Chris-Chan: A Comprehensive History

BigTubboWithLittleChina said:
No, Rosechu talking about 'dumb laws' is talking about child labour, not cheese pizza. I mean, approving of child labour if it helps a nudie shoot isn't exactly impeccable morals either, but it's not half as bad as the old CP.
Click to expand...
He still thinks it’s appropriate to have a minor involved in a stripping protest, which is also gross. But it’s somewhat less gross than Chris longing to see a minor or a child nude.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, uBlock Origin, Hogar Grupal and 1 other person
BigTubboWithLittleChina said:
No, Rosechu talking about 'dumb laws' is talking about child labour, not cheese pizza. I mean, approving of child labour if it helps a nudie shoot isn't exactly impeccable morals either, but it's not half as bad as the old CP.
Click to expand...
No, it's about child porn laws.
Rosechu turns down Zapina's initial offer to nude model because of the "dumb laws". Then Zapina offers to act as a spotlight, which is accepted. Chris is a pedophile.
1648750414345.png
1648750573522.png
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Dumb
Reactions: AsianChris, Crusader King 1, trickyzerg23 and 7 others
BigTubboWithLittleChina said:
No, Rosechu talking about 'dumb laws' is talking about child labour, not cheese pizza. I mean, approving of child labour if it helps a nudie shoot isn't exactly impeccable morals either, but it's not half as bad as the old CP.
Click to expand...

On the very next page, Zapina was working on the shoot as a spotlight. So the issue wasn't that she was working, she just couldn't be in the nude show because of "dumb laws." Also, according to the CWCKi, Zapina has been a construction worker, a soldier, and a babysitter. The issue is clearly not the fact that she's working.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy Hopkins, LeDarkMemer, BigTubboWithLittleChina and 5 others
Jack Awful said:
If not understanding boundaries means he's getting too handsy with kids then he's a pedophile. Again, him saying that child pornography being a "dumb law" in the comics to me is the same as when he admitted he had sex dreams of his mom.

I obviously don't think he's exclusively attracted to minors (he fucked his mom who's nearly twice his age) I just think he would fuck a 15 year old if he knew he would get away with it.
Click to expand...
What kids did he get handsy with, the TTS? That's if you believe them after all the gay shit they pulled. They also bought porn from chris and smoked weed with him, I can imagine in Chris's broken mind those are some pretty mixed signals regarding their status as of age people.

I'm not going to defend the "dumb law" line because any way you interpret it is pretty gross but I would say like most things in sonichu what Chris meant by that is up in the air. There is a old video where Chris gives his full throated denouncement of pornographic images depicting a sonee and a rosee saying that is "illegal everywhere" and disgusting.

I guess when there is smoke there is often fire but all I'm saying is that it doesn't feel justified shoot Chris with the pedophile gun over this stuff now when the line in recent years has been that Chris isn't a pedo and only a-logs call him that.
 
  • Agree
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: Crusader King 1, ñññ, Ophelia and 2 others
ScrappyLobsterchu said:
What kids did he get handsy with, the TTS? That's if you believe them after all the gay shit they pulled. They also bought porn from chris and smoked weed with him, I can imagine in Chris's broken mind those are some pretty mixed signals regarding their status as of age people.

I'm not going to defend the "dumb law" line because any way you interpret it is pretty gross but I would say like most things in sonichu what Chris meant by that is up in the air. There is a old video where Chris gives his full throated denouncement of pornographic images depicting a sonee and a rosee saying that is "illegal everywhere" and disgusting.

I guess when there is smoke there is often fire but all I'm saying is that it doesn't feel justified shoot Chris with the pedophile gun over this stuff now when the line in recent years has been that Chris isn't a pedo and only a-logs call him that.
Click to expand...
I'm not giving Chris the benefit of the doubt anymore. We used to say that only A-Logs think that Chris is in an incestual relationship with Barb too.

EDIT:
This isn't me saying "go bully Chris". I'm just saying that based on behavior patterns I believe that he would have sex with someone who's underage if given the chance.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: Crusader King 1, Cockadoodle85, trickyzerg23 and 4 others
Jack Awful said:
No, it's about child porn laws.
Rosechu turns down Zapina's initial offer to nude model because of the "dumb laws". Then Zapina offers to act as a spotlight, which is accepted. Chris is a pedophile.
View attachment 3129779
View attachment 3129790
Click to expand...
Chris is famously terrible at structuring word balloons into an order in which real people would actually read them. From context, though, it's clear that the conversation is supposed to be read like this:
ROSECHU: But listen, Zapina, while I truly appreciate your kind offer to be a model; I’m afraid that as a responsible adult, I can’t accept it, because you are still too young.

ZAPINA: That’s cool. But I can still help; I can sit in a tree and use my tail as a spotlight on an area in your backyard.

ROSECHU: Ah, I don’t know child, what with the dumb laws…

LOLISA: Hey, I couldn’t help but overhear; this little one can shine light in the backyard?

ROSECHU: Yes, Lolisa, but the…
Click to expand...

So Rosechu turns Zapina's offer to model down flat, then Zapina offers to be a gaffer instead. Rosechu whines that that would be against the "dumb laws," but (on the next page) Lolisa says this is a volunteer gig and she will supervise Zapina, and Rosechu relents. And Zapina does indeed go on to light their gross photoshoot--which is problematic itself, of course, but the "dumb laws" in question are clearly child labor laws.

I can't believe I actually typed all that shit up.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Zap Rowsdower, FinnSven, Nguyen Van Phuoc and 8 others
Norman B. Normal said:
Chris is famously terrible at structuring word balloons into an order in which real people would actually read them. From context, though, it's clear that the conversation is supposed to be read like this:


So Rosechu turns Zapina's offer to model down flat, then Zapina offers to be a gaffer instead. Rosechu whines that that would be against the "dumb laws," but (on the next page) Lolisa says this is a volunteer gig and she will supervise Zapina, and Rosechu relents. And Zapina does indeed to go on to light their gross photoshoot--which is problematic itself, of course, but the "dumb laws" in question are clearly child labor laws.

I can't believe I actually typed all that shit up.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the clarification, guess I was just reading the panels wrong.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, PhoBingas and Norman B. Normal
Norman B. Normal said:
Chris is famously terrible at structuring word balloons into an order in which real people would actually read them. From context, though, it's clear that the conversation is supposed to be read like this:


So Rosechu turns Zapina's offer to model down flat, then Zapina offers to be a gaffer instead. Rosechu whines that that would be against the "dumb laws," but (on the next page) Lolisa says this is a volunteer gig and she will supervise Zapina, and Rosechu relents. And Zapina does indeed go on to light their gross photoshoot--which is problematic itself, of course, but the "dumb laws" in question are clearly child labor laws.

I can't believe I actually typed all that shit up.
Click to expand...
I’m inclined to think this is how it’s meant to be understood. She does work elsewhere, but Chris is really bad at continuity and generally making sense.

Sex with a minor teen is seriously go to hell bad. Sex with a child is extremely go to the special hell bad. Chris might do the first one, but people accuse him of being interested in the second and it’s just not something he’s ever indicated he thought of. The degree of difference does matter.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: uBlock Origin, BigTubboWithLittleChina, Norman B. Normal and 2 others
Norman B. Normal said:
Chris is famously terrible at structuring word balloons into an order in which real people would actually read them. From context, though, it's clear that the conversation is supposed to be read like this:


So Rosechu turns Zapina's offer to model down flat, then Zapina offers to be a gaffer instead. Rosechu whines that that would be against the "dumb laws," but (on the next page) Lolisa says this is a volunteer gig and she will supervise Zapina, and Rosechu relents. And Zapina does indeed go on to light their gross photoshoot--which is problematic itself, of course, but the "dumb laws" in question are clearly child labor laws.

I can't believe I actually typed all that shit up.
Click to expand...

This is actually my favorite kind of autism so I appreciate it. I don't think it's as clear as you say about the speech bubbles. Chris also regularly uses multiple speech bubbles for text that's clearly uninterrupted. Also, CWCVille doesn't seem to have child labor laws as Zapina has other jobs.

Even so, at the end of the day, he decided to write a 14 year old character who wanted to volunteer for pornography. That's sus just in itself.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, Norman B. Normal and Mary Jane
Ophelia said:
Sex with a minor teen is seriously go to hell bad. Sex with a child is extremely go to the special hell bad. Chris might do the first one, but people accuse him of being interested in the second and it’s just not something he’s ever indicated he thought of. The degree of difference does matter.
Click to expand...

Well, there's also mixed messages. If Chris fucked a 16 year old at his ponyfag con in Washington, it would be legal. If he fucked a 15 year old at the pony con in Washington, it would be a felony. But if he fucked a 15 year old in Virginia, it would be a misdemeanor (not a wobbler felony like fucking Barb, just a flat out misdemeanor).

Meanwhile if he fucked that 15 year old in Denmark, it would be legal there, but then he'd be arrested when he came back to the US.

Chris was led to believe that 18 was the law everywhere, but then he got confused when people had younger girlfriends, like Jason Kendrick Howell. He condemned JKH for his "illegal" relationship, even though it was legal, and was confused when JKH didn't get in any trouble.

I guess what I'm saying is that, given the totality of his experiences, I wouldn't put it past Chris to fuck a 16 year old, but I am dead certain he would not fuck a 6 year old.

Just like I think Chris would go 60 mph in a 55mph zone, but not 160mph in a 55mph zone -- even if the new Son-Chu was a Bugatti Veyron.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Jimmy Hopkins, BigTubboWithLittleChina, Ophelia and 2 others
ABE LINN COHN said:
Nah, Chris rigidly obeys traffic laws to the letter.
View attachment 3131396
Click to expand...

Yes, and he'd never commit incest.

Actually, speaking of traffic laws, I think a lot of people think Chris fucking Barb is somehow the most serious thing he's done. In reality, the charges have exactly the same severity as the hit and run charges he faced with Michael Snyder. Class 5 felony wobbler.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Watamelon, Cockadoodle85, BigTubboWithLittleChina and 2 others
I don't know if anyone has seen this yet, but it seems like Geno has gone through and changed all of the titles and thumbnails for the entire series, as well as changing the name of the Geno 2.1 channel to "Tekken Time Bomb". Any idea why he did this?
 
  • Late
  • Autistic
Reactions: ABE LINN COHN and ñññ
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back