- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
No problem, it's just a lot parallels in the way it's happening in both communities. Sorry for the derail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah don't sweat it, it's all culture wars, so you're gonna see a lot of Deja Vu everywhere, it's just that I want to keep the thread as sharp and info-dense as possible.No problem, it's just a lot parallels in the way it's happening in both communities. Sorry for the derail.
Interesting, I never came across this one yet.. Was he involved in any major events so far? Or does he just sperg-out and shake his fist at the sky?And now we have one of the militant Anti-CG spergs (that i don't think has been featured here yet):
![]()
Nick, Andrew, and Josh make the trinty of militant butthurt anti-CGers. I will have more on Josh and Andrew soon, I'm currently busy with some other stuff:Interesting, I never came across this one yet.. Was he involved in any major events so far? Or does he just sperg-out and shake his fist at the sky?
Jesus, that's everything wrong with political comics in a nutshell. Who the hell needs all these labels including the ones on T'Challa and Diana? I'd be surprised if there was some remote village in Africa that didn't know what Wonder Woman looked like at this point. The stuff about that having nothing to do with comics has already been said.
It is from The Onion.Jesus, that's everything wrong with political comics in a nutshell. Who the hell needs all these labels including the ones on T'Challa and Diana? I'd be surprised if there was some remote village in Africa that didn't know what Wonder Woman looked like at this point. The stuff about that having nothing to do with comics has already been said.
The ultimate irony of that "political" cartoon is that it acts as though that WW and BP making boatloads of money are somehow wins for the female and black demographics respectively when in reality the profit made from those big blockbusters are only lining the pockets of the already ultra rich Hollywood execs and actors who don't give a fuck about the struggles of the common people outside of how to cater to them for more money.I got this from a Comicsgate tweet during the Black Panther craziness:
Tweet (Archive)
![]()
CG reacts to that tweet:
![]()
![]()
And now we have one of the militant Anti-CG spergs (that i don't think has been featured here yet):
![]()
Nick has to preach against the Evil Comicsgate EVERYDAY:
![]()
I attached the screnshots in case the Spoiler img links fail:![]()
![]()
LOL. So superhero films didn't make mad bank until a black man and a woman starred in them?
Is it? It's hard to tell nowadays.It is from The Onion.
The ultimate irony of that "political" cartoon is that it acts as though that WW and BP making boatloads of money are somehow wins for the female and black demographics respectively when in reality the profit made from those big blockbusters are only lining the pockets of the already ultra rich Hollywood execs and actors who don't give a fuck about the struggles of the common people outside of how to cater to them for more money.
Bragging about profits as a "win" for social justice or whatever has always been fucking exceptional; you can bleat about "muh representation" all you want but at the end of the day a sanitized Hollywood product isn't gonna do shit about the sorry state of the school system or get more women in STEM.
https://www.theonion.com/up-up-and-astray-1823159422Is it? It's hard to tell nowadays.
Ideally, someone happy to churn out formulaic dreck for a steady paycheck.Look what they're looking for in the first place. What kind of people would write and draw comics based on shitty toys?
LMAO, Poe's Law. Now I don't even know if it was used sarcastically or not in that tweet.
I forgot to answer your questions.Interesting, I never came across this one yet.. Was he involved in any major events so far? Or does he just sperg-out and shake his fist at the sky?
You know what's fucked up? Before I saw this, my first thought when looking at bum-ass Pete in this issue was "he looks like a fucking heroin addict OD'ing". Thanks for bringing my mental image to life dude.
What... What am I looking at here? Is that a legitimate page from spider-man? He's wearing that shirt but also making a move the needle reference and calling himself the world's biggest loser while he apparently shoots up - is this supposed to be aimed at someone or did the writer and artist just flip out autistically?
It's a real panel but the needle is edited in, and they changed what Peter said.What... What am I looking at here? Is that a legitimate page from spider-man? He's wearing that shirt but also making a move the needle reference and calling himself the world's biggest loser while he apparently shoots up - is this supposed to be aimed at someone or did the writer and artist just flip out autistically?
The weird thing about Spidey is he always was pretty damn smart and had marketable skills that often got ignored in the comics. After all, as a teenager he used a mix of chemicals and other stuff from a science kit he had to make an industrial strength adhesive that was self dissolvable. He also gadgeted up a device to spray it as strands or webbing from hand using a bevy of spare parts. Him being a CEO is shortsighted, but I wouldn't have minded a Pete that became a Starktech man with his own design team... in competent hands.It's a plotline of Spiderman becoming CEO of a big industry (a tony stark affiliate I think?) and then falling miserably and having to live on the shoulders of his feminist girlfriend (the tshirt is hers and it's a reference to a sadly famous cover). The idea of Spiderman being a billionaire CEO was idiotic in the first place, since being the everyday guy is half of his shtick, but I digress.