- Joined
- Jan 22, 2023
Troons are a special case, though. I am guilty of getting mati in this very thread. Sometimes they do such horrible things to their families or just other unrelated people that it gets to me. It shouldn't, but it does.
Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).
- Thread starter Admiral Throbnelius
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2017
If these Bluesky retards get their way, yes. However if Newsom actively throws these peoples' opinions in the trash (which he and other Dems should absolutely do) I could see him becoming President.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2016
Also, the modus operandi of Troonsky users, in the spirit of the eternal communist struggle, is fighting and cancelling others. On a site populated by only their kind, they have to spend more time coming up with esoteric reasoning to justify why their fellow leftist is worse than Hitler than doing the fighting they love. On Xitter, the chuds are right there. They can't resist.
Back in my day, we had a term for people who became obsessively angry over lolcows and wished harm on them. It was called A-LOGGING! It was named after a guy who got unfathomably angry at Chris Chan, and after he was doxxed, was revealed to be just as much of an autistic loser as Chris. Wishing that child abusers, violent criminals and corrupt politicians could just get the Canadian lethal injection and leave good people alone is normal. Getting obsessively mad at cows (or a community, or a Thunderdome thread) makes you an A-Log. Criticizing their every move and creating elaborate fantasies about torturing them makes you an A-Log. Placing yourself in a mirror version of the Troonsky user's "eternal struggle" is not normal. Your obsession indicates that you are compensating for something very wrong with you.
This thread makes a good observation about how "lolcows" shifted to "moral outrage cows" because of the political polarization of the 2010s and how it's easier to get mad than to laugh. That's why I only read the CW threads about my hobbies (where I can laugh at my deranged fellow hobbyists/critics) and the legal threads (where I can laugh at poorly-written lolsuits). Oh, and Will Stancil. If you find yourself feeling angry at what you see on this site, remember: Lolcows are supposed to be funny.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
"Moral outrage cows" proliferate because moral outrage gets rewarded with clicks and e-infamy, which turns into money and pseudo-fame. The social media algorithms have been gamified to the point where you need to inject moral outrage into anything to get noticed.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2026
True on that. A lot of modern cows either capitalize on political outrage over nothingburgers or something that is blown out of proportion or they become retarded trashfires for people to get mad at.
But it is important to not get angry at the cows since these are not normal people. They wouldn't be able to function properly without the internet. You should get angry within reason about things that you should legitimately angry at. But not about these people because that is a waste of time and energy.
It's kind of why while i appreciate DSP and all his lore i avoid his thread. Plus, if you need to prove you are better than a cow, you are no better than them
SIMON THE PIEMAN
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2025
Someone in this thread mentioned that the algorithm is completely fucked. I can confirm that this is true. I made an account and then selected video games, animals and software engineering as my interests. I haven't followed a single person. My feed is full of TDS and facebook-tier political takes. It's like Gab but gayer.
Fag Alert Major Fag Alert
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2023
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2026
Attie.ai is now the 2nd most blocked account on Bluesky, only second to JD Vance.
(Clearsky) (Archive, Mega)
lmao
"hey respectfully, I'll do what I want"
(Link) (Wayback, Archive, Ghost)
You know what's worse than epilepsy? Someone posting a picture of (presumably their) micropenis. "that'll show them! i'm sticking it (semen) to the man!!!"
ehhhhh, you'll be alright (maybe not if you saw that picture)
They seem to be very happy!
"this is against the law"
Are you aware of what website you're on sir?????
18 day old account, already on 652 lists.
(Link) (Archive)
They're also blocked by 155K people using blocklists (separate from the number visible on the top 20 chart and on the normal "blocked by" page).
(Must be logged into Bluesky on here to view this for some reason)
(Clearsky) (Archive, Mega)
lmao
"hey respectfully, I'll do what I want"
(Link) (Wayback, Archive, Ghost)
You know what's worse than epilepsy? Someone posting a picture of (presumably their) micropenis. "that'll show them! i'm sticking it (semen) to the man!!!"
ehhhhh, you'll be alright (maybe not if you saw that picture)
They seem to be very happy!
"this is against the law"
Are you aware of what website you're on sir?????
18 day old account, already on 652 lists.
(Link) (Archive)
They're also blocked by 155K people using blocklists (separate from the number visible on the top 20 chart and on the normal "blocked by" page).
(Must be logged into Bluesky on here to view this for some reason)
Kokonut Kangs Klan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2025
Troonsky provides a public feed API of the entire network, even posts normally requiring login. Mr. Estrogon's demand (the fuck is that username about?) is impossible by design, the AI overlords WILL be raping you Mr. Estrogon."this is against the law"
Also literally this faggot (BS / BS):
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2025
I find this guy funny and it’s without it being political. He’s just a funny guy.
Trollistic
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2024
How dare you call them retards! That’s an insult to actual retards! It’s like calling niggers a bunch of pajeets/spics/sandnigs/SEAs (if you think about it)
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2026
Yeah, what exactly is nerdjpg.com on Bluesky's contribution to the "socialist revolution"?
It better not just be "here's commieslop pdf files and youtube links be informed naow or ur a bigot and want trannies to die".
(Link) (Wayback, Archive, Mega)
Seriously what are you guys actually doing for this movement????? What is their plan for a "revolution" if it isn't violence? These types are notorious for being violent too no?
"how are so many people so smug" "because they're so smart and read the big books" the fucking irony... Usually these types tell you "be educated" "do better" "you're misinformed" "be informed". Or flex that they've read so many books and that you're an illiterate pleb, therefore you must listen to me me me!!!!
It literally says to "educate yourself" LOL! And to spread commie garbage propaganda anywhere and everywhere
There's this Google Doc embedded on the site.
(Link) (Attempted archive.today snapshot)
(MobileBasic View) (Wayback, Archive, Ghost, Mega)
Here's some local archives for it (not sure what the best format would be so here's a few)
Am I now apart of the movement?????? (lol)
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2026
It is a constant in all libtoids to yell "educate yourself" to their enemies and less extreme peers. To their enemies because they firmly believe that not being a libtoid (and specially one like them) is a matter of being educated and being smart. Therefore if you are not like them and even worse, you don't like leftoid politics, you are evil and dumb because you are not only uneducated, you do not want to be educated.
Also, it's funny that when they say it they mean "read the insane drivel that is the basis of an ideology that has failed for more than 100 years" and not to read anything that you might apply to your life or the following "revolution" like driving vehicles, survivalism, cooking or handicrafts.
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2022
A new article got posted about the decline of Bluesky, and how it has stagnated and dying a slow death.
Last month, Bluesky CEO Jay Graber stepped down after more than four years leading the company. The board is now searching for a permanent CEO, as pressure intensifies on the platform to keep up with Elon Musk’s X. The timing is rough. What was once billed as the most credible post-Twitter alternative is now showing clear signs of stagnation.
Bluesky’s trajectory raises an uncomfortable question: is this just a temporary plateau, or the beginning of terminal decline? The early evidence points toward the latter. Stripped of the hype and headline user surges, Bluesky increasingly looks less like a breakout success and more like a case study in why ideologically homogeneous platforms struggle to sustain meaningful engagement.
Bluesky only opened to the public in February 2024, having spent a year in invite-only beta after growing out of a project originally launched by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey. The post-election exodus from X in November 2024 was supposed to be Bluesky’s moonshot moment, adding roughly 13 million users in six weeks, and then crossing 20 million by mid-November and 30 million by January 2025.
Alas, it’s now a gloomy case study in why ideological monocultures can’t sustain engagement. Over on X, a journalist recently flagged Bluesky’s engagement data. The accompanying graphs, drawn from the platform’s own public metrics tracker, tell a brutal story. Daily posters spiked to 1.5 million and now sit around 600,000. As one analysis noted, by early April 2026, average daily posters had fallen back to September 2024 levels, handing back everything the site gained since Trump’s election. To address this problem, Bluesky’s head of product released an engagement-focused 2026 roadmap in January. It promised an overhauled Discover feed, better follow recommendations, and real-time curation tools for live events, which amounts to an admission that their mechanics for finding interesting content never worked properly.
Mark Cuban, once an enthusiastic evangelist who posted nearly 2,000 times after joining in November 2024, reversed course in June 2025, writing that engagement had devolved from substantive conversations into culture war-style purity tests. It didn’t matter if users were Democrats or Left-wing; no one was safe. Take, for example, Slate‘s legal correspondent, Mark Joseph Stern, who was piled on for offering a measured legal analysis of the Supreme Court’s conversion therapy ruling. Unfortunately, his experience is not unique; researchers at the University of Zurich and Aalto University found that on the most polarized topics on Bluesky such as trans rights, dissenting opinions made up only 1-2% of users.
The obvious story here is that Bluesky is dying a slow death. The tribal approach looked logical on paper. First, you build a safe harbor for progressives alienated by Musk’s X, then let community loyalty compound. The trouble is that agreement doesn’t generate the friction social media runs on. When 98% of users share the same politics, there’s nothing left to argue about, and those controversies are what create user clicks and advertiser cash. The failures of Parler and Gab proved the same lesson from the Right.
Bluesky’s problem is simpler than its boosters would like to admit. It grew quickly on the back of a political moment, but it hasn’t figured out how to keep people talking now that moment passed. The problem for Bluesky is that it isn’t big enough to ignore engagement problems, and it isn’t distinctive enough to overcome them. Unless that changes quickly, its brief period as the heir to Twitter will look less like a turning point and more like a blip.
Bluesky’s trajectory raises an uncomfortable question: is this just a temporary plateau, or the beginning of terminal decline? The early evidence points toward the latter. Stripped of the hype and headline user surges, Bluesky increasingly looks less like a breakout success and more like a case study in why ideologically homogeneous platforms struggle to sustain meaningful engagement.
Bluesky only opened to the public in February 2024, having spent a year in invite-only beta after growing out of a project originally launched by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey. The post-election exodus from X in November 2024 was supposed to be Bluesky’s moonshot moment, adding roughly 13 million users in six weeks, and then crossing 20 million by mid-November and 30 million by January 2025.
Alas, it’s now a gloomy case study in why ideological monocultures can’t sustain engagement. Over on X, a journalist recently flagged Bluesky’s engagement data. The accompanying graphs, drawn from the platform’s own public metrics tracker, tell a brutal story. Daily posters spiked to 1.5 million and now sit around 600,000. As one analysis noted, by early April 2026, average daily posters had fallen back to September 2024 levels, handing back everything the site gained since Trump’s election. To address this problem, Bluesky’s head of product released an engagement-focused 2026 roadmap in January. It promised an overhauled Discover feed, better follow recommendations, and real-time curation tools for live events, which amounts to an admission that their mechanics for finding interesting content never worked properly.
Mark Cuban, once an enthusiastic evangelist who posted nearly 2,000 times after joining in November 2024, reversed course in June 2025, writing that engagement had devolved from substantive conversations into culture war-style purity tests. It didn’t matter if users were Democrats or Left-wing; no one was safe. Take, for example, Slate‘s legal correspondent, Mark Joseph Stern, who was piled on for offering a measured legal analysis of the Supreme Court’s conversion therapy ruling. Unfortunately, his experience is not unique; researchers at the University of Zurich and Aalto University found that on the most polarized topics on Bluesky such as trans rights, dissenting opinions made up only 1-2% of users.
The obvious story here is that Bluesky is dying a slow death. The tribal approach looked logical on paper. First, you build a safe harbor for progressives alienated by Musk’s X, then let community loyalty compound. The trouble is that agreement doesn’t generate the friction social media runs on. When 98% of users share the same politics, there’s nothing left to argue about, and those controversies are what create user clicks and advertiser cash. The failures of Parler and Gab proved the same lesson from the Right.
Bluesky’s problem is simpler than its boosters would like to admit. It grew quickly on the back of a political moment, but it hasn’t figured out how to keep people talking now that moment passed. The problem for Bluesky is that it isn’t big enough to ignore engagement problems, and it isn’t distinctive enough to overcome them. Unless that changes quickly, its brief period as the heir to Twitter will look less like a turning point and more like a blip.
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2019
Of course Bluesky is dying, echochambers like that always die out in the long run, leaving behind small hardened communities of eccentric outcasts that the rest of the mainstream internet doesn't want anything to do with.
Honestly, I'd feel sorry for them, but bluesky is for faggots so fuck'em.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2026
Not only that, a lot of these people try either joining small instances that kinda vibe with them or try creating their own. But they end up the same since these retards cannod deal with a larger forum interacting with them and thus, they go back to square one
Trollistic
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2024
calm down
Kill all Bluesky users