- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
I disagree with parts of this and think you may be a little bit too MATI at some random Japanese authorGabi sucks because she serves no purpose other than to anger people who liked Sasha. There's really no justification for her character. If she was a foil for Eren, she would have inherited a titan, but would have been above the hate and stand for justice. She would be a mirror for Eren, not identical to him. There's no real reason to have an identical Eren, because you have a character who already embodies these traits.
Gabi is simply a bad character to anger readers, because even though she is identical to Eren, she shows no personal growth, basically like Eren. So what is the point of her being there? She's redundant. You don't need two Eren's in a story as its obviously quite logical that the opposing side would have one similar to him, but when you're crafting a story, you want that person to have a purpose. You want her to learn where he doesn't. You want her to recant her hate. You want the guilt for murder to eat her alive. That's how you develop a foil.
But she's not developed as a foil. She is a meta character, there to aggravate readers and serve as a tool to kill a character Isayama already wanted dead and replace her with something he wanted. This is why Gabi is a bad character. She is more of a self-insert than anything else. Its also one of the many examples of why Isayama is a bad writer. You don't kill a character and basically replace them with an identical character (unless you're in Gantz and then you're already in bugfuck territory).
Gabi COULD have been a foil for Eren, being like him in the beginning but changing over the story and developing into the protagonist while Eren becomes the antagonist, hence having this role reversal where Eren can't let go of his hate but Gabi can. But that never happens.
What is her purpose? What narrative themes does she offer that other characters do not have? We've already got child soldiers. We've already got unrepentant killers as kids. We've already got someone like Sasha. She's a complete redundancy. You CAN'T write characters that are thematically redundant, no matter the side. Of COURSE the other side is going to view the other side as 'bad'. The problem is you have to consider the audience. Which side has the audience spent the most time with? Have you given previous context to their actions being amoral or morally dubious? Do the protagonists oppose these views? Do they support them? "LOL BOTH SIDS ARE BAD" because they just don't consider these questions and a lot of authors forget that the audience is always going to side with characters and factions they've spent the most time with, especially if they're enjoyable and they're the protagonist. Or especially if they're just following around this awesome protagonist but then randomly his side is just as shitty or he does out of character actions to show that his side is 'just as bad'.
It's really idiotic to assume Gabi's entire existence is to piss Sasha fans off when Iseyama could've easily done worse to make Sasha's death more rage-inducing he could've easily made her act like an idiot to build up to her death or alternatively basically have her tortured to death by Marleyans by having her be eaten by dogs as some pretentious way of saying "LOL SHE LIKES MEAT BUT NOW SHE IS FOOD FOR DOGS" or some shit-machine bullshit. Also I disagree that she had no growth because she hated the Islanders less after meeting Sasha's family and some close relatives to see them as not devils. She still hates Eren which is justified since Eren committed mass murder.
Outside of appearances and being cheerful at times, Gabi is not really similar to Sasha and just feels like a mini-genderswap fusion of Eren and Reiner (though ironically she acts more like Floch is). As for an alleged Iseyama self-insert, it feels like Zeke or Eren are more of a self-insert than Gabi. Zeke has been hyped up the most out of any AOT character by Iseyama for years, and is an autistic nerd who is always portrayed as super smart with most of his plans going well. Eren meanwhile is the protagonist who knows absolutely anything, near-unbeatable (depends on how the ending goes), always portrayed as cool and badass, and could potentially get away with mass genocide. Gabi on the other hand is more of a plot device to generate conflict at her worst. Both characters are also portrayed as the smartest and have super cool "clever" plans to make them look like they are playing 4D chess (though out of the two, Eren is the more likely to be a self-insert) like the semi-pretentious moment when both Eren and Zeke are in the PATHs world to show cool Eren is which feels like it came straight out of a pretentious nerd's self insert story, they just need to play a game of Chess to really ram down the pretentious angle.
As for Gabi's purpose in the story, I think she was a messy way (even though I am indifferent about her/mildly like her, she is a mess writing wise) of Iseyama trying to break the self-fulfilling prophecy of having someone like Reiner/Eren get out of the cycle of being a mentally disturbed child soldier who hurt those closest to them for their own goals of wanting to be a hero to their people which is why there is a big deal of Reiner wanting Falco to get a titan instead of Gabi and Gabi getting humiliated or learning that not all of the other side is bad. The only times Gabi was ever portrayed in a "badass" way is to only ever further the plot rather than make her cool. The issue with Gabi's arc is that there isn't enough time to know her before she killed Sasha outside of being Pre-Timeskip!Eren 2.0. If Iseyama wanted to get the intended emotions for Gabi that he likely have wanted than he should've just had Gabi still get on the ship but get her ass kicked right away for killing that redshirt by Floch and friend, and probably have some sort of relationship with Sasha to build up then during the Marley invasion fight, Sasha could've died to save her. This is cliche but Gabi's whole character is not really new as she is a brainwashed soldier who learns the other side is not so bad and that things are much more grey.
tl;dr Eren and Zeke are more likely Iseyama self-inserts, Gabi is just a messy attempt of a "breaking the cycle" character arc by being a mini-fusion of Eren and Reiner, and she would've been better received if Iseyama went a safer route with her character arc then rushing into it for audience shock.