Orbiter DarkSydePhil A-Logs General - Infighting and Cringe Galore (Sons of Kojima, et al)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Will suprczy actually file a lolsuit against Philip Paul Burnell?

  • Yes

    Votes: 46 19.9%
  • No

    Votes: 199 86.1%

  • Total voters
    231
DSP flat out says he did the claim on purpose in the video he posted and then retracted the takedown when "he learned his lesson" months later.
Given that he has retracted the takedown, this could be an obstacle for suprcrzy's "plan". Whatever, he's exercising his rights here since he was kicked from the partner program as a result, supposedly.

The way he's trying to raise money for it is not ideal, because for one in the description he's giving the impression that he has solid grounds since it will "cost DSP a lot of money", paraphrased, but it is also amusing people here rejecting the idea that he should be able to pursue legal action for potential negligent/malicious intent on DSP's part.
 
710C9BE8-E271-44AF-8FEC-CABC4670EF18.jpeg90A8B6CA-55DE-45D4-B57E-04FDD02E564A.jpeg
Phil apparently discussed this situation on stream a bit ago, but I can’t find a clip
 
If you gave Phil and Supercry an IQ test I guarantee you Phil would score higher. Probably only by like 2-3 points but Phil would beat him for sure.
 
View attachment 6357729View attachment 6357730
Phil apparently discussed this situation on stream a bit ago, but I can’t find a clip
I've posted clips in the MATI thread. Phil was informed Suprcrzy was going to sue and Phil initially thought it was something from 2015. The chat eventually told him it was from 2022, so Phil pulled it up on stream, pointed out that it says "inactive," and ripped hard on Suprcrzy, saying that "the King's court has needed some jesters!"

Suprcrzy is spamming INACTIVE because Phil said anytime Suprcrzy brings this lawsuit or the copyright claim up that people should spam Suprcrzy with the fact that Phil retracted the claim and it's now inactive.
 
I've posted clips in the MATI thread. Phil was informed Suprcrzy was going to sue and Phil initially thought it was something from 2015. The chat eventually told him it was from 2022, so Phil pulled it up on stream, pointed out that it says "inactive," and ripped hard on Suprcrzy, saying that "the King's court has needed some jesters!"

Suprcrzy is spamming INACTIVE because Phil said anytime Suprcrzy brings this lawsuit or the copyright claim up that people should spam Suprcrzy with the fact that Phil retracted the claim and it's now inactive.
Imagine Phil shitting on you for being a retard, and actually be correct. What a hellscape.
 
I enjoyed some of supercrzy's videos in the past but all this information on him is just wild. His hypocrisy towards Phil is just obvious now and dumb. He brought up Phil's drinking at least a few times in the past while he himself has a worse history of alcohol abuse and alcohol related crimes. I knew his a-logs were weird but damn.

Why are so many DSP a-logs such vile disgusting people
I think people on the Internet tend to orbit people they can relate to in some way.
(Chantal's a-logs tend to be (fat) women. Bossmanjack's tend to be gambling addicts. KingcobraJFS's troles tend to be retards. Gordon Paille's a-logs tend to be pedophiles and trannies)
It just so happens that DSP a-logs relate to Phil's bad traits such as lying, grifting, and just being an asshole in general. They also seem to feel justified in their actions, much like a crusader oddly enough. A kind, caring, genuinely good person wouldn't be an a-log to begin with, so that just leaves the "dregs of society" as has been said before.
 
I hope suprcrzy rides into court wearing a cowboy hat with a bandanna around his mouth to remind everyone of his train robber past.
 
Back
Top Bottom