Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.2%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 46 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 185 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 137 6.0%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 489 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,274 56.2%

  • Total voters
    2,266
Stabby's autism really shines through on this one.

He's auguring the letter of the law (you can't fine me because I only lied a little bit) and not it's intent and the old chestnut of the judge is totes biased against me comes back for another try.

He's not writing this for the magistrate, he's writing this with the appeal already in his mind. He knows the magistrate will rule against him and probably already has the appeal paperwork filled out.
 
He's not writing this for the magistrate, he's writing this with the appeal already in his mind. He knows the magistrate will rule against him and probably already has the appeal paperwork filled out.
That makes sense why he's trying to speedrun the dismissal. When he gets sanctioned and it's dismissed he can then go straight to the appeals court without begging for an interlocutory appeal.

I also noticed something.
The mod date on his alleged 7/31 document is today, as one might expect when it gets the little stamp put on it and uploaded by the clerk. But why, if it was "Filed" on the 31st did it not show up till today.
2025-08-05_11-37.webp
The creation date, on at least one previous filing matches the filing date even when it was after hours, in this case it does not.
I'm going to suggest that on the 31st Stabby uploaded his document, but sadly it was corrupt and the court couldn't read it, so they let him know Friday and he couldn't get his computer problem "fixed" until Monday. Since he really did file on 7/31 they helpfully backdated the fixed file to that date. This, of course, gave him all weekend to finish gobbling in the filing.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure there

I think David will try to drag this out as long as possible to avoid paying the fine. So I think he will try every trick in the book as it only costs him time and David's time is worthless.

In the end however I think he will end up eating this one. He lied on a court document and that's a sanctionable offense.

Funny...David's greed over 15 dollars will end up costing him everything. I dunno what the court collection process is, I wonder if David will ever really have to pay. I mean he's got nothing, no job, no savings and lives off of the state so in the end the courts can't do too much to him.
 
In unrelated Stabby news. Stabby v Alphabet, now just Bibi Faizi. He has filed a motion for a subpoena duces tecum for the identity of Bibi Faizi against Alphabet.

And he has cited Avvo.
2025-08-05_12-39.webp

We'll see what YouTube/Alphabet comes back with assuming the motion is granted, which it likely will be as the court told him to do it.2025-08-05_12-40.webp

 
NOW COMES Plaintiff Stabby and his "Akshually" filing.
Honestly, the gall of saying he doesn't have the money to pay the fine. As I recall, he does, he'd just have to fork over most of the money he won from his first real legal "win" (because he couldn't help but squabble over fifteen bucks).

And the aimless "Judge is biased against me" defense is so quintessentially "Stebbins," I'm surprised that part of the filing didn't file its own lawsuit while making weird off-screen turkey noises.
 
Just keep plugging away at those lawsuits, lad.

One day you'll get your eleventy trillion dollar settlement for clips of shitty Fiverr songs that had negative commercial value anyway and then you won't have to do all this tedious work. :story:
View attachment 7740461
View attachment 7740462
I haven't been keeping up much with this fat turkey fuck, but does he actively tie his fucking AcerThorn shit to his work? Holy shit, man. No wonder there were people who claimed to work with him posting in this thread lmfao.
I am honestly not shocked if it is real that he tried to download data off of a customers phone, it was the nudes of the guys' wife or some shit right? Lmfao.
 
Acerthorn really is insane. I'd love to hear his reasoning for putting this in the filing:
1.webp
Know what judges love most? When you insult them! Can't wait to see how this works out for him.

I think THIS was my favorite part though:
2.webp
"You WILL respond to EVERY SINGLE WORD of this filing, no matter HOW ridiculous it is." I can hear the gobbling from here. Also, "handwaiving." :story:
 
Acerthorn really is insane. I'd love to hear his reasoning for putting this in the filing:
View attachment 7741382
Know what judges love most? When you insult them! Can't wait to see how this works out for him.

I think THIS was my favorite part though:
View attachment 7741385
"You WILL respond to EVERY SINGLE WORD of this filing, no matter HOW ridiculous it is." I can hear the gobbling from here. Also, "handwaiving." :story:
Jesus christ I knew he was retarded and egocentric but this is some next level entitlement
Imagine how horrifying it would be if karens were that entitled

You bet if he physically could he'd storm into the white house with his stebbinsstabber™️ and try to get a carving off whatever president there is in office
 
Acerthorn really is insane. I'd love to hear his reasoning for putting this in the filing:
View attachment 7741382
Know what judges love most? When you insult them! Can't wait to see how this works out for him.

I think THIS was my favorite part though:
View attachment 7741385
"You WILL respond to EVERY SINGLE WORD of this filing, no matter HOW ridiculous it is." I can hear the gobbling from here. Also, "handwaiving." :story:
I've heard women judges really like it when you talk about their lady parts and alcohol.
He needs to take a few more pages from the Rekieta playbook.
 
That makes sense why he's trying to speedrun the dismissal. When he gets sanctioned and it's dismissed he can then go straight to the appeals court without begging for an interlocutory appeal.

I also noticed something.
The mod date on his alleged 7/31 document is today, as one might expect when it gets the little stamp put on it and uploaded by the clerk. But why, if it was "Filed" on the 31st did it not show up till today.
View attachment 7740657
The creation date, on at least one previous filing matches the filing date even when it was after hours, in this case it does not.
I'm going to suggest that on the 31st Stabby uploaded his document, but sadly it was corrupt and the court couldn't read it, so they let him know Friday and he couldn't get his computer problem "fixed" until Monday. Since he really did file on 7/31 they helpfully backdated the fixed file to that date. This, of course, gave him all weekend to finish gobbling in the filing.
thats most likely counted as a "new document" when the court scans it with a stamp and the docket / court info at the top of all pages i would think
 
In unrelated Stabby news. Stabby v Alphabet, now just Bibi Faizi. He has filed a motion for a subpoena duces tecum for the identity of Bibi Faizi against Alphabet.

And he has cited Avvo.
View attachment 7740892

We'll see what YouTube/Alphabet comes back with assuming the motion is granted, which it likely will be as the court told him to do it.View attachment 7740918

he wants 5 years of GPS movement that no court ever would allow ( if they catch that it says 5 years) David will most likely just because of this BS get google in and get them to fight him until the case gets thrown out compeltely .. Possibly google shows all the time he filled false DMCA knowingly and the still sued people and never learned
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Adr1anD
he wants 5 years of GPS movement that no court ever would allow ( if they catch that it says 5 years) David will most likely just because of this BS get google in and get them to fight him until the case gets thrown out compeltely .. Possibly google shows all the time he filled false DMCA knowingly and the still sued people and never learned
It seems likely that he'll get exactly what Bibi submitted on the complaint form. Which may or may not be accurate, depending on if he's the same user as the Bibi YouTube account. I looked at the form, you're supposed to provide real name, address, email and phone. I did not check to see if it would be accepted if I wasn't logged in. I suspect that since the name appears to be an alias it's highly likely all other data is fake.
 
Last edited:
Back