Christopher Vito Gesualdi / Vito / Vaedophile / CringleJingle / Co-Host of the "The Biggest Problem in the Universe" Reboot - Self-admitted paedophile, least funny comedian, lolicon artist, shotacon consumer, spousal abuser, snuff distributor and pet of Dick "Juju the cow" Masterson. Follows accounts making CGI of teenagers and generates AI images of lolicon hentai covers.

[Redeemer]

By ignoring the context you've made yourselves look like absolute retards. Not even look like, i am legitimately believing that a lot of you are genuinely retarded

I am asking for the context to be explained. The clip that elissaclips posted seemed pretty self-contained. If it's misleading, I want to know how. Neither you, nor juju, nor vito have actually explained the context that we are ignoring.

Also, even if it's a joke, it's mega retarded to make that joke when everybody is already accusing you of being a pedophile.

 

[Fleetwood]

It is made up you moron, no 13 year olds went to a house party at Dick's.

By ignoring the context you've made yourselves look like absolute retards. Not even look like, i am legitimately believing that a lot of you are genuinely retarded

What is worse is you have now forced me to defend Dick on this so we don't all look retarded, especially when they could have been pressed on why they didn't think she was 13.

Next time, don't cum bucket loads without checking the context because the correct context had the potential to be funnier.

Edit: some angry spellings

ok snopes, she said it was a party so it's false?
Also once you do this enough times you are actually retarded

 

[Annealing Crater]

Bringing a 13 year old up to your hotel room at a convention to “interview” them with daddy juju isn't any better than taking them to juju’s house. I guess the never-wife might not be there to provide the kid with a fake ID, at least.

 

[Harm]

I believe the more creepy thing is that they think there's a such thing as an appropriate place to take a 13 year old child you've met while trying to pick up women.

 

[3MMA]

Everybody knows about his big #WeToo moment. Vaedo is trying really hard to bury that moment with a new story about it:

Link | Archive
Recall that earlier ITT, someone uncovered this from Vaedo’s post about “We” back in 2022:

 

[Harm]

He really just wants to fuck minors.

 

[LastStableVersion]

View attachment 6517529

He really just wants to fuck minors.

 

[Harm]

View attachment 6517551

That's all that exists of that tweet. It's verified by Vito as legitimate in Nina Infinity's January 2022 pedophilia debate livestream which was inspired by that tweet. It's the same debate where Vito debates in defense of non-offending pedophiles for 40 minutes+. A supercut I made of the livestream (including Vito confirming the tweet) is in the OP here:

Vito Gesualdi appeared on a show called "Simpcast" to try and defend his stance on "non-offending paedophiles" and the Cuties film.

 

[genericwhitemale]

There wasn't a house party that Vito invited a 13 year old to and this was all a big misunderstanding, okay.
The fact that Vito, a man in his mid 30s, couldn't instinctively tell a 13 year old from a fully grown woman is also giving me flashbacks to Mr. Girl's Cuties review and his argument that "if you put men in front of a 13 year old giving you a lap dance and said "don't get a boner or you'll be shot", they wouldn't take that risk."

 

[LastStableVersion]

That's all that exists of that tweet. It's verified by Vito as legitimate in Nina Infinity's January 2022 pedophilia debate livestream which was inspired by that tweet. It's the same debate where Vito debates in defense of non-offending pedophiles for 40 minutes+. A supercut I made of the livestream (including Vito confirming the tweet) is in the OP here:

It's all good man, just messing with you.
I remember watching that stream about a year ago and getting legitimately MATI with him making desperate "won't someone please think of the poor child rapists" comments and appeals the whole time. Like, if he literally just came out and said "yes I am a pedo" that would be better than him constantly getting right up to the edge of saying it and then backing off and claiming he just has "empathy" for them.

 

[3MMA]

You can tell the whole WE thing still bothers him greatly as he’s trying to change the facts around his infamous moment to this very day. (Impossible to do.) That raises the question of why he’s so fixated on it beyond wanting to save his reputation. If it was a joke, as he now claims, why is he so bent out of shape about it that he’s coping & seething about it today? Comedians & public speakers in general tend to stand by their jokes or words. Unless apologizing or retroactively trying to create a new narrative. Vaedo stood behind his very loud, “WE” for a few years. IIRC, it wasn’t until this thread was published that he became fixated on trying to rewrite that moment. As he stood behind that statement for so long, it makes it more difficult to claim it was “just jokes, man.” Not going into what a sick thing that alleged joke was right now because everybody knows, & if he regrets it, he should try the apology route because it’s clear he was admitting he’s a non offending nonce, just like the paedophiles he included himself amongst. Multiple times even. To stop the cope would help him a smidgen more than what looks like lying about it after the fact. Only other thing left is to face the wall.

 

[Guntkvd]

Juju had the choice to not mention this situation, he knew full well how it will make vedo look, and he still did it.
Feels great.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

It is made up you moron, no 13 year olds went to a house party at Dick's.

By ignoring the context you've made yourselves look like absolute retards. Not even look like, i am legitimately believing that a lot of you are genuinely retarded

What is worse is you have now forced me to defend Dick on this so we don't all look retarded, especially when they could have been pressed on why they didn't think she was 13.

Next time, don't cum bucket loads without checking the context because the correct context had the potential to be funnier.

Edit: some angry spellings

I know when I first heard it I was confused on the context because it came off as Vito brought a kid to Dick’s just because that’s where they always do their dumb interviews and Vito had to say it was at a comic con. It’s a clip out of context and everyone jumped in with half answers sure, but…

Why is a 30+ year old fat balding man with Pedo face approaching 13 year olds in any context?

 

[Oliver Onions]

Everybody knows about his big #WeToo moment. Vaedo is trying really hard to bury that moment with a new story about it:

Link | Archive

What a disingenuous fat faggot. You didn't say 'we' should have basic empathy for criminals, you said 'we (i.e. pedos) understand that breaking the existing laws is a no-no'. It is completely unambiguous what you were saying, and even then you were given the opportunity to clarify when someone asked 'we?' and you chose to double down by responding 'we.' making sure there was absolutely no confusion you were lumping yourself in with other chesters.

I am glad this moment is still eating at him to this day, I hope it follows him for the rest of his life until he finally finds a ceiling beam strong enough to hold the rope.

 

[BigDuckEnergy]

I am asking for the context to be explained

The context that it was never said, you were just told that was what was said?

Does that really need explaining?

It was just a vox pox thing in a convention.

ok snopes, she said it was a party so it's false?

Yes, it was false.

Bringing a 13 year old up to your hotel room at a convention

What hotel room? Why are you just making random shit up now? This is why you all sound retarded.

The fact that Vito, a man in his mid 30s, couldn't instinctively tell a 13 year old from a fully grown woman

This 100% this, this was the route you all should have taken but all your retarded spergings have fumbled it worse than Jesse PS that no one will take this seriously now.

the fucking truth is funnier

 

[Redeemer]

The context that it was never said, you were just told that was what was said?

It was certainly said... there's a video.

You still refuse to explain the context for some reason. All you have to do is post this comment by Vito (the only public explanation I can find of it), which was generously pinned by elissaclips, the person you are accusing of being unfair and disingenuous.

 

[spacko]

The context that it was never said, you were just told that was what was said?

Does that really need explaining?

It was just a vox pox thing in a convention.

Yes, it was false.

What hotel room? Why are you just making random shit up now? This is why you all sound retarded.

This 100% this, this was the route you all should have taken but all your retarded spergings have fumbled it worse than Jesse PS that no one will take this seriously now.

the fucking truth is funnier

i dont know why you're getting so worked up defending pedophiles but please keep posting

 

[Harm]

It was certainly said... there's a video.

You still refuse to explain the context for some reason. All you have to do is post this comment by Vito (the only public explanation I can find of it), which was generously pinned by elissaclips, the person you are accusing of being unfair and disingenuous.

View attachment 6524420

Pretty telling that when Vito did attempt to explain the context, he didn't even address the issue of where they took the girl. He either wanted that inaccurate detail to persist, or he knows deep down that it's immaterial to why people found the story so disgusting.

Surely if that was important context then in Vito's comment prefaced with "Context:" he'd have brought it up. Instead, now they say we're all liars who just make shit up. Why didn't he call Elissa a liar who makes shit up in that comment?

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Even if Elissa Clips did get that one detail wrong, the detail about where they invited the child, it's not what made the story disconcerting anyways. It's like correcting the record by going "THESE STUPID KIWI FARMER LIARS! WE DIDN'T ASK HER STORIES ABOUT WAR! WE ASKED HER STORIES ABOUT WEATHER PATTERNS! ACK ACK ACK!" They already verified the elements of the story which matter:

Elissa didn't get the context wrong, YOU got the context wrong when you posted it in the community happenings thread.

The below post is totally wrong and seeded incorrect information into the thread.

Christopher "CringleJingle" Gesualdi has verified the legitimacy of a recent story where he brings an unaccompanied 13 year old girl to Juju the Cow's home.

The Vito statement you linked to did not state anything close to what you claimed, since it's clear that he's stating it took place at a Comic Con:



How and why you posted something so wrong I have no idea.

Surely if that was important context then in Vito's comment prefaced with "Context:" he'd have brought it up. Instead, now they say we're all liars who just make shit up. Why didn't he call Elissa a liar who makes shit up in that comment?

Presumably because Elissa wasn't the one who made it up.

ok snopes, she said it was a party so it's false?

I'm fairly certain the clip initially only said that it was a "friend". Which isn't really misleading, per se. I took it as a sarcastic comment in the title.

When Vito made the comment clarifying, "Comic Con" was added into the title.

I haven't seen anywhere that the clip described it as a "party".

Juju had the choice to not mention this situation, he knew full well how it will make vedo look, and he still did it.
Feels great.

Dax obviously knew what he was doing and he got a bonus too because apparently people can't resist gilding the lily about it. I still maintain that Dax will eventually turn Vito into Maddox 2.0 and come out with all these stories again, but in a negative light instead of laughing about it.

 

[Fleetwood]

I'm fairly certain the clip initially only said that it was a "friend". Which isn't really misleading, per se. I took it as a sarcastic comment in the title.

When Vito made the comment clarifying, "Comic Con" was added into the title.

I haven't seen anywhere that the clip described it as a "party".

I'm only responding to this other poster about what they said. That poster here was being picky about other people describing where the location was that Vedo interacted with a minor child. I don't really care if it was a convention, a podcast, or a party at dax's they are pretty much the worst people you would ever want your teenager to meet. (if you were their parents) Also maybe they are implying it was another haha we fooled you it never happened work which is stupid also.

Edit:

in the comicsgate thread check out this post I can't quote it without double posting

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/comicsgate.38138/post-19584559