Well, that's government for you, isn't it? They could hire more clerks, and solve this in 15 minutes, but africa and other shitholes need to receive billions of our money. The structure is there, only thing you need is governmental compliance. That, however, is just a dream. Government for the people is like troons without child molestation, it just doesn't happen.
The motion repeatedly cites a case between two dear old friends of ours:
The court can, but rarely does actually act on its own motion, and there are reasons for that. We really don't want free-roving judges traversing the countryside doing things nobody asked for. Google apparently has the motivation to do this, because they have more money than God and because as this idiot keeps suing everyone on their platforms, they invariably get sucked into it as well.
I literally was looking at the case name thinking I needed to read it later because haha that's Carl's name. And here we are.
Not much until he collects a few of these little rewards and qualifies for a nationwide ban, which very few people manage. Perhaps he should try to speedrun it. Google's problem from this perspective is they're so ubiquitous they probably qualify for general jurisdiction in every District Court in the country including the Northern Mariana Islands and other shit like that.
How often does an actual request to declare a Plaintiff Vexatious cross their desk though. It seems to be one of those things that is rarely granted, but also rarely asked for. And if nothing else Google has very effectively communicated to the Court that the Pro Se In Forma Pauperis moron is an autistic and psychotic nutbag with a long history of lunacy.
I don't believe it would put a stop in ongoing cases (bar an order to that effect), but it likely would be used as consideration in considering the merits of the case
Absolutety idiotic!
Ooof! That was fast. And rather brutal. Countdown to next Mandamus demand? Or demand the Judges recuse?
Certainly, you have the right to file a lawsuit in the event you believe you've been wronged, but what about someone who is clearly just filing lawsuits with malicious intent and no real goal of winning based on the facts? And are you saying that you believe ruling someone a vexacious litigant should never happen? If not, then what is your limit?
Worse, he plays like a sweaty tryhard at a friendly local tournament. He's playing super scuffy, thinking he's hot shit. He calls the judge (heh) on every actions his opponents does, and throw a fit when the judge disqualify him for his 5th unsportsmanlike conduit of the night, instead of his opponent who took an approved shortcut to combat.
