They wouldn't care. There were non-KF compilations going around during the big Keffals debacle but only maybe a third of anyone tweeting/posting elsewhere about it were actually reading it and not just brushing it off as "lol transphobes". There really isn't anything to be done to get through to those people if the subject in question is one of their own, no matter how utterly heinous and sick they are.
I do not wish to ride on the troon-powered rocketship
I disagree. It honestly doesn’t hurt to give it a shot. At least sending off a comprehensive, unbiased dossier would give them more attention to Fong’s antics. Most people think of this as a hate site where we just go after poor minorities for shits and giggles. Maybe this would give them a more thorough picture of what this community is about.
Three is retarded and is also blocking Tutanota (private encrypted email provider), they are on a power trip.
Yeah I read that on el Reg. Shame as they used to be decent, huge data allowances and a brilliant roaming scheme but they are paring all that back. Bending the knee to the consent accident enjoyer means I will go elsewhere for my next contract.
What gets me is they snuck it in at multiple ISPs across the nation. It's not just CenturyLink, it's CenturyLink, AT&T, Xfinity, Cox... and it's not the backbone provider either, it hits 1 hop into their network and dies.
Aren't VPNs stupidly expensive? Plus I can never tell which one will rat me out if I download some capeshit movie over them. Supposedly some of the "zomg privacy" ones that were paying youtubers left and right to shill were outed as being not-so-private after all.
You know former Tor developers? Dude, do you know how many fucking hardcore SJW cancel-culture TRAs worked at Tor? This one (who now hates Tor and would be more than happy to user her insider knowledge to destroy her ex-employer), and this one recently got his Twatter account back, a notorious doxxer who has deleted any mention of Tor from his Twatter timeline to make it seem like he was never associated with them, but the internet never forgets. The Tor Project has always been up to their nose in TRAs and SJWs.
A year before EFF went to the mat to protect Google’s surveillance business from “anti-Gmail” legislation, it mounted an honorable legal and public relations campaign against President George W. Bush’s Patriot Act. EFF properly pointed out that the law was a threat to civil liberties, and it rightly criticized government internet surveillance initiatives launched in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks like the Total Information Awareness program, a predictive policing technology developed at the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and later handed over to the National Security Agency, among others. EFF worried that these technologies would allow the government to turn the internet into a surveillance machine and compile dossiers on millions of Americans with unprecedented ease—again, an eminently justified source of worry, as legions of NSA leaks have since demonstrated.
But when it came to Google and private surveillance, EFF took a totally different line. Corporate surveillance and government surveillance were totally distinct issues, according to the organization. But for ordinary net users, the distinctions were not so clear. Google assembled dossiers and built predictive profiles of its users in order to more effectively sell them products. To do that, the company vacuumed up every morsel of data that people left behind on its platforms. The NSA’s various surveillance programs, including Total Information Awareness, did the same, but ostensibly to find and detain America-hating bad guys. The objectives differed, but the data and technology was more or less identical. And anyway, the NSA depended on companies like Google to build services and attract users—to create and run the information infrastructure that the agency could tap for intel.
...
In the public sphere, meanwhile, EFF’s vision won out. Concerns about private surveillance were pushed out of the spotlight, crowded out by utopian proclamations about how companies like Google and Big Data would change the world for the better. Privacy would come to mean “privacy from government surveillance.” And corporations? Corporate intentions were assumed to be good—or, at worst, neutral. Corporations like Google didn’t spy; they “collected data”—they “personalized.”
...
But that’s what EFF is all about: it’s a Silicon Valley corporate front group, no different than the rest. The only thing unique about it is how successful it’s been in positioning itself as a defender of the people—so successful, in fact, that even the people who work for it believe it. The fact that EFF has been able to pull it off of for so long shows the kind of immense power that Silicon Valley wields over our political culture. When we think about technology and the Internet, there’s no left or right. There’s just Google and Facebook.
All EFF’d Up | Yasha Levine
The lords of the internet care very little about user privacy—what they want to preserve, is their own commercial license against government regulation of any kind.thebaffler.com
Gamergate was a State Dept psyop that went scorched earth on communities that were a little too free and artists that wouldn't get in line. So yeah, this saga is reminiscent. But it had nothing to do with the effort level, there was never a winning move.
5 a month and the best are protonvpn, mullvad, ivpn, windscribe
