Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[RomanesEuntDomus]

You can't just multiply percents, they have to be expressed in decimal formats (or fractions) to perform mathematical functions. For example, 5% x 100 = .05 x 100 = 5. So when you express your formula in percentages, what you are saying is [.04 + .01] x [.04 + .04 + .04 + .04 + .04] =.05 x .20 = .01. To express that as a percent, you would multiply by 100. .01 x 100 = 1%. In other words, 5% x 20% = 1% -- meaning your formula doesn't work using percentages. This is basic math, Brad, how do you not know this?

Well, cut him some slack, it's not like he's an accomplished Mathematioh

 

[Graffiti canvas]

@Graffiti canvas,

It was obvious.

Theory of Luck Equation
luck 100 points = [karma 4 + modesty 1] x [desire 4 + actions 4 + abilities 4 + contributions 4 + blessings 4]
​

No, it wasn't obvious, Brad. You flat out express the values as points in your product (Luck) Without another quantitative descriptor, the reader is left to assume the rest of the formula follows suit.

Plus, as voice already said, you can't multiply raw percentages without decimal conversion first. This formula doesn't follow the basic rules of mathematics.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

@Graffiti canvas,

It was obvious.

Theory of Luck Equation
luck 100 points = [karma 4 + modesty 1] x [desire 4 + actions 4 + abilities 4 + contributions 4 + blessings 4]
​

Everyone,

If you don't like this equation for any reason, then ignore it and dismiss it like all the other information I share with you. I AM just tying to help you. But that doesn't mean that this equation is not part of every decision and act you make that involves luck.*


*Synchronism: 11:34 "No such luck for ---" - Dunhill Champ. on Golf Channel

Whether I like it or not is irrelevant. The formula is improperly defined, so its not possible to even consider until it is.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

I think it's off-topic. Fist-timer here? What do you think of the Theory of Luck Equation? Do you think it was just lucky that I discovered it?

How about you provide proof that it actually has any significance at all, first? At this point it's just a random arbitrary equation without any application or meaning.

If your goal is to show people how smart and divine you are, Brad, how about actually supporting your claims?

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

View attachment 142394

Have any Kiwis ever visited the Serpent Mount with its 7 coils in Ohio? I haven't.

It's ok, although there is a burger joint down the street that's pretty legit.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@RomanesEuntDomus,

You can either consciously use the Theory of Luck Equation to your advantage or you can dismiss it and suffer its consequences. Your choice. I lived up to my obligations.

 

[bacterium]

I lived up to my obligations.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

@RomanesEuntDomus,

You can either consciously use the Theory of Luck Equation to your advantage or you can dismiss it and suffer its consequences. Your choice. I lived up to my obligations.

Brad, for an equation to work, you need to quantify the constants and provide units of measure for the variables. Your equation does neither. Making a proper equation is junior-high-level math and you can't even manage that.

Turning around and tantruming that we don't have to use it is childish. You ask us to take you as a man of science, but when we treat you like one, you stomp your feet and say "I don't care." Science doesn't work like that, Brad.

 

[YankeeTrader]

I lived up to my obligations.

wow

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

@RomanesEuntDomus,

You can either consciously use the Theory of Luck Equation to your advantage or you can dismiss it and suffer its consequences. Your choice. I lived up to my obligations.

Brad, you've slapped together a bunch of numbers with an arbitrary equation and declare it valid. That's not how science works. How is anyone supposed to take this seriously? By taking your word? You give people no reason to do that. And given the many times you have made false claims, you are in no position to demand authority here.

Here's an equation:
"Eat your vitamins + say your prayers + stay true to yourself = Luck " It's easily just as valid.
Or, alternatively "Luck = the sound of one hand clapping + a pound of candlewax"... it holds the same validity as your equation.
You have a weird habit of making your claims factual and undisputable, when you could just say they are metaphorical and save yourself a lot of problems.

 

[Electric Eye]

@Electric Eye,

I think it's off-topic. Fist-timer here? What do you think of the Theory of Luck Equation? Do you think it was just lucky that I discovered it?

Yeah, I'm all about fisting.

Also, I think your luck equation is okay, but if you really want to min/max you should really redistribute some of those blessing and karma points into STR, SPD, and INT. I mean you're going to run into problems when we run into higher level monsters who can nullify crit modifiers like LCK.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@BlueArmedDevil,

Have you seen the Serpent Mound in-person or not? Had you even heard of it before?

 

[AlanRickmanIsDead]

@BlueArmedDevil,

Have you seen the Serpent Mound in-person or not?

Once, when I walked through the red light district in Bangkok.

 

[Graffiti canvas]

You can either consciously use the Theory of Luck Equation to your advantage or you can dismiss it and suffer its consequences. Your choice. I lived up to my obligations.

Obligation of what? As Einstein's reincarnate, you've given us a mathematical equation that doesn't follow the basic principals of mathematics that were well established and used by you in a former life on a daily basis.

How can you ignore them now? What happened to you?

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Brad, you've slapped together a bunch of numbers with an arbitrary equation and declare it valid. That's not how science works. How is anyone supposed to take this seriously? By taking your word?

It's no "arbitrary equation". It took me years to get the Theory of Luck Equation correctly and after many years of experimentation.

You can either accept it or dismiss it, but it's how GOD/Nature works.

---------------------------------------------------​

Pittsburgh 21 points - Georgia Tech 20 points​

STOP THE GAME! AND DON'T RESTART IT UNTIL KIWIS DETERMINE EXACTLY WHAT A 'POINT' IS!

Obligation of what?

My obligation of being the 2nd Coming of the Christ and my obligation of being a scientist and sharing my discoveries that are causing a paradigm shift.

Everyone,

If you want to be an antichrist, than fight me and fight everything I AM teaching. If you don't want to be an antichrist, than follow my teachings.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

It's no "arbitrary equation". It took me years to get it correctly and after many years of experimentation.

You can either accept it or dismiss it. But it's how GOD/Nature works.

Ok. How did you experiment to find it and check it?
How does this work?

As @ChurchOfGodBear said, you want to be seen as a great thinker and scientist, but when people ask you to actually follow suit and explain or prove your claims, you start pouting like a child. Is that how Einstein or Jebus would behave?

STOP THE GAME! AND DON'T RESTART IT UNTIL KIWIS DETERMINE EXACTLY WHAT A 'POINT' IS!

In stark contrast to your equations, a point, how it is scored und the circumstances under which it is invalid is thoroughly defined in every sport, Brad

If you want to be an antichrist, than fight me and fight everything I AM teaching. If you don't want to be an antichrist, than follow my teachings.

So people have to believe you blindly despite you never providing scientific proof for any claims you make or they are antichrists? If I may borrow the expression: That's so Brad.

 

[Graffiti canvas]

My obligation of being the 2nd Coming of the Christ and my obligation of being a scientist and sharing my discoveries that are causing a paradigm shift.

Everyone,

If you want to be an antichrist, than fight me and fight everything I AM teaching. If you don't want to be an antichrist, than follow my teachings.

Brad, I'm not fighting you. I'm just asking how you can throw a mathematical equation out that isn't possible to solve with current mathematical rules.

You just can't drop a possible world wide impacting mathematical formula like that, one that doesn't follow the known laws of mathematics, without being questioned intensely for proof of concept.

Simply throwing it out there and going "DEAL WITH IT BITCHES, I'M GOD" isn't a valid proof of concept in any circle of science.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

(I once saw the Serpent Mound in-person) when I walked through the red light district in Bangkok.

Have you been to a doctor to check for venereal disease? Advanced VD would explain your mental condition.
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Venereal_disease

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

@BlueArmedDevil,

Have you seen the Serpent Mound in-person or not? Had you even heard of it before?

Yeah I have Bradford what do you want to know.

 

[Graffiti canvas]

@RomanesEuntDomus / RomanesCuntDufus,

Fuck you. From now on, just imagine that that is the reply you get from me every time you comment.

Don't be mean, Brad. Gosh.