US Cloudflare: "Terminating Service for 8Chan"


Terminating Service for 8Chan

Tweet
August 05, 2019 1:44AM


The mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio are horrific tragedies. In the case of the El Paso shooting, the suspected terrorist gunman appears to have been inspired by the forum website known as 8chan. Based on evidence we've seen, it appears that he posted a screed to the site immediately before beginning his terrifying attack on the El Paso Walmart killing 20 people.

Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. Nearly the same thing happened on 8chan before the terror attack in Christchurch, New Zealand. The El Paso shooter specifically referenced the Christchurch incident and appears to have been inspired by the largely unmoderated discussions on 8chan which glorified the previous massacre. In a separate tragedy, the suspected killer in the Poway, California synagogue shooting also posted a hate-filled “open letter” on 8chan. 8chan has repeatedly proven itself to be a cesspool of hate.

8chan is among the more than 19 million Internet properties that use Cloudflare's service. We just sent notice that we are terminating 8chan as a customer effective at midnight tonight Pacific Time. The rationale is simple: they have proven themselves to be lawless and that lawlessness has caused multiple tragic deaths. Even if 8chan may not have violated the letter of the law in refusing to moderate their hate-filled community, they have created an environment that revels in violating its spirit.

We do not take this decision lightly. Cloudflare is a network provider. In pursuit of our goal of helping build a better internet, we’ve considered it important to provide our security services broadly to make sure as many users as possible are secure, and thereby making cyberattacks less attractive — regardless of the content of those websites. Many of our customers run platforms of their own on top of our network. If our policies are more conservative than theirs it effectively undercuts their ability to run their services and set their own policies. We reluctantly tolerate content that we find reprehensible, but we draw the line at platforms that have demonstrated they directly inspire tragic events and are lawless by design. 8chan has crossed that line. It will therefore no longer be allowed to use our services.

What Will Happen Next

Unfortunately, we have seen this situation before and so we have a good sense of what will play out. Almost exactly two years ago we made the determination to kick another disgusting site off Cloudflare's network: the Daily Stormer. That caused a brief interruption in the site's operations but they quickly came back online using a Cloudflare competitor. That competitor at the time promoted as a feature the fact that they didn't respond to legal process. Today, the Daily Stormer is still available and still disgusting. They have bragged that they have more readers than ever. They are no longer Cloudflare's problem, but they remain the Internet's problem.

I have little doubt we'll see the same happen with 8chan. While removing 8chan from our network takes heat off of us, it does nothing to address why hateful sites fester online. It does nothing to address why mass shootings occur. It does nothing to address why portions of the population feel so disenchanted they turn to hate. In taking this action we've solved our own problem, but we haven't solved the Internet's.

In the two years since the Daily Stormer what we have done to try and solve the Internet’s deeper problem is engage with law enforcement and civil society organizations to try and find solutions. Among other things, that resulted in us cooperating around monitoring potential hate sites on our network and notifying law enforcement when there was content that contained an indication of potential violence. We will continue to work within the legal process to share information when we can to hopefully prevent horrific acts of violence. We believe this is our responsibility and, given Cloudflare's scale and reach, we are hopeful we will continue to make progress toward solving the deeper problem.

Rule of Law

We continue to feel incredibly uncomfortable about playing the role of content arbiter and do not plan to exercise it often. Some have wrongly speculated this is due to some conception of the United States' First Amendment. That is incorrect. First, we are a private company and not bound by the First Amendment. Second, the vast majority of our customers, and more than 50% of our revenue, comes from outside the United States where the First Amendment and similarly libertarian freedom of speech protections do not apply. The only relevance of the First Amendment in this case and others is that it allows us to choose who we do and do not do business with; it does not obligate us to do business with everyone.

Instead our concern has centered around another much more universal idea: the Rule of Law. The Rule of Law requires policies be transparent and consistent. While it has been articulated as a framework for how governments ensure their legitimacy, we have used it as a touchstone when we think about our own policies.

We have been successful because we have a very effective technological solution that provides security, performance, and reliability in an affordable and easy-to-use way. As a result of that, a huge portion of the Internet now sits behind our network. 10% of the top million, 17% of the top 100,000, and 19% of the top 10,000 Internet properties use us today. 10% of the Fortune 1,000 are paying Cloudflare customers.

Cloudflare is not a government. While we've been successful as a company, that does not give us the political legitimacy to make determinations on what content is good and bad. Nor should it. Questions around content are real societal issues that need politically legitimate solutions. We will continue to engage with lawmakers around the world as they set the boundaries of what is acceptable in their countries through due process of law. And we will comply with those boundaries when and where they are set.

Europe, for example, has taken a lead in this area. As we've seen governments there attempt to address hate and terror content online, there is recognition that different obligations should be placed on companies that organize and promote content — like Facebook and YouTube — rather than those that are mere conduits for that content. Conduits, like Cloudflare, are not visible to users and therefore cannot be transparent and consistent about their policies.
The unresolved question is how should the law deal with platforms that ignore or actively thwart the Rule of Law? That's closer to the situation we have seen with the Daily Stormer and 8chan. They are lawless platforms. In cases like these, where platforms have been designed to be lawless and unmoderated, and where the platforms have demonstrated their ability to cause real harm, the law may need additional remedies. We and other technology companies need to work with policy makers in order to help them understand the problem and define these remedies. And, in some cases, it may mean moving enforcement mechanisms further down the technical stack.

Our Obligation

Cloudflare's mission is to help build a better Internet. At some level firing 8chan as a customer is easy. They are uniquely lawless and that lawlessness has contributed to multiple horrific tragedies. Enough is enough.

What's hard is defining the policy that we can enforce transparently and consistently going forward. We, and other technology companies like us that enable the great parts of the Internet, have an obligation to help propose solutions to deal with the parts we're not proud of. That's our obligation and we're committed to it.

Unfortunately the action we take today won’t fix hate online. It will almost certainly not even remove 8chan from the Internet. But it is the right thing to do. Hate online is a real issue. Here are some organizations that have active work to help address it:
Our whole Cloudflare team’s thoughts are with the families grieving in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio this evening.
 
All posts have a "disclaimer" by default that can be disabled in the settings

2019-11-02-150541_1366x768_scrot.png


2019-11-02-150844_1366x768_scrot.png
 
Twitter.com/HW_BEAT_THAT/status/1190710530807255040
Kikewheels woke up just to try and shut it down, truly a bitter ex
1572723120330.jpg
Also the website is still up, kikewheels and friends are just trying to DDOS it and are trying contact anyone close to 8chan to try and shut it down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Already DDoSed or just a shitty launch with a weak server and lots of interest?
Hotwheels seems happy to take the credit either way.
smug.png

(https://archive.li/PBKzm)

Also the website is still up, kikewheels and friends are just trying to DDOS it and are trying contact anyone close to 8chan to try and shut it down.
Yep. It's all hands on deck! Our boy @L33TGUY noticed that 8kun's host is ducking their emails, so now he wants to 'speak to the manager'.
l33t.png

(https://archive.li/8ORDP)
Code:
CEO: NICK DVAS  https://twitter.com/dvas He’s Russian
CEO EMAIL: nick@dvas.ru (CC HIM!)
EMAIL: ABUSE@SERVERS.COM

Domain in question: 8KUN.NET
IP in question: 62.113.112.43 via your customer VDSINA.RU
 
Dear Sir or Madam,
 
Please note that we have already contacted your downstream customer in control of this IP https://vdsina.ru via adbuse@vdsina.ru but they do not respond to emails as you can see here:

4.2.1 The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that
4.2.1 prevents additional messages from being delivered. Please resend your
4.2.1 message at a later time.

In 2019, three terrorist manifestos were uploaded to 8chan. The terrorists in Christchurch, New Zealand, Poway, California, and El Paso, Texas, used 8chan to upload their manifestos. Between all three attacks, over 70 people died. Here is an archive of the ChristChurch massacre with the original post by the shooter Brenton Tarrant:  https://archive.st/archive/2019/3/8ch.net/7s0s/8ch.net/pol/res/12916717.html

 WaPo reported that 8chan is an incubator for mass shooters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/08/04/three-mass-shootings-this-year-began-with-hateful-screed-chan-its-founder-calls-it-terrorist-refuge-plain-sight/
 
As a result, 8chan was removed from many major American networks. It was deplatformed by Tucows, CloudFlare and Epik in August; and from Zare (UK) as "8kun" in October.
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2019/08/05/tucows-drops-8chan-domain-registration-after-el-paso-shooting/#294385f9ffbf
https://blog.cloudflare.com/terminating-service-for-8chan/
 
All competent observers agree that 8kun is no different than 8chan, and is a bad faith rebrand to try to evade bans.
 
https://www.cnet.com/news/controversial-site-8chan-tries-to-return-under-8kun-name/
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmj8y4/inside-the-war-to-kill-off-8chan-and-crush-qanon
 
Here is a live shot of 8KUN on your customer’s server showing how it looks identical to 8ch.net but with a new logo: https://i.imgur.com/IO286XB.png - Compare to 8ch: https://i.imgur.com/abX8tuY.jpg

8chan was known to host and promote content that is in violation of your acceptable use policy, this includes regular images and video of murder, including the 51 victims of the Christchurch massacre. Most notably 8chan violates on a daily basis your “Offensive Content” ban:

- Threats of physical harm, excessively violent material that incites violence, threatens violence, or contains harassing content or hate speech;
- Material that is defamatory or violates a person's privacy;
- Material that promotes terrorism or any kind of ethnic, social or religious discord;
 
Last week Alibaba refused to do business with 8chan: https://twitter.com/luica/status/1185723871229550592

Since then, 8chan's owner, Jim Watkins, and his son, Ron Watkins, have become more and more desperate to find a host. Chinese hosting companies Alibaba and Tencent both said "no" to 8chan under the name "8kun" as well.
 
They are now setup to use your network as their host to engage primarily in discussions that are in direct violation of your acceptable use policy: https://www.servers.com/legal/policies#5_acceptable_use_policy
 
I hope that you will not allow them to do this to you, as allowing them services has already indirectly caused real people to lose their lives around the world. 8chan is a breeding ground for extremism, and is reaching a public safety threat not far from that posed by ISIS or other terrorist groups. We urge you to stand against the type of “free speech” Jim Watkins and 8chan/8kun are offering. I hope you also consider carefully that members of the US congress have indicated they may pass a law that changes how Section 230 would apply to hate speech and to make tech companies liable. This legislation is coming. You have an opportunity to be on the right side of history with this issue. We hope you’ll take it.

If I do not get a response from you within 24 hours I will promptly contact your upstream provider to seek assistance.
 
Thank you for reading,
[CODE]
CEO: NICK DVAS  https://twitter.com/dvas He’s Russian
CEO EMAIL: nick@dvas.ru (CC HIM!)
EMAIL: ABUSE@SERVERS.COM

Domain in question: 8KUN.NET
IP in question: 62.113.112.43 via your customer VDSINA.RU
 
Dear Sir or Madam,
 
Please note that we have already contacted your downstream customer in control of this IP https://vdsina.ru via adbuse@vdsina.ru but they do not respond to emails as you can see here:

4.2.1 The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that 
4.2.1 prevents additional messages from being delivered. Please resend your 
4.2.1 message at a later time.

In 2019, three terrorist manifestos were uploaded to 8chan. The terrorists in Christchurch, New Zealand, Poway, California, and El Paso, Texas, used 8chan to upload their manifestos. Between all three attacks, over 70 people died. Here is an archive of the ChristChurch massacre with the original post by the shooter Brenton Tarrant:  https://archive.st/archive/2019/3/8ch.net/7s0s/8ch.net/pol/res/12916717.html

 WaPo reported that 8chan is an incubator for mass shooters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/08/04/three-mass-shootings-this-year-began-with-hateful-screed-chan-its-founder-calls-it-terrorist-refuge-plain-sight/
 
As a result, 8chan was removed from many major American networks. It was deplatformed by Tucows, CloudFlare and Epik in August; and from Zare (UK) as "8kun" in October.
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2019/08/05/tucows-drops-8chan-domain-registration-after-el-paso-shooting/#294385f9ffbf
https://blog.cloudflare.com/terminating-service-for-8chan/
 
All competent observers agree that 8kun is no different than 8chan, and is a bad faith rebrand to try to evade bans.
 
https://www.cnet.com/news/controversial-site-8chan-tries-to-return-under-8kun-name/
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmj8y4/inside-the-war-to-kill-off-8chan-and-crush-qanon
 
Here is a live shot of 8KUN on your customer’s server showing how it looks identical to 8ch.net but with a new logo: https://i.imgur.com/IO286XB.png - Compare to 8ch: https://i.imgur.com/abX8tuY.jpg

8chan was known to host and promote content that is in violation of your acceptable use policy, this includes regular images and video of murder, including the 51 victims of the Christchurch massacre. Most notably 8chan violates on a daily basis your “Offensive Content” ban:

- Threats of physical harm, excessively violent material that incites violence, threatens violence, or contains harassing content or hate speech;
- Material that is defamatory or violates a person's privacy;
- Material that promotes terrorism or any kind of ethnic, social or religious discord;
 
Last week Alibaba refused to do business with 8chan: https://twitter.com/luica/status/1185723871229550592

Since then, 8chan's owner, Jim Watkins, and his son, Ron Watkins, have become more and more desperate to find a host. Chinese hosting companies Alibaba and Tencent both said "no" to 8chan under the name "8kun" as well.
 
They are now setup to use your network as their host to engage primarily in discussions that are in direct violation of your acceptable use policy: https://www.servers.com/legal/policies#5_acceptable_use_policy
 
I hope that you will not allow them to do this to you, as allowing them services has already indirectly caused real people to lose their lives around the world. 8chan is a breeding ground for extremism, and is reaching a public safety threat not far from that posed by ISIS or other terrorist groups. We urge you to stand against the type of “free speech” Jim Watkins and 8chan/8kun are offering. I hope you also consider carefully that members of the US congress have indicated they may pass a law that changes how Section 230 would apply to hate speech and to make tech companies liable. This legislation is coming. You have an opportunity to be on the right side of history with this issue. We hope you’ll take it.

If I do not get a response from you within 24 hours I will promptly contact your upstream provider to seek assistance.
 
Thank you for reading,
[YOUR NAME]
 
Last edited:
Already DDoSed or just a shitty launch with a weak server and lots of interest?

Well the TOR site loads quick for me. But posting timesout and if you to manage to get a post through it takes like 30mins to show up in the thread. I don't know how the site works but with that I would guess that they are DOSing the database somehow.

What ever is bogging it down can't be legitimate traffic because there arn't 100's of posts showing up every minute. The post counter is barely moving.
tor.png
 
Yep. It's all hands on deck! Our boy @L33TGUY noticed that 8kun's host is ducking their emails, so now he wants to 'speak to the manager'.
View attachment 994557
Ya 4 or 5 likes. A bot, hw, an ircfag, and himself from his pedochan account. Ron puts out useless low-effort tweets and gets tons of upboats.
And they have been reduced to begging others to send emails now.



Also last night Jim's creepy vlog was just him singing 'And he WALKS with me' and then talking about how good it felt to go for a WALK to blow off steam or meditate. Edit: also I just noticed the thumbnail is a non-walking COW.
 

Attachments

  • pleaseclap.png
    pleaseclap.png
    131.2 KB · Views: 64
  • They_remember.png
    They_remember.png
    40 KB · Views: 49
Last edited:
Ya 4 or 5 likes. A bot, hw, an ircfag, and himself from his pedochan account. Ron puts out useless low-effort tweets and gets tons of upboats.
And they have been reduced to begging others to send emails now.
View attachment 994588




Also last night Jim's creepy vlog was just him singing 'And he WALKS with me' and then talking about how good it felt to go for a WALK to blow off steam or meditate. Edit: also I just noticed the thumbnail is a non-walking COW.
I'm just guessing, but Jim Watkins will sue hotwheels.
 
Also last night Jim's creepy vlog was just him singing 'And he WALKS with me' and then talking about how good it felt to go for a WALK to blow off steam or meditate.
:story: Holy cow, you weren't kidding! He's not even being that subtle about it, it's pretty much a roast dressed up as a creepy meditation instruction video.
2:55 When you need to blow off some steam, try taking a walk!
3:20 Running might be considered an advanced form of meditative Yoga. You know what I mean: even if you have never done it, you, as a human, have the potential to be good at it.
3:50 Walking, and running, are an opportunity to develop proper posture and breath control.
4:25 Of course, there are certain limits based on the shape of your bones.
...


Also: Deja vu, I've just been in this place before 🎶
herewegoagain.png

(https://archive.li/sl7HT)
 
I'm just guessing, but Jim Watkins will sue hotwheels.
DDoS is illegal in the US and Europe but the cripple expects everyone hates 8chan 8kun/Jim Watkins so much they'll overlook it. I wonder if that's true, given some prosecutors feel if you let the small things slide it will only result in bigger crime in the future.

Frederick is desperate for attention; Jim taking action against him would be a dream come true. He'd never shut up about it and milk the pity bucks for all its worth.
 
Hotwheels seems happy to take the credit either way.
View attachment 994552
(https://archive.li/PBKzm)


Yep. It's all hands on deck! Our boy @L33TGUY noticed that 8kun's host is ducking their emails, so now he wants to 'speak to the manager'.
View attachment 994557
(https://archive.li/8ORDP)
Code:
CEO: NICK DVAS  https://twitter.com/dvas He’s Russian
CEO EMAIL: nick@dvas.ru (CC HIM!)
EMAIL: ABUSE@SERVERS.COM

Domain in question: 8KUN.NET
IP in question: 62.113.112.43 via your customer VDSINA.RU

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please note that we have already contacted your downstream customer in control of this IP https://vdsina.ru via adbuse@vdsina.ru but they do not respond to emails as you can see here:

4.2.1 The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that
4.2.1 prevents additional messages from being delivered. Please resend your
4.2.1 message at a later time.

In 2019, three terrorist manifestos were uploaded to 8chan. The terrorists in Christchurch, New Zealand, Poway, California, and El Paso, Texas, used 8chan to upload their manifestos. Between all three attacks, over 70 people died. Here is an archive of the ChristChurch massacre with the original post by the shooter Brenton Tarrant:  https://archive.st/archive/2019/3/8ch.net/7s0s/8ch.net/pol/res/12916717.html

WaPo reported that 8chan is an incubator for mass shooters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/08/04/three-mass-shootings-this-year-began-with-hateful-screed-chan-its-founder-calls-it-terrorist-refuge-plain-sight/

As a result, 8chan was removed from many major American networks. It was deplatformed by Tucows, CloudFlare and Epik in August; and from Zare (UK) as "8kun" in October.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2019/08/05/tucows-drops-8chan-domain-registration-after-el-paso-shooting/#294385f9ffbf
https://blog.cloudflare.com/terminating-service-for-8chan/

All competent observers agree that 8kun is no different than 8chan, and is a bad faith rebrand to try to evade bans.

https://www.cnet.com/news/controversial-site-8chan-tries-to-return-under-8kun-name/
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmj8y4/inside-the-war-to-kill-off-8chan-and-crush-qanon

Here is a live shot of 8KUN on your customer’s server showing how it looks identical to 8ch.net but with a new logo: https://i.imgur.com/IO286XB.png - Compare to 8ch: https://i.imgur.com/abX8tuY.jpg

8chan was known to host and promote content that is in violation of your acceptable use policy, this includes regular images and video of murder, including the 51 victims of the Christchurch massacre. Most notably 8chan violates on a daily basis your “Offensive Content” ban:

- Threats of physical harm, excessively violent material that incites violence, threatens violence, or contains harassing content or hate speech;
- Material that is defamatory or violates a person's privacy;
- Material that promotes terrorism or any kind of ethnic, social or religious discord;

Last week Alibaba refused to do business with 8chan: https://twitter.com/luica/status/1185723871229550592

Since then, 8chan's owner, Jim Watkins, and his son, Ron Watkins, have become more and more desperate to find a host. Chinese hosting companies Alibaba and Tencent both said "no" to 8chan under the name "8kun" as well.

They are now setup to use your network as their host to engage primarily in discussions that are in direct violation of your acceptable use policy: https://www.servers.com/legal/policies#5_acceptable_use_policy

I hope that you will not allow them to do this to you, as allowing them services has already indirectly caused real people to lose their lives around the world. 8chan is a breeding ground for extremism, and is reaching a public safety threat not far from that posed by ISIS or other terrorist groups. We urge you to stand against the type of “free speech” Jim Watkins and 8chan/8kun are offering. I hope you also consider carefully that members of the US congress have indicated they may pass a law that changes how Section 230 would apply to hate speech and to make tech companies liable. This legislation is coming. You have an opportunity to be on the right side of history with this issue. We hope you’ll take it.

If I do not get a response from you within 24 hours I will promptly contact your upstream provider to seek assistance.

Thank you for reading,
[CODE]
CEO: NICK DVAS  https://twitter.com/dvas He’s Russian
CEO EMAIL: nick@dvas.ru (CC HIM!)
EMAIL: ABUSE@SERVERS.COM

Domain in question: 8KUN.NET
IP in question: 62.113.112.43 via your customer VDSINA.RU

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please note that we have already contacted your downstream customer in control of this IP https://vdsina.ru via adbuse@vdsina.ru but they do not respond to emails as you can see here:

4.2.1 The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that
4.2.1 prevents additional messages from being delivered. Please resend your
4.2.1 message at a later time.

In 2019, three terrorist manifestos were uploaded to 8chan. The terrorists in Christchurch, New Zealand, Poway, California, and El Paso, Texas, used 8chan to upload their manifestos. Between all three attacks, over 70 people died. Here is an archive of the ChristChurch massacre with the original post by the shooter Brenton Tarrant:  https://archive.st/archive/2019/3/8ch.net/7s0s/8ch.net/pol/res/12916717.html

WaPo reported that 8chan is an incubator for mass shooters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/08/04/three-mass-shootings-this-year-began-with-hateful-screed-chan-its-founder-calls-it-terrorist-refuge-plain-sight/

As a result, 8chan was removed from many major American networks. It was deplatformed by Tucows, CloudFlare and Epik in August; and from Zare (UK) as "8kun" in October.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2019/08/05/tucows-drops-8chan-domain-registration-after-el-paso-shooting/#294385f9ffbf
https://blog.cloudflare.com/terminating-service-for-8chan/

All competent observers agree that 8kun is no different than 8chan, and is a bad faith rebrand to try to evade bans.

https://www.cnet.com/news/controversial-site-8chan-tries-to-return-under-8kun-name/
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmj8y4/inside-the-war-to-kill-off-8chan-and-crush-qanon

Here is a live shot of 8KUN on your customer’s server showing how it looks identical to 8ch.net but with a new logo: https://i.imgur.com/IO286XB.png - Compare to 8ch: https://i.imgur.com/abX8tuY.jpg

8chan was known to host and promote content that is in violation of your acceptable use policy, this includes regular images and video of murder, including the 51 victims of the Christchurch massacre. Most notably 8chan violates on a daily basis your “Offensive Content” ban:

- Threats of physical harm, excessively violent material that incites violence, threatens violence, or contains harassing content or hate speech;
- Material that is defamatory or violates a person's privacy;
- Material that promotes terrorism or any kind of ethnic, social or religious discord;

Last week Alibaba refused to do business with 8chan: https://twitter.com/luica/status/1185723871229550592

Since then, 8chan's owner, Jim Watkins, and his son, Ron Watkins, have become more and more desperate to find a host. Chinese hosting companies Alibaba and Tencent both said "no" to 8chan under the name "8kun" as well.

They are now setup to use your network as their host to engage primarily in discussions that are in direct violation of your acceptable use policy: https://www.servers.com/legal/policies#5_acceptable_use_policy

I hope that you will not allow them to do this to you, as allowing them services has already indirectly caused real people to lose their lives around the world. 8chan is a breeding ground for extremism, and is reaching a public safety threat not far from that posed by ISIS or other terrorist groups. We urge you to stand against the type of “free speech” Jim Watkins and 8chan/8kun are offering. I hope you also consider carefully that members of the US congress have indicated they may pass a law that changes how Section 230 would apply to hate speech and to make tech companies liable. This legislation is coming. You have an opportunity to be on the right side of history with this issue. We hope you’ll take it.

If I do not get a response from you within 24 hours I will promptly contact your upstream provider to seek assistance.

Thank you for reading,
[YOUR NAME]
Dude this little gimp has turned into a real life A-Log over night. Did Jim Watkins take his wheelchair away or some shit?
 
@L33TGUY isn't a larper and admits everything on twitter
I suppose it's good to have the confirmation. I was already operating on the assumption that they were one and the same, but fair point.

Hey @L33TGUY, what do you think about all this? Penny for your thoughts?
l33tguy.png
 
DDoS is illegal in the US and Europe but the cripple expects everyone hates 8chan 8kun/Jim Watkins so much they'll overlook it. I wonder if that's true, given some prosecutors feel if you let the small things slide it will only result in bigger crime in the future.

Frederick is desperate for attention; Jim taking action against him would be a dream come true. He'd never shut up about it and tard cum the pity bucks for all its worth.
Out of interest, could Jim sue Brennan and his orbiters for tortious interference or for doing some DDoSing? In light of their latest involvement in a completely incompetent lawsuit, another one would be pretty funny. If Cuckwheels was willing to suck the dick of his enemy to help them take down Jim, I can only imagine his reaction to being served by the guy he A-logs.
 
Out of interest, could Jim sue Brennan and his orbiters for tortious interference or for doing some DDoSing? In light of their latest involvement in a completely incompetent lawsuit, another one would be pretty funny. If Cuckwheels was willing to suck the dick of his enemy to help them take down Jim, I can only imagine his reaction to being served by the guy he A-logs.
Fred's a US citizen breaking US law, which is resulting in loss/damage to another US citizen (Jim). I'm sure Jim could sue him in the US. Nothing about 8kun is illegal but what Frederick is doing is.

It would be hilarious if Jim took legal action tbh.
 
Fred's a US citizen breaking US law, which is resulting in loss/damage to another US citizen (Jim). I'm sure Jim could sue him in the US. Nothing about 8kun is illegal but what Frederick is doing is.

It would be hilarious if Jim took legal action tbh.
If he's having a fit now over the fact that Jim actually managed to get it up and running (with the TOR version working perfectly), then he will shit himself in anger from being sent litigation. That would be the ultimate irony, his crusade gets him back into the spotlight and is used against him. Though he's fucking broke, so I don't know what Jim would want from him. One of these injunctions to say "stop fucking with my business" or whatever the US equivalent is would be more fitting.
 
If he's having a fit now over the fact that Jim actually managed to get it up and running (with the TOR version working perfectly), then he will shit himself in anger from being sent litigation. That would be the ultimate irony, his crusade gets him back into the spotlight and is used against him. Though he's fucking broke, so I don't know what Jim would want from him. One of these injunctions to say "stop fucking with my business" or whatever the US equivalent is would be more fitting.
Social Security benefits can be garnished, being a cripple or poor doesn't give you immunity from legal judgments.
 
Social Security benefits can be garnished, being a cripple or poor doesn't give you immunity from legal judgments.

Social Security disability can't be garnished. It's against the law to try. (Exceptions, Social Security fraud, child support, back taxes, criminal penalties.)
 
Back