- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm glad someone else watched it, I thought I was going crazy. When he starts going on rants about how the stormcloaks (windhelm residents basically) are not racist because the races they are keeping out in the freezing cold or being segregated to the ghettos deserve to be there was incredible. I've only heard this kind of reasoning from actual racists before so I couldn't stop laughing.I have watched the new acerthorn stormcloak video
lmao, just fuck my shit up broFrom start to finish the Opposition trips over itself, relying on made-up legal
principles and math equations, citing Supreme Court cases for propositions they reject, ignoring
other cases that contradict his positions, and refusing to acknowledge facts that are apparent on the
face of the Complaint (“Compl.”)
Short version: "Your honor, I spent four years in law school and countless hours working my way up from a novice. I now have lost my will to live. Please draw and quarter this fucker. TIA."
It's pretty common for casebooks to have cases that aren't particularly important or interesting that illustrate some point. Usually they're the ones that get a little squib and not quoted at length.It's in this one casebook on disability law, which is why it appears in law curricula: https://www.amazon.com/Disability-Discrimination-Colker-Grossman-Hardcover/dp/B011DC2Y9I
I'm sure it's edited for the important bits, but on the UC Berkeley curriculum posted above it specifically says to read the Stebbins case. That makes me think it's more than just a squib case. But I can't access the casebook for free via my own resources, so I can't check. A disability law casebook is pretty niche, honestly. Only crazy lefty schools (likely on the west coast) or schools with huge amounts of resources would offer something like a disability law course. Every other school would just have an employment law class.It's pretty common for casebooks to have cases that aren't particularly important or interesting that illustrate some point. Usually they're the ones that get a little squib and not quoted at length.
To celebrate this judge White decided to allow Stabbins to try again in a Rebolo case, even if "the Court has doubts about his ability to do so".We are approaching 100 pages.
Attached@Useful_Mistake CL is not cooperative for me in Polano case, so I request an assistance.
There are two orders but I'm unable to view the contents.
"Plaintiff is permitted leave to amend only his infringement claims based on the 2D images and his claims based on the alleged copying of livestream videos other than the April 10, 2021 video. Plaintiff may not add any new claims or new defendants. Plaintiff must set forth a short and plain statement of his claims showing his entitlement to relief as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)"To celebrate this judge White decided to allow Stabbins to try again in a Rebolo case, even if "the Court has doubts about his ability to do so".
Oh thank God you where able to watch the infected turkey video I tried to watch the video but it felt like in cohesive rambling for two hours doesn't get to the point until the 30 minute markI have watched the new acerthorn stormcloak video
This is clearly out of order pending a challenge to the sufficiency of the complaint. The judge should stay all discovery when it is already abundantly clear there is no stated cause of action.