Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 185 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.5%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,260 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,244
Acerthorn's new cope session Youtube video linked in the document. For 15 whole minutes he repeats over and over that the Court gave no reason for rejecting his appeal.
I lost on appeal simply because the judges don't like me me personally.
Video description
I'm uploading this without music. People have my permission to do full-length reactions to this video if they want. But of course, none of you (not even the lawyers) are going to be able to actually refute any of the arguments I put for that the Court completely ignored.
 
"I appealed because I didn't have a choice!"

Yes, you did, David. You have the choice to stop being a useless burden on everybody and wasting everyone's time treating the court system as a PowerBall.
I lost on appeal simply because the judges don't like me me personally.
They don't like you personally because you're a spiteful spastic who treats everyone like shit.
 
"I appealed because I didn't have a choice!"

Yes, you did, David. You have the choice to stop being a useless burden on everybody and wasting everyone's time treating the court system as a PowerBall.

They don't like you personally because you're a spiteful spastic who treats everyone like shit.

I do wunder how David's internal hamster rationalizes how a judge he never met, never spoke to and never interacted with aside from said judge reading his lolsuit appeal just automatically hates him? Hates him to the extent he would put his career on the line just to make sure David loses his case.

I mean there is paranoia and then there is paranoia
 
I feel like the CoA's analysis could have been replaced by a giant eye-rolling emoji and the effect would have been similar.

Another pretty typical Acerthornism to recast a Court's appropriately succinct reasoning as "no reason whatsoever." He doesn't seem to understand that his word-vomit pseudo-arguments don't require anything more than a couple sentences to rebut for anyone who, you know, actually went to law school.
 
He doesn't seem to understand that his word-vomit pseudo-arguments don't require anything more than a couple sentences to rebut for anyone who, you know, actually went to law school.
Or has more than two brain cells to rub together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets
Acerthorn's new cope session Youtube video linked in the document. For 15 whole minutes he repeats over and over that the Court gave no reason for rejecting his appeal.
I lost on appeal simply because the judges don't like me me personally.
Video description

Do not fall for this.
This is clearly a trap that will help Mr. Stabbins conduct more frivolous lolsuits.
It is highly advised beyond reasonable doubt to not do anything in response to that video.
 
Acerthorn's new cope session Youtube video linked in the document. For 15 whole minutes he repeats over and over that the Court gave no reason for rejecting his appeal.
I lost on appeal simply because the judges don't like me me personally.
Video description
Looks like a certain, former Marine officer gas station attendant has involved himself. Old habits die hard.

Screenshot_20240829_175315_Brave (1).jpg
Screenshot_20240829_175325_Brave (1).jpg
Screenshot_20240829_175334_Brave (1).jpg
 
Do not fall for this.
This is clearly a trap that will help Mr. Stabbins conduct more frivolous lolsuits.
It is highly advised beyond reasonable doubt to not do anything in response to that video.
Instructions unclear; emailed a litigious psychopath with my personal details attached and agreed to become his gimp to avoid court.
 
Do not fall for this.
This is clearly a trap that will help Mr. Stabbins conduct more frivolous lolsuits.
It is highly advised beyond reasonable doubt to not do anything in response to that video.
It's a really shitty trap because any suit he files on this video would be futile due to estoppel, but goddamn it would be like navigating a swamp for a long ass time. It's a trap that wastes everyone's time.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Mankirk
Every single point has been refuted here, though, and the court clearly laid out it's reasoning
(Heavy sigh) For NO REASON AT ALL except those in their opinion.

Now, if you’d just make a video countering all of Stebbins legal arguments and then upload that to YouTube and make yourself a target for another pro se lawsuit that would be greatly appreciated.

Maybe that will be his tactic going forward- trying to get people to settle so he can raise a gimp army to send out DMCA notices. I’m picturing Master Blaster from Mad Max but I don’t think anyone is gonna carry Stebbins on their shoulders.
 
Acerthorn's new cope session Youtube video linked in the document. For 15 whole minutes he repeats over and over that the Court gave no reason for rejecting his appeal.
I lost on appeal simply because the judges don't like me me personally.
Petition the SCOTUS, Stabby. Come on, you know you want to do it. It'll go fine I promise.
 
It's a really shitty trap because any suit he files on this video would be futile due to estoppel, but goddamn it would be like navigating a swamp for a long ass time. It's a trap that wastes everyone's time.
Effective trap? No.
Trap? Yes.

Instructions unclear; emailed a litigious psychopath with my personal details attached and agreed to become his gimp to avoid court.

That's kinky.

Maybe that will be his tactic going forward- trying to get people to settle so he can raise a gimp army to send out DMCA notices. I’m picturing Master Blaster from Mad Max but I don’t think anyone is gonna carry Stebbins on their shoulders.

Forgot to multi-quote you @TurboNAS but I see Stebbins more of Blaster seeking a Master to carry around on his shoulders.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TurboNAS
Effective trap? No.
Trap? Yes.
It is effective, at least in doing what it's meant to do. I don't think Stebbins thinks he's going to win the lawsuits, but he does them anyway to maximize suffering/financial issues on behalf of the defendant.

Unless Stebbins is completely delusional and legitimately thinks he has the ability to win, which isn't unlikely.
 
Unless Stebbins is completely delusional and legitimately thinks he has the ability to win, which isn't unlikely.

He is completely delusional whether through subpar acting skills, but he sounded like he was in tears because the Judge in the case against Creetosis didn't allow his complaint to be filed. You would have to be delusional to keep filing lolsuits over hurt feelings and reasons of 'This person is a scumbag and deserves to be sued.' All of his lolsuits going forward will be easily pushed off because of his own admittance, he sues people because they're scumbags and deserve to be sued.
Supposedly he's getting Spectre's videos pulled from Rumble and even threatening him with legal actions even though anyone that falls for his trap of 'Argue my points and I'll accept that I am wrong.'

Big red flag here is that Stebbins can't fathom ever being wrong about anything in his mind, and there is no point to argue him because unlike what he says he is unable to fathom the idea of ever being wrong. He is a walking contradiction that has put forward the idea that he can be debated, but the moment that you disagree with him all bets are off and he'll chase after you with his turkey gobbling warcry for all of your value as a human. He is ungovernable, and unemployable. He is just smart enough to figure out how to file lawsuits, but that's it. He can't provide evidence to backup his claims beyond his word.

He believes that his right and everyone else is wrong and doesn't know what they're talking about. He will even go to great lengths to call a lawsuit a win when in reality time is running out on his case against SidAlpha because most of the 50 states in the US have libel laws where the statue of limitations is no more than 2 years. I have no clue how in the fuck mold brain thinks he's winning in that one, but supposedly he is in his words.
 
Back