Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
Last edited by a moderator:
Prove it.

Ok

T8x4RYu.jpg


MbVDf1t.jpg
 
I don't think Brad realizes that all of the star trek episodes are on Netflix.
 
@YankeeTrader,

Thanks for getting that Star Trek quote correct. See, you are useful!

"It won't pounce like tigers." - CarMax ad on BBC America

Given that all he does is reference cable tv and wikipedia, I don't think he's aware of much else.
That's false. I read alot of books and I've recently referenced Lincoln, Programming The Universe, Jesus Family Tomb, Soul Survivor, and of course, the Bible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's false. I read alot of books and I've recently referenced Lincoln, Programming The Universe, Jesus Family Tomb, Soul Survivor, and of course, the Bible.
With the exception of the Bible, all of those are mass-media works intended for entertainment first, and historical value a distant second, if at all. They have no academic or scientific value.
 
Besides that being completely illogical and unscientific, the discovery of the http://JesusFamilyTomb.com in April 1980 gives us solid archeological proof of his physical life and death.
From the site you linked us to:
"Ossuary 80/503 "Yeshua bar Yosef� � �Jesus, Son of Joseph�
It is the plainest of the ten ossuaries found in the tomb, a modest coffin, perhaps made in haste. Alarmingly, there is a large cross mark right next to the name �Jesus.� A cross, deliberately carved. The archaeologists, however, immediately and ever since, dismissed this as a mason�s mark. Besides, they say, Christians didn�t use crosses until the time of Constantine in the 4th century. This �Jesus, Son of Joseph� ossuary couldn�t belong to that Jesus, son of Joseph.
Back in 1926, another �Jesus, son of Joseph� ossuary was discovered languishing in the basement of what is now the Rockefeller Museum�by none other that Eleazer Sukenik, the archaeologist famous for his 1948 discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The Hebrew University professor did not publicize his astonishing find until 1931 at a conference in Berlin. The news made headlines around the world. And then the world forgot all about it.
Today, that same ossuary is on display at the Israel Museum. It is in no way connected with Jesus of Nazareth but instead is on display to send a message: don�t get excited if you find archaeological mention of any �Jesus.� The name is common ."
That doesn't sound like solid archeological proof to me. It sounds more like:

Judaism in Y'shua's time and today believes that no person can be God. Islam believes this, too. Yet, God was in human form according to Genasis.
Genesis 1:27 -- "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him"
God did not take the form of a man, man was made in the form of God. Show me in Genesis where it says God took the form of a man. (I'll save you some time -- it doesn't.)
My Plan-it Theory of GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 on Planet Nestor; FIG=6|7 (Design Worlds Theory) alone proves how I AM the reincarnation of Jesus and God-incarnate.
So...The proof that you are what you say you are is something you wrote yourself. At least I have photographic evidence that I might be Santa Claus. I make no such claim, and yet my evidence is far more compelling than yours.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
@YankeeTrader,

I AM being consistent. That's GOOD.
The only thing consistent that I see you do is you ignore people by throwing buckets of red herrings into the thread and tantrum when the hurtful truth level gets too high instead of actually answering any questions.

And last I checked, isn't Jesus just another transcription of Joshua, since both come from Yeshua?
 
I bet this gets posted all the time, but you have to give some credit to Mr Watson over here for being able to completely ignore any and all things that contradict what he's saying at all times. Think about how much effort he must have to put in to accomplish this!
 
I bet this gets posted all the time, but you have to give some credit to Mr Watson over here for being able to completely ignore any and all things that contradict what he's saying at all times. Think about how much effort he must have to put in to accomplish this!

Cocaine
 
@Have a Pepsi,

Synchronisms are real, they're constantly happening. On TV, the Internet, daily life, Nature. Our lives are better when we recognize them and sharing these synchronisms with others helps them to understand how GOD/Nature works.

Have a Diet Pepsi, there's way too much sugar in Pepsi.
That's nice. Had nothing to do with what I said, though.

Synchronism: "What was the point of that?" 5:42 My little brother playing Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door.
 
@Lalala,

Go "literally eat a dick".
Why, you offering?

That's false. I read alot of books and I've recently referenced Lincoln, Programming The Universe, Jesus Family Tomb, Soul Survivor, and of course, the Bible.

You recently read the Bible and yet still managed to spell 'Genesis' wrong twice, implying it wasn't a mistype but a genuine spelling mistake?
Why do I get the feeling 'read the bible' means scanned to any passages with a '7' or '4' in them to quote mine so you look more legit?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Why, you offering?



You recently read the Bible and yet still managed to spell 'Genesis' wrong twice, implying it wasn't a mistype but a genuine spelling mistake?
Why do I get the feeling 'read the bible' means scanned to any passages with a '7' or '4' in them to quote mine so you look more legit?


Brad spells Genesis wrong in order to fit his number code.
 
You recently read the Bible and yet still managed to spell 'Genesis' wrong twice, implying it wasn't a mistype but a genuine spelling mistake?
Brad uses that spelling for two reasons:
1) He says that spelling correctly reflects the pronunciation. Never mind that it's pronounced Gen-eh-sis instead of Gen-ah-sis. Brad is deaf to the distinction.
2) The real reason -- By changing the second e to an a, the word conveniently adds up to 74, thus giving him more ammo for his crackpot "theory". Have you ever seen him refer to the "Guardin'" of Eden? Same deal -- Guardin' adds up to 74. "MORE PROOF!" All he's really proving is he doesn't know how to spell for shit in my book.
 
Brad spells Genesis wrong in order to fit his number code.
Brad uses that spelling for two reasons:
1) He says that spelling correctly reflects the pronunciation. Never mind that it's pronounced Gen-eh-sis instead of Gen-ah-sis. Brad is deaf to the distinction.
2) The real reason -- By changing the second e to an a, the word conveniently adds up to 74, thus giving him more ammo for his crackpot "theory". Have you ever seen him refer to the "Guardin'" of Eden? Same deal -- Guardin' adds up to 74. "MORE PROOF!" All he's really proving is he doesn't know how to spell for shit in my book.
tumblr_inline_navya3FJ9l1qiq05v.gif
Yeah yeah reaction gifs bad but goddamn words can't express how much that information made me bust a gut, and this is a person I asked for empirical evidence to back up his claims? Jeez lesson learned, lurk more and expect less.
 
Back