Dave Hopkins - Furry Rape Fetishist

[Twilight Sparkle]

..... I remember seeing this dudes comics when I was younger. Y'know, people love cute animals n shit. I was about 11-12 years old. I fucking cried in the fetal position all night as far as I can remember, and I kept reading because of reasons. Even now looking at it, I feel slightly unsettled.

I remember him back when he started in Internet 1.0, I was super into terrible fanfiction and awful webcomics. I just saw it as weird
I'm honestly suprised if he is still doing this, is he still drawing furry crap to this day?

 

[Meowthkip]

While they made some fantastic points and were probably the best source for Hopkins info, they did succumb to the tumblr virus in the end. There was a time when they accepted riffs using the word "exceptional individual." Toward the end of their life they stopped accepting "offensive riffs" that "punch down" at people with disabilities. One of their more recent riffs included such memorable lines as "the not-all-men-osaurus" and "Dave thinks misandery is real." When called out on their bullshit Kate only retreated deeper into their hugbox.

In a way I'm kind of glad Dave shut them down before they could go full exceptional individual. The last riff they posted was filled with nothing but unfunny random access humor. Unfortunately we also lost all of their classic riffs. Megan's Dumb Part 1 & 2 will always hold a special place in my heart.

When you're on Tumblr, it's very easy to bend under the will of the SJ order. Guilt is pretty powerful on that site, friend.

I will miss those riffs, though.

That song he butchered is by The Nails, not Nine Inch Nails, not that he didn't shoehorn NIN lyrics into his older arcs all the time.

Someone paid him $51 to draw this

Spoiler

View attachment 33759

Whoooops, my mistake. I thought it sounded odd. I figured it was some weird B-side or a collab or something.

 

[Johnny Bravo]

$20 dollars for this, he couldn't at least fix the face for $20 dollars?

Spoiler

View attachment 33763View attachment 33764

What do you mean "fix"? It's just his style.

One of the reasons Jack got so big was because of all the cameos from popular furfags. One of his first comics features a couple named Trixi and Tet who Dave know IRL. Apparently they had a really positive reputation in the fandom because that particular arc got him a lot of attention. Dave isn't popular because of Jack. He's popular because he has (had?) popular friends.

 

[Molasses Assassin]

I remember him back when he started in Internet 1.0, I was super into terrible fanfiction and awful webcomics. I just saw it as weird
I'm honestly suprised if he is still doing this, is he still drawing furry crap to this day?

he's still active on his FA page, and he says he's going to start working on ending Jack when he's finished his "The Wall" project. And yeah, he actually does still have some real fans.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

This thread seems a little dead and I want to resurrect it. Here's a review I wrote of David's first arc back in January 2014. (Beware, this review is 2914 words long.) Also, I haven't saved David's comic. My apologies.

Spoiler: The review.

Hello, everyone.

First off, in my opinion, I don’t think Jack’s first arc is all that bad. I think it could have been much better, as shown by artist-guy on Tumblr. But I feel as if David did fairly well with this little endeavour of his.

The art is quite good, with a nice scratchy look. And it’s in colour! And that first page; those wicked eyes! Those devilish fingers. I’m being honest when I say that the first arc has a really nice look to it.

In my opinion that first page of Jack did more for the comic than any other. Words are irrelevant because that image alone represents the feeling I think is most important when it comes to Jack; the feeling of evil and looming cruelty. What is ‘Jack’ about? ‘Jack’ is about murder, rape, Hell, the world’s strongest evil and the dark side of religion. This first image may not speak of religion and Hell but fuck me does it portray evil flawlessly! Inarguably the greatest thing to come out of the entirety of ‘Jack’ is its first page.

However, after the first image, how good is this arc truly? Well, honestly, I feel that it does a decent job of showing Fnar’s death as an unborn. Fnar looks creepy, delightfully ugly in fact, and it even shows Fnar tugging onto his umbilical cord as he drowns out in the darkness, a good symbol for death; falling, drowning. Ooh it’s good. A little grammatical misstep with “Where are you[,] mother[?],” but whatever. We all make mistakes.

Next we Jack collecting Fnar; Death; the Grim Reaper; and the fucking Ferryman himself. This is the dude no one want to meet when the die.

This page develops Fnar as this young innocent child who has died before birth. Instantly the atmosphere of ‘Jack’ is portrayed rather well. I admire David in how to-the-point this first arc is concerning its topic material. However, I do dislike how Fnar is able to talk. You learn how to talk if you are born through your parents and community. People aren’t born with language, they are born with the ability to learn language. Furthermore, how does Fnar know what playing is? Fnar is a foetus, not a child. Fnar knows literally nothing at this point. Fnar also ages rather quickly. Why this age, David? What is Fnar? Eight? Why not eighteen? And how does Fnar grow and in what environment has Fnar instantly grown up in in order to give him his knowledge and personality traits? Just a thought. Still, we learn about Fnar and that he’ll be spending his time with his mother. First off, we know this isn’t true because later in the comic Fnar spends relatively little time with his mother, even when she’s let off the wall for recognising her sins - that she should have been Fnar’s mother. Oh yeah… Hopkins has a thing for mothers. Goddamn. But whatever. This is early days.

And his name. Argh! Fnar? Fnar’s name is an initialism of For No Apparent Reason. I like the idea, David, but Fnar sounds ridiculous. How am I supposed to take such a sound seriously in a comic as dark as ‘Jack’? Fnar? Goddamn. In the second page Fnar said his mother and father both want him. Fnar’s father, Drip, the serial killer/rapist who currently embodies the Sin of Lust, most likely doesn’t want to settle down with a wife and a child. Perhaps this is just Fnar’s perspective, but he’s incorrect. And Fnar’s account of the truth isn’t terribly relevant to the plot of ‘Jack’ throughout its plot so why is Fnar so blatantly incorrect here? It sticks out so much that’s it’s actually rather jarring.

But here’s a compliment. The cold steal refers to Fnar death, where Fnar’s mother, Jink, was stabbed in the stomach with a knife, killing both of them. Who stabbed her, Drip or herself, I don’t know. Pretty grisly, right? You see why I used to love this comic when I was a teenager? Still, though, there seems to be a fair amount I can already question about this comic, taking into account my deep knowledge of the comic.

Also, how the fuck does Jack know Fnar’s name? Did Jink tell Jack? I would have to assume Jack’s already collected her then. Makes enough sense to me. I know Jack’s the Grim Reaper and all but he isn’t omniscient. But if a foetus can talk why the fuck would Jack knows Fnar’s name? Who wouldn’t?

‘Hey, look here, Jimothy, there’s a talking fucking foetus right here. His name’s Fnar, I think.’
‘Oh. So there is.’
‘I do say, gentlemen, I am having quite a lot of difficulty here. Would you mind picking me up and giving me to my mother right there?’
‘Goddamn this is actually really creepy.’
‘Yeah, fuck this.’

And then Santa smashes it with a hammer like he smashed the Son of Satan in that ‘South Park’ episode.

Furthermore, the art on this third page is rather appropriate; the colours are so vivid, differentiated and nice, despite the ridiculousness of Jack having green fingernails. The colours are vibrant and Jack’s face in the bottom right-hand corner is just awesome. I’m serious! It’s fucking great. Those red eyes, the shadows covering his face, the mangled, creepily bent scythe is cool as hell, and that odd strand of hair is great. I love it! However, as we all know, Jack is a rabbit with a dog’s nose! That is ridiculous!

And as a side note, Jack was the first Furry of his kind created. Now, the furries were explicitly created by man - with science! - for a - fucking still! - currently unknown reason. Well, Kane had a God complex, but that doesn’t explain any other person’s involvement. So how did anyone acquire funding? Who/whom from? Why’d they fund Kane? How did Kane attain the legal rights? Who wanted this? And much, much more. I mean, what was even the purpose of creating sentient human-like animals? I, as well as a myriad of others, are still futilely waiting for that answer.

As well as that, David’s never once tackled the topic of scientific evolution - transhumanism, h+. Like, this is a huge fucking topic, David! And with the comic centred on Christian mythology, it would be a truly interesting story, don’t you think? I mean, that’s a huge part of the problem, David. Have you ever played Deus Ex?

To finish on page three, the art’s good, except those weird fucking fingers which bend at seven points, there are many flaws in the narrative, and that wicked feel Jack has is rich in this arc! Oh, and the grammar is still very poor. Missing commas, apostrophes, bad sentence structure, the whole David Hopkins works!

Onto the fourth page!

Jack tells Fnar that he’s taking Fnar to Hell. Fnar assumes that Hell’s a bad place; how does Fnar know this? Also why? Fnar should be reborn or something, right? Furthermore, Hell won’t have any effect on Fnar? Again why? Onwards in the comic it is learned that Drip and Jink can affect Fnar because they’re Fnar’s parents. This is never truly explained why. The nature of the unexplained, which might just be a metaphor for religion, is rife within this comic; terrible storytelling.

Jack does, however, tell Fnar and the reader why Hell won’t affect him; because he’s derpy. Seriously, Fnar’s innocent and ignorant, unknowing of Hell and its content, so it can’t affect him. This is because Adam and Eve, in the Garden of Eden, were free from pain and suffering prior to when they traded innocence for knowledge. Knowledge isn’t a bad thing, we all know this. But Biblically speaking, Adam and Eve betrayed God’s trust, and now everyone else is paying for it. This idea isn’t inconceivable but it still makes little sense. This plot is flimsier than paper.

My main problem with Fnar’s expulsion to Hell is that he deserves to go to either Heaven or Earth, not Hell. Also, Fnar is in Hell, so surely Fnar will be able to learn, right? He learned about Hell being a bad place and about the English language, so obviously Fnar isn’t too ignorant of certain information. When does ignorance end? How much is too much and how much is too little?

Fnar shouldn’t be in Hell. But, alas, we eventually learn why Fnar was put in Hell; he’s part of God’s plan to get raped and give Jack someone to talk to. Farrago, an angel we’ll meet later on, had some say in getting Jack to keep Fnar in Hell. How Farrago had this say, I don’t know. But she did. Farrago isn’t important in the politics of the comic but she is important to Jack. Goddamn nepotism. Farrago forced Fnar to linger in Hell so that Jack would have some company. And all this accomplished was Fnar’s anal rape by Drip. Seriously. God kept Fnar in Hell so that Drip could rape Fnar in order for Drip’s soul and Fnar’s soul to grow. Step three, profit.

Simply put, this is just bad right now. This is just terrible. But that’s for another arc.

The art on the fourth page is pretty good. It’s creepy, unearthly, weird and unwelcoming. It’s ugly and freaky, and it reeks of evil. That’s what I loved about it, damn it! It’s a shame the storytelling is so shit.

Eventually we see Fnar meeting his mother, Jink, who’s in Hell, glued to a wall. She, apparently, David writes, is in Hell for similar reasons Jack is: Jack killed the entire human population of seven billion and Jink assisted in the rapes and murders of many innocent people alongside her partner on Earth, Drip. David, Jack is not in Hell for identical reasons to Jink. If that were the case, there should be two Grim Reapers. Oh shit, I just realised how ugly Jack’s hand looks as he’s holding his staff in the bottom left panel… actually, all the hands look fucking funky as hell! I mean, David has never been able to draw hands, but fuck me! Hands are David’s Achilles heel. But, uh, yeah. Apparently Jink and Jack are on par.

Whatever. Moving onwards. As the final point for the first arc, Fnar loses his nose to a stray bird. First off, I thought Fnar parents were the only ones that could harm Fnar! Also, how the fuck does one steal a fucking nose? Why doesn’t Fnar even seem remotely annoyed by this? Wouldn’t having your nose stolen hurt? Why’s there no blood? How and why the fuck is there a fucking raven, or whatever kind of bird it is, flying merrily around in Hell? Why would a bird steal a nose? And why the fuck would this ever happen ever?! Does Jack see the bird? If so, why doesn’t he swat it away? I don’t want to lose my nose. Why isn’t Jack or Fnar even remotely annoyed by this audacious fucking bird?

As a side note, are there any non-anthropomorphic animals in Hell, and I assume, on Earth. What do the furries on Earth think of this? How do they feel about this? What do they do about this? Imagine seeing a human being act like any animal. Apparently the humans wanted every fucking animal, insect and fish on Earth to become a sentient animal. Seriously, in the ‘Cliff’ series of comics there’s a squid-man. There are also aliens and insects. What fucking human wanted an insect to talk? In 9 Brides there’s a fucking spider. I’m serious! He’s also a bond villain, too. Again, I’m fucking serious! All the furries that exist do so because some motherfucker wanted it that well. Goddamn furries. But who thought it’d be a good idea to create a talking frog?! Who thought creating a frog-man was a good idea?! I can understand wanting to create a humanised dog or cat, but a fucking beetle or a chipmunk?

Anyway, for the fifth page, we discover that Jink didn’t want to lose Fnar and wishes she could hold him. That’s fine and all but Jink loses her pinprick eyes, the metaphor that a denizen of Hell hasn’t repented, by deciding to become Fnar’s mother later in the comic, not for all the people she helped Drip rape and murder. Murder? Abandonment of a child? Murder? Fucking off? David really has a thing for mothers. I doubt David would say the same thing for men, which is why Drip never repents, not only because he’s evil but because Hopkins’ dad didn’t run out on him, but who gives a shit? I mean, Jink helps murder and rape innumerable innocents but this is less relevant than fucking parenting. Goddamn.

And Jink said it wasn’t her choice to lose Fnar, obviously implying it was Drip’s fault, and so why is she in Hell? Jack agrees with David, too. Jack says that being a good “Mommy” might have saved her. So the goal in life is to be a parent? Well, if you’re an animal in the wild who needs to procreate in order to assist their species it is, but if you’re a person in the modern world, being a parent isn’t a necessity, it’s essentially a luxury. I mean, people are able to choose when to have kids, so how is it life-saving?

Basically, being a parent shouldn’t save your soul! Jink helping those she wronged should. They’re the people that matter. I mean, why is Jink even being punished for doing something she didn’t do? Drip killed Fnar, and Jink simultaneously, so it’s Drip who should suffer the consequences. Not Jink, David.

As a last note on the fifth page, who the fuck is that green bastard? And why the fuck is he here? Where did he come from? What the fuck is he? And why the fuck is he dressing Fnar? Shouldn’t Jack have just brought Fnar’s clothes with him? It’d save someone some avoidable hassle. Other than that, the stupid cartoony way Fnar dresses himself in the fifth page is just totally out of place.

Jesus Christ page five! But the art was decent, it just needs improvement. Fuck the story, though.

Just on the sixth page, reading, reading, reading… “I have things yet to to”… “things to to”… “to to”…

What a simple, stupid, lazy mistake.

The last page isn’t too bad, but it’s terribly impotent thanks to David’s childish sense of humour. Not really much to comment on. But something I can mention is Jack’s weird face in the bottom right-hand corner and Fnar’s gross sausage fingers.

As well as that, I hate how David only on occasion puts in a background. David, you can’t just occasionally add a background. Each arc needs backgrounds because it’s important information about the story and scene. This is something all good artists do. It’s the universal standard, David.

Final verdict? Well, in all fairness, it’s hard to say. I love art style of the first arc, especially the dark, gritty look for the first three and a half pages. That’s where Jack is at its artistic best, maybe other than The Hubbard… maybe. But after the first arc the comic just gets worse and worse. Especially when the story kicks in and the art become lighter and uncoloured. The comic just fails in every sense of Jack being gritty, ugly and aggressive.

The art is the comic’s saving grace, especially the first page, which basically sold the comic to me when I was young. The creepy, weird and unnerving style is great, but its cartoony side fucks it all up, removing a feeling of threat, danger and incorporeal ugliness. David, drop the Tiny Toon bullshit and scratch the page with your pencils, you goddamn idiot.

The story, though, is shit. Pure shit. It’s just terrible in every way and never once does it reach any serious level of accomplishment. A foetus in Hell, his father killed him, the Grim Reaper, Fnar mother stapled to the wall, a bird ripping off the kid’s nose and a green Martian. How does David fuck that up?! I don’t know. But the motherfucker found a way.

This arc is still one of the better ones because the comic gets much worse as we go on. I’d say this arc is in the top five or so.

Artist-guy on created a much better job than David did. I do wish artist-guy used colour, but that’s only a personal preference. That art is much, much better, the characters are a hell of a lot more relatable and interesting, and it’s just better all-around in every single way. The handwriting, though, and the few grammatical errors - not as many as David, though - are rather jarring, where I have to seriously squint in order to read the text. But other than that, go read artist-guy’s work. It’s much better and much more interesting.

Goodbye, everyone.

I have more of these reviews. In fact, I've reviewed literally every single arc up to date and 'When Summer Woke' and all the shorts. I've been thinking about reviewing ''9 Brides' because goddamn is that bitch funny all hell in only the best lolcow ways. That piece could easily be milked for a lot of laughs, and I mean a lotta lotta. If you like this I'll post more.

 

[BrokenEntity]

This thread seems a little dead and I want to resurrect it. Here's a review I wrote of David's first arc back in January 2014. (Beware, this review is 2914 words long.) Also, I haven't saved David's comic. My apologies.

Hello, everyone.

First off, in my opinion, I don’t think Jack’s first arc is all that bad. I think it could have been much better, as shown by artist-guy on the Kate forum. But I feel as if David did fairly well with this little endeavour of his.

Honestly. The art is quite good, with a nice scratchy look about it. It’s in colour! And that first page; those wicked eyes! Those devilish fingers. I’m being honest when I argue that the first arc has a really nice look about it.

But in my opinion, that first page of Jack did more for the comic than any other. Words and irrelevant because that image alone represents the feeling I think is most important when it comes to Jack. Because what is jack about? Jack is about murder, rape, Hell, the world’s strongest evil and the dark side of religion. This first image may not speak of religion and Hell, but fuck me does it portray evil flawlessly! Inarguably, the greatest thing to come out of the entirety of Jack.

However, after the first image, how good is it truly? Well, honestly, I feel that it does a decent job of showing Fnar’s death as an unborn. Fnar looks creepy, delightfully ugly in fact, and it even shows Fnar tugging onto his umbilical cord as he drowns out in the darkness, a good symbol for death; falling, drowning. Ooh it’s good. A little grammatical misstep with “Where are you mother[?]”, but that’s okay.

Next we have some dude collecting Fnar. This dude is called Jack, Death, the Grim Reaper and the fucking Ferryman! This is the dude no one want to die when the die. Anyhoo. This page then develops Fnar, as this young innocent child. First off, I kind of dislike how Fnar is able to talk. You learn how to talk if you are born through your parents and community. Furthermore, how does Fnar know what playing is? Fnar is a foetus, not a child. There’s a difference. Still, we learn about Fnar and that he’ll be spending his time with his mother. First off, we know this isn’t true because later in the comic Fnar spends relatively little time with his mother, even when she’s let off the wall for recognising her sins - that’s she should have been Fnar’s mother. Yeah, get used to talk about mothers in this fucking comic.

Also, what the fuck does Fnar mean? Fnar? That’s an exceedingly strange name, don’t you think? So what does it mean? Well, it means For No Apparent Reason. Right, in the second page Fnar said his mother and father both want him. Fnar’s father, Drip the serial killer/rapist who currently embodies the Sin of Lust, most likely doesn’t want to fucking settle down. Also, the cold steal refers to Fnar death, where Fnar’s mother, Jink, was stabbed in the stomach with a knife, killing both of them. Pretty grisly, right? You see why I used to love this comic? Still, though, there seems to be a fair amount I can already question about this comic, taking into account my deep knowledge of the comic.

Also, how the fuck does Jack know Fnar’s name? Did Jink tell Jack? I would have to assume Jack’s already collected her then. Makes enough sense to me. I know Jack’s the Grim Reaper and all, but he isn’t omniscient. But if a foetus can talk, why the fuck not?!

Furthermore, the art on this third page is rather appropriate; the colours are so vivid, differentiated and nice, despite the ridiculousness of Jack having green fingernails. Still, the colours are vibrant and Jack’s face in the bottom right-hand corner is just beautiful. I’m serious! It’s really fucking great. Those awesome red eyes, the shadows covering his face, the mangled, creepily bent scythe is cool as hell and that odd strand of hair is very unique. I love it! However, as well all know, Jack is a rabbit with a fucking dog’s nose! That is ridiculous!

And as a side note, Jack was the first Furry of his kind created. Now, the furries were explicitly created by man - with science! - for a - fucking still! - currently unknown reason. Well, Kane had a God complex, but that doesn’t explain any other person’s involvement, how they got funding, from who/whom, why they funded Kane, how Kane got the legal the legal rights, who wanted this, and much, much fucking more. I mean, what was even the purpose of creating sentient, human like animals? I, as well as a myriad of others, are still futilely waiting for that blasted answer!

As well as that, though, David’s never once tackled the topic of scientific evolution - transhumanism, h+. Like, this is a huge fucking topic, guys! And with the comic centred on Christian mythology, it would be a truly interesting story don’t you think? I mean, that’s a huge fucking part of the problem, David! Have you ever played Deus Ex: Human Revolution? I hope so.

Nevertheless, I’m getting off topic. All that I just mentioned is really for another review. Anyway! To finish on page three, the art’s good, except those weird fucking fingers which bend at seven points, there are many flaws in the narrative, and that wicked ‘feel’ Jack has it rich! Oh, and the grammar is still very poor. Missing commas, apostrophes, bad sentence structure, the whole David Hopkins works! But I’ll stop mentioning the abhorrent grammar now, otherwise it’ll take up half the fucking review.

Onto the fourth page!

Jack tells Fnar that he’s taking Fnar to Hell. Fnar assumes that Hell’s a bad place; how does Fnar know this? Also… fucking why?! Fnar should be reborn or something, right? Furthermore, Hell won’t have any effect on Fnar? Again why? Onwards we learnt that Drip and Jink can affect Fnar, though. This is because they’re Fnar parents. This is never truly explained why. You’ll begin to see a running theme here.

Regardless, Jack does tell Fnar and the reader why Hell won’t affect him; because he’s derpy. Seriously, Fnar’s innocent and ignorant, unknowing of Hell and its content, so it can’t affect him. This is because Adam and Eve, in the Garden of Eden, were free from pain and suffering prior to when they traded innocence for knowledge. Knowledge isn’t a bad thing, we all know this. But Biblically speaking, Adam and Eve betrayed God’s trust, and now everyone else is paying for it. I won’t debate religion here, though, just how well David uses the Christian faith - and Muslim faith at one point - in Jack.

My main problem with Fnar’s expulsion to Hell is that he deserves to go to Heaven or Earth, not Hell. Also, Fnar isn’t in Hell, he’s in fucking Hell. So surely Fnar will be able to learn, right? He learned about Hell being a bad place and about the English language, so obviously Fnar isn’t too derpy, although he still is. So essentially, Fnar shouldn’t be in Hell. He really shouldn’t. But alas, dear audience, we eventually learn why Fnar was put in Hell, as part of God’s plan in some way. Farrago, an angel we’ll meet later on, apparently had some say in getting Jack to keep Fnar in Hell. How Farrago had this say, I don’t fucking know. But she did. She did this so that Jack would have some company, despite the unending threat of the Sin and embodiment of fucking Lust being his arse fucking father! Sure, no else but Jink is a problem, but Drip sure as shit fucking is!

Simply put, this is just bad right now. When it comes to it, this is just terrible.

The art on the fourth page, though? Again, pretty good. It’s creepy, unearthly, weird and unwelcoming. It’s ugly and freaky, and it reeks of evil. That’s what I loved about it, damn it! It’s a shame the storytelling is so fucking shit!

Eventually we see Fnar meeting his mother, Jink, who’s in Hell glued to a wall. She, apparently, is in Hell for the same reasons Jack is; Jack killed the entire human population and Jink assisted in the rapes and murders of many other innocent people alongside her partner on Earth, Drip. First off, David, Jack is not in Hell for identical reasons to Jink. If that were the case, there should be two Grim Reapers, dude. Oh God is just realised how ugly Jack’s hand looks as he’s holding his staff in the bottom left panel… actually, all the hands look fucking funky as hell! I mean, David has never been able to draw hands, but fuck me! Seriously, though, hands are David’s Achilles heel. He just can’t fucking do it. And he’ll never be able to.

Whatever. Moving onwards, as the final point for the first arc, Fnar loses his nose to a stray bird. First off, I thought Fnar parents were the only ones that could harm Fnar! Also, how the fuck does one steal a fucking nose!? Why doesn’t Fnar even seem remotely annoyed by this? How and why the fuck is there a fucking raven, or whatever kind of bird it is, flying merrily around in Hell? Why would a bird steal a nose, too? And why the fuck would this ever fucking happen, ever?! Does Jack see the bird? If so, why doesn’t he swat it away? I don’t want to lose my fucking nose, why isn’t Jack or Fnar even remotely annoyed by this audacious fucking bird?

As an interesting side point, by the way, is that there are non-anthropomorphic animals in Hell, and I assume, on Earth. What do the furries on Earth think of this? How do they feel about this? What do they do about this? Imagine seeing a human being truly act like literally any animal - because apparently the humans wanted every fucking animals, insect and fish on Earth to become a fucking sentient animal! Seriously, in the cliff series of comics, there’s a fucking squid-man. There are also alien and insects. What fucking human wanted an insect to talk? In 9 Brides, there’s a fucking spider. I’m fucking serious! He’s also a bond villain. Again, I’m fucking serious! If I can find my file of 9 Brides I’ll post it. If I can’t will someone else do so for me please? But still, all the furries that exist do so because some mother fucker wanted it to. So who the fuck thought it’d be a good fucking idea to create a talking fucking frog?! Who thought creating a fucking frog-man was a good idea?! I can understand wanting to create a humanised dog or cat, but a fucking Beetle? Suck my cock, David, you fucking dolt!

Anyway, for the fifth page, we discover that Jink didn’t want to LOSE Fnar, and wishes she could hold him. First off, Jink LOSES her pinprick eyes by deciding to become Fnar’s mother, not for all the people she helped Drip rape and murder.

But seriously, what the fuck, David? Priorities?

I guess a woman get right her all her sins by mothering a child. I doubt David would say the same thing for men, but who gives a shit? I mean, Jink’s help in the murder and rape of innocents is obviously irrelevant, because David believes women can’t rape others, male or female. But David’s a fucking idiot, so who gives a shit?

I mean, Jink said it wasn’t her choice to LOSE Fnar, obviously implying it was Drip’s fault, and so why is she in Hell, David? Clearly Jink Pinprick eyes and the way in which she was saved are totally unconnected, but does it matter to David? Obviously not. Jack agrees with David, though. Because Jack overtly says that being a good “Mommy” might have saved her. So the goal in life is to be a parent? Well, if you’re a fucking animal in the wild who needs to procreate in order to assist their species, but if you’re a person in the modern world, being a parent isn’t a necessity, it’s essentially a luxury nowadays. I mean, people are able to fucking choose when to have their fucking kids! If you’re some fucking tiger, fuck, elephant, fox, you have kids so that you’re species can survive, not that you can have some fun with your fellow parent friends at fucking Starbucks!

Basically, being a parent won’t save your soul! Jink helping those she wronged will. Because they’re the people that truly mattered. I mean, why the fuck is Jink even being punished for doing something she didn’t fucking do?! Drip killed Fnar, and Jink simultaneously, so it’s Drip who should suffer the consequences? Not fucking Jink, David! David Hopkins, you ineffable shithead!

As a last note on the fifth page, who the fuck is that green bastard? And why the fuck is he here? Where the fuck did he come from? What the fuck is he? And why the fuck is he dressing Fnar? Shouldn’t Jack have just brought Fnar’s clothes with him? It’d save someone some avoidable fucking hassle, unless it’s where they fucking sinned; they were the worst tailor ever! One star, go ducking yourself green tailor man!

Jesus Christ page five was shit! But again, the art was decent, it just needs improvement.

Just on the sixth page, reading, reading, reading… “I have things yet to to”… “things to to”… “to to”…

What a simple, stupid, lazy mistake.

Anyway, the last page isn’t too bad, it’s just impotent and flaccid. Not really much to comment on, that’s why I went on for a while just now. But something I can mention is Jack’s weird face in the bottom right-hand corner and Fnar gross sausage fingers. Other than that, the stupid cartoony way Fnar dresses himself in the fifth page is just totally out of place.

As well as that actually, I hate how David only on occasion puts in a background. Listen, David, you can’t just occasionally add a background. Each age needs one because it’s important information about the story and scene. This is something all good artists do; a fucking background to know where the fuck we are! Seriously, it’s the universal standard, David, you shithead. Apart from that, though, page six is just average.

So that was the first arc of Jack! My final verdict? Well, in all fairness, it’s hard to say. I love art style of the first arc, especially the dark, gritty look for the first three and a half pages. That’s where Jack is at its artistic best, maybe other than The Hubbard… maybe. But then with the first arc, it just gets worse and worse when the story kicks in and as the art become lighter. It just fails in every sense of Jack being gritty, ugly and aggressive. Is Jack ugly? If so, then every character Jack has ever drawn is ugly, because they all basically look the same.

The art in my opinion is the comic’s saving grace, especially the first page, which basically sold the comic to anyone who was ever interested. The creepy, weird and unnerving style is great, but its cartoony side fucks it all up, removing a feeling of threat, danger and incorporeal ugliness. Seriously, David, drop the fucking Tiny Toon bullshit and scratch the page with your pencils you god damn idiot. So essentially, the art has potential and is being weighed down from greatness.

The story, though, is shit. Pure shit. It’s just terrible is every way and never once does it reach any serious level of interest. A foetus in Hell, his father killed him, the Grim Reaper, Fnar mother stapled to the wall, a bird ripping off the kid’s nose and a green Martian. How does David fuck that up?! I don’t know. But the motherfucker found a way.

My honest opinion, though, is that this arc is still one of the better ones. I mean it, the comic gets much worse as we go on. I’d say this arc is in the top five or so.

But my overall opinion? This arc could have been great, but it just ended up fucking itself.

Artist-guy on Deviantart, who’s currently posting a re-write of this arc, is doing a much better job than David did. I do wish art-st-guy used colour, but that’s only a personal preference. That art is much, much better, the characters are a hell of a lot more relatable and interesting, and it’s just better all-around in every dingle way. The handwriting, though, and the few grammatical errors - not as many as David, though - are rather jarring, where I have to seriously squint in order to read the text. But other than that, go read artist-guy’s work. It’s much better, and much more interesting.

Other than that, thanks for reading, and never give in when an angel tries to fuck you. Because whether you’re a man, a woman, gay, straight or anything in between, if an angels creeps on you and wants to fuck you, even if David only ever shows females harassing straight males… obviously not rape or a double-standard, never fuck them! Stand up for your rights, and make sure that your ticket back to Earth is through a conversation, just as in the Side arc where Vinci and Bashful are sent back to Earth to try life again.

Goodbye, everyone.

I have more of these reviews. In fact, I've reviewed literally every single arc up to date and 'When Summer Woke' and all the shorts. I've been thinking about review ''9 Brides' because goddamn is that bitch funny all he best lolcow ways. That piece could easily be milked for a lot. If you like this I'll post more.

I haven't read the review yet, and I plan to, but can you put the review in a spoiler? It takes up a lot of room otherwise.
Thank you!

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

I haven't read the review yet, and I plan to, but can you put the review in a spoiler? It takes up a lot of room otherwise.
Thank you!

That's a good point. I'll do just that from now on.

 

[WireSponge]

That's a good point. I'll do just that from now on.

You should edit your post from before
Just go to tools and click edit. Use the mouse to selet your story. Once your story has been selected, Click the + button then click spoiler (the eye). Click continue (you may or may not want to put a name for it) and your story should be spoilered.

 

[Meowthkip]

This thread seems a little dead and I want to resurrect it. Here's a review I wrote of David's first arc back in January 2014. (Beware, this review is 2914 words long.) Also, I haven't saved David's comic. My apologies.

Hello, everyone.

First off, in my opinion, I don’t think Jack’s first arc is all that bad. I think it could have been much better, as shown by artist-guy on the Kate forum. But I feel as if David did fairly well with this little endeavour of his.

Honestly. The art is quite good, with a nice scratchy look about it. It’s in colour! And that first page; those wicked eyes! Those devilish fingers. I’m being honest when I argue that the first arc has a really nice look about it.

But in my opinion, that first page of Jack did more for the comic than any other. Words and irrelevant because that image alone represents the feeling I think is most important when it comes to Jack. Because what is jack about? Jack is about murder, rape, Hell, the world’s strongest evil and the dark side of religion. This first image may not speak of religion and Hell, but fuck me does it portray evil flawlessly! Inarguably, the greatest thing to come out of the entirety of Jack.

However, after the first image, how good is it truly? Well, honestly, I feel that it does a decent job of showing Fnar’s death as an unborn. Fnar looks creepy, delightfully ugly in fact, and it even shows Fnar tugging onto his umbilical cord as he drowns out in the darkness, a good symbol for death; falling, drowning. Ooh it’s good. A little grammatical misstep with “Where are you mother[?]”, but that’s okay.

Next we have some dude collecting Fnar. This dude is called Jack, Death, the Grim Reaper and the fucking Ferryman! This is the dude no one want to die when the die. Anyhoo. This page then develops Fnar, as this young innocent child. First off, I kind of dislike how Fnar is able to talk. You learn how to talk if you are born through your parents and community. Furthermore, how does Fnar know what playing is? Fnar is a foetus, not a child. There’s a difference. Still, we learn about Fnar and that he’ll be spending his time with his mother. First off, we know this isn’t true because later in the comic Fnar spends relatively little time with his mother, even when she’s let off the wall for recognising her sins - that’s she should have been Fnar’s mother. Yeah, get used to talk about mothers in this fucking comic.

Also, what the fuck does Fnar mean? Fnar? That’s an exceedingly strange name, don’t you think? So what does it mean? Well, it means For No Apparent Reason. Right, in the second page Fnar said his mother and father both want him. Fnar’s father, Drip the serial killer/rapist who currently embodies the Sin of Lust, most likely doesn’t want to fucking settle down. Also, the cold steal refers to Fnar death, where Fnar’s mother, Jink, was stabbed in the stomach with a knife, killing both of them. Pretty grisly, right? You see why I used to love this comic? Still, though, there seems to be a fair amount I can already question about this comic, taking into account my deep knowledge of the comic.

Also, how the fuck does Jack know Fnar’s name? Did Jink tell Jack? I would have to assume Jack’s already collected her then. Makes enough sense to me. I know Jack’s the Grim Reaper and all, but he isn’t omniscient. But if a foetus can talk, why the fuck not?!

Furthermore, the art on this third page is rather appropriate; the colours are so vivid, differentiated and nice, despite the ridiculousness of Jack having green fingernails. Still, the colours are vibrant and Jack’s face in the bottom right-hand corner is just beautiful. I’m serious! It’s really fucking great. Those awesome red eyes, the shadows covering his face, the mangled, creepily bent scythe is cool as hell and that odd strand of hair is very unique. I love it! However, as well all know, Jack is a rabbit with a fucking dog’s nose! That is ridiculous!

And as a side note, Jack was the first Furry of his kind created. Now, the furries were explicitly created by man - with science! - for a - fucking still! - currently unknown reason. Well, Kane had a God complex, but that doesn’t explain any other person’s involvement, how they got funding, from who/whom, why they funded Kane, how Kane got the legal the legal rights, who wanted this, and much, much fucking more. I mean, what was even the purpose of creating sentient, human like animals? I, as well as a myriad of others, are still futilely waiting for that blasted answer!

As well as that, though, David’s never once tackled the topic of scientific evolution - transhumanism, h+. Like, this is a huge fucking topic, guys! And with the comic centred on Christian mythology, it would be a truly interesting story don’t you think? I mean, that’s a huge fucking part of the problem, David! Have you ever played Deus Ex: Human Revolution? I hope so.

Nevertheless, I’m getting off topic. All that I just mentioned is really for another review. Anyway! To finish on page three, the art’s good, except those weird fucking fingers which bend at seven points, there are many flaws in the narrative, and that wicked ‘feel’ Jack has it rich! Oh, and the grammar is still very poor. Missing commas, apostrophes, bad sentence structure, the whole David Hopkins works! But I’ll stop mentioning the abhorrent grammar now, otherwise it’ll take up half the fucking review.

Onto the fourth page!

Jack tells Fnar that he’s taking Fnar to Hell. Fnar assumes that Hell’s a bad place; how does Fnar know this? Also… fucking why?! Fnar should be reborn or something, right? Furthermore, Hell won’t have any effect on Fnar? Again why? Onwards we learnt that Drip and Jink can affect Fnar, though. This is because they’re Fnar parents. This is never truly explained why. You’ll begin to see a running theme here.

Regardless, Jack does tell Fnar and the reader why Hell won’t affect him; because he’s derpy. Seriously, Fnar’s innocent and ignorant, unknowing of Hell and its content, so it can’t affect him. This is because Adam and Eve, in the Garden of Eden, were free from pain and suffering prior to when they traded innocence for knowledge. Knowledge isn’t a bad thing, we all know this. But Biblically speaking, Adam and Eve betrayed God’s trust, and now everyone else is paying for it. I won’t debate religion here, though, just how well David uses the Christian faith - and Muslim faith at one point - in Jack.

My main problem with Fnar’s expulsion to Hell is that he deserves to go to Heaven or Earth, not Hell. Also, Fnar isn’t in Hell, he’s in fucking Hell. So surely Fnar will be able to learn, right? He learned about Hell being a bad place and about the English language, so obviously Fnar isn’t too derpy, although he still is. So essentially, Fnar shouldn’t be in Hell. He really shouldn’t. But alas, dear audience, we eventually learn why Fnar was put in Hell, as part of God’s plan in some way. Farrago, an angel we’ll meet later on, apparently had some say in getting Jack to keep Fnar in Hell. How Farrago had this say, I don’t fucking know. But she did. She did this so that Jack would have some company, despite the unending threat of the Sin and embodiment of fucking Lust being his arse fucking father! Sure, no else but Jink is a problem, but Drip sure as shit fucking is!

Simply put, this is just bad right now. When it comes to it, this is just terrible.

The art on the fourth page, though? Again, pretty good. It’s creepy, unearthly, weird and unwelcoming. It’s ugly and freaky, and it reeks of evil. That’s what I loved about it, damn it! It’s a shame the storytelling is so fucking shit!

Eventually we see Fnar meeting his mother, Jink, who’s in Hell glued to a wall. She, apparently, is in Hell for the same reasons Jack is; Jack killed the entire human population and Jink assisted in the rapes and murders of many other innocent people alongside her partner on Earth, Drip. First off, David, Jack is not in Hell for identical reasons to Jink. If that were the case, there should be two Grim Reapers, dude. Oh God is just realised how ugly Jack’s hand looks as he’s holding his staff in the bottom left panel… actually, all the hands look fucking funky as hell! I mean, David has never been able to draw hands, but fuck me! Seriously, though, hands are David’s Achilles heel. He just can’t fucking do it. And he’ll never be able to.

Whatever. Moving onwards, as the final point for the first arc, Fnar loses his nose to a stray bird. First off, I thought Fnar parents were the only ones that could harm Fnar! Also, how the fuck does one steal a fucking nose!? Why doesn’t Fnar even seem remotely annoyed by this? How and why the fuck is there a fucking raven, or whatever kind of bird it is, flying merrily around in Hell? Why would a bird steal a nose, too? And why the fuck would this ever fucking happen, ever?! Does Jack see the bird? If so, why doesn’t he swat it away? I don’t want to lose my fucking nose, why isn’t Jack or Fnar even remotely annoyed by this audacious fucking bird?

As an interesting side point, by the way, is that there are non-anthropomorphic animals in Hell, and I assume, on Earth. What do the furries on Earth think of this? How do they feel about this? What do they do about this? Imagine seeing a human being truly act like literally any animal - because apparently the humans wanted every fucking animals, insect and fish on Earth to become a fucking sentient animal! Seriously, in the cliff series of comics, there’s a fucking squid-man. There are also alien and insects. What fucking human wanted an insect to talk? In 9 Brides, there’s a fucking spider. I’m fucking serious! He’s also a bond villain. Again, I’m fucking serious! If I can find my file of 9 Brides I’ll post it. If I can’t will someone else do so for me please? But still, all the furries that exist do so because some mother fucker wanted it to. So who the fuck thought it’d be a good fucking idea to create a talking fucking frog?! Who thought creating a fucking frog-man was a good idea?! I can understand wanting to create a humanised dog or cat, but a fucking Beetle? Suck my cock, David, you fucking dolt!

Anyway, for the fifth page, we discover that Jink didn’t want to LOSE Fnar, and wishes she could hold him. First off, Jink LOSES her pinprick eyes by deciding to become Fnar’s mother, not for all the people she helped Drip rape and murder.

But seriously, what the fuck, David? Priorities?

I guess a woman get right her all her sins by mothering a child. I doubt David would say the same thing for men, but who gives a shit? I mean, Jink’s help in the murder and rape of innocents is obviously irrelevant, because David believes women can’t rape others, male or female. But David’s a fucking idiot, so who gives a shit?

I mean, Jink said it wasn’t her choice to LOSE Fnar, obviously implying it was Drip’s fault, and so why is she in Hell, David? Clearly Jink Pinprick eyes and the way in which she was saved are totally unconnected, but does it matter to David? Obviously not. Jack agrees with David, though. Because Jack overtly says that being a good “Mommy” might have saved her. So the goal in life is to be a parent? Well, if you’re a fucking animal in the wild who needs to procreate in order to assist their species, but if you’re a person in the modern world, being a parent isn’t a necessity, it’s essentially a luxury nowadays. I mean, people are able to fucking choose when to have their fucking kids! If you’re some fucking tiger, fuck, elephant, fox, you have kids so that you’re species can survive, not that you can have some fun with your fellow parent friends at fucking Starbucks!

Basically, being a parent won’t save your soul! Jink helping those she wronged will. Because they’re the people that truly mattered. I mean, why the fuck is Jink even being punished for doing something she didn’t fucking do?! Drip killed Fnar, and Jink simultaneously, so it’s Drip who should suffer the consequences? Not fucking Jink, David! David Hopkins, you ineffable shithead!

As a last note on the fifth page, who the fuck is that green bastard? And why the fuck is he here? Where the fuck did he come from? What the fuck is he? And why the fuck is he dressing Fnar? Shouldn’t Jack have just brought Fnar’s clothes with him? It’d save someone some avoidable fucking hassle, unless it’s where they fucking sinned; they were the worst tailor ever! One star, go ducking yourself green tailor man!

Jesus Christ page five was shit! But again, the art was decent, it just needs improvement.

Just on the sixth page, reading, reading, reading… “I have things yet to to”… “things to to”… “to to”…

What a simple, stupid, lazy mistake.

Anyway, the last page isn’t too bad, it’s just impotent and flaccid. Not really much to comment on, that’s why I went on for a while just now. But something I can mention is Jack’s weird face in the bottom right-hand corner and Fnar gross sausage fingers. Other than that, the stupid cartoony way Fnar dresses himself in the fifth page is just totally out of place.

As well as that actually, I hate how David only on occasion puts in a background. Listen, David, you can’t just occasionally add a background. Each age needs one because it’s important information about the story and scene. This is something all good artists do; a fucking background to know where the fuck we are! Seriously, it’s the universal standard, David, you shithead. Apart from that, though, page six is just average.

So that was the first arc of Jack! My final verdict? Well, in all fairness, it’s hard to say. I love art style of the first arc, especially the dark, gritty look for the first three and a half pages. That’s where Jack is at its artistic best, maybe other than The Hubbard… maybe. But then with the first arc, it just gets worse and worse when the story kicks in and as the art become lighter. It just fails in every sense of Jack being gritty, ugly and aggressive. Is Jack ugly? If so, then every character Jack has ever drawn is ugly, because they all basically look the same.

The art in my opinion is the comic’s saving grace, especially the first page, which basically sold the comic to anyone who was ever interested. The creepy, weird and unnerving style is great, but its cartoony side fucks it all up, removing a feeling of threat, danger and incorporeal ugliness. Seriously, David, drop the fucking Tiny Toon bullshit and scratch the page with your pencils you god damn idiot. So essentially, the art has potential and is being weighed down from greatness.

The story, though, is shit. Pure shit. It’s just terrible is every way and never once does it reach any serious level of interest. A foetus in Hell, his father killed him, the Grim Reaper, Fnar mother stapled to the wall, a bird ripping off the kid’s nose and a green Martian. How does David fuck that up?! I don’t know. But the motherfucker found a way.

My honest opinion, though, is that this arc is still one of the better ones. I mean it, the comic gets much worse as we go on. I’d say this arc is in the top five or so.

But my overall opinion? This arc could have been great, but it just ended up fucking itself.

Artist-guy on Deviantart, who’s currently posting a re-write of this arc, is doing a much better job than David did. I do wish art-st-guy used colour, but that’s only a personal preference. That art is much, much better, the characters are a hell of a lot more relatable and interesting, and it’s just better all-around in every dingle way. The handwriting, though, and the few grammatical errors - not as many as David, though - are rather jarring, where I have to seriously squint in order to read the text. But other than that, go read artist-guy’s work. It’s much better, and much more interesting.

Other than that, thanks for reading, and never give in when an angel tries to fuck you. Because whether you’re a man, a woman, gay, straight or anything in between, if an angels creeps on you and wants to fuck you, even if David only ever shows females harassing straight males… obviously not rape or a double-standard, never fuck them! Stand up for your rights, and make sure that your ticket back to Earth is through a conversation, just as in the Side arc where Vinci and Bashful are sent back to Earth to try life again.

Goodbye, everyone.

I have more of these reviews. In fact, I've reviewed literally every single arc up to date and 'When Summer Woke' and all the shorts. I've been thinking about review ''9 Brides' because goddamn is that bitch funny all he best lolcow ways. That piece could easily be milked for a lot. If you like this I'll post more.

Spoiler

Seriously, while I appreciate the review, I must offer a tip to you for future reviews:

You see a guy named William Shakesman once said "Brevity is the soul of wit." This just means don't waste my time.

I think your review would be better serviced with the pages in context. Might save you a lot of keystrokes.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

Seriously, while I appreciate the review, I must offer a tip to you for future reviews:

You see a guy named William Shakesman once said "Brevity is the soul of wit." This just means don't waste my time.

I think your review would be better serviced with the pages in context. Might save you a lot of keystrokes.

That was always a big fear of mine at the time of when I first wrote this review. I think my writing has improved as the reviews progressed yet I totally agree that my reviews sometimes went on way too long. But seeing as I've written about fifty or so reviews since January 2014 at this point and I'm too lazy to truncate any of them I doubt I'll be reworking too many of them to size them down. My longest review was of the arc 'Debts' which clock in at around ten thousand words. Another problem, however, is that a lot of my reviews linked to pages of David's and his website, pholph.com, is currently down, which is David's fault. There will also be other dead links. But that's natural and to be expected.

I had a lot to say about Hopkins and his comic, and still do though to a lesser degree, so these reviews were a total indulgence for me. Sorry if it's too long.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

You should edit your post from before
Just go to tools and click edit. Use the mouse to selet your story. Once your story has been selected, Click the + button then click spoiler (the eye). Click continue (you may or may not want to put a name for it) and your story should be spoilered.

You're a diamond. Thank you very much.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

I haven't read the review yet, and I plan to, but can you put the review in a spoiler? It takes up a lot of room otherwise.
Thank you!

There you go, pal. I hope that helps.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Spoiler: Typos and boo-boos

Words and irrelevant

This is the dude no one want to die when the die.

the cold steal

as well all know,

how Kane got the legal the legal rights,

a woman get right her all her sins

you’re species can survive

go ducking yourself

No offense, man. It's just that if you're, quite rightly, going to take Hopkins to task for his language-mangling, yours should be impeccable as you do it. In a way it's the least of his sins (no pun intended), but it does make the comic look even less professional.

 

[Varis]

Kate-comics alluded to It in one of their riffs. People started asking them questions about it, I think they said the victim was one of their riffers but I'm not sure. They said she went through the forums and or the comic to see if there were any red flags she missed. They also said the forum members were telling the one guy that he had a right to womens bodies so...yeah. It was a while ago when I read about it so the details are fuzzy but the old forum is gone now.

Would that be the Keenspace forum (now Comic Genesis) or the Ezboard forum (now Yuku)?

The internet truly is forever, sometimes.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

Spoiler: Typos and boo-boos

No offense, man. It's just that if you're, quite rightly, going to take Hopkins to task for his language-mangling, yours should be impeccable as you do it. In a way it's the least of his sins (no pun intended), but it does make the comic look even less professional.

Spoiler: Typos and boo-boos

I wrote this when I was super drunk. LOL. I'll go through it when I can because goddamn I never knew how fucked this was when I initially wrote. Again, goddamn. Thanks for pointing out all my errors. I haven't even glanced at this thing since January 2014 so it's been a while.

 

[Molasses Assassin]

Would that be the Keenspace forum (now Comic Genesis) or the Ezboard forum (now Yuku)?

The internet truly is forever, sometimes.

I honestly don't know what forum it was on, I only heard about it from kate-comics. Also, they (kate comics) don't know if the victim actually told the police or not.

By the way, dave has been uploading his comic to FA under the name ReaperRabbit. He's probably waiting for Arty to put the site back up so who knows when that will happen.

ALSO, according to the remixers, one of them found the secret kate chan, and they said it seems like they probably won't be returning. Thats too bad, they had some good stuff I wanted to post here.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

I honestly don't know what forum it was on, I only heard about it from kate-comics. Also, they (kate comics) don't know if the victim actually told the police or not.

By the way, dave has been uploading his comic to FA under the name ReaperRabbit. He's probably waiting for Arty to put the site back up so who knows when that will happen.

ALSO, according to the remixers, one of them found the secret kate chan, and they said it seems like they probably won't be returning. Thats too bad, they had some good stuff I wanted to post here.

I think David's "victim" overreacted like a complete queen. Something certainly did happen, and Hopkins is certainly a freak, but when dealing with the claims of Tumblrites and idiots who would easily call all men rapist I doubt what the victim, who's called Fallen, suffered from was in any way, shape or form tragic. I hate defending Hopkins but he could easily have been framed due to all the hate he receives. But frankly, there's too little evidence readily available for me to make any sort of logical judgement call. Fallen would not have called the police because what Fallen experienced was nothing.

I'm looking forward to all the answers which will hopefully effervesce sooner than later. I'm also looking forward to Hopkins' comic returning because boy have I been missing the lols.

 

[AnOminous]

I think David's "victim" overreacted like a complete queen. Something certainly did happen, and Hopkins is certainly a freak, but when dealing with the claims of Tumblrites and idiots who would easily call all men rapist I doubt what the victim, who's called Fallen, suffered from was in any way, shape or form tragic. I hate defending Hopkins but he could easily have been framed due to all the hate he receives. But frankly, there's too little evidence readily available for me to make any sort of logical judgement call. Fallen would not have called the police because what Fallen experienced was nothing.

You forgot one thing, though. He's a furry. So obviously he's guilty.

 

[Molasses Assassin]

I think David's "victim" overreacted like a complete queen. Something certainly did happen, and Hopkins is certainly a freak, but when dealing with the claims of Tumblrites and idiots who would easily call all men rapist I doubt what the victim, who's called Fallen, suffered from was in any way, shape or form tragic. I hate defending Hopkins but he could easily have been framed due to all the hate he receives. But frankly, there's too little evidence readily available for me to make any sort of logical judgement call. Fallen would not have called the police because what Fallen experienced was nothing.

I'm looking forward to all the answers which will hopefully effervesce sooner than later. I'm also looking forward to Hopkins' comic returning because boy have I been missing the lols.

I was talking about a different victim of one of Dave's fans.

As for FC, from what I saw, it seemed like she only made a tumblr account after that shit went down to explain what happened, she had a Fur Affinity account before that. I should also mention that it looked like she was following Dave for a while and chatting with him on FA and stuff for some time before the thing happened.

 

[Johnny Bravo]

I was talking about a different victim of one of Dave fans.

As for FC, from what I saw, it seemed like she only made a tumblr account after that shit went down to explain what happened, she had a Fur Affinity account before that. I should also mention that it looked like she was following Dave for a while and chatting with him on FA and stuff for some time before the thing happened.

I think FC definitely had contact with Dave. Dave even admitted that much. It's just a question of what transpired.