Secret Asshole
Expert in things that never, ever happened
Forum Staff
⚡ Thunderdomer ⚡
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
I've seen the comparisons to Evangelion in the past few pages, but to be honest, I don't think it's particularly accurate. EVA at least was a character exploration on what escapism does to you. Hideaki Anno is kind of well known for using that story to tell people all the negative outcomes of what being an Otaku does to you... which fell on deaf ears. It had some sense of self improvement themes in it.
Attack on Titan on the other hand, is just Isayama's unfiltered rage at this point. Things don't get better not because they can't, things don't get better because he's so narrow minded about what he's trying to do. The nihilism game is so strong in this guy it doesn't even warrant a Shinji comparison. Also, I think Isayama loves doing this to his readers. He thrives in it. Anno absolutely despises having to come back and work on EVA Rebuild because that entire set of movies was his "fuck you guys for not getting the message and turning my small show into a cult".
Isayama definitely enjoys hurting his audience. He's got full on GoT syndrome and has had it for awhile. The problem is everyone is already rooting for Eren, so he'll just have to do some dumb bullshit to Eren to piss everyone off. I mean, hysterically, Reiner is still fucking impotent. He's been a constant fuck up. The only thing he ever did right was smash the walls in, but otherwise he's spent nearly the entire manga getting his ass kicked.
AoT is definitely nihilism for nihilism's sake. There's no point to it.
I mean there's a difference and it's not because it's "garbage" since it's still doing well with most people. It's because there were issues with WIT Studio which originally did the series that were at fault with budgeting issues along with having too many animators overworking which is what caused Season 3 to split in half, and Iseyama wants to have some clear control over the anime's production as he helped with the Uprising arc in the anime because he didn't like it in the manga and sort of schedules things within the anime as a way to "draw parallels" with his manga, and he also places foreshadowing in the endings.
AOT's anime issues was due to not having a very reliable studio and Iseyama really wanting to have some control on the anime adaption which I don't think many studios really want or it could just be that other studios have other big projects to work on that AOT doesn't finish their schedule.
I feel a better comparison to this would've been Full Metal Alchemist because Arakawa was doing their final arc while Brotherhood was airing and made sure to get through to it so the team of Brotherhood could animate it. Hell while it was divided, Arakawa gave full creative freedom to the 2003 FMA team since she knew she wouldn't have finished the manga by then.
As for current AOT, it's not much of a surprise Iseyama is taking influence from Western Media for his most recent stuff since his original ending was literally a ripoff of the ending to The Mist.
I guess so. But still, you'd think another studio would have picked up on it. I'm already guessing that the studio has consulted with Isayama on the ending, as he can't be very far away from it and he already knows what he's going to do. I doubt it will be an anime-only ending. Though with the amount of shit they have to cram into two cours is fucking hilarious. No idea how they're going to do that. And I fucking hate the art style they're going with. Choosing to copy Isayama's style for the anime, fucking ugh. The manga is ass ugly, usually you try to make it look better. A lot of the time I have trouble distinguishing between characters because the art is so trash and everyone looks identical.
The only shame is that the music is absolutely wasted on AoT. I mean, the animation and music is beautiful. Its a shame everything else on it is trash.