b25ea3c6c1b1ce431d42e613e03e2de84a0aca8448e11644768b1.png

The PCF again
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Le_Hyaric
38c6872dc28c06fe2bb1d566dee7278a5e084426776d0cef6d657dfc63a66f90.png
6dffb5625bd98a6e36480844087d1697f5590dc096872a3846d0ba51568938f8.png

Bové used too dismantle McDonalds and cut genetically engineered corn illegally. And
invading GM farms and uprooting crops.



-Marie-Pierre VIEU (PCF), vote FOR.

-Patrick LE HYARIC (PCF), vote FOR.

-Younous OMARJEE (LFI), ABSTENTION.

-Marie-Christine VERGIAT (GUE-NGL), ABSTENTION.

There's more right-wing MEPs who voted against than left-wing MEPs.
 
Last edited:
Canada still has Alberta, which is essentially like having one foot in the real world. I'm not sure Europe has the equivalent. Bavaria, maybe? I've seen BBC articles about the horriffic racism of rural Germany, and if they offend the BBC, they can't be all bad.
Never before have I been this proud to live in Alberta, as I have in 2018.
 
This will be trivial to bypass, and is typical limp-dicked EU legislation.

The likes of facebook and youtube will simply host their content outside of the EU, and tell Brussels to suck their collective cocks. These companies are not going to invest in the personnel to mediate their content.

Smaller web devs have already been leaving the EU, and this is only going to speed that up. The EU is simply legislating the internet economy out of europe.

And memes will never die. All the EU is opening themselves up to being meme'd to death and back, while their citizens resent Brussels for being overbearing cunts.
 
It's as simple as parking your servers in the US and, upon receiving any requests to remove content or whatever from the EU, sending them a form letter telling them that you won't, complete with the text of the SPEECH act, which makes it inadvisable for them to attempt to actually sue you.

Nice dream, but as far as I can tell, non-EU content that breaks these new EU rules will be blocked from being accessible to EU consumers.

Do you all see how fucked this is yet?
 
Back