Chris-Chan: A Comprehensive History

i could never really listen to the mumble calls with chris because i felt as if everyone involved with fucking with him was a massive faggot, and the clips i've heard from the documentary pretty much confirm this theory. people out there really listen to that shit and say "yeah, i really want to have a role in this autistic man falling apart, just like these badass guys."

The BlueSpike saga is difficult to get through for sure. One just has to remember how much hatred and vitriol Chris had towards everyone else in his life that caused the BlueSpike saga to happen. I found myself sympathising with Chris through the mumbles, but Chris is great at playing the victim. He is outwardly polite, but inwardly selfish and boorish. BlueSpike did go too far, but one only has to remember Adam Stackhouse, the gameplace and Megan to remember the true Chris. Chris is weakened during the days of the Bluespike saga. He's hoping for true love, while people are telling him his entire life is a failure while he just sighs and tries to act polite and accommodating. This isn't how Chris acts in every other situation.

I think when people troll, they want to be the next Liquid or Alec not BlueSpike. They want to make Chris participate in an amusing, cartoonish scenario, and see where it goes.

I think that's different from the typical weens who want to scream julay or pretend to be his boyfriend-free girl for their 15 minutes of fame though.

I hate the Bluespike Saga. It's the only Saga that makes Chris look good because most of the people trolling him come across as socially awkward weirdos themselves. The idea of Clyde Cash as the Eggman to Chris' Sonic is hilarious, but Simmons, the Mumble trolls and BlueSpike were bigger spergs than Chris.
 
The BlueSpike saga is difficult to get through for sure. One just has to remember how much hatred and vitriol Chris had towards everyone else in his life that caused the BlueSpike saga to happen. I found myself sympathising with Chris through the mumbles, but Chris is great at playing the victim. He is outwardly polite, but inwardly selfish and boorish. BlueSpike did go too far, but one only has to remember Adam Stackhouse, the gameplace and Megan to remember the true Chris. Chris is weakened during the days of the Bluespike saga. He's hoping for true love, while people are telling him his entire life is a failure while he just sighs and tries to act polite and accommodating. This isn't how Chris acts in every other situation.
Everybody does some bad things if they live long enough. Chris just sucks at hiding them.
 
Despite screaming "I AM A HOMO!" and shoving his medallion up his ass, Chris arguably comes out of that chat with more of his dignity intact.
Feel free to rate :disagree:, but I thought Chris could have ended the trolling right then and there if he had the sense to say his trolls were a bunch of child groomers who would stoop to no low to get a cheap laugh out of him.

But as we all know, Chris wouldn't be the legendary cow he is if he could have pulled that off. Plus Liquid Chris came along to pull one of the greatest trolling sagas ever.
 
Feel free to rate :disagree:, but I thought Chris could have ended the trolling right then and there if he had the sense to say his trolls were a bunch of child groomers who would stoop to no low to get a cheap laugh out of him.

But as we all know, Chris wouldn't be the legendary cow he is if he could have pulled that off. Plus Liquid Chris came along to pull one of the greatest trolling sagas ever.
Dude, you're talking about an exceptional person who thought that Bluespike was a woman based on his voice alone. A person who was (and still probably) is getting catfished by his own Sonic OCs.

I don't think that you can blame Chris for not spotting this, it's way beyond his capabilities at the time, and it could even be beyond his capabilities now.
 
Just started watching this series the other day. It's great, it has a lot of little details that I've missed these passed 10 years which I really appreciate as someone who has followed him. My only criticism (which really isn't a criticism, but more of a thought) is that it's extremely long for a documentary. I think the sachumo documentary is a better summary of important events and is what I'd send somebody who knows nothing of Chris. This appeals more to people like us, who have already developed an autistic fascination with him and will sit through it all no matter how minor the information presented is. Someone who has never been exposed to him would probably shut it off before the first 10 minutes are up, which is not something someone directing a documentary would want.

That being said, I wouldn't say that one documentary is better than the other, I think they are both equally great at what they do.
 
Last edited:
That was difficult to sit through. If Bluespikes behaviour isn't that of a textbook sociopath then I struggle to see what is.

There was ample opportunity for Chris to put a stop to it then and there. I'm left wondering what would happen now in similar circumstances knowing what he knows.
 
And the other trolls intervening by saying things went too far - too bad they couldn't be arsed to speak up much sooner - or more vocally - than they had.

And these are the people the weens aspire to be like? Really?

Should the other trolls have intervened sooner? Yeah, I think that's pretty uncontroversial. But when? And why?

Why was the situation with BlueSpike a bridge too far? What made this incident specifically worse than everything else?

Was it because it was sexual in nature? Loads of trolling has been.

Is it because it Chris was being coerced into doing something he'd rather not be doing? Nearly every effort to troll Chris has involved manipulating him.

Declaring the BlueSpike incident as too much, too far, too gross is a slippery slope. Where and why do you draw the lines?

As I see it, there are only two intellectually honest positions to take on this: either you go the sociopathic route and say everything is fine because Chris is subhuman trash and deserves to be tortured, or you realize that the entire game of trolling him has been fucked up and gross and basically nobody involved is blameless or "good." Even the trolls who claim to have been trying to "help him" generally did so as an afterthought, probably as a way of making themselves feel less guilty for their weird, harmful behavior.

I can only think of one example of a troll whose actions were basically harmless and defensible, and that's Robert Simmons V.
 
Should the other trolls have intervened sooner? Yeah, I think that's pretty uncontroversial. But when? And why?

Why was the situation with BlueSpike a bridge too far? What made this incident specifically worse than everything else?

Was it because it was sexual in nature? Loads of trolling has been.

Is it because it Chris was being coerced into doing something he'd rather not be doing? Nearly every effort to troll Chris has involved manipulating him.

Declaring the BlueSpike incident as too much, too far, too gross is a slippery slope. Where and why do you draw the lines?

As I see it, there are only two intellectually honest positions to take on this: either you go the sociopathic route and say everything is fine because Chris is subhuman trash and deserves to be tortured, or you realize that the entire game of trolling him has been fucked up and gross and basically nobody involved is blameless or "good." Even the trolls who claim to have been trying to "help him" generally did so as an afterthought, probably as a way of making themselves feel less guilty for their weird, harmful behavior.

I can only think of one example of a troll whose actions were basically harmless and defensible, and that's Robert Simmons V.

Bluespike is very controversial because he was a child at the time, fucking 13..... Very few fucks would have been given if he was 5 years older.
 
Just started watching this series the other day. It's great, it has a lot of little details that I've missed these passed 10 years which I really appreciate as someone who has followed him. My only criticism (which really isn't a criticism, but more of a thought) is that it's extremely long for a documentary. I think the sachumo documentary is a better summary of important events and is what I'd send somebody who knows nothing of Chris. This appeals more to people like us, who have already developed an autistic fascination with him and will sit through it all no matter how minor the information presented is. Someone who has never been exposed to him would probably shut it off before the first 10 minutes are up, which is not something someone directing a documentary would want.

That being said, I wouldn't say that one documentary is better than the other, I think they are both equally great at what they do.

My personal opinion is that the saschumo doc is great for an hour at work & you want to burn some time, while Geno's series is more of a 'leave me alone for the weekend' marathon.
 
That mumble chat was very hard to listen to - though, weirdly enough, I found the way Max/BlueSpike was reacting to watching CWC shove a broken medallion up his ass was far more disturbing than CWC's anxiety during any of the chats (which were bad enough, in their own rights). That sick child was clearly getting excited over watching it play out - you could hear it in his voice. And the other trolls intervening by saying things went too far - too bad they couldn't be arsed to speak up much sooner - or more vocally - than they had.

And these are the people the weens aspire to be like? Really?

CWC is trash for his own reasons; but that lot was just horrific.

It's pretty much agreeable that what Max made Chris do was fucked up. The you have the part where Max outright tells Chris to burn his house down (ironic that it eventually happened due to Chris idocy). I'm honestly surprised Chris didn't suffer blood loss or end up septic after what max made him do. Bluespike is a member here, and I don't think anyone has asked him what his feeling are to that iconic moment, or if he regrets it, but chances are he gets rediculed for it.

I just can't believe Chris actively chose to put the medallion up his ass. He was asked to burn it and immediately sprang to "I'll shove it up my ass!" Why?

He didn't want to burn Sonichu. But then again, Chris logic is always stupid. I guess Chris thought shoving Sonichu up his ass and getting him covered with his shit would be better than lighting Sonichu on fire. He may also thought that Sonichu was alive in the medallion and he didn't want to hurt him, we all know Chris 100% believes his cartoons are living breathing abominations.
 
When a documentary is too short I always think the producer wants to push some agenda (you will never see a Michael Moore film with 3 hours or more). Look at the O.J. doc that was released last year, the movie is 7 hours long and it shows all points of view, it's a fucking masterpiece. If it were just 120 minutes of garbage it would end up in two situations: "Niggos dindu nuffin" or "Jail all bastards without any chance of defense or prosecution", see? Heavily handed and totally partial.

You simply can't make a documentary about someone as controversial as Chris-Chan in just 100 minutes. If so, the end result will inevitably be the situation I said before: or Chris is a garbage human being or a poor autistic who was brutally harassed. Life is more complex than that.

I never cared about Chris that much. I watched the "Down the Rabbit Hole" video about him and found interesting but somehow lacking any real substance. With this series of videos, though, my reaction was completely different, I'm hooked by the story. And most important, I don't have a side, I genuinely can't hate Chris, albeit he's obviously disgusting.

About the trolls: I think all of them are hideous, Bluespark is no different than the others, his problem is the total lack of fun. The other trolls are garbage sick fucks too but they have a sense of humor at least. I'm a piece of shit for laughing too, but I'm not pretending to be otherwise, it's hypocrisy. It's funny, you know? I laugh about funny things, but bluespark is simply not funny at all, that's his biggest sin.
 
Last edited:
I think sadist is a more accurate term for the runt.

I'd say a sadistic little faggot that had an anal insertion fetish.

If Bluespikes behaviour isn't that of a textbook sociopath then I struggle to see what is.

Nah. He was just a 13-YO shithead with a 13-YO’s sense of humor trying to impress a group of trolls that were older than him. To be fair, though, most 13-YOs *are* shitheads. It goes with the territory.

Bluespike’s biggest problems were that he didn’t go into his trolling with any sort of plan as to what he wanted to do, and that the folks he was with didn’t pull the plug on him more quickly.
 
Back