- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Unlikely. He hasn't quit anything so far. The only way to get rid of him is to throw him out and bar him from playing. Be it Pokemon or Law Follies.
Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.
- Thread starter Mister Mint
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
Wait, did he win a judgement against this Gary Johnson person or does he just think this guy owes him money?
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Who knows. I think he started listing him around the time of his first mandamus appeal. @Mister Mint do you remember?
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
That's a lot of money to spend on food for one person when all you eat is wieners. Gay fat tard.
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2021
> self employment $32.25
Acerthorn is really making all that jewtube money
For his bottomless mouth for his wieners addiction
Acerthorn is really making all that jewtube money
For his bottomless mouth for his wieners addiction
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2023
unfortunately the demand for retarded obese turkey gobbling youtube content is rather low. he would be gobbling on the streets for his wiener money if not for the welfare leeching.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Now he's starting to sound like he's having a tantrum in his written pleadings. This will obviously go down so well for you David.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
All of his pleadings sound like a tantrum. Except that one really creepy one talking about hypothetical murders.
On the positive side he's trying his hardest to do Googles work for them in proving that he is a vexatious and abusive litigant.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2017
if acerthorn was a lawyer instead of a wannabe, he would know that the "HYPOTHETICALS" part of his motion is where he's supposed to put actual case law that says what his hypotheticals say. i.e., using a judge's words in a real case to demonstrate how a legal principle applies to an analogous fact pattern because nobody gives a shit about some fake situation you made up in your wiener-poisoned brain
Did he not read the same defense as Google? They clearly listed evidence of fair use of the icon on it's own merits. Can you really go on and tell the judge the opposing party didn't do something they clearly did?
... Can we expect a "plaintiff's argument is not faithful to the records"?
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
He’s incredibly tedious to read past the initial complaint. That’s a common pro se tactic - bury the opposition in paperwork. Hell, it works for regular lawyers too.
But Stebbins has all the power of hyper focus and ignorance of social norms at his disposal. The several warnings he’s had from other judges isn’t going to slow him down a bit.
Using a single frame from a multi-hour video to set up a channel that criticizes this goof seems like the heart of fair use.
Good thing Stebbins has other cases in the pipeline, it would be sad to have to wait till July for the next update.
But Stebbins has all the power of hyper focus and ignorance of social norms at his disposal. The several warnings he’s had from other judges isn’t going to slow him down a bit.
Using a single frame from a multi-hour video to set up a channel that criticizes this goof seems like the heart of fair use.
Good thing Stebbins has other cases in the pipeline, it would be sad to have to wait till July for the next update.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2022
Oh noes, now he can claim damages since his declared earnings in 2022 and 2021 were equal 42$...
"Hey judge, why won't you just agree with what I state without checking (this time)? Also ignore that my citations are hypotheticals only" - Stabbins probably
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
There's a reason he's pleading statutory damages rather than actual damages, one of the few things he's done correctly in this entire case.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
MongolianMongoose
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2023
Acer keeps weaseling around admitting he has porn accounts.
Stebbins v. Rebolo docket 1
Stebbins v. Rebolo docket 53
Stebbins v. Polano docket 105
Stebbins v. Polano docket 106
"claim to have found"
"supposedly joined"
"may have joined"
"psuedonyms similar to my own"
"usernames that suggest they could belong to me"
Stebbins v. Rebolo docket 1
Stebbins v. Rebolo docket 53
Stebbins v. Polano docket 105
Stebbins v. Polano docket 106
"claim to have found"
"supposedly joined"
"may have joined"
"psuedonyms similar to my own"
"usernames that suggest they could belong to me"
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
The appeal was finally docketed (yesterday) in the 9th circuit:
Acerthorn's opening brief is due 06/02/2023
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Update:
As Acerthorn contends:
Interestingly he provides no authority for anything relating this "summary reversal" not even where it comes from (local rule 3-6 for the 9th circuit). So what does 9th circuit think about this motion? Well, these kinds of motions are "rare and exceptional" and "usually reserved . . . for situations in which the law is well settled and stable, the facts are not in dispute, and the decision below is clearly in error." (See, Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley, 988 F.2d 868 (9th Cir. 1992) ) Something that is not true here. It seems, then, that this is another L for dear Acer. @AnOminous , thoughts?