US Cloudflare: "Terminating Service for 8Chan"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Terminating Service for 8Chan

Tweet
August 05, 2019 1:44AM


The mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio are horrific tragedies. In the case of the El Paso shooting, the suspected terrorist gunman appears to have been inspired by the forum website known as 8chan. Based on evidence we've seen, it appears that he posted a screed to the site immediately before beginning his terrifying attack on the El Paso Walmart killing 20 people.

Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. Nearly the same thing happened on 8chan before the terror attack in Christchurch, New Zealand. The El Paso shooter specifically referenced the Christchurch incident and appears to have been inspired by the largely unmoderated discussions on 8chan which glorified the previous massacre. In a separate tragedy, the suspected killer in the Poway, California synagogue shooting also posted a hate-filled “open letter” on 8chan. 8chan has repeatedly proven itself to be a cesspool of hate.

8chan is among the more than 19 million Internet properties that use Cloudflare's service. We just sent notice that we are terminating 8chan as a customer effective at midnight tonight Pacific Time. The rationale is simple: they have proven themselves to be lawless and that lawlessness has caused multiple tragic deaths. Even if 8chan may not have violated the letter of the law in refusing to moderate their hate-filled community, they have created an environment that revels in violating its spirit.

We do not take this decision lightly. Cloudflare is a network provider. In pursuit of our goal of helping build a better internet, we’ve considered it important to provide our security services broadly to make sure as many users as possible are secure, and thereby making cyberattacks less attractive — regardless of the content of those websites. Many of our customers run platforms of their own on top of our network. If our policies are more conservative than theirs it effectively undercuts their ability to run their services and set their own policies. We reluctantly tolerate content that we find reprehensible, but we draw the line at platforms that have demonstrated they directly inspire tragic events and are lawless by design. 8chan has crossed that line. It will therefore no longer be allowed to use our services.

What Will Happen Next

Unfortunately, we have seen this situation before and so we have a good sense of what will play out. Almost exactly two years ago we made the determination to kick another disgusting site off Cloudflare's network: the Daily Stormer. That caused a brief interruption in the site's operations but they quickly came back online using a Cloudflare competitor. That competitor at the time promoted as a feature the fact that they didn't respond to legal process. Today, the Daily Stormer is still available and still disgusting. They have bragged that they have more readers than ever. They are no longer Cloudflare's problem, but they remain the Internet's problem.

I have little doubt we'll see the same happen with 8chan. While removing 8chan from our network takes heat off of us, it does nothing to address why hateful sites fester online. It does nothing to address why mass shootings occur. It does nothing to address why portions of the population feel so disenchanted they turn to hate. In taking this action we've solved our own problem, but we haven't solved the Internet's.

In the two years since the Daily Stormer what we have done to try and solve the Internet’s deeper problem is engage with law enforcement and civil society organizations to try and find solutions. Among other things, that resulted in us cooperating around monitoring potential hate sites on our network and notifying law enforcement when there was content that contained an indication of potential violence. We will continue to work within the legal process to share information when we can to hopefully prevent horrific acts of violence. We believe this is our responsibility and, given Cloudflare's scale and reach, we are hopeful we will continue to make progress toward solving the deeper problem.

Rule of Law

We continue to feel incredibly uncomfortable about playing the role of content arbiter and do not plan to exercise it often. Some have wrongly speculated this is due to some conception of the United States' First Amendment. That is incorrect. First, we are a private company and not bound by the First Amendment. Second, the vast majority of our customers, and more than 50% of our revenue, comes from outside the United States where the First Amendment and similarly libertarian freedom of speech protections do not apply. The only relevance of the First Amendment in this case and others is that it allows us to choose who we do and do not do business with; it does not obligate us to do business with everyone.

Instead our concern has centered around another much more universal idea: the Rule of Law. The Rule of Law requires policies be transparent and consistent. While it has been articulated as a framework for how governments ensure their legitimacy, we have used it as a touchstone when we think about our own policies.

We have been successful because we have a very effective technological solution that provides security, performance, and reliability in an affordable and easy-to-use way. As a result of that, a huge portion of the Internet now sits behind our network. 10% of the top million, 17% of the top 100,000, and 19% of the top 10,000 Internet properties use us today. 10% of the Fortune 1,000 are paying Cloudflare customers.

Cloudflare is not a government. While we've been successful as a company, that does not give us the political legitimacy to make determinations on what content is good and bad. Nor should it. Questions around content are real societal issues that need politically legitimate solutions. We will continue to engage with lawmakers around the world as they set the boundaries of what is acceptable in their countries through due process of law. And we will comply with those boundaries when and where they are set.

Europe, for example, has taken a lead in this area. As we've seen governments there attempt to address hate and terror content online, there is recognition that different obligations should be placed on companies that organize and promote content — like Facebook and YouTube — rather than those that are mere conduits for that content. Conduits, like Cloudflare, are not visible to users and therefore cannot be transparent and consistent about their policies.
The unresolved question is how should the law deal with platforms that ignore or actively thwart the Rule of Law? That's closer to the situation we have seen with the Daily Stormer and 8chan. They are lawless platforms. In cases like these, where platforms have been designed to be lawless and unmoderated, and where the platforms have demonstrated their ability to cause real harm, the law may need additional remedies. We and other technology companies need to work with policy makers in order to help them understand the problem and define these remedies. And, in some cases, it may mean moving enforcement mechanisms further down the technical stack.

Our Obligation

Cloudflare's mission is to help build a better Internet. At some level firing 8chan as a customer is easy. They are uniquely lawless and that lawlessness has contributed to multiple horrific tragedies. Enough is enough.

What's hard is defining the policy that we can enforce transparently and consistently going forward. We, and other technology companies like us that enable the great parts of the Internet, have an obligation to help propose solutions to deal with the parts we're not proud of. That's our obligation and we're committed to it.

Unfortunately the action we take today won’t fix hate online. It will almost certainly not even remove 8chan from the Internet. But it is the right thing to do. Hate online is a real issue. Here are some organizations that have active work to help address it:
Our whole Cloudflare team’s thoughts are with the families grieving in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio this evening.
 
Feeling a little nostalgic again so here's a few 8chan banners I had saved. Keep in mind I only saved most of these cause of le aesthetic.
1411220422545.gif

1411220438432.gif

15065241526914.gif

1411220472696.gif

1411255854985.jpg

1426622898007.gif

1434250849880.gif

1435051346964.png

1466629096314.gif

1466904836643.png

b.jpeg

b.png

b2.png
 
Last edited:
I only went on 8chan ONCE before it got yeeted.

Interesting place. 8 /pol/ is waaaaaaaaaaaay better than 4 /pol/.
8/pol/ was easily the most surreal place on the whole site. They went from calling the Christchurch shooter a Jewish false flag to a savior of the white race in the span of a month. Towards the end of 8chan's life they had meme generals dedicated to "Saint Tarrant".
 
If you recall, the FBI literally admitted in court filings that they had agents posting in Tarrant threads.
No it was even better than that, they submitted reports with (you) screenshots.
I'd be a glow nigger if I could get paid to shitpost all day, and I wouldn't be dumb enough to include screen caps of myself encouraging people to commit acts of violence in my reports.
 
If you recall, the FBI literally admitted in court filings that they had agents posting in Tarrant threads.
No it was even better than that, they submitted reports with (you) screenshots.
I'd be a glow nigger if I could get paid to shitpost all day, and I wouldn't be dumb enough to include screen caps of myself encouraging people to commit acts of violence in my reports.
Do you guys have any images of this? Like the court filings or the falseflagging screenshots? I remember 8/pol/ had been paranoid about being watched by the feds long before glownigger existed as a term but I always thought it was just paranoia until after the Christchurch shooting happened which brought loads of attention upon 8chan.
 
If you recall, the FBI literally admitted in court filings that they had agents posting in Tarrant threads.
No it was even better than that, they submitted reports with (you) screenshots.
I'd be a glow nigger if I could get paid to shitpost all day, and I wouldn't be dumb enough to include screen caps of myself encouraging people to commit acts of violence in my reports.
That was a different shooter, the one in Cali I think, where the photocopied and faxed screens were submitted as evidence with "(You)"s all over the place. The Tarrant thread was probably taken over by boomer glowniggers posting cringe, hoping to entrap someone and make a case so they could get a promotion, go on CNN and retire.

Answer said:


Do you guys have any images of this? Like the court filings or the falseflagging screenshots? I remember 8/pol/ had been paranoid about being watched by the feds long before glownigger existed as a term but I always thought it was just paranoia until after the Christchurch shooting happened which brought loads of attention upon 8chan.
They get posted on 4chan occasionally mainly when a sped is calling another sped a glownigger.
 
Last edited:
Do you guys have any images of this? Like the court filings or the falseflagging screenshots? I remember 8/pol/ had been paranoid about being watched by the feds long before glownigger existed as a term but I always thought it was just paranoia until after the Christchurch shooting happened which brought loads of attention upon 8chan.
I saved one of the pics in question
fed D9Jwn6cXYAAVKot.png
 
And he's still posting like he's a member of the community in good standing? Wow, I have even less respect for the now-furry, quasi-SJW, formerly based goblin than ever.

It seriously takes some stones to shit on a forum in an interview and then to banally shit post about it about fursonas and shit without actually engaging one's critics.

Me I mostly still used halfchan so his antics affect me nil but his defense of CP and criticism of political speech infuriate me to no end. Has he taken back his stances on CP/lolis/creepshots/etc.?

I know he's doxxed but halal thread when. A fursona, grandiose hypocrisy and even low tier spasticposting is enough to make a lolcow IMO. No he's no Chris but who is.
He may want the internet to forget about /cuteboys/ and the "Official Pedo Thread", but we haven't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GhostNotes
It's absolutely hilarious to me that l33tguy and hotwheels are so open to media exposure when a little digging leads you to things like pic related.


The tl;dr is that a global mod on 8chan banned people for posting onion links to CP and Hotwheels publicly called him out for deleting them. Old news for sure, but still relevant today with how censorious he's been in the last year.
Damn these archives tugged on my heartstrings.
 
You'd think the Feds would have something of better quality than that of a Fax machine.
Note: alphabets, lawyers, doctors, and bank-related industries are holdouts to using faxes. There are legal precedents that solidify faxing a signature for contracts/legal documents.

Those 'electronic signature' clicks have been both supported and defeated in court. A faxed signature (unless faked) has been airtight for decades.
 
Back