- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Oh, now she follows the Chicago Tribune.It should be MANDATORY for BRUTE MALES to be automatically declared guilty upon being accused!!!
View attachment 79332
Where's the pout emoticon?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, now she follows the Chicago Tribune.It should be MANDATORY for BRUTE MALES to be automatically declared guilty upon being accused!!!
View attachment 79332
I don't understand what they're complaining about. Aside from the word "corpus," there's not really any jargon used in that snip. This is like baby's first academic thesis, but these knuckle-draggers act like it's some incredibly obtuse, cryptic postmodern academic nonsense. I like how Wu's trying to score points by taking a dig at academic writing, but the example he's using just makes him look like an anti-intellectual simpleton.I'm 100% certain that academia is glad that you aren't part of it either.
Doesn't stop you from talking like you know how research works all the time though. Using word like "scientifically" and "research" in your tweets just looks retarded, but please, do keep using them. It's funny!
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/713123396956106758
The snip of the paper(?) looks reasonable in the context that can be established. The use of language is a field of research not only for linguists but also in psychology.
You've obviously never been to Deviantart.Actually I don't think I know a single person who would feel sexually attracted to one of Wu's half-melted Barbie-dolls. You could argue that they aren't sexualised at all, since they all look like the victims of a demented plastic surgeon.
John'Cos she doesn't believe a single word she says, it's all just an act. She fetishizes sexy women. Check out this interview with Amanda Warner:
(source, too much javascript to archive well.)
This is how she wanted R60 to be:
It's just a pose she's adopted because she thinks it'll make her one of the in crowd.
I'm angry because Brianna Wu touched me in the bathing suit area.
Actually I don't think I know a single person who would feel sexually attracted to one of Wu's half-melted Barbie-dolls. You could argue that they aren't sexualised at all, since they all look like the victims of a demented plastic surgeon.
Isnt the ratio of men to women rather high?Tech, as it were, is a huge industry. Gaming is a relatively small component of what is normally considered the tech industry. Silicon Valley startups, while highly visible, do not make up the majority of what is considered the tech industry. It's also an industry which is results orientated and clamoring for anyone and everyone who can achieve those results - thus making the only real litmus test for inclusion the actual ability to do the job. I would argue that tech is probably the most inclusive highly lucrative growth industry on the planet right now. There are few industries outside of the "goth nightlife industry" where I have regularly seen so many tranny people so readily accepted.
If Wu thinks the tech industry is sexist or has a problem with sexism, transphobia or inclusion, wait till she sees what it's like working in finance or law.
Brianna would have to do something to hurt Frank real bad for Frank to divorce her. He already seems to take a fair amount of abuse from her but they also seem to be lovey dovey around each other when the camera is on them. This makes me think the relationship might have some volatility to it but what do I know? It will only happen if the walls come crashing down around Brianna and she takes it out on Frank or if any of her antics affect Frank IRL like affecting his job.It's amazing how much Wu's world crashes into nothingness if he ever becomes Frank's third ex-wife. He'll probably have to live in his car again.
If Frank was smart he would. Hopefully his first divorce taught him something.I was wondering about that. Do they have a prenuptial agreement?
Yes more niche content on Cable
There's plenty of TV shows that promote the ideals of feminism. Supergirl. Veep. Madam Secretary. Homeland. Jessica Jones. Just for some off the top of my head. A lot of them are pretty decent.
There's very few that promote Brianna's batshit totalitarian worldview, because it makes for very boring and pretentious television. Girls is the only one that springs to mind and that completely bombed.
There's plenty of TV shows that promote the ideals of feminism. Supergirl. Veep. Madam Secretary. Homeland. Jessica Jones. Just for some off the top of my head. A lot of them are pretty decent.
There's very few that promote Brianna's batshit totalitarian worldview, because it makes for very boring and pretentious television. Girls is the only one that springs to mind and that completely bombed.
But there's scenes of women being abused or raped. So it's shitlordscum or whatever these clowns might call things they disapprove of. Never mind what happens to male characters, as long as one girl suffers, it's potentially "problematic".What about The Sarah Connor Chronicles? All the characters that did anything were women.
Game Of Thrones is arguably feminist too, seeing as the female characters can be as scheming and indeed, even more devious than the majority of the men.
Didn't Game of Thrones pissed off SJWs because it has rape or something?What about The Sarah Connor Chronicles? All the characters that did anything were women.
Game Of Thrones is arguably feminist too, seeing as the female characters can be as scheming and indeed, even more devious than the majority of the men.
Didn't Game of Thrones pissed off SJWs because it has rape or something?
So, you pretty much just want "feminism" to be reduced to a marketing slogan, Brianna? Because that's what it sounds like and what your fellow idiots have been trying to do with the movement for the last few years.
Holy cow, that video is priceless.Short Answer: Appealing to feminists is an economic dead-end, and television stopped being the biggest entertainment vector some time ago. There's no money in supporting a channel for a minority opinion that provably won't back sponsors and would go out of its way to threaten to tear the whole thing down if it offends them in some fashion or another.
If you want the perfect example of why this won't ever happen, Brianna, you need look only in a mirror.
Isn't GSK a huge completely-official-big-house-brand-name company, Wu? Why don't you fund that with all of GSK's funds from the huge success of Revolution 60 then, instead of begging other, more successful companies to do so?
Why do that when you can use it to buy more Apple crap, pay2win mobile games and vidya you'll rarely play?Isn't GSK a huge completely-official-big-house-brand-name company, Wu? Why don't you fund that with all of GSK's funds from the huge success of Revolution 60 then, instead of begging other, more successful companies to do so?