Once again, Bob for no reason or benefit to himself goes to bat for a woman who will never fuck him. Once again, Bob ends his statement with a question mark because he doesn't believe in what he's saying and is looking for approval or he just doesn't know how human interactions and conversations are supposed to work.
It's also yet another example of
@Flexo's theory (you should really come up with a name for it at this point) of Bob's style of "humor." He thinks that the more layers it takes to understand a joke, the funnier it is for those who get it (gatekeeping much, Bobbo?). Hence, Gadsby's riff on the old "[x]er? I 'ardly know 'er!" joke is actually funnier in Bob's opinion, despite the fact that "meta" doesn't actually end in an -er sound, and thus sounds like she's painfully trying and failing to make that joke. Maybe it works if you're into cringe comedy, but I'm not, so it's just bad.
And again, if you think Superior Future can be won through democratic elections, then the joke is on you.
Bob not so subtly implying that his solution is to simply kill everyone who disagrees with him before they have a chance to stop him. Be glad he will never be in a position of power.
Child abuse is bad no matter where it's coming from, and I'd make no excuses for it. That said, troons are without a doubt the biggest purveyors of child abuse these days because they've been given a free pass by the powers that be to lure unsuspecting children into their cult and make them think they're something they're not. Even worse, they're causing not just mental but also physical trauma, convincing children to undergo "treatments" that sterilize and mutilate them.
I'd throw Bob to the lions, but that would be animal abuse. I wouldn't want them to get diabetes or have a heart attack after eating him.
Bobby does not believe in the separation of the Church and State -- if said Church is the Church of Sexual Depravity.
Bob acting tough will never not be amusing, especially when he tries to use it to diminish a perfectly logical argument. I don't know if I'm actually noticing a sea change this year or if it's just wishful thinking, but it feels like people just got tired of pride shit before it even started. It's reasonable to ask why the fuck it's worth highlighting the fact that you put a gay rainbow on the side of a government building when it's completely irrelevant to what your supposed job is,
especially with food prices still being ridiculous, but Bob mocking it with a "boohoo did your widdle feefees get hurt????" comically misses the point.
Also, any time I see his "you're not a person" spiel, I just imagine him staring into the mirror and chanting it at himself. It's a more accurate picture.
Again, crybabies are screeching at the usual suspects, for their disrespecting their favorite toy franchise.
You've noticed that the Critical Drinker's verdict isn't bad at all -- and this only enrages the crybabies even more.
Someone clipped what I presume to be
part of Drinker's review. Drinker seems to have issues with the portrayal of the only straight white man in the cartoon as a bumbling heartless father who repeatedly put his baby child in way of danger.

No. As a straight white man the Drinker must not care about representation at all.
My god, the seething jealousy is so palpable, I'm bathing in it.
Drinker's review was much more positive than they're implying, and he did give a solid recommendation to go see it. He didn't think it quite reached the heights of the first movie, but it was still a worthy follow-up that has him excited to see the conclusion next year. His criticisms are fairly mild, mostly relegated to "this doesn't really make sense" a la Jessica Drew riding a motorcycle while
fucking pregnant, or the aforementioned befuddlement at why Peter Parker's character seems to have backslid from where he ended up after the previous film, becoming more of a dopey sitcom dad taking his toddler daughter along instead of being back on his feet again. Not once did he have anything racist to say about Miles as a character, merely suggesting that his personal arc was a bit redundant and bloated in comparison to Gwen's more streamlined one.
Also, why is Bobby retweeting the guy saying he's not trying to hype it up as though that's a bad thing? I thought that fandom hype was actually toxic poison cancer. Shouldn't a level-headed review be exactly what Bob wants? Oh wait, I forgot, Bob is the ur-consoomer, he lives off of hype.
Honestly, I think a lot of these pop culture grifters are pretty obnoxious, but they've found their niche and they're gonna milk it until they can't anymore. They're just the flip side of the coin, with consoomers like Bobby on the other side gargling the studios' balls and heaping praise on everything they put out. Each side is feeding off the other as well, milking reactions both positive and negative for further content. But hey, if you don't like it, there's nothing that says you have to view it, and you can stay out of the whole autistic slapfight. General audiences will gravitate towards content they do want to watch, and that's all there is to it.
[insert comparison of Drinker's stats to Bobby's here]
These people seem so certain that nig-spider won't be cast on the wayside once the novelty wears off.

It is very strange that Bobby sticks to Adam West's version of Batman through thick and thin, but can cast off the Spiderman he knew and (presumably) loved so well in cartoon in a heartbeat.
Notice how nobody's actually referring to the comics when they say "my [x] loves [y character]." That's because the comic book versions of these characters, to my understanding, generally suck ass. They're basically nothing more than tokenized versions of the Spiderman character created by the diversity hires at Marvel, the exact sort of thing people don't like. When other more talented writers come along and actually try and do something different, that's when you get people onboard. Spider-Verse Miles is a better character than comic book Miles, but I agree, he's still not
the Spiderman that people are going to remember for years to come. One need only look at the toy aisle or the racks of children's T-shirts to confirm that there's a lot more original Spidey merch.
Although the fact that they're only talking about a literal cartoon for babies is kind of weird.
There's a big difference between a serious story and a story that takes itself seriously. Star Wars was the latter until Disney bought it and hired a bunch of hack writers to "deconstruct" the entire canon, resulting in a story that shit on fans and the death of one of the biggest fictional universes of all time. I'll gladly take Han punching a big animal in the face over Luke drinking green alien tiddy milk any day.