- Joined
- Feb 3, 2019
I'm not quite sure what point he's even trying to make. If people are willing to voluntarily pay even more money on top of the MSRP for a one-off book they really want, why shouldn't the creator roll around in the money? It's not like they're doing anything underhanded, there is no sweatshop or dishonesty involved. If people can individually fart out one book per year, and survive off that, I don't see how that's worse than a whole team of people churning out endless books at an R. L. Stine pace. Oh, wait, this couldn't possibly be another industry shill. Of course the people who got booted from regular publishing like to brag that they can still reach an audience.
And Dead Beats looks like it will be the most cliche detritus seen since MySpace was a thing.
It's only confusing if you take those tweets on face value, they're not some manifesto on how to 'crowdfund the Communist way', they're the blustering, pre-emptive excuses for the fact that TUG will lap these losers several times over in the crowdfunding stakes.
And he's so embarrassed by that fact, he feels the need to point out that 'he never intended making more then his funding goal anyways, so there!'. These tweets are nothing but a face saving exercise. If their boring anthology made a million bucks he'd be singing a very different tune.
That tweet thread is an ode to fear and failure, and so is the SJW fondness for anthology books with dozens of people working on them, they love those because when their book inevitably makes no money, nobody's really to blame, because they all failed together collectively, (but at least they have something for their portfolio)... oh, wait, perhaps it is a 'crowdfunding the Communist way' manifesto after all.....
Last edited: