Dave Hopkins - Furry Rape Fetishist

I am not slut-hating. I like sluts. And hey, what's not to like? Besides, the only thing I said which may be conceived of as sexist or misogynistic or any of that shit is that I said Fallen "woman'd out," which she absolutely did. If saying woman'd out is sexist then I'm a sexist; then I'm a misogynist. Sorry. (Though it would have helped greatly if you specified how I was slut-hating and how I was being misogynistic.) More importantly, however, read my posts once over. Do you honestly think I'm white-knighting Hopkins? Are you fucking serious? I called Hopkins, and I quote, "a freak! Goddamn furries. Goddamn right-wing Christian (child) rape-loving furfags." How in any way am I white-knighting Hopkins. Hopkins is a despicable, retarded shithead who deserves to have his teeth kicked in. And here you are thinking that I'm defending someone who glorifies the rape of men, women and children!

Hopkins is screwed and he's a cunt. Hopkins is a bad fucking person. He's also a complete fucking idiot. So no, I'm not white-knighting. And also, what the fuck does this mean: "or did he just get screwed over?" Screwed over in what capacity?

The mistake you made, darling, is that you said specifically 'FC totally woman'd out and tried to label Hopkins as a peadophile and a rapist and all that shit'; this gives the impression that you believe that women chimp out and label people everything under the sun if things don't go their way. This is sexist and generally pretty gross. I don't say that lightly as I sure as hell ain't no feminist myself, but people are going to jump all over you for saying shit like that and then shamelessly trying to justify it. Me included.

Put down the shovel.
 
@ofalltheplacestobe this is why I told you to read the Connor thread. You're really chimping out and driving this thread off-topic.

You don't seem to understand what trollshielding is so I'll clarify: trollshielding is when you very loudly proclaim your hatred of a certain cow, over and over again, especially after someone else has called you out on your behavior. It's basically trying to deflect negative attention away from yourself and onto a cow. I'm not sure if that's what you're doing, but it's sure what it looks like.

Most Kiwis are anti-feminist. A lot of us are also women, so you can see why we take offense to your idea that women often falsely accuse men they don't like of rape. It does happen - and may be what FC did - but that doesn't make her the norm at all.

My problem with FC is that she made a lot of claims about Dave and provided no proof. She claimed to have worked with the FBI to catch predators, yet it apparently never occurred to her to screencap her convos with Dave. Dave, as far as I know, has also provided no proof of his claims. So it's just one person's claim against another. If I had to guess I'd say they're both lying to some degree.
 
@ofalltheplacestobe this is why I told you to read the Connor thread. You're really chimping out and driving this thread off-topic.

You don't seem to understand what trollshielding is so I'll clarify: trollshielding is when you very loudly proclaim your hatred of a certain cow, over and over again, especially after someone else has called you out on your behavior. It's basically trying to deflect negative attention away from yourself and onto a cow. I'm not sure if that's what you're doing, but it's sure what it looks like.

Most Kiwis are anti-feminist. A lot of us are also women, so you can see why we take offense to your idea that women often falsely accuse men they don't like of rape. It does happen - and may be what FC did - but that doesn't make her the norm at all.

My problem with FC is that she made a lot of claims about Dave and provided no proof. She claimed to have worked with the FBI to catch predators, yet it apparently never occurred to her to screencap her convos with Dave. Dave, as far as I know, has also provided no proof of his claims. So it's just one person's claim against another. If I had to guess I'd say they're both lying to some degree.
Yeah. I made a mistake. I don't want to talk about me. I want to talk about Hopkins.

So, concerning Fallen and Hopkins, I think the two are at least hiding information. Fallen, whoever this person is, talked up one hell of a game whilst Hopkins didn't do himself any favours by falling into Fallen's trap, if it can even be called that.
 
So, concerning Fallen and Hopkins, I think the two are at least hiding information. Fallen, whoever this person is, talked up one hell of a game whilst Hopkins didn't do himself any favours by falling into Fallen's trap, if it can even be called that.

David's reaction tells me that something went down. He clearly thought Fallen posed a threat to him, which was why he shut down his website and FA account (albeit temporarily). Anyway, since this thread is active again, I decided I may as well dig up some new info.

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/reaperrabbit <--- Dave's made a new FA account to start posting Jack comics. I guess this means Pholph won't be coming back anytime soon, if ever. I assume he'll use this account to make some or all of the comic unavailable to people without an FA account. He also talks about wanting to make "changes" to Jack. I recall he once said something about taking the rape out of Games We Play in Hell, so maybe that's what he means.

http://www.furaffinity.net/view/16986702/ <--- My suspicions were correct. If you click on these links without an FA account it will say you're not allowed to view them. :sigh:
 
David's reaction tells me that something went down. He clearly thought Fallen posed a threat to him, which was why he shut down his website and FA account (albeit temporarily). Anyway, since this thread is active again, I decided I may as well dig up some new info.

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/reaperrabbit <--- Dave's made a new FA account to start posting Jack comics. I guess this means Pholph won't be coming back anytime soon, if ever. I assume he'll use this account to make some or all of the comic unavailable to people without an FA account. He also talks about wanting to make "changes" to Jack. I recall he once said something about taking the rape out of Games We Play in Hell, so maybe that's what he means.

http://www.furaffinity.net/view/16986702/ <--- My suspicions were correct. If you click on these links without an FA account it will say you're not allowed to view them. *sigh*
Interestingly enough, one could actually find certain bits of information on David's FA account by accurately typing in certain words. I can't remember what the site wrote but it basically said that David's account was terminated though it could be resuscitated by David at any time he desired.

Secondly, I found out about David's new account. He hasn't done anything with it yet but I'm looking forward to see what he does end up doing with it. I don't know if anyone remembers but Hopkins edited his arc 'How to Make a Monster,' and arc which details for the fiftieth time Drip's history. In this episode readers learn of how Drip's parents died (timey-wimey bullshit where the Davil brings Drip back through history to reveal that Drip was destined to be Lust or some shit) and what Drip's relationship with Alure was like and this one time Drip liked to jerk off in women's underwear. (That was the part Hopkins removed.) Yeah, fuck the murder and the rape of his mother. Drip jerking on in ladies underwear, something that actually occurred in 'When Summer Woke,' was what needed to be removed. Goddamnit, David Hopkins. Also, you're correct about saying Hopkins wants to remove the rape from 'Games We Play in Hell.' I think he mentioned this on his older FA account. He'll do other things too.

Thirdly, yeah. I can't see David's images either. I hate FA's bullshit where you have to have an account to view certain images, and because David banned my numerous accounts from asking too many questions FA has saved my IP (ha, ha, ha!) and now I can't even make a new account. Goddamnit!
 
Well Pholph.com is back up.

All the images are broken to me.
It's down for me too. But David certainly didn't forget to maintain the links to donate to him and purchase his shirts, because David sure as shit needs his money. And holy shit, pholph has been down for how many months? (Does anyone precisely know?) Either way, what a shame that the site looks exactly like it has since 2001. Not even a minor renovation. Fuck.
 
It's down for me too. But David certainly didn't forget to maintain the links to donate to him and purchase his shirts, because David sure as shit needs his money. And holy shit, pholph has been down for how many months? (Does anyone precisely know?) Either way, what a shame that the site looks exactly like it has since 2001. Not even a minor renovation. Fuck.

Since late May or early June I believe. In the not too distant past the site would often go down for no reason at all and fail to return for a week or more simply because Hopkins' host provider couldn't be arsed to do anything about it (or Hopkins himself didn't know). There would also be random periods of no updates that would last about a month due to Dave's laziness.

I hope he at least finishes that story arc about Jack's past. People donated money to have him do that arc. It's been years.
 
Since late May or early June I believe. In the not too distant past the site would often go down for no reason at all and fail to return for a week or more simply because Hopkins' host provider couldn't be arsed to do anything about it (or Hopkins himself didn't know). There would also be random periods of no updates that would last about a month due to Dave's laziness.

I hope he at least finishes that story arc about Jack's past. People donated money to have him do that arc. It's been years.
Has it seriously been down down that long? My god. I wonder how long it's been since Hopkins last updated that 'Princess of Hell's Highlands' shit. That must be twelve or so months old. I remember when pholph's technical failures would randomly sprout up. I think a guy called Tet is David's systems administrator. I doubt he gives even the remotest flying fuck about the health of pholph so his apathy doesn't surprise me. And you're right, Hopkins doesn't know much about IT, thus rendering him in an infantile state when problems sprout up. (Uneducated bastard.) And I also recall those months long periods during various arcs, not just the "current one, where Hopkins either stopped giving a shit or couldn't figure out how to complete another story about rape. (The plight of all artists, truly.) But I, too, hope Hopkins eventually completes that arc revealing what happened to Earth, the humans, Jack, the war and all that shit. I personally would rather enjoy seeing a transitional period depicting the human response to the existence of man-made sentient life in a religious, social, philosophical, legal perspective. That to me sounds really cool. But Hopkins isn't even remotely intelligent enough to tackle such a scopious topic. Let's just hope Hopkins can at least finish off Jack. Not only for the sake of the story but, as you quite rightly pointed out, for the sake of the poor people who gave Hopkins all that free money back in 2012. Hopkins; you greedy, lazy shit. No one wanted your 'The Wall' shit and here you are ignoring all those people who supported you for years. Jesus.
 
'The Princess of Hell's Highlands' is gone.

How appropriate. It’s not as if anyone even enjoyed that shitty arc. I doubt Hopkins is even going to finish it at this point. But how ironically beautiful perfect because Furandot, as the comic was jocundly nicknamed, was clearly inspired by the classic play ‘Turandot,’ a play written by Giacomo Puccini the author never finished because Puccini died in 1924 before the play’s completion. And here we have Hopkins not finishing his comic. I tell ya, it was fucking fate. I don’t even believe in fate but that was fucking fate. I wonder who’s going to finish David’s flawed masterpiece. Who is David’s Franco Alfano? Do I hear Razor-Rabbit?

Nonetheless, this arc was arguably was of the most bizarre, jarring and meaningless arcs Hopkins shat out. I can’t for a second understand what Hopkins was thinking whilst he worked on that crap. Not only was the art and story inept but goddamn was the hero of the story stupid-looking! He looked like a furred animal version of Elvis from the fifteenth fucking century!

And of course Hopkins is reworking ‘Games We Play in Hell.’ Hopkins warns new readers of the dangers of reading ‘Jack’ and then he goes and removes parts from it, obviously the element of musical holes. I just hope Hopkins doesn’t remove gun-head. Remember gun-head!? Holy shit I do! Gun-head is one of the funniest things to come out of ‘Jack’!
 
@ofalltheplacestobe, you appear to be walking a very thin line. Friendly recommendation? Be very cautious of your conduct, or take a little break for a bit. Trollshielding makes us curious, and that's a kind of curiosity you don't want to inspire. Just a suggestion.
I'll take what you've said to heart. I did write this comment, however, and I feel as if the Kiwis would enjoy it so I'd like to share it. I've put my comment in a spoiler to keep things clean.

http://www.pholph.com/

Dis gon be güd!

Goddamn the fucking grammar! David Hopkins is partly known for his inept grammatical skills. Not as much as the quality and content of his comic but grammar is certainly in there next to the laughable levels of disaster like David’s ability to draw faces and feet and hands, and David’s ability to represent the rape of children with a sense of class.

There are so many instances of comma splicing on the warning page. (There’s no need for a comma after “For now,” “read the strip” and “enter the site.” There’s even an Oxford comma, the contentious comma, after “material in here” and “That you are and adult.”) (There should either be the use of a full stop (a period) or the use of an ‘and’ after “The forum is archived off.”) There are also instances where commas have been left out! (A comma is needed after “[’]Jack[’] is back. However.”)

Just as hilariously, why are so many words being capitalised when they shouldn’t? Well, it’s because Hopkins is retarded but let’s take a closer look:

a) “Hiatus;”

b) “Archives;”

c) “Two Thousand;”

d) and “There.”

None of these words should be capitalised for obvious professional reasons.

What’s also brilliantly funny is the grammatically jarring “Adult material.” (Why the fuck is this tiny two word sentence all on its own with no direction? Ha, ha, ha!) And check out “consentual”! Phft, ha, ha, ha, ha! It’s spelled ‘consensual,’ Hopkins! Come on! You’re a grown fucking adult! Ha, ha, ha! And there’s also that disgusting space between “(consentual, not…)” and a comma. So unprofessional. And let’s not ignore this gem: “That you are and adult.” And adult. And adult! And adult! I am and adult, apparently. Wow.

Another piece of sheer genius is the fact that “violence” and “gore” were mentioned twice in the list of nouns! What the fuck!? Hopkins, how can you be so inept? That had to be intentional. It just had to. You are playing a joke on me, Hopkins. Furthermore, why is “faith” and “hope” listed amongst words like “death” and “suicide.” I understand these words are meant to act as a separate however sort of response to the sadness, like Hopkins is saying things aren’t too bad, but at least throw in a ‘however’ or an ‘although.’ At least Hopkins added an ellipsis, though; implying more to come. Fucking hell, Hopkins.

There’s also the oddness of “WARNING” having two asterisks on each side yet the second warning, appropriately titled “EXTRA WARNING,” having a mere single asterisk. Clearly Hopkins doesn’t understand the power of ascension. (Badum tish.)

But what is easily the most entertaining part about all of this is how much Hopkins sucks himself off with his bullshit purple prose and self-fellating salesmanship:

a) “There are no punches pulled within these pages;”

b) “along the way you’ll meet great characters;”

c) and “willing to venture down the long dark passages.”

No punches pulled, huh? That’s not too bad but it’s still rather indulgent. The same goes for venturing (o0o0o0oh) down long dark passages. I bet Hopkins can tell us what’s long and dark. But best of all, “great characters.” (Also, each ellipsis has a link.)









Yeah, I’m just going to let that waft for a moment.

Great characters, huh, Hopkins? Great characters. I don’t even need to refute that point. Having read ‘Jack’ I have the knowledge, as does every other reader, of knowing that this point is self-refuting. That’s like saying William McGonagall had great rhythm and thyme! Hopkins, you are the poetaster of webcomics!

Goddamn. David Hopkins really is the gift that keeps on giving. Here’s looking to another couple of months of irregular and unreliable updates before you fuck off for a month without explanation and unexpectedly return with even more shit than you shat out before, David. (Raises glass! Smashes glass on head! Bleeds profusely.) Tally ho!
 
I'll take what you've said to heart. I did write this comment, however, and I feel as if the Kiwis would enjoy it so I'd like to share it. I've put my comment in a spoiler to keep things clean.

http://www.pholph.com/

Dis gon be güd!

Goddamn the fucking grammar! David Hopkins is partly known for his inept grammatical skills. Not as much as the quality and content of his comic but grammar is certainly in there next to the laughable levels of disaster like David’s ability to draw faces and feet and hands, and David’s ability to represent the rape of children with a sense of class.

There are so many instances of comma splicing on the warning page. (There’s no need for a comma after “For now,” “read the strip” and “enter the site.” There’s even an Oxford comma, the contentious comma, after “material in here” and “That you are and adult.”) (There should either be the use of a full stop (a period) or the use of an ‘and’ after “The forum is archived off.”) There are also instances where commas have been left out! (A comma is needed after “[’]Jack[’] is back. However.”)

Just as hilariously, why are so many words being capitalised when they shouldn’t? Well, it’s because Hopkins is retarded but let’s take a closer look:

a) “Hiatus;”

b) “Archives;”

c) “Two Thousand;”

d) and “There.”

None of these words should be capitalised for obvious professional reasons.

What’s also brilliantly funny is the grammatically jarring “Adult material.” (Why the fuck is this tiny two word sentence all on its own with no direction? Ha, ha, ha!) And check out “consentual”! Phft, ha, ha, ha, ha! It’s spelled ‘consensual,’ Hopkins! Come on! You’re a grown fucking adult! Ha, ha, ha! And there’s also that disgusting space between “(consentual, not…)” and a comma. So unprofessional. And let’s not ignore this gem: “That you are and adult.” And adult. And adult! And adult! I am and adult, apparently. Wow.

Another piece of sheer genius is the fact that “violence” and “gore” were mentioned twice in the list of nouns! What the fuck!? Hopkins, how can you be so inept? That had to be intentional. It just had to. You are playing a joke on me, Hopkins. Furthermore, why is “faith” and “hope” listed amongst words like “death” and “suicide.” I understand these words are meant to act as a separate however sort of response to the sadness, like Hopkins is saying things aren’t too bad, but at least throw in a ‘however’ or an ‘although.’ At least Hopkins added an ellipsis, though; implying more to come. Fucking hell, Hopkins.

There’s also the oddness of “WARNING” having two asterisks on each side yet the second warning, appropriately titled “EXTRA WARNING,” having a mere single asterisk. Clearly Hopkins doesn’t understand the power of ascension. (Badum tish.)

But what is easily the most entertaining part about all of this is how much Hopkins sucks himself off with his bullshit purple prose and self-fellating salesmanship:

a) “There are no punches pulled within these pages;”

b) “along the way you’ll meet great characters;”

c) and “willing to venture down the long dark passages.”

No punches pulled, huh? That’s not too bad but it’s still rather indulgent. The same goes for venturing (o0o0o0oh) down long dark passages. I bet Hopkins can tell us what’s long and dark. But best of all, “great characters.” (Also, each ellipsis has a link.)









Yeah, I’m just going to let that waft for a moment.

Great characters, huh, Hopkins? Great characters. I don’t even need to refute that point. Having read ‘Jack’ I have the knowledge, as does every other reader, of knowing that this point is self-refuting. That’s like saying William McGonagall had great rhythm and thyme! Hopkins, you are the poetaster of webcomics!

Goddamn. David Hopkins really is the gift that keeps on giving. Here’s looking to another couple of months of irregular and unreliable updates before you fuck off for a month without explanation and unexpectedly return with even more shit than you shat out before, David. (Raises glass! Smashes glass on head! Bleeds profusely.) Tally ho!
Stop taking this so seriously. Hopkins is just a shitty person on the Internet. Calm down. He is not worth it.
 
I think Hopkins is fun to mock. I guess we all feel such an urge every once in a while. I don't get kicks out of anyone like CWC but I do from Hopkins. I just have a strong connection with the awfulness of 'Jack.'
But you seem to take mocking Dave to a more personal level. Mockery is one thing, but you act like you're genuinely angry at Dave. Also, what do you mean when you say that you have a "connection" with Jack?
 
Back