Dave Hopkins - Furry Rape Fetishist

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
But you seem to take mocking Dave to a more personal level. Mockery is one thing, but you act like you're genuinely angry at Dave. Also, what do you mean when you say that you have a "connection" with Jack?
I've been reading 'Jack' since I was slightly younger than sixteen (I'll be twenty on 23/07/2015) and for about two years it was my favourite piece of literature. (Odd choice, I know, but I loved the cruelty of the comic, its violence, its sadism, its ugliness, etc. I will also concede, shamefully, that I enjoyed the comic's use of anthro animals - I was high on 'Maus' and 'Blacksad' at the time.) But when I was about seventeen and six months old I realised how bad the comic was and I got really upset with myself and Hopkins. I tried to contact Hopkins but he was rude to me and gave me virtually no good answers to my questions when I questioned him on the comic (something Hopkins is known for) and because of these reasons I have a close connection, odd word, I know, with 'Jack.'

This is why I care so much and why I can't stop reading the damn thing and why I can't stop writing about it. I need to know the ending and I care too much about the plot and its little details. I'm personally very upset with Hopkins' non-existent levels of attention to detail and his disgusting apathy to quality because I think his comic has some true genuine potential and I hate seeing it wasted.

I have a version of Stockholm syndrome where I don't love my captor but I feel an irrepressible compulsion to hang around. And hanging around for too long just might end up killing me. Or at least wasting a lot of my time.

I'm a freak, I know. Maybe Hopkins' evil touch has made me a little sexist. Lol. I'll try to calm things down if you'd prefer. I'll try to be as light-hearted as I can.
 
This is why I care so much and why I can't stop reading the damn thing and why I can't stop writing about it. I need to know the ending and I care too much about the plot and its little details. I'm personally very upset with Hopkins' non-existent levels of attention to detail and his disgusting apathy to quality because I think his comic has some true genuine potential and I hate seeing it wasted.
Dave Hopkins is a disturbed man with a rape fetish. The only potential you should see in him is the potential to be arrested.
 
So after like 15 years on the internet Dave finally puts up a content warning? I don't get it. :\

I guess he did say he was talking to a lawyer about the FC incident. Maybe his lawyer advised him to put it there. Although, that doesn't make a lot of sense because the content itself was never the issue; it was what the content revealed about Dave's character, in conjunction with other evidence such as the Love Line call and interviews where he's flat out said he hates his mother and wants to rape women.

Dave Hopkins is a disturbed man with a rape fetish. The only potential you should see in him is the potential to be arrested.

The premise of Jack always had potential. Its two greatest downfalls were furries and David himself, mostly David.

Wow. It's kind of fucked up when 'it involves furries' isn't the worst thing you can say about a comic.
 
I've been reading 'Jack' since I was slightly younger than sixteen (I'll be twenty on 23/07/2015) and for about two years it was my favourite piece of literature. (Odd choice, I know, but I loved the cruelty of the comic, its violence, its sadism, its ugliness, etc. I will also concede, shamefully, that I enjoyed the comic's use of anthro animals - I was high on 'Maus' and 'Blacksad' at the time.) But when I was about seventeen and six months old I realised how bad the comic was and I got really upset with myself and Hopkins. I tried to contact Hopkins but he was rude to me and gave me virtually no good answers to my questions when I questioned him on the comic (something Hopkins is known for) and because of these reasons I have a close connection, odd word, I know, with 'Jack.'

This is why I care so much and why I can't stop reading the damn thing and why I can't stop writing about it. I need to know the ending and I care too much about the plot and its little details. I'm personally very upset with Hopkins' non-existent levels of attention to detail and his disgusting apathy to quality because I think his comic has some true genuine potential and I hate seeing it wasted.

I have a version of Stockholm syndrome where I don't love my captor but I feel an irrepressible compulsion to hang around. And hanging around for too long just might end up killing me. Or at least wasting a lot of my time.

I'm a freak, I know. Maybe Hopkins' evil touch has made me a little sexist. Lol. I'll try to calm things down if you'd prefer. I'll try to be as light-hearted as I can.
I get that it had a major influence on you, to put it lightly, but you need to lighten up a little bit. This isn't supposed to be super serious, it's supposed to mostly be laughing at a dumbass. If you get too autistic about it, people are going to start turning their attention on you, and that's not really a place where you want to be.
 
So...anybody wanna see some of Daves ugly art? Here's some newer stuff

17112244@400-1436987503.jpg
17049553@400-1436388646.jpg
17130658@400-1437157934.jpg
17131278@400-1437162736.jpg

This one is a "saturation" of someone else's character he made for one of his "chick books"
tmp_12613-1437246031.driprat_chrystialiasaturation54108048.jpg
 
Last edited:
I see no potential in Hopkins. I see potential in 'Jack.' In the hands of someone capable I think the comic could have been great. It's premise is proof enough.
Fuck it, I tried.
So you're mad at Hopkins because he can't write well? That's Entersphere level sperging. You just need to calm down.
Exactly. Let's all laugh at a dumbass together, guys. We don't need to play amateur art critic.
 
Prog Rock and furries: two spergy tastes that sperg great together!

Seriously, though, I realize part of the problem is that I don't know anything about the context, but I have no idea what the fuck is supposed to be going on there. It's not even a case of the gore being shocking when contrasted with cute, furry animals (in part because the characters aren't actually cute, just ugly). It's just dumb looking furry gore.
 
Back