Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

"I was not asked to weigh in on this, but I still will because I am Cinema Roberto, defender of women. Especially lesbians, who might let me film them fucking."

The only thing of her 'comedy' I saw was this stand up show where comedians do their seven minutes and then the next person comes on. She did this bit about how now that she's out as a dyke, dudes want her to watch lesbian porn with them, I guess to get her input or something. I doubt Bob knows anything about her because as soon as he heard she wasn't into that shit he'd lose all interest in her.
 
What's the zinger?

What's great about this is that Bob's such an illiterate idiot he doesn't realize it's wordplay for a setup, not an actual punchline. She's enough of a comedian that she's giving you the part where you are supposed to go "ohhh what's this?" and you're enticed to know more's coming. But Bob's such a wannabe sycophant clapping seal that he immediately declares "SHUT IT DOWN" as if her intro is the concluding line so he stomps completely all over the things she actually wants to say on the topic. He's undermining and destroying the very value of her art (whatever it may or may not be) by his own lack of thought capability.

Also, damn, she got fat. I already wouldn't have sex with her but I guess she's concerned about the possibility.
 
What's the zinger?
The dumb Hannah Gadsby bitch saying "If it's not from a female perspective then I'm not interested". Or at least, that's what Bob thinks a "zinger" looks like. Because of course lesbican doesn't care about men's perspective just like she doesn't want to fuck a man, because those things are equivalent I guess? And Bob thinks this is a FUNNY "zinger" because LOL lesbican makes fun of dead white male, calls him "Pablomatic" because Pablo Picasso + Problematic = Pablomatic, get it? - Bob, probably

Bob, my dude, she's DEFINITELY neither going to fuck you, nor let you watch. Let alone film it.
What's great about this is that Bob's such an illiterate idiot he doesn't realize it's wordplay for a setup, not an actual punchline.
Yeah, @Flexo has brought this up before, where Bob's comprehension of comedy is so bereft of any intelligence, that he tries to do level 3 or 4 jokes, without "getting there" via level 1 or 2 first, yet. Or, he thinks this lesbican "zinger" is a level 5 joke, rather than a setup for a different punchline. He's incapable of actual Thinking ™️ . Especially when he's buzzed on that 5th can of Pabst Blue Ribbon for the day. Or hell, since the troon ad blowup, he's probably drinking Bud Lite instead.
 
The dumb Hannah Gadsby bitch saying "If it's not from a female perspective then I'm not interested".
If that's supposed to be a joke then the joke is squarely on her.

art.jpg

And again, if you think Superior Future can be won through democratic elections, then the joke is on you.
elect.png

This is how Bobby would set up a joke: two presidential candidates and Elon Musk walk into a bar...
musk1.png

Musk's obsession with the letter X has made him the butt of another bad joke.
XV1.png



cath1.png

JK.png

cath2.jpg
At this moment Christians aren't the group that is keep yelling about being rounded up in camps and being genocided.

Bobby does not believe in the separation of the Church and State -- if said Church is the Church of Sexual Depravity.
agri.png

And Bobby is not very receptive to the wisdom of pee o'seas either.
walsh2.png
May I hazard a guess that Walsh didn't interview that woman because he was not making a documentary about child marriage? But then, genital mutilation.... 🤔

walsh.jpg

groom.png

DeS.png
No I won't revise my verdict on Yale just because God Emperor II graduated from it.

homeschool.jpg
What seems to be the problem?

ship.png
It's a very beautiful ship, but Nazi fetish is beautiful too.


Again, crybabies are screeching at the usual suspects, for their disrespecting their favorite toy franchise.
spid1.png

You've noticed that the Critical Drinker's verdict isn't bad at all -- and this only enrages the crybabies even more.
drink.png

Someone clipped what I presume to be part of Drinker's review. Drinker seems to have issues with the portrayal of the only straight white man in the cartoon as a bumbling heartless father who repeatedly put his baby child in way of danger.
drink2.png
No. As a straight white man the Drinker must not care about representation at all.

spid4.png

spid5.jpg

These people seem so certain that nig-spider won't be cast on the wayside once the novelty wears off.
spid6.jpg
It is very strange that Bobby sticks to Adam West's version of Batman through thick and thin, but can cast off the Spiderman he knew and (presumably) loved so well in cartoon in a heartbeat.

spid2.jpg

spid7.png

spid7.png
LOL I don't even know what Bobby is saying. Period.

Bobby then talks about Flash.
flash.png

SW.jpg


Bobby cried bloody murder when Zaslav canceled Batgirl, but when the other shoe drops, Bobby is dead silent.
dis.jpg
Cry me a fucking river.

More good news:
pixar.png
Pixar self-destructs perfectly well. Chapek did not tell them to make a film about a girl showing her "panda" for money, or make Lightyear unpalatable to China and the Middle East.

On the other hand, a certain good thing might soon come to an end.
strike.png

pixar2.png

Dave Bautista announces his sexual availability.
dave.jpg

ollie.png

war.png
The Console War was Bobby's "own private Vietnam" (Page 47 of Brick By Brick) Do your research trolls!

niece.jpg
 
Last edited:
You've noticed that the Critical Drinker's verdict isn't bad at all -- and this only enrages the crybabies even more.

You know, at this point, I don't need to watch the Critical Drinker videos anymore, because Robert is always up to tell me what was the Drinker's take on anything.

Seriously, I think he spends more time and energy talking about people he doesn't like and their opinion than actually talking about a movie he says to be "the best Spiderman movie", it ain't enough to enjoy the thing he likes, Robert needs to seethe about "bad people" and what they will think about said thing.

But the real fun of this new phase of Robert's sperging is that he pretends that his "beef" with Critical Drinker and others from his clique is about bad movie discourse, criticism and "media iliteracy" (the new buzz word), when it is so obviously not.

It is jealousy, plain and simple. Robert focuses his ire on the Critical Drinker specifically because the man has everything Robert wants, big you tube channel, lot's of views, popular stream with friends, and hey, they even have women on those (who Robert resentfully calls "pick me girls"). And hell, seems like Will Jordan (the drinker) even has a rather successful career as a writer as well (I have yet to read his Books, But I heard his Ryan Drake series is a good take on Clancy's schtick), and now writing even Official comics for Stallone.

Now, picture this: You wake up fat and bald, grey beard on you face, 40 and at mom's house. You eke out a living on a ever diminishing patreon, that goes down doesn't without fail every single month in the last 3 years, and the only job you can get now is to wiki capeshit for a channel that has lost it's relevancy years ago. Your biggest acomplishments are a stagnant youtube channel that hasn't seen growth for over 5 years and a embarrassing book where you make a fool out yourself. You have no friends, no wife, never will have any kids, you have no presence on the internet outside your little twitter box, you don't get invited to any big podcasts, you don't collab with anybody, people think of you as the consoomer meme.

And then... and then comes this guy,who has everything you want, and makes FUN of you!?? Image that, and then it all makes sense.

I can't say I dig much of the Critical Dinker's work, but if his mere presence makes losers like Robert and other bottom feeders ankle bitters like him to seethe into twitter oblivion, then he is good on my books, godspeed good sir.
 
Last edited:
Oh my god, that one stylized picture based on that one moment from that one mid-90's book where Han Solo fought a Selonian in a cage match is so dumb and silly because Selonians are like big badgers. It's not like there aren't Wookies and Wampas and other monstrous/animalistic aliens in Star Wars. We've never seen something like that. As we all know, you can't have occasionally silly or pulpy things go on in an otherwise serious series. Not ever.
 
If that's supposed to be a joke then the joke is squarely on her.

art.jpg
Once again, Bob for no reason or benefit to himself goes to bat for a woman who will never fuck him. Once again, Bob ends his statement with a question mark because he doesn't believe in what he's saying and is looking for approval or he just doesn't know how human interactions and conversations are supposed to work.

EDIT:
to not double post
Bob loves when black trannys see black characters that reflect themselves
1685913121482.png
Thing 1
1685913213720.png
Thing 2
1685913243636.png

Thing 3
1685913295844.png

I have no idea who these characters are nor where they come from. The first one looks like a racist caricature who uses...it's (?) boombox to make phone calls on the bus. The second one is just black with dreadlocks. Bob sees representation no matter how piss poor or insulting it is and claps his flippers like the arfing seal he is.
 
Last edited:
And again, if you think Superior Future can be won through democratic elections, then the joke is on you.
elect.png
Bob really rooting for the Dems to give the civil war a second shot. Lets see how that turned out
lel.jpg
Also Grant was fresh out of West Point and whooped Lee's ass. Just saying. I don't think civil war part 2 electric boogaloo with B-52 bombers is what you want Bob.
*Insert stat about school teachers vs priests in rape* Bob, woke is a religion. A religion of raping children and chopping off their balls. You literally want to kill this man because he simply stated he doesnt LIKE gays.
 
Once again, Bob for no reason or benefit to himself goes to bat for a woman who will never fuck him. Once again, Bob ends his statement with a question mark because he doesn't believe in what he's saying and is looking for approval or he just doesn't know how human interactions and conversations are supposed to work.
It's also yet another example of @Flexo's theory (you should really come up with a name for it at this point) of Bob's style of "humor." He thinks that the more layers it takes to understand a joke, the funnier it is for those who get it (gatekeeping much, Bobbo?). Hence, Gadsby's riff on the old "[x]er? I 'ardly know 'er!" joke is actually funnier in Bob's opinion, despite the fact that "meta" doesn't actually end in an -er sound, and thus sounds like she's painfully trying and failing to make that joke. Maybe it works if you're into cringe comedy, but I'm not, so it's just bad.
And again, if you think Superior Future can be won through democratic elections, then the joke is on you.
elect.png
Bob not so subtly implying that his solution is to simply kill everyone who disagrees with him before they have a chance to stop him. Be glad he will never be in a position of power.
Child abuse is bad no matter where it's coming from, and I'd make no excuses for it. That said, troons are without a doubt the biggest purveyors of child abuse these days because they've been given a free pass by the powers that be to lure unsuspecting children into their cult and make them think they're something they're not. Even worse, they're causing not just mental but also physical trauma, convincing children to undergo "treatments" that sterilize and mutilate them.

I'd throw Bob to the lions, but that would be animal abuse. I wouldn't want them to get diabetes or have a heart attack after eating him.
Bobby does not believe in the separation of the Church and State -- if said Church is the Church of Sexual Depravity.
agri.png
Bob acting tough will never not be amusing, especially when he tries to use it to diminish a perfectly logical argument. I don't know if I'm actually noticing a sea change this year or if it's just wishful thinking, but it feels like people just got tired of pride shit before it even started. It's reasonable to ask why the fuck it's worth highlighting the fact that you put a gay rainbow on the side of a government building when it's completely irrelevant to what your supposed job is, especially with food prices still being ridiculous, but Bob mocking it with a "boohoo did your widdle feefees get hurt????" comically misses the point.

Also, any time I see his "you're not a person" spiel, I just imagine him staring into the mirror and chanting it at himself. It's a more accurate picture.
Again, crybabies are screeching at the usual suspects, for their disrespecting their favorite toy franchise.
spid1.png

You've noticed that the Critical Drinker's verdict isn't bad at all -- and this only enrages the crybabies even more.
drink.png

Someone clipped what I presume to be part of Drinker's review. Drinker seems to have issues with the portrayal of the only straight white man in the cartoon as a bumbling heartless father who repeatedly put his baby child in way of danger.
drink2.png
No. As a straight white man the Drinker must not care about representation at all.
My god, the seething jealousy is so palpable, I'm bathing in it.

Drinker's review was much more positive than they're implying, and he did give a solid recommendation to go see it. He didn't think it quite reached the heights of the first movie, but it was still a worthy follow-up that has him excited to see the conclusion next year. His criticisms are fairly mild, mostly relegated to "this doesn't really make sense" a la Jessica Drew riding a motorcycle while fucking pregnant, or the aforementioned befuddlement at why Peter Parker's character seems to have backslid from where he ended up after the previous film, becoming more of a dopey sitcom dad taking his toddler daughter along instead of being back on his feet again. Not once did he have anything racist to say about Miles as a character, merely suggesting that his personal arc was a bit redundant and bloated in comparison to Gwen's more streamlined one.

Also, why is Bobby retweeting the guy saying he's not trying to hype it up as though that's a bad thing? I thought that fandom hype was actually toxic poison cancer. Shouldn't a level-headed review be exactly what Bob wants? Oh wait, I forgot, Bob is the ur-consoomer, he lives off of hype.

Honestly, I think a lot of these pop culture grifters are pretty obnoxious, but they've found their niche and they're gonna milk it until they can't anymore. They're just the flip side of the coin, with consoomers like Bobby on the other side gargling the studios' balls and heaping praise on everything they put out. Each side is feeding off the other as well, milking reactions both positive and negative for further content. But hey, if you don't like it, there's nothing that says you have to view it, and you can stay out of the whole autistic slapfight. General audiences will gravitate towards content they do want to watch, and that's all there is to it.

[insert comparison of Drinker's stats to Bobby's here]
These people seem so certain that nig-spider won't be cast on the wayside once the novelty wears off.
spid6.jpg
It is very strange that Bobby sticks to Adam West's version of Batman through thick and thin, but can cast off the Spiderman he knew and (presumably) loved so well in cartoon in a heartbeat.
Notice how nobody's actually referring to the comics when they say "my [x] loves [y character]." That's because the comic book versions of these characters, to my understanding, generally suck ass. They're basically nothing more than tokenized versions of the Spiderman character created by the diversity hires at Marvel, the exact sort of thing people don't like. When other more talented writers come along and actually try and do something different, that's when you get people onboard. Spider-Verse Miles is a better character than comic book Miles, but I agree, he's still not the Spiderman that people are going to remember for years to come. One need only look at the toy aisle or the racks of children's T-shirts to confirm that there's a lot more original Spidey merch.

Although the fact that they're only talking about a literal cartoon for babies is kind of weird.
There's a big difference between a serious story and a story that takes itself seriously. Star Wars was the latter until Disney bought it and hired a bunch of hack writers to "deconstruct" the entire canon, resulting in a story that shit on fans and the death of one of the biggest fictional universes of all time. I'll gladly take Han punching a big animal in the face over Luke drinking green alien tiddy milk any day.
 
[insert comparison of Drinker's stats to Bobby's here]

Lately I've been terribly amused by comparing Bob's numbers to the numbers of Nate the Hoof Guy, a feller from the Midwest who posts videos of him trimming cows' hooves and patching up the injuries they tend to suffer. Maybe Bob can be a guest star when he finally loses one of his feet?

Nate has over 700,000 subscribers and his top video has over 51 million views.

Hoof trimming. Dig it.
 
Lately I've been terribly amused by comparing Bob's numbers to the numbers of Nate the Hoof Guy, a feller from the Midwest who posts videos of him trimming cows' hooves and patching up the injuries they tend to suffer. Maybe Bob can be a guest star when he finally loses one of his feet?

Nate has over 700,000 subscribers and his top video has over 51 million views.

Hoof trimming. Dig it.
Ah, I see you're a man of culture as well.
 
It's also yet another example of @Flexo's theory (you should really come up with a name for it at this point) of Bob's style of "humor." He thinks that the more layers it takes to understand a joke, the funnier it is for those who get it (gatekeeping much, Bobbo?). Hence, Gadsby's riff on the old "[x]er? I 'ardly know 'er!" joke is actually funnier in Bob's opinion, despite the fact that "meta" doesn't actually end in an -er sound, and thus sounds like she's painfully trying and failing to make that joke. Maybe it works if you're into cringe comedy, but I'm not, so it's just bad.
Hey I'm open to suggestions. @Mola Ram seems like he might be good to come up with something. "joke hopping"? "level crash"?

Also I think the person is using "meta" under the assumption of a british accent which sounds like "hah" when they pronounce "her." (Anyone remember that time where a bunch of twittertards went on this whole thing where they thought a british pronunciation of "ma'am" was "mom"? ah fun times)

Notice how nobody's actually referring to the comics when they say "my [x] loves [y character]." That's because the comic book versions of these characters, to my understanding, generally suck ass. They're basically nothing more than tokenized versions of the Spiderman character created by the diversity hires at Marvel, the exact sort of thing people don't like. When other more talented writers come along and actually try and do something different, that's when you get people onboard. Spider-Verse Miles is a better character than comic book Miles, but I agree, he's still not the Spiderman that people are going to remember for years to come. One need only look at the toy aisle or the racks of children's T-shirts to confirm that there's a lot more original Spidey merch.
SFDebris pointed out in his review of the first spidey-verse movie that they story of comic book Miles Morales.... was already done in Spider-man Homecoming. By Peter Parker.

So the makers of the movie had to go and figure out a new story to make Miles more original.

It's a shame. I love - LOVE - legacy stories. Batman Beyond is my jam and I was a big fan of Spider-girl (Mayday). Doing a time-skip style story where Peter's older and Miles gets the powers and then has to learn from him - that could have been pretty compelling. Oh wait! They did that in the first spider-verse movie and it was a hit! But anyway...

1685929321685.png

This just pisses me off because it just shows how these people have no concept of constructive criticism. Like something must be PERFECT or it's rubbish. The idea that yes, you can have something be brilliant or excellent - even with a few flaws - just seems to be an impossible concept for them. (I mean again, I love Nolan's movies to death, will defend almost any of them until Matthew McConaughey comes home, but even I'll admit they have things that could improve them here and there.)

1685929997727.png

Well this proves to me that whoever clipped his segment, went out of his way to remove any context. From the video transcript:
also I can't shake the feeling that the script is doing everything in its power to play Down Peter Parker like it's afraid the audience will somehow start rooting for him over miles if he's shown to be too capable and confident the first movie portrayed him as an aging burned out loser who only redeems himself at the end while the second film morphs him into a bumbling hapless father in a pink bathrobe who for some reason keeps taking his baby along and life-threatening Adventures despite having a perfectly capable Mother at home to look after it is this some weird attempt to mocking belittle the Spider-Man that most people know and love who incidentally just happens to be the only straight white man in the entire movie I don't know man it just kind of leaves a sir [sour] taste in my mouth that's all
That is it. That is the ENTIRE sequence that they categorize as "existential meltdown."

Also... I'm sorry but if you keep bringing your INFANT into harms way despite a ready alternative, that does NOT mean you are shown to being intelligent and competent. But we'll see (I hope to see the movie sometime this week.)

(Also "but it never clicks that media for years was always focused on them" - yeah it's not like Will Smith or the Rock were major movie stars or anything...)
 
"Picasso depicted all the perspectives but women's"
What a retarded statement. Picasso painted cubism portraits. If anything, he depicted too many perspectives of women.

This just pisses me off because it just shows how these people have no concept of constructive criticism.
Fandom Actual seems like a monumental smooth-brain. Yeah, the Drinker can like something that the "fandom menace" doesn't, or God forbid, think that a movie has both good and bad points. I loved the Dark Knight ever since I saw it in theaters, and I still think the pacing toward the end grinds down to a complete halt. I think A Knight's Tale is a great movie that's lots of goofy fun, and I also think the romance subplot sucks and drags the movie down. Raiders of the Lost Ark is one of the best adventure films ever made, but there's still the super cringeworthy line where it sounds like Indy committed statutory rape just awkwardly dropped into the plot and ignored.

But lets pretend that Fandom Actual is criticizing the Drinker in good faith. What should his title say? If he thought its good but flawed, the title seems perfectly apt. So unless the Drinker lied in his video, what the fuck would you call it? Spiderverse 2: Above Average? In reality, I assume Fandom Actual just wants to take a pot shot at the Drinker, but is too much of a coward to just have a run of the mill tard fight and has to pretend that he's critiquing the Drinker's work.
 
But lets pretend that Fandom Actual is criticizing the Drinker in good faith.

I don't think there is not even a point to that. I've checked this "Fandom Actual" guy, and his whole deal is to trash talk the "anti-fans", you know, the anti-woke folks talking about Disney movies. But he is such a nothing that it any chance of tracking for him is that he needs to talk about bigger youtubers, and the Critical Drinkers is the big guy now.

And that is just bottom of the barrel shit, Criticising children's movies (or movies in general lets be real) is already a pretty lame activity, no one should take any of that in seriousness, but to take issues on what people have to say about fucking capeshit and make a dedicated channel to do nothing but "counter and debunk" said opinions is just the next level of sad.

It sort reminds me of the "critics of the critics" back when the Nostalgia Critics and his troupe was the biggest thing around, when people started doing videos on how much those guys sucked, only to be made by the least charismatic and insightful people to who ever walked on this green earth.

But if we do get this discussion in good faith indeed, one thing I don't get is, why even have said discussion it in the first place?

One thing Robert said is that he opposes the anti-fans for the sake of a healthy discourse about movies, but as far a the "culture-war" goes, at least in entretainment in general, Robert's side won, the big movies and media in general cater to his tastes, Disney ain't going broke, and if ideological alignment is something that matters to a person, like it seems to do for Robert, then he is living in the golden age of filmmaking.

It is one of the reasons why I never liked the term "culture war", when it feels like a one sided beating to be honest. yeah, Critical Drinker and other anti-wokies have popular channels, but they don't even register as a blip in the main-stream radar.

So as far as "culture-wars" goes, Robert won, and victors don't bother with the whine of the losers... and yet Robert seems to be unable to shut-up about them, almost as if this isn't about children's movies in the first place.
 
Last edited:
This one's good, it's got two layers to it.

First, we have Bob pretending he has other things in his life so he's not understanding the "controversy" but he betrays this immediately by his need to appear all knowing so he ascribes it to a change in the punditry.

Second, the punditry didn't change around, the original selling point of Gadsby by the punditry was that she didn't tell jokes because post-Trump we live in a world where humor needs to transcend the bounds of being funny and begin speaking to the complete human soul in all the emotions and that being funny was a backwards right-wing reactionary method of harming marginalized people like Gadsby who had found a superior way of speaking truth in standup than mere regressive "humor" that the Trumpsuckers and Believers enjoy. If there's anything changing around it's that the people who praised her previously are now offended because she's targeting something they respect and also they had long since moved on from using talking about her for their own social status climbing purposes so now they can hop on the trend of saying they never really thought she was great in order to place themselves in the new dominant trend and ignore their failed trend-chasing in the past creating the impression of having perfect taste always.
 
Hey I'm open to suggestions. @Mola Ram seems like he might be good to come up with something. "joke hopping"? "level crash"?

Oh, hey, way to put the meatbag on the spot.

How's this for a first crack: "nesting doll jokes." Gotta keep taking them apart to get to the next one, but once you're done they're all just hollow.
 
1685938931138.png
Bobby, my brother in Christ, they most certainly will "see it coming". Especially the paranoid/"prepper" types.
1685939377345.png
This is bullshit. Bobby does not now, nor has he ever, properly understood the concept of Faith. Nor is it likely he'll ever grok it. The Bible does not advocate ignorance. Belief has nothing to do with how much knowledge - or lack thereof - that a person (or not-a-person, lol) has. "Not-A-Persons" who are "afraid" don't understand the Bible any more than Bob does.
LOL I don't even know what Bobby is saying. Period.
I do love that Bob's usual "who are you" insult getting turned around on him for a change when he starts shitting up some other dude's mentions.
Pixar self-destructs perfectly well. Chapek did not tell them to make a film about a girl showing her "panda" for money, or make Lightyear unpalatable to China and the Middle East.
Bob's ignorantly blaming Chapek when it's his predecessor, the CURRENT king of Disney, Bob Iger, that greenlit ALL that shit. But then again, Narcissists will always blame scapegoats for the Golden Child's mistake.
It's also yet another example of @Flexo's theory (you should really come up with a name for it at this point) of Bob's style of "humor." He thinks that the more layers it takes to understand a joke, the funnier it is for those who get it (gatekeeping much, Bobbo?). Hence, Gadsby's riff on the old "[x]er? I 'ardly know 'er!" joke is actually funnier in Bob's opinion, despite the fact that "meta" doesn't actually end in an -er sound, and thus sounds like she's painfully trying and failing to make that joke. Maybe it works if you're into cringe comedy, but I'm not, so it's just bad.
I mean, If you have a british or similar accent, then you can get a "er" sound on the end of "Meta".
Hey I'm open to suggestions. @Mola Ram seems like he might be good to come up with something. "joke hopping"? "level crash"?

I'd call it the Moviebob Comedy Gap.
Although the fact that they're only talking about a literal cartoon for babies is kind of weird.
Cartoons do tend to do fairly well, especially if it's a big-name property like Spiderman. Most kids will like stuff like that provided it's not too bullshit or boring. (Or traumatizing. I'm looking at YOU, Transformers: The Movie).

There's a big difference between a serious story and a story that takes itself seriously. Star Wars was the latter until Disney bought it and hired a bunch of hack writers to "deconstruct" the entire canon, resulting in a story that shit on fans and the death of one of the biggest fictional universes of all time. I'll gladly take Han punching a big animal in the face over Luke drinking green alien tiddy milk any day.
Bob claims to be media literate, and then retwats that nonsense.
What a retarded statement. Picasso painted cubism portraits. If anything, he depicted too many perspectives of women.
Ah yes, but the exceptionals like Bob and Hanna Gadsby, think that the perspectives have to come FROM women, not be OF women by a man. Still an exceptional viewpoint though.

How's this for a first crack: "nesting doll jokes." Gotta keep taking them apart to get to the next one, but once you're done they're all just hollow.
I think this is the best option by far. But I'd alter it slightly to "Nesting dolls, but with at least two missing in the middle" jokes.
 
  • DRINK!
  • Like
Reactions: Flexo and Mola Ram
Back