Dave Hopkins - Furry Rape Fetishist

[ofalltheplacestobe]

I was talking about a different victim of one of Dave fans.

As for FC, from what I saw, it seemed like she only made a tumblr account after that shit went down to explain what happened, she had a Fur Affinity account before that. I should also mention that it looked like she was following Dave for a while and chatting with him on FA and stuff for some time before the thing happened.

It seems like FC and David has some sort of cyber thing going on. (Shudder.) But David must have done something stupid because he's a spergic arsehole with no social skills. I believe, because of my lack of proof, that Hopkins either said some things or shared some things; all equally inappropriate. But I'm also confident in the belief that FC totally woman'd out and tried to label Hopkins as a peadophile and a rapist and all that shit. (Which honestly isn't much of a stretch. Based on 'Jack,' Hopkins is a fucked up puppy.) FC is a total psycho ex-girlfriend bitch who wanted blood and decided to achieve this by doing what all bitchy cunts do: she spoke behind Hopkins' back; but, of course, on the internet. So not quite behind Hopkins' back but you know what I mean.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

You forgot one thing, though. He's a furry. So obviously he's guilty.

Based on the fucked up shit Hopkins is guilty of, not the violence nor the brutality but instead the rape of children (for example, the arc where Fnar gets butt raped by his biological father, Drip, (and Drip wasn't even interested in raping Fnar for the sake of pleasure but instead just really, really pissing off Jack) and the arc 'Suffer,' where a doctor with the ability also decides to rape the children he's working with in his work on cancer treatments (because why the fuck not, I guess)), for example. Rape is always bad. But child rape is easily the worst. And Hopkins is used child rape as a plot device multitudinous times! More than once! What a freak! Goddamn furries. Goddamn right-wing Christian (child) rape-loving furfags.

 

[Meowthkip]

But I'm also confident in the belief that FC totally woman'd out and tried to label Hopkins as a peadophile and a rapist and all that shit.

Wait, what?

 

[WireSponge]

Wait, what?

I really hope this guy won't go where I think he's going.

 

[Pickle Pirate]

I really hope this guy won't go where I think he's going.

I hope he does, it could be amusing.

 

[Molasses Assassin]

FC totally woman'd out

Oh yeah, fuckin hysterical females always womaning out amirite?

 

[Rin]

It seems like FC and David has some sort of cyber thing going on. (Shudder.) But David must have done something stupid because he's a spergic arsehole with no social skills. I believe, because of my lack of proof, that Hopkins either said some things or shared some things; all equally inappropriate. But I'm also confident in the belief that FC totally woman'd out and tried to label Hopkins as a peadophile and a rapist and all that shit. (Which honestly isn't much of a stretch. Based on 'Jack,' Hopkins is a fucked up puppy.) FC is a total psycho ex-girlfriend bitch who wanted blood and decided to achieve this by doing what all bitchy cunts do: she spoke behind Hopkins' back; but, of course, on the internet. So not quite behind Hopkins' back but you know what I mean.

Based on the fucked up shit Hopkins is guilty of, not the violence nor the brutality but instead the rape of children (for example, the arc where Fnar gets butt raped by his biological father, Drip, (and Drip wasn't even interested in raping Fnar for the sake of pleasure but instead just really, really pissing off Jack) and the arc 'Suffer,' where a doctor with the ability also decides to rape the children he's working with in his work on cancer treatments (because why the fuck not, I guess)), for example. Rape is always bad. But child rape is easily the worst. And Hopkins is used child rape as a plot device multitudinous times! More than once! What a freak! Goddamn furries. Goddamn right-wing Christian (child) rape-loving furfags.

So are you white knighting him or not? Is he obsessed with child rape, or did he just get screwed over? Make up your mind. Also, try cutting down on the misogyny while you're at it - you're starting to sound like a SlutHater, and they have a separate forum.

 

[Meowthkip]

So are you white knighting him or not? Is he obsessed with child rape, or did he just get screwed over? Make up your mind. Also, try cutting down on the misogyny while you're at it - you're starting to sound like a SlutHater, and they have a separate forum.

Methinks @ofalltheplacestobe might have posted on the Jack forums (or at least was a genuine fan) at some point.

Call it a hunch.

 

[WireSponge]

Methinks @ofalltheplacestobe might have posted on the Jack forums (or at least was a genuine fan) at some point.

Call it a hunch.

He definitely gives off a trollshielding vibe. I wouldn't be surprised if a guy who tells people their "womaning out" would take interest in a comic so obsessed with rape.

 

[Johnny Bravo]

@ofalltheplacestobe used to be a friend of the Kate blog. When he started doing critiques of Dave's work they gave him a little shout out. I don't think there's anything wrong with me mentioning this as he posted a link to his review blog earlier in the thread. After the FC debacle he fell out of favor with Dave's trollfans on Tumblr because he questioned FC's story, a story which deserved to be questioned as I've pointed out many times. He also dared to use ableist language in his reviews. I invited him here cuz I didn't like the knee-jerk SJW reaction to his comments and thought he might have some interesting insight into the current situation.

Bruh, seriously.

 

[WireSponge]

@ofalltheplacestobe used to be a friend of the Kate blog. When he started doing critiques of Dave's work they gave him a little shout out. I don't think there's anything wrong with me mentioning this as he posted a link to his review blog earlier in the thread. After the FC debacle he fell out of favor with Dave's trollfans on Tumblr because he questioned FC's story, a story which deserved to be questioned as I've pointed out many times. He also dared to use ableist language in his reviews. I invited him here cuz I didn't like the knee-jerk SJW reaction to his comments and thought he might have some interesting insight into the current situation.

Bruh, seriously.

It's too bad that he just turned out to be trollshielding. He actually made some good points in his review, but he tarnished his credibility by being sexist. It's never a good day when the SJWs are right about someone.

 

[D.Angus]

It's too bad that he just turned out to be trollshielding. He actually made some good points in his review, but he tarnished his credibility by being sexist. It's never a good day when the SJWs are right about someone.

Hey when you throw darts everywhere, you're bound to hit something.. Eventually...

 

[DirkBloodStormKing]

I wonder if this is the webcomic that Marjan and the Philosophy of Rape crowd would read, considering Mr. Hopkin's autistic obsession with raping women and portraying said rapists as "heroes". Also listened to the radio call and yeah, I really feel bad for his wife. She deserves better than him.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I wonder what his mother thinks of all this.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

It's too bad that he just turned out to be trollshielding. He actually made some good points in his review, but he tarnished his credibility by being sexist. It's never a good day when the SJWs are right about someone.

The biggest problem I had with being "sexist" is that no one told me why I was sexist or how I was being sexist even though I asked many people; privately too. Then again, SJWs think all men are evil sexist rapists. So what sort of straight answer was I going to get. The idiots at Kate even called me homophobic from time to time despite the fact I was totally upfront about being bisexual. So it's idiocy like that which I have to deal with. If I am being sexist I will change my ways because sexism isn't right. There are differences between the sexes but whatever.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

I wonder what his mother thinks of all this.

Nothing nice. After all, the mother of Katie, Hopkins' wife, revealed that her mother doesn't like (which really means hate) Hopkins. But no one likes Hopkins for genuine reasons. People will only ever say they like Hopkins because they pity him. Liking Hopkins is like telling the kid with Down syndrome that you're they're friend. Expect Hopkins likes rape, of course.

 

[ofalltheplacestobe]

Methinks @ofalltheplacestobe might have posted on the Jack forums (or at least was a genuine fan) at some point.

Call it a hunch.

I'm using the same name I once used there because I simply like the name. No other reason, really.

When I was, like, fifteen to seventeen, when I was quite naive, I truly liked 'Jack.' But I've grown up and I realise how shit the comic is, though I've been reading the comic since I was fifteen, nearly twenty. I need to read the ending of this comic simply because I have to. I need to. And to achieve this I even tried to converse with Hopkins throughout the years, including on FA, but Hopkins was of absolutely no use, proving that even he most likely does have an ending for the comic yet, and I wasted my time.

I was a total fan of 'Jack' when I was younger because I was a foolish teenager. And I certainly posted on the forum.

 

[Rin]

The biggest problem I had with being "sexist" is that no one told me why I was sexist or how I was being sexist even though I asked many people; privately too. Then again, SJWs think all men are evil sexist rapists. So what sort of straight answer was I going to get. The idiots at Kate even called me homophobic from time to time despite the fact I was totally upfront about being bisexual. So it's idiocy like that which I have to deal with. If I am being sexist I will change my ways because sexism isn't right. There are differences between the sexes but whatever.

Well in your post here, you were being sexist by saying that FC "woman'd out," which I don't even understand, and frequently said things that implied all women are just crazy liars. Does that help? I get that SJWs are obnoxious, but that doesn't justify going to the other extreme and bashing an entire gender just because some of them are assholes.

Also, we do have a multiquote function, so there's no need for you to double-post.

 

[WireSponge]

I am not slut-hating. I like sluts. And hey, what's not to like? Besides, the only thing I said which may be conceived of as sexist or misogynistic or any of that shit is that I said Fallen "woman'd out," which she absolutely did. If saying woman'd out is sexist then I'm a sexist; then I'm a misogynist. Sorry. (Though it would have helped greatly if you specified how I was slut-hating and how I was being misogynistic.) More importantly, however, read my posts once over. Do you honestly think I'm white-knighting Hopkins? Are you fucking serious? I called Hopkins, and I quote, "a freak! Goddamn furries. Goddamn right-wing Christian (child) rape-loving furfags." How in any way am I white-knighting Hopkins. Hopkins is a despicable, retarded shithead who deserves to have his teeth kicked in. And here you are thinking that I'm defending someone who glorifies the rape of men, women and children!

Hopkins is screwed and he's a cunt. Hopkins is a bad fucking person. He's also a complete fucking idiot. So no, I'm not white-knighting. And also, what the fuck does this mean: "or did he just get screwed over?" Screwed over in what capacity?

Saying that someone "womaned out" is absolutely sexist because it applies negative connotations to being a woman. Furthermore, no one is accusing you of white-knighting. We're accusing you of trollshielding, which you clearly are.

 

[Rin]

I am not slut-hating. I like sluts. And hey, what's not to like? Besides, the only thing I said which may be conceived of as sexist or misogynistic or any of that shit is that I said Fallen "woman'd out," which she absolutely did. If saying woman'd out is sexist then I'm a sexist; then I'm a misogynist. Sorry. (Though it would have helped greatly if you specified how I was slut-hating and how I was being misogynistic.) More importantly, however, read my posts once over. Do you honestly think I'm white-knighting Hopkins? Are you fucking serious? I called Hopkins, and I quote, "a freak! Goddamn furries. Goddamn right-wing Christian (child) rape-loving furfags." How in any way am I white-knighting Hopkins. Hopkins is a despicable, retarded shithead who deserves to have his teeth kicked in. And here you are thinking that I'm defending someone who glorifies the rape of men, women and children!

Hopkins is screwed and he's a cunt. Hopkins is a bad fucking person. He's also a complete fucking idiot. So no, I'm not white-knighting. And also, what the fuck does this mean: "or did he just get screwed over?" Screwed over in what capacity?

I don't know what "woman'd out" means. It sounds like you're suggesting that women are naturally weaker than men, though, so you'll forgive me for reading between the lines a little. SlutHate is another forum full of misogynists who whine that women won't fuck them. We have another section about them here.

As to the white-knighting, your one post seemed to be defending him, and then the very next one was talking about how awful he is. Trollshielding is a better term, though, as @WireSponge pointed out. Sorry for using the incorrect terminology.