DailyDiapers Forums

Just generally try to avoid shitting yourself in public, I can't believe I'm having to say this.

B-but the shitlover doesn't hurt u!1 Sure he might smell really really really gross but it's a harmless fetish! Yes human feces can make you sick but that's not as bad as Nick Bate! Don't judge the harmless shitloving person who might come in contact with you and doesn't wash their hands.

Btw I'm NOT a Whiteknight!1
 
It's not consensual when the shitter is literally shitting themself while in a public place.... Or someplace like work. They are forcing people to be around themselves as they shit or piss themself. That unsanitary and gross. It's one thing if they can't help it for medical reasons, it's a whole other thing if they do it for sexual reasons.

I wouldn't let someone with a fetish for wearing diapers or playing with shit anywhere near me. I'd at least go near Chris or PixyTeri.... Hell, I'd probably be ok with being in the same room as Vade or Harel ... But a diaper/piss/poop lover/fucker/fetisher...fuck that.

So question: would YOU be ok with someone who was horny, standing in their own shitty/pissed diapers, serve you a meal at a restaurant?

If you'd read my posts, I made it very clear that people who publicize their fetishes (particularly disgusting ones) should expect to be shunned by society. That was never my argument. That's just how society works, and that's how society should work. Furthermore, someone shitting their pants at work and then serving you food is illegal (there are hygiene codes in any food establishment which employees are obligated to follow) in most every state anyways, so no, that is not okay and I never made any point to the contrary. You're completely missing my point. I'll do you a favor and repeat it:

Do you think every single person with a sexual fetish takes that fetish outside the bedroom? Do you have any idea how many completely "normal" people around you are into some extremely weird sexual behavior? Plenty of people with fetishes far more extreme than this one will keep their sex at home because MOST people, yes, even sexual "deviants", are logical people who don't want to endanger their jobs or their reputations.

For every 1 idiot who wears a diaper to work and shits his pants there, there's probably 100 with the same fetish who keep it in their bedroom, and making sweeping generalizations about an entire group of people is fucking asinine (particularly the ones who know to keep their sexual behaviors private). Even worse when those generalizations are very, very stupid ones (this fetish is the same thing as pedophilia). If that's the case, then rape fetishists are all rapists and people into violence are all abusive criminals.

Any sound-minded adult realizes that this is not the case. What people do in their bedroom, so long as they keep it in their bedrooms and with a consensual partner who isn't at risk of harm, doesn't concern anyone.

ABDL is usually on the same level as Nick Bate or TJ Church when it comes to sexual and public deviancy like this.

Because someone who likes wearing diapers to bed is the same level as a fucking child rapist? Are you out of your mind?

B-but the shitlover doesn't hurt u!1 Sure he might smell really really really gross but it's a harmless fetish! Yes human feces can make you sick but that's not as bad as Nick Bate! Don't judge the harmless shitloving person who might come in contact with you and doesn't wash their hands.

Btw I'm NOT a Whiteknight!1

There's a reason I ignore you, and it has everything to do with you clearly being too stupid to speak intelligently, much less argue.
 
Last edited:
There's a reason I ignore you, and it has everything to do with you clearly being too stupid to speak intelligently, much less argue.

Maybe I'm a little slow, but I think I just figured this guy out.

Chess_piece_-_White_knight.JPG
 
...
We're talking about an adult baby fetish site, man. It ain't that serious. I just have my views against generalizations and I like to argue them - nothing personal against people who disagree with that and at the end of the day it's just a couple of forum posts on a silly board.

Except for people who say this is the same thing as Nick Bate, that's twisted because what he did was very real and very harmful.
Why is this the hill you wanna die on? Just wondering.
 
We're talking about an adult baby fetish site, man. It ain't that serious. I just have my views against generalizations and I like to argue them - nothing personal against people who disagree with that and at the end of the day it's just a couple of forum posts on a silly board.

Except for people who say this is the same thing as Nick Bate, that's twisted because what he did was very real and very harmful.

If you get so butthurt at us, Why are you even here?

Seriously, if you don't like us talking about people who like to shit their pants (and have tutorials on how to damage your body to facilitate this) in a bad light
maybe you should go to a place like Icanhascheezburger or 9gag for thin skinned crybabies like you
 
Reminds me of some ageplayer who got butthurt at me because I expressed my hatred of the ABDL community due to being stalked by a couple of members and their habits, and blocking an ABDL on DA. She tried to defend the fetish as well, and even went as far as to call me a troll.

She clearly doesn't get that not everyone will tolerate this crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meowthkip
For the record I said that ABDL is borderline pedophiliac. As in, not the same thing, but almost there. Of course actual child rapists are worse. But still, it creeps me out to no end that these people exist.

You can say that they're consenting adults, but by that logic, if two people want to mutilate and permanently disfigure each other in the bedroom, they should be allowed to. Do you see how insane that is?
 
(I haven't actually checked the forum, but I'm guessing here).

we told you to click the links
All of the evidence is on the site, however you completely refuse to go there for some reason
Why? Why do you refuse to accept our evidence?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FramerGirl420
If you'd read my posts, I made it very clear that people who publicize their fetishes (particularly disgusting ones) should expect to be shunned by society. That was never my argument. That's just how society works, and that's how society should work. Furthermore, someone shitting their pants at work and then serving you food is illegal (there are hygiene codes in any food establishment which employees are obligated to follow) in most every state anyways, so no, that is not okay and I never made any point to the contrary. You're completely missing my point. I'll do you a favor and repeat it:

Do you think every single person with a sexual fetish takes that fetish outside the bedroom? Do you have any idea how many completely "normal" people around you are into some extremely weird sexual behavior? Plenty of people with fetishes far more extreme than this one will keep their sex at home because MOST people, yes, even sexual "deviants", are logical people who don't want to endanger their jobs or their reputations.

For every 1 idiot who wears a diaper to work and shits his pants there, there's probably 100 with the same fetish who keep it in their bedroom, and making sweeping generalizations about an entire group of people is fucking asinine (particularly the ones who know to keep their sexual behaviors private). Even worse when those generalizations are very, very stupid ones (this fetish is the same thing as pedophilia). If that's the case, then rape fetishists are all rapists and people into violence are all abusive criminals.

Any sound-minded adult realizes that this is not the case. What people do in their bedroom, so long as they keep it in their bedrooms and with a consensual partner who isn't at risk of harm, doesn't concern anyone.



Because someone who likes wearing diapers to bed is the same level as a fucking child rapist? Are you out of your mind?



There's a reason I ignore you, and it has everything to do with you clearly being too stupid to speak intelligently, much less argue.
You are sounding like a broken record and you are derailing the thread. You made your feelings known and while I agree with you that diaper fetish does not automatically mean pedophilia, but this is a site where we mock the extreme. We focus on those who take their obsession too far to the point where they become interesting. The ones who give the illusion of normality are not on our radar because they are boring.
 
You can say that they're consenting adults, but by that logic, if two people want to mutilate and permanently disfigure each other in the bedroom, they should be allowed to. Do you see how insane that is?

There is a man who killed another one with his consent and ate him. They had a cannibalism fetish. Totally ok because they were consenting adults. Am I right???????1!!1
 
Do you think every single person with a sexual fetish takes that fetish outside the bedroom? Do you have any idea how many completely "normal" people around you are into some extremely weird sexual behavior? Plenty of people with fetishes far more extreme than this one will keep their sex at home because MOST people, yes, even sexual "deviants", are logical people who don't want to endanger their jobs or their reputations.

I'm curious, what would you describe as a "far more extreme" fetish than permanent incontinence and being turned on by human waste?

For every 1 idiot who wears a diaper to work and shits his pants there, there's probably 100 with the same fetish who keep it in their bedroom, and making sweeping generalizations about an entire group of people is fucking asinine (particularly the ones who know to keep their sexual behaviors private). Even worse when those generalizations are very, very stupid ones (this fetish is the same thing as pedophilia). If that's the case, then rape fetishists are all rapists and people into violence are all abusive criminals.

Any sound-minded adult realizes that this is not the case. What people do in their bedroom, so long as they keep it in their bedrooms and with a consensual partner who isn't at risk of harm, doesn't concern anyone.

Intentionally disabling yourself in order to indulge a fetish is definitely a form of self-harm. Therefore, by your own standards, what DDF advocates is enough for us to be validated in our concerns.

There's a reason I ignore you, and it has everything to do with you clearly being too stupid to speak intelligently, much less argue.

Oh hi, Marijan.

We're talking about an adult baby fetish site, man. It ain't that serious. I just have my views against generalizations and I like to argue them - nothing personal against people who disagree with that and at the end of the day it's just a couple of forum posts on a silly board.

A man who isn't taking this forum seriously said:
There's a reason I ignore you, and it has everything to do with you clearly being too stupid to speak intelligently, much less argue.
 
Back