Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
@YankeeTrader,

Wow! Your demons actually let you acknowledge that I got a few things "correct"!! While you were posting that, did your head swivel all the way around and did you then vomit green-pea soup?
 
@YankeeTrader,

Wow! Your demons actually let you acknowledge that I got a few things "correct"!! While you were posting that, did your head swivel all the way around and did you then vomit green-pea soup?


It's such a rare occurrence that you do say something factually correct that I'm baking a cake to celebrate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChurchOfGodBear
I'm not going to read almost 590 pages to completely understand this. But from what I have read, you are a delightfully crazy freak who probably thinks children getting raped and killed is part of "God's Will" because he ignored them and instead was too busy saving someone's cat who prayed.


The TL:DR version of this thread is Brad is a crazy person and places cosmic significance whenever the numbers 4 and 7 appear together. In any inane context.
 
You don't get to decide who lurks and who doesn't. You are not the God Emperor of this thread. You are merely a guest, and if you keep putting people on ignore and being a d----, a mod will threadban you again to teach you manners.
You are on my 'Ignore list' and I'll choose whether to read your posts74 and whether to respond to you. That's my right as it is your right.
 
Graffiti canvas,

Did you actually read the entire Bible once? What did you learn from it? What verses do you remember?

No "Catholics raped kids in the name of GOD", although many Catholic priests are guilty of child molestation including rape. That's the excuse you're using for dismissing GOD, the Bible, the Christ and Christianity?


Synchronism: 12:53 "You can't always rely on the defense. On play 75, they're a little fatigued!" - Dolphins coach on Ch 7
 
Remember kids, the key to a healthy relationship is to utterly ignore your girlfriend to indulge in a penguin slapfight with relative strangers online over two random numbers out of our ten digits.

Also remember the key to being intelligent is to drop out of 10th grade math and science because the voice in your head said you should. Also science is dumb and merely a tool to fuel your insecurities and self-lies and delusions.
 
@RomanesEuntDomus / Latinus Douchebagicus,

What exactly do you need the verifiable resource for? The ancients observed 7 moving objects74 in the heavens74 - now known as the 7 Classical Planets - and 4 can't cast shadows74 on Earth (Venus can); 4 can't be easily seen with the naked eye during the day (Venus can)?

objects=74=O15+B2+J10+E5+C3+T20+S19
heavens=74=H8+E5+A1+V22+E5+N14+S19
shadows=74=S19+H8+A1+D4+O+W23+S19


Do you need the verifiable resource for there being 4 lunar phases of roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each in the lunar months74? Lunar year of 354 days + 7 day week + 4 days = 365 day solar year? In our Roman Calendar, there are 7 months with thirty-one days + 4 months with thirty days + February's 28 (7x4) days?

months=74=M13+O+N14+T20+H8+S19

Do you need the verifiable resource for both the Big Dipper and Little Dipper being 7 stars with 4 in the bowl.
These aren't things I dispute. I do dispute, however, their significance - that is to say, I attribute no importance to such "gematric" coincidences whatsoever. When you sift through a dictionary long enough, you'll eventually turn up with a lot of words with a certain gematric value, be that 47, 74, 88, 92, 312 or whatever your favorite number is and the signifcance will always inevitbaly orbit a steady "Zip and Nill".

But I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about some of your claims like reincarnation being in accordance with the bible, that Jesus taught it, or that it is indeed scientifically proven. These claims direly need some foundation which you sadly haven't been posting.

But you know... we've gone over this a couple of times and I assume it has become as stale to you as it has become to me. So, how about we talk about music for a change?

You're a percussionist (or whatever God's primary language calls it), how did you choose that instrument and what is your favorite song to perfom?
Sadly, I am not a musical person, myself.
 
These aren't things I dispute. I do dispute, however, their significance - that is to say, I attribute no importance to such "gematric" coincidences whatsoever. When you sift through a dictionary long enough, you'll eventually turn up with a lot of words with a certain gematric value, be that 47, 74, 88, 92, 312 or whatever your favorite number is and the signifcance will always inevitbaly orbit a steady "Zip and Nill".

But I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about some of your claims like reincarnation being in accordance with the bible, that Jesus taught it, or that it is indeed scientifically proven. These claims direly need some foundation which you sadly haven't been posting.

But you know... we've gone over this a couple of times and I assume it has become as stale to you as it has become to me. So, how about we talk about music for a change?

You're a percussionist (or whatever God's primary language calls it), how did you choose that instrument and what is your favorite song to perfom?
Sadly, I am not a musical person, myself.
No, it doesn't have to do with his horrible brain disorder so he'll ignore it and shill his lies some more.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
@Flowers For Sonichu,

I AM not a promoter of censorship. But moderators are supposed to help the forum by eliminating those who do harm. @LordCustos3 constantly did harm here, so...

Thanks73.


Synchronism: 13:03 Elementary, Dear Data, Star Trek: TNG (S2/Ep3, 1988) on BBC America

Synchronism: 13:09 "Primarily as Dr. Watson, you will document everything I say and do for later publication." - Star Trek: TNG. 13:20 "Sherlock is back - Season 2 on BBC America" - ad

@RomanesEuntDomus / Latinus Douchebagicus,

(I've deleted the gematria from the following just for you.)

What exactly do you need the verifiable resource for? The ancients observed 7 moving objects74 in the heavens74 - now known as the 7 Classical Planets - and 4 can't cast shadows74 on Earth (Venus can); 4 can't be easily seen with the naked eye during the day (Venus can)?

Do you need the verifiable resource for there being 4 lunar phases of roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each in the lunar months74? Lunar year of 354 days + 7 day week + 4 days = 365 day solar year? In our Roman Calendar, there are 7 months with thirty-one days + 4 months with thirty days + February's 28 (7x4) days?

Do you need the verifiable resource for both the Big Dipper and Little Dipper being 7 stars with 4 in the bowl?

Please answer those questions.


Synchronism: 13:16 "Come, Watson." - Star Trek: TNG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Graffiti canvas,

Did you actually read the entire Bible once? What did you learn from it? What verses do you remember?

I learned plenty. Most of all, it's just another flavor of Sky Wizardry along side many others invented by different cultures and they all clamor to be right.

The only practical take away from it is "Don't be a dick to people". But you know, not even devout followers of any religion actually adhere to that basic principle when it doesn't suit their needs. Besides, if the threat of some imaginary god brought to life only by belief is the only thing keeping people nice to someone else, then they aren't people I'd want to be around anyways.

No "Catholics raped kids in the name of GOD", although many Catholic priests are guilty of child molestation including rape. That's the excuse you're using for dismissing GOD, the Bible, the Christ and Christianity?
So it's just alright to ignore that the most devout members of a religion were OK with molesting kids? Sounds like a powerful message god has there to be nice to people and believe in him.
 
Haha, no Brad. The 365 day year was made because literally before the Julian calendar, the Romans constantly needed to fuck with the dates by including a intercalary month to account for the missing days. They also tended to miss those days because of things like wars, which made the dates get fucked bad. Gaius Julius Caesar wanted to make an accurate calendar that didn't need to be fucked with that much to match the tempo of the seasons to help prevent that problem, so he gathered a load of smart people together to create a better calendar. They came up with it because some greek guy noticed that the seasons match a bit over 365 solar passes.
 
@Graffiti canvas,

You learned nothing from the Bible and you can't remember anything other than your perverse version of the Golden Rule. I don't believe that you read the whole Bible. And you are also* guilty of "clamoring to be right".

Those Roman Catholic priests that molested children are not "the most devout members of Christianity" - just the opposite! And you know that.


*Synchronism: 13:26 "Whatever finds us, my dear Watson." - Star Trek
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mr. X
You once said the Tower of Babel was the Bible's biggest contradiction.
This is the Bible's BIGGEST contradiction! In fact, everyone was NOT united in one language and that was not what was in "defiance of God". T
Now you're saying it's true.
The historic validity of their being a Tower of Babel aka Ziggurat of Babylon is definite.
First you make a definitive statement, then you quote Biblical commentary that refutes what you just said. I think that's the biggest contradiction.
But does anyone really think that in c. 2100 BC, everyone around the world was speaking just one language?! It's ridiculous to everyone except Jewish-Christian-Muslim fundamentalists. But one of the points of this story is how important one common language for all humanity is!

"I. The advantages which befriended their design of keeping together, 1. They were all of one language, Gen. 11:1. If there were any different languages before the flood, yet Noah’s only, which it is likely was the same with Adam’s, was preserved through the flood, and continued after it. Now, while they all understood one another, they would be the more likely to love one another, and the more capable of helping one another, and the less inclinable to separate one from another." - Matthew Henry's commentary
And speaking of contradictions:
Have you got a source for that? And none of those crappy Wikipedia articles.

Which is it, Brad? Crap or a knowledgeable source? Because it can't be both.
Had you ever even heard of the Burning of Washington in 1814 and* how the fires of the White House and other Govt. buildings were put out by a hurricane that came out of nowhere?! And how it spawned a tornado that set down on Constitution Avenue that sent British soldiers and cannons flying into the air? And how the British were so spooked by this act of GOD/Nature that they retreated to their ships on the Chesapeake without** any opposition from the US Army?
I have a lot to say about this piece of misinformation. First what was your source? Oh! Of course! Wikipedia! There's a paragraph about the alleged hurricane and tornado. And it has citations! One of them -- Myatt, Kevin (August 26, 2006). "Did tornado wreak havoc on War of 1812?". The Roanoke Times. Roanoke, VA. Retrieved August 24, 2010. -- takes you here:
upload_2016-9-20_12-32-44.jpeg

The other one -- NWS staff (June 15, 2011). "NWS Sterling, VA – D.C. Tornado Events". National Weather Service Eastern Region Headquarters. Retrieved August 24, 2010. -- takes you here:
upload_2016-9-20_12-36-10.jpeg

You might notice on that second citation that the information was apparently retrieved before it was published!
History.com has two accounts of the incident. Here is how they end:
1. "The White House, a number of federal buildings, and several private homes were destroyed. The still uncompleted Capitol building was also set on fire, and the House of Representatives and the Library of Congress were gutted before a torrential downpour doused the flames. On August 26, General Ross, realizing his untenable hold on the capital area, ordered a withdrawal from Washington."
2. "More destruction occurred the following day, when the British torched what remained of the Washington Navy Yard and the Treasury building, along with the brick home of the State, War and Navy departments. They also smashed the presses of a newspaper Cockburn disliked and desecrated a monument dedicated to veterans of the First Barbary War. Lastly, they headed to an arsenal two miles south of the Capitol. But as they were destroying the gunpowder there, an accidental explosion killed at least a dozen British soldiers and injured many more. That evening, right after a violent thunderstorm, the British withdrew from the city rather than face a potential counterattack, retracing their steps to the fleet at Benedict."
We live in South Florida, Brad. We see torrential downpours and violent thunderstorms all the time. They aren't hurricanes. And there is no way to prove it was a hurricane. No, I didn't pull that out of my ass, I went to weather.gov, the official website of the National Weather Service and looked up Hurricanes in Washington D.C. The earliest recorded was "1878 October 23 Not Named. A Category 2 hurricane hit the Washington/Baltimore region. This is the strongest storm to ever hit this region since record-keeping began in 1851." Notice that last part, Brad. There are no official storm records from 1814. Now, I will not definitively state that there was no hurricane on the day in question, but no one can definitively state that there was a hurricane because this was 37 years before records of storms were kept. Also, the retreat from Washington was strategic, not because they were "spooked".
Wrong, at the simplest level asymmetry and symmetry breaking are the same thing, i.e. Unified Strings 21/19 Theory. But like always, you ignore any mathematical* & scientific evidence that disagrees with your second grade mentality. I came up with a Theory of Everything because it obviously exists: FIG=6|7. Stephen Hawking is frustrated that he didn't discover the TOE.
Then you'd better write the Physics Department at Stanford University and tell them their encyclopedia (my source) is wrong. While you're at it, why not send a copy of your TOE to Hawking for peer review? If he were to sign off on it then I think everyone here would owe you an apology. I suspect, however, it is more likely he will laugh his arse off at it (strictly an opinion, not to be misconstrued with researched fact).
All I know is that you keep pulling your antichrist opinions out of your ass without wiping them off and expecting us to accept them without one iota of proof other than, essentially, "It's true because I said so!"
I have researched and found sources for everything I have said. Your primary source seems to be yourself.
And for the record, you blithering idiot, I thought you told me on http://7seals.yuku or somewhere else that you stalk me on that you live in Coral Springs/South Florida.
I have never said that. I would never tell you what town I live in, I don't want you showing up here spewing your lunacy. (Although if you were really even slightly competent in online research, you would know where I live.)
God-incarnate is not omniscient; G-D is.
Claiming to be God-Incarnate means that God is made flesh through you -- ergo you are claiming to be God.
40.749444,-73.968056

I know how all you Kiwis demand exact figures. Do you feel comfortable at rounding-off the longitude of 73.968056 W to 74° W?
Only if you feel comfortable at rounding off the latitude to 41 degrees N.
@Flowers For Sonichu,

I AM not a promoter of censorship. But moderators are supposed to help the forum by eliminating those who do harm. @LordCustos3 constantly did harm here, so...

Thanks73.
The rules are listed at the top of the page and I don't see that one. Nor do I see how challenging you for proof of what you claim and calling you out on it when you don't is doing harm. You know what they say: "If the oven's too hot, get out of the kitchen."
 
@Graffiti canvas,

Your sarcasm is noted. Those priests weren't even 10% of the Roman Catholic priests and the RNCh is less than half of Christianity worldwide.

How many atheists were guilty of child molestation in that same period of time?
 
@RomanesEuntDomus / Latinus Douchebagicus,

(I've deleted the gematria from the following just for you.)

What exactly do you need the verifiable resource for? The ancients observed 7 moving objects74 in the heavens74 - now known as the 7 Classical Planets - and 4 can't cast shadows74 on Earth (Venus can); 4 can't be easily seen with the naked eye during the day (Venus can)?

Do you need the verifiable resource for there being 4 lunar phases of roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each in the lunar months74? Lunar year of 354 days + 7 day week + 4 days = 365 day solar year? In our Roman Calendar, there are 7 months with thirty-one days + 4 months with thirty days + February's 28 (7x4) days?

Do you need the verifiable resource for both the Big Dipper and Little Dipper being 7 stars with 4 in the bowl?

Please answer those three questions.


Synchronism: 13:16 "Come, Watson." - Star Trek: TNG
Again, I don't dispute the things about 7 classical planets, though the "4 can't cast shadows on earth" seems a bit deliberate. It's just a weird way to say that 3 do cast shadows (though we presumably agree that this classical definition of "planet" is really off, seeing how the sun and moon are considered planets there, too). To me, it's just seems like a weird way to work 4 in there somewhere.

The 4 lunar phases aren't as much a celestial thing and more a manmade measurement. Between a full moon and a new moon, there's two phases of half moons. According to how we nowadays choose to view it. You could as easily end up with 8 phases, though that turns out a bit unwieldy, which makes the 4 phases more attractive.

In terms of the calender, I just think you got it backwards. The earth has a certain speed at which it circles around the sun. Combined with the tilted earth axis, we end up with annual weather changes. Coming from that, we get a system that measures it. The moon circles around the earth at a certain speed too. And finally, earth spins around itself at a certain speed. People just based their measurements of time on such easy to observe, non-locally-limited things.
Basically, what I think you did was looking at these things and declare them "Synchronisms", but you overlooked that they are by human design, not by divine planing. Everything about the calender is manmade and is using nature for reference. So no wonder there's ties between the calender and celestial mechanics.

Concerning the two Dippers, these constallations have been "designated" by people looking at the sky.
Seems to me you picked two constellations that satisfy your number-fetish for 7 and 4. You tried the same with Orion until I pointed out that Orion has (without his club and bow) 8 stars. You just latch on to these things as long as a 7 is involved - a 4 can then be dragged into it pretty easily. That last part is one of the biggest flaws, now that I think about it, really. When somewhere "7" pops up as an attribute (and it sooner or later will for something), you can always somehow bent the rules until the 4 emerges as well. That doesn't really highlight the importance of 7_4, it only shows you can do numbers crunching or look for random specifications until you get the desired result. Which is why many people say you have a problem with confirmation bias, I guess.

Again, these aren't things I dispute. I just don't see a big significance in there. Are these answers satisfactory?

Now, with that out of the way, I'd like to repeat my question:
Why did you choose percussion instruments, what made them so attractive to you?
What song do you like to perform the most?
 
Last edited:
Back