Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Mister Mint]

Though I want to say that there is no point in countersuing besides filing a motion requesting the court to consider labelling Acerderp a vexatious litigant and demanding him to file any new filings with a lawyer on board. Any sue back for fees will hit a dry well infested with roaches.

This is what I want to see most. I'd love to see him get his computer taken away, but then there's not as much milk for us all. I like the idea of taking away his frivolous lawsuits since he seems to cling to them as his magical train out of crippling poverty.

 

[Furry killer]

The video in the OP where he's screaming and thrashing around the apartment makes me dread having a sound and logical arguement with him.

True and I would too. That's the problem with this retard.

 

[Kendrick]

This is what I want to see most. I'd love to see him get his computer taken away, but then there's not as much milk for us all. I like the idea of taking away his frivolous lawsuits since he seems to cling to them as his magical train out of crippling poverty.

I doubt a bankruptcy would deprive Acert from his PC. Depending on where you are, there's some stuff you can't just lose. The means to do your job is usually one. You can't take a plumber's tools during a bankruptcy, so this would probably apply to a streamer's computer. (Even if he's unsuccesful.)

 

[Useful_Mistake]

SidAlpha:

"It's not just me. I'm doing my best to help protect 8 other Creators in addition to myself within the same lawsuits. Creetosis, Echo Wilder, Rogue Internet Man, Initiative Kookie, TGP482, SofiannP, Enclave Emily, JustEmi. This ISN'T about just me. This is for all of us. And the super secret 9th member who had their channel nuked by Acerthorn via 3 DMCA strikes, never to be recovered, xArtemisWolf. Actually not so secret, but with her channel gone, he can't sue her. But She has DEFINITELY been harmed as well."

https://web.archive.org/web/20220419130710/https://twitter.com/SidAlpha/status/1516250021150134275

Sidalpha:

"I am back. I may have to conduct an early pull from GoFundMe and Paypal before week's end to cover the retainer fee. Just so everyone is aware, that will be precisely $15k. I will work on a publicly available spreadsheet for funds donated vs. removed and why."

https://web.archive.org/web/20220419131000/https://twitter.com/SidAlpha/status/1516244048914227200

 

[GosalynGaming]

Acerthorn about page, the disclaimer is a joke.

https://archive.ph/3duJP

Echo Wilder tweet about the fundraiser for the Acer lawsuit

https://archive.ph/PbVfJ

 

[Kendrick]

Acerthorn about page, the disclaimer is a joke.
View attachment 3194906

https://archive.ph/3duJP

Well that disclaimer is an outright lie. I'm 150% sure he does not own most of the copyrights, and pretty sure he never filed a succesful copyright related to any work he's done that someone might clip out.

He doesn't own the copyrights to the games he plays, he owns a limited license to play and stream them. (Comes with all games).

He also doesn't own any copyrighted musics from those games, again only owning the automatic license from the games themselves.

And I'm pretty confident that "intent to secure copyright" means that the letter's in the mail already. You can't just say "I claim copyright, therefore I claim intent to secure copyright, but will do nothing until I deem I need to file it to slam someone I don't like with the books of the law".

(c)In the case of a work consisting of sounds, images, or both, the first fixation of which is made simultaneously with its transmission, the copyright owner may, either before or after such fixation takes place, institute an action for infringement under section 501, fully subject to the remedies provided by sections 502 through 505 and section 510, if, in accordance with requirements that the Register of Copyrights shall prescribe by regulation, the copyright owner—
(1)serves notice upon the infringer, not less than 48 hours before such fixation, identifying the work and the specific time and source of its first transmission, and declaring an intention to secure copyright in the work; and
(2)makes registration for the work, if required by subsection (a), within three months after its first transmission.

Yeah, that disclaimer is bullshit.

 

[AnOminous]

It's more to prevent a precedent where some idiot wins a court case despite fair use. If that happens, it opens the doors for other malicious (and possibly not autistic) actors to sue people for things that are fair use and using Acerthorn's court win as precedent.

In other words, it's about sending a message.

Trial court cases aren't going to result in any meaningful precedent, and any competent lawyer could handle one. Vastly overspending to defend such a case means the NEET autist wins because wasting your time and money was his whole point in the first place.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

and pretty sure he never filed a succesful copyright related to any work he's done that someone might clip out.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391146/gov.uscourts.cand.391146.15.1.pdf

Can't provide a link or archive, because copyright office links are temporary ones, and trying to archive them always fails. You can go to https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First, and do the search yourself either by his Name, or one of his copyrights.

 

[PickwickPub]

It's more to prevent a precedent where some idiot wins a court case despite fair use. If that happens, it opens the doors for other malicious (and possibly not autistic) actors to sue people for things that are fair use and using Acerthorn's court win as precedent.

In other words, it's about sending a message.

Its pretty important not to end up like dean and Vicki in that retarded Preston poulter lawsuit. While clearly a frivolous lolsuit, they didn't take it seriously and one defaulted while the other waived key jurisdictional arguments by relying on a sperg with no education. Actually in acerthorns current set of lawsuits I believe two defendants have already defaulted. For pro se litigants thats manna from heaven because they had no possibility of winning on the merits. Melinda was psyched about when her inadequate service caused Null not to respond.

Its worth hiring a good lawyer even in frivolous suits because a layman cannot be expected to know and raise the defenses necessary for dismissal.

 

[SidAlpha]

Sorry about that then. Guess good ol' Youtube is fucking everything over again. Could you post that Linktree link here as well? Thanks!

Happy to. And no need to apologize. Whenever something doesn't go correctly for me in regards to stuff like that, it's almost always YouTube's fault lol. God, what a shit platform.

https://linktr.ee/sidalpha

 

[Nasty Habits]

great op! first heard about this guy from cr1t1kal, great to hear more retarded shit hes done

 

[PsychoNerd054]

great op! first heard about this guy from cr1t1kal, great to hear more retarded shit hes done

Doesn't seem like an easy thing to do either considering the consequences that may follow for sharing his stuff. Major props for the dare.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I doubt a bankruptcy would deprive Acert from his PC. Depending on where you are, there's some stuff you can't just lose. The means to do your job is usually one. You can't take a plumber's tools during a bankruptcy, so this would probably apply to a streamer's computer. (Even if he's unsuccesful.)

The law doesn't always see streaming as a job.

 

[Pee Cola]

BREAKING: in the SofiannP/InitiativeKookie/TGP482 sister laswuit, Corpo Attorneys INTERVENED in the motion for default judgement and it is SO ORDERED that the Acerthorn accidental livestream is NOT Copyrightable and Copyright Claims of that are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Basically Acerthorn can eat a dick. Over 50% of his allegations of infringement just evaporated with a single ruling. Fighting these lawsuits just got that much easier. (archive)

 

[lolwatagain]

BREAKING: in the SofiannP/InitiativeKookie/TGP482 sister laswuit, Corpo Attorneys INTERVENED in the motion for default judgement and it is SO ORDERED that the Acerthorn accidental livestream is NOT Copyrightable and Copyright Claims of that are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Basically Acerthorn can eat a dick. Over 50% of his allegations of infringement just evaporated with a single ruling. Fighting these lawsuits just got that much easier. (archive)

View attachment 3200396

Sid's jumping the gun here. That's the proposed order, not a final signed order.


Edit: We won't have any ruling until June 3rd at the earliest.

 

[Pee Cola]

Sid's jumping the gun here. That's the proposed order, not a final signed order.

View attachment 3200424

I wonder if/when Sid's lawyer will tell him to cool it. I saw it mentioned earlier ITT that there are YouTube lawyers out there that know about the case but are currently reticent because they don't want to accidentally give Stabbins any clues on how he could potentially improve his case.

 

[lolwatagain]

I wonder if/when Sid's lawyer will tell him to cool it. I saw it mentioned earlier ITT that there are YouTube lawyers out there that know about the case but are currently reticent because they don't want to accidentally give Stabbins any clues on how he could potentially improve his case.

Any Youtube lawyer who thinks they can accidentally give Stabbins a hint about improving his case due to their analysis must have a massive fucking ego. Or the standard ego for a litigator.

His copyright claims are unsalvageable because he made a Judicial Admission in his fucking complaint. He cannot walk it back, he cannot take it back. It is an unalienable truth in this litigation that he made that video on accident, and lacks the bare minimum creativity necessary to obtain copyright protection. Nothing short of the hand of God or a fucking time machine can unfuck his complaint.

Once again, he is his own worst enemy; which seems to be a common lolcow trend.

 

[SidAlpha]

Sid's jumping the gun here. That's the proposed order, not a final signed order.

View attachment 3200424
Edit: We won't have any ruling until June 3rd at the earliest.

I did jump the gun, unfortunately. I let excitement overrule my ability to read.

 

[Seria]

Sid's jumping the gun here. That's the proposed order, not a final signed order.

View attachment 3200424
Edit: We won't have any ruling until June 3rd at the earliest.

ohh this is well argued .. this is going to make Asscorn explode LOL ... i call this a nuclear anal bomb

Edit. Also it might take some time before the judge rules, i expect the judge wants a counter argument from Acerthorn first ( and he is going to file lots of documents trying to get this thrown out still ) before the judge makes a judgment .. but it looks pretty dar for acerthorn if the judge allows this

 

[lolwatagain]

ohh this is well argued .. this is going to make Asscorn explode LOL ... i call this a nuclear anal bomb

Edit. Also it might take some time before the judge rules, i expect the judge wants a counter argument from Acerthorn first ( and he is going to file lots of documents trying to get this thrown out still ) before the judge makes a judgment .. but it looks pretty dar for acerthorn if the judge allows this

Acerthorn's Opposition is due on May 4th. I'll be shocked if we don't get a rambling screed filed by Friday. Youtube's reply is due on May 11th and Acerthorn will probably try to file a sur-reply afterwards. If the Judge decides to have a hearing instead of ruling on the papers, I would not be surprised if we see a tentative ruling issued on June 2nd. If the judge decides to rule on the papers, then we'll see a ruling sometime between June 3rd and whenever the hell the Judge feels like it, which will depend on how badly he wants this shit off of his docket.