- Joined
- May 23, 2019
How did John Wayne Gacy manage to bury like 30 kids under his house when he was physically too big to even get down there?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please link your sources.The Boy in the Box’s name has finally been revealed. I don’t know if there are any photos available of him when he was alive, but he has his name back.
Rest in peace, Joseph Augustus Zarelli (January 13, 1953 - February 1957). Here’s to hoping your killer is identified.
It was 55 years ago. I am doubtful that the killer is even still alive. Unless there was some sort of deathbed confession, sadly this case will remain unsolved.Please link your sources.
His name is Joseph Augustus Zarelli, and he was believed to be from the western part of Philadelphia. He had just turned four. His parents are both deceased, and their names have not been released as to protect the identities of Joseph's siblings who are still alive. The police still consider this case an active homicide investigation, and taking tips, and there's a $20,000 reward for any that lead to the arrest, and conviction of the person, or persons who killed him.
View attachment 4027914
65 years agoIt was 55 years ago. I am doubtful that the killer is even still alive. Unless there was some sort of deathbed confession, sadly this case will remain unsolved.
I don't really know anything about this case but based on the descriptions in the article and elsewhere I would bet money it was one / both of the parents. Given that they are both dead I wonder if they will even bother announcing it if they can confirm the parents did the crime.It was 55 years ago. I am doubtful that the killer is even still alive. Unless there was some sort of deathbed confession, sadly this case will remain unsolved.
Sorry about that.Please link your sources.
That's wild. It's ridiculous the police just because a history of mental illness. As if someone who had to go through that wouldn't go at least a little crazy.We've had a lot of Does I follow this year identified, not necessarily solved but identified is always such a great thing to see when it happens! El Dorado Jane Doe and Christmas Tree Lady are two I don't see mentioned often but I was just elated to see them finally get their names back.
With all the news about the Boy in the Box finally being identified, one thing that has always confused me in the 13+ years I've known about it. A woman came forward with her account of what happened to him and details known only to police, and they brushed her off because she apparently had a history of mental illness, and were "unable to verify her story". It seems so strange to me that she could know so many details of the case that had not been released to the public and still not be taken seriously.
Another theory was brought forward in February 2002 by a woman identified only as "Martha." Police considered her story to be plausible but were troubled by her testimony, as she had a history of mental illness. "M" claimed that her abusive mother had "purchased" the unknown boy (whose name was Jonathan) from his birth parents in the summer of 1954. Subsequently, the boy was subjected to extreme physical and sexual abuse for two and a half years. One evening at dinner, the boy vomited up his meal of baked beans and was given a severe beating, with his head slammed against the floor until he was semiconscious. He was given a bath, during which he died. These details matched information known only to the police, as the coroner had found that the boy's stomach contained the remains of baked beans and that his fingers were water-wrinkled.
"M"'s mother cut the boy's distinctive long hair (accounting for the unprofessional haircut which police noted in their initial investigation) in an effort to conceal his identity. "M"'s mother forced "M" to assist her in dumping the boy's body in the Fox Chase area. "M" said that as they were preparing to remove the boy's body from the trunk of a car, a passing male motorist pulled alongside to inquire whether they needed help. "M" was ordered to stand in front of the car's license plate to shield it from view while the mother convinced the would-be Good Samaritan that there was no problem. The man eventually drove off. This story corroborated confidential testimony given by a male witness in 1957, who said that the body had been placed in a box previously discarded at the scene.
He had two younger men who worked for him for a long time that were often tasked with digging in the crawlspace, and other various other spaces on the property (the bbq pit, etc). Their names escape me at the moment, but in the considered opinion of todays investigators they really should have been pressed harder. They must have known something strange was happening at that house, and one of the men even had sex with Gacy sometimes/might have had sex with Gacy's victims. If I recall correctly, that same man even ended up with a victims car.How did John Wayne Gacy manage to bury like 30 kids under his house when he was physically too big to even get down there?
A man who Gacy for some reason released, Jeffrey Rignall, reported waking up briefly to find himself bound to a frame and a man who was not Gacy performing oral sex on him, if memory serves.He had two younger men who worked for him for a long time that were often tasked with digging in the crawlspace, and other various other spaces on the property (the bbq pit, etc). Their names escape me at the moment, but in the considered opinion of todays investigators they really should have been pressed harder. They must have known something strange was happening at that house, and one of the men even had sex with Gacy sometimes/might have had sex with Gacy's victims. If I recall correctly, that same man even ended up with a victims car.
Good God that's awful. Gotta wonder if everyone in the "artist's" life are just to polite to tell them that they're terrible? Feel like it might be up to me to track this person down and let them know that they're a failureFairfax Jane Doe has been identified. I complained how hideous the composite sketch was earlier in the thread, so now I'm glad the person has been identified, though most of it's because I never have to see that hideous sketch ever again.
![]()
After 27 years, Fairfax County Jane Doe (1993) is Identified
Fairfax County Police Department Partners with Othram to Identify 1993 Jane Doednasolves.com
Sounds pretty clear to me. The parents were separated, the mother was distraught enough to commit suicide. She most likely killed Timmothy because she didn't have custody. Saying you'll "never find him" and "he's with people who love him" etc... he's in Heaven. He's dead. Otherwise why would she kill herself? She was joining him.Timmothy Pitzen's case is strange. His mom took him out of class. They went on a small roadtrip to a waterpark. The Mom is seen checking in with the Kid, but he just disappears. Then the mom killers herself. She wrote in her suicide not that Tim is "with people who would love and care for him" and "You'll never find him". IIRC, some Teen showed up a few years ago saying he was Tim, but his DNA wasn't a match..
Already posted about this story on another thread, but I thought it was perfect for here because it combines a longstanding missing-person case, an almost-certain murder that's still unsolved, and the paranormal: Marie Elizabeth Spannhake.
(There's a good, recent Unsolved Mysteries episode about it if you're not into reading the article above.)
It is an extremely freaky case, but it's not going anywhere in a hurry, unfortunately. With the skeleton of the woman missing, there's really nothing anyone can do. And even if it does turn up, how could you prove it really is the remains of the woman in the tree? The last few years have seen some incredible advancements in forensic technology, but I fear that Bella will never have her real name back.I keep hoping they'll run DNA on Bella in the Wych Elm just because it would be crazy if the graffiti really was linked to her or if she was involved in German spying or something. In all likelyhood she's just some girl from the next village over who was raped and strangled in war time and stuffed in a tree and some cheeky teenagers did the graffiti just for laughs but still, it's a strange case all around.
I have so many questions:
1) Is this the guy? An unfired round from a semi is REALLY shaky evidence. The round wasn't even fired.
Fired round 'Fingerprinting' is voodoo science at best. Mass manufacture leads to thousands of identical 'fingerprints'.
But an unfired round is literally matching scratches that are identical to thousands of units.
I've watched a lot of true crime TV shows and what gets repeated a lot in regard to bullet fingerprinting is that every time a gun is made, there are imperfections in the manufacturing that causes each bullet to have different striations.1) Is this the guy? An unfired round from a semi is REALLY shaky evidence. The round wasn't even fired.
Fired round 'Fingerprinting' is voodoo science at best. Mass manufacture leads to thousands of identical 'fingerprints'.
But an unfired round is literally matching scratches that are identical to thousands of units.
So it used to be unique. Is this even accurate anymore?Prior to mass production of firearms, each barrel and bullet mold was hand made by gunsmiths making them unique.
Reading further there doesn't seem to be many studies that actually tests the accuracy of this evidence. I guess it gets canned because it may call into question thousands of convictions. If every examiner has different methods of doing this, I can't see it being very reliable as a whole.Further criticism came from the 2009 NAS report on the current state of various forensic fields in the United States. The report's section on firearm examination focused on the lack of defined requirements that are necessary in order to determine "matches" between known and unknown striations. The NAS stated that, "sufficient studies have not been done to understand the reliability and repeatability of the methods."[29]: 154 Without defined procedures on what is and what isn't considered "sufficient agreement" the report states that forensic firearm examination contains fundamental problems that need to be addressed by the forensic community through a set of repeatable scientific studies that outline standard operating procedures that should be adopted by all firearm examiners.[29]: 155 Another report issued in 2016 by the United States President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology confirmed the NAS's findings, finding only one appropriately designed study that examined the rate of false positives and reliability amongst firearm examiners.[48]
What happens when a murder weapon is shot a bunch of times after it was used in a murder? Does it lead to false negatives?Although bullet striations are individualized unique evidence, microscopic striations in the barrel of the weapon are subject to change slightly, after each round that is fired. For this reason, forensic ballistics examiners may not fire more than five shots from a weapon found at a scene.
The main guy from this channel is being prosecuted for allegedly raping his 9-year-old cousin.Yea its pretty cool this channel had some good ones: