- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
technically they did, but like all bureaucratically managed safety systems it was left to rot and never updated to meet changing circumstancesWhy would they not build escape pods? Did they not see Star Wars?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
technically they did, but like all bureaucratically managed safety systems it was left to rot and never updated to meet changing circumstancesWhy would they not build escape pods? Did they not see Star Wars?
In Mario Kart Wii’s Rainbow Road, if you drive off the course, your character will instantly catch on fire and burn up as it re-enters the atmosphere and a clone of the original will continue the race.I'm reasonably sure you saw a movie or show that had a scene where the ship is re-entering the atmosphere and is on fire. and if not you must have heard the phrase "burn up on re-entry" at least once
Pretty sure you get rescued by Lakitu. Not sure if he charges you thoIn Mario Kart Wii’s Rainbow Road, if you drive off the course, your character will instantly catch on fire and burn up as it re-enters the atmosphere and a clone of the original will continue the race.
it's hidden in a box of HamdingersCan't the cosmonauts just use the escape pod?
There is usually one soyuz capsule attached to the ISS at all times, but ideally they try and have two. Three people per.Okay, that is definitely wrong. The Soyuz Capsule is far too small to host 6 people in.
There is no reason for there to be two Soyuz capsules attached to the ISS besides for if there is a problem with a Soyuz spacecraft. Especially with American crew capsules having a crew of four. Sure, it could boost the crew of the station to 10 but if the intent is to increase the amount of crew on the station then one would wish to push for flying Starliner with a crew of 5, and having more of the American capsules instead of Russian ones.There is usually one soyuz capsule attached to the ISS at all times, but ideally they try and have two. Three people per.
The American side of the ISS is more suited for large cargo transports, so those are usually kept clear. The Starliner taking one of those slots up is very annoying in this respect.There is no reason for there to be two Soyuz capsules attached to the ISS besides for if there is a problem with a Soyuz spacecraft. Especially with American crew capsules having a crew of four. Sure, it could boost the crew of the station to 10 but if the intent is to increase the amount of crew on the station then one would wish to push for flying Starliner with a crew of 5, and having more of the American capsules instead of Russian ones.
The ISS doesn't have any permanent Soyuz or escape pods. One would have to be launched for a rescue attempt.There is usually one soyuz capsule attached to the ISS at all times, but ideally they try and have two. Three people per.
Seems so. My initial research is wrong now that I am double checking. Alot of sources seemed to say there always was one, but its more that there is usually one since its the primary space taxi.The ISS doesn't have any permanent Soyuz or escape pods. One would have to be launched for a rescue attempt.
did they not learn from the titanic to have life boats for everyone?The ISS doesn't have any permanent Soyuz or escape pods. One would have to be launched for a rescue attempt.
The large cargo transports of the ISS are typically berthed to the station, not docking to the International Docking Adapters. The Cygnus spacecraft doesn't dock to the IDAs which Dragon and Starliner use. Dragon is the only cargo vehicle that uses the IDAs. The Japanese cargo module would also berth. Berthing is generally better for cargo vehicles because the hatches are bigger. This was the same thing that the Multipurpose Logistic Modules used.The American side of the ISS is more suited for large cargo transports, so those are usually kept clear
A NASA spokesperson confirmed that is indeed [not] the case. “Astronauts do not get overtime or holiday/weekend pay. They get paid for a 40-hour work week, i.e. their regular salaries,” the spokesperson told MarketWatch via email.
“However, they are on official travel orders and their transportation, lodging and meals are all provided,” the spokesperson added. “They do receive the incidentals amount for each day they are in space, but since they are on long-term TDY (temporary duty), that amount is reduced by whatever the percentage is required for the length of the trip per federal travel regulations.”
The incidentals amount is $5 per day.
Not even a million per person they killed. 338 deaths.Boeing would pay a fine of at least $243.6 million
The problem isn't the height, it's that the ISS is in orbit, and being in orbit means you're moving sideways so fast that you keep missing the ground. Newton illustrated this by a cannonball fired out of a cannon* on top of a hill, as in his picture here:Couldn’t you just jump off the ISS with a parachute?
Brazilian because they are less likely to lie to me than Chinese. Aka, neither are spec but Brazillian is most likely closer to spec than Chinese