Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%

  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%

  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%

  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%

  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%

  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%

  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%
  • Total voters
    2,240
Rangoon said:
So, 18 hours ago, David has updated and pinned a comment on his Elden Ring video. The funniest part is that not only is he being a massive snowflake but he might update his comment further. Here it is:
EVERYONE: READ TO BEFORE COMEMNTING!

My responses to some of the most common complaints. Those who continue to post the same comments will have their comments deleted and they will be blocked from the channel.

"You can't have an opinion on a game you haven't played." Bite me.

"You aren't criticizing the game, you're just criticizing the community." No, I'm criticizing both. I'm also criticizing From Software for cultivating this fanbase, just like how it's the fault of KiwiFarms or 4Chan for allowing such toxic communities to thrive on their platforms.

"The title is misleading because you're just criticizing the community, not the game." The title is fine the way it is and will undergo no revisions. Got a problem with that? Feel free to report this video for misleading titles. I guarantee you that Youtube will take no action. The title is not misleading; you are just butthurt.

"You are the toxic one." No, I'm simply expressing my disdain for the toxic community. At best, this is self-defense toxicity.

"If you post such horrible takes, you have to expect backlash." So in other words, "If a woman tells everyone that her boyfriend is abusing her, that boyfriend is totally justified in going home and beating the shit out of her as punishment for spreading such horrible lies about him. What did she honestly expect to happen when she starts spreading such malicious rumors about him?!"
Or, alternatively, "If you call a police officer corrupt or crooked, of course he's going to plant drugs in your car and frame you for a crime! What do you expect?!"
Is that basically what you're saying?

"I haven't seen any of the toxicity you speak of." In other words ... "Well, I get enough to eat. So world hunger must be a myth." Is that the long and short of it?

"Why don't you just play the game and not interact with the community?" Why doesn't the community just cast out the toxic fuckwads?

"If you haven't played any of the game, where is this footage from?" Check the description.

"How is your use of someone else's footage not copyright infringement" Why don't you ask your attorney?

I'll add more as they occur to me.
TL;DR spastic spergout and "replies" about various things related to the video as well as other shit, continues to play the victim and whine at every single opportunity despite being a total hypocrite who has never even touched the fucking game prior to his "review". I could go on but it would just lead to the same thing over and over again. Also he called us out.
Click to expand...
Next time attach a screenshot and and archive.
Screenshot 2022-05-03 005532.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Onni Kalsarikännit, GosalynGaming, Stocking Anarchy and 2 others
I'm reading through his replies on his Elden Ring video and my god this man has no sense of perspective. He's just a hairsbreadth away from comparing his treatment by the From Soft community to The Holocaust.

Here's an abridged account, for brevity:

Acerthorn: *makes that video that Elden Ring sucks even though he didn't play it because its fanbase is shitty and From Soft doesn't somehow magically make all their fans nice, non-rabid, affable fellows.*

Viewer Comment: I have the opposite experience, I streamed Dark Souls 2 and found the community to be incredibly friendly and inviting.

Acerthorn: OH YEAH, SO YOU MUST THINK WORLD HUNGER DOESN'T EXIST SINCE YOU'RE GETTING ENOUGH TO EAT.

Viewer: ...no, I'm saying it's unfortunate you experienced that when I experienced the opposite. I think maybe you get what you give to a community. If they say "git gud" throw a joke back at them. Don't take it too seriously, most people are just there to have fun.

Acerthorn: IF 9 COPS WITNESS 1 COP BEATING A CIVILIAN, HOW MANY CROOKED COPS DO YOU HAVE?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, ConSluttant, Onni Kalsarikännit and 2 others
Mister Mint said:
I'm reading through his replies on his Elden Ring video and my god this man has no sense of perspective. He's just a hairsbreadth away from comparing his treatment by the From Soft community to The Holocaust.

Here's an abridged account, for brevity:

Acerthorn: *makes that video that Elden Ring sucks even though he didn't play it because its fanbase is shitty and From Soft doesn't somehow magically make all their fans nice, non-rabid, affable fellows.*

Viewer Comment: I have the opposite experience, I streamed Dark Souls 2 and found the community to be incredibly friendly and inviting.

Acerthorn: OH YEAH, SO YOU MUST THINK WORLD HUNGER DOESN'T EXIST SINCE YOU'RE GETTING ENOUGH TO EAT.

Viewer: ...no, I'm saying it's unfortunate you experienced that when I experienced the opposite. I think maybe you get what you give to a community. If they say "git gud" throw a joke back at them. Don't take it too seriously, most people are just there to have fun.

Acerthorn: IF 9 COPS WITNESS 1 COP BEATING A CIVILIAN, HOW MANY CROOKED COPS DO YOU HAVE?
Click to expand...
Those replies are why I'm saying that he has definite potential to be the next DSP or WingsOfRedemption.

There is just no limit whatsoever to both the quantity and quality for the level of sheer retardation he spews out.

All that has to be done is to leave a critical, mean, or spiteful comment on any of his YouTube videos and he will respond by either flipping out Gran Autismo style or threatening to call his lawyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Onni Kalsarikännit, DiggieSmalls and Mister Mint
Found this,
"Why does Trunks' girlfriend have to be Mai?"
"Why is it that literally every major relationship in the series has to be based on people who are already in the story? Why can't somebody be introduced into the series for the sole purpose of being someone else's love interest?

I can honestly think of only two times when it made sense for established characters to hook up. The first is Goku and Chi-Chi. Goku had no interest whatsoever in dating, so the only way Goku was going to get married (and thus, the only way he would have sired Gohan into the story) was if he inadvertently promised to marry someone and she later came back to guilt-trip Goku into it. The second one was Yamcha and Bulma. It was a perfect thematic resolution to the Pilaf Saga that they ultimately realize they had each others' wishes all along and didn't even need the dragon balls. It brought everything in the first saga full circle and tied it all up in a nice little bow.

But after that? Too much. 18 ended up marrying Krillin, Videl marries Gohan, Vegeta and Bulma get together. The only time we ever see a character introduced into the story for the sole purpose of being the love interest of another established character is Launch, and even then, she was never Roshi's girlfriend, so much as someone for Roshi to unwittingly molest.

Then Trunks ends up falling in love with Mai. I'm sorry, but I draw the line there. Couldn't Trunks have just fallen in love with some completely new girl instead? It just makes the universe feel too small that Trunks just happens to fall in love with someone who is from Bulma's and Goku's extended social circle.

Not to mention, in Future Trunks' timeline, Mai has to be old enough to be Trunks' grandmother. We're given no indication that Pilaf, Shu, and Mai used the dragon balls in their timeline to regress their own ages. In fact, by that point in Future Trunks' timeline, Piccolo would have been killed by the androids, so there wouldn't have even been any dragon balls in the first place! So yeah, even though Mai looks the same in the Goku Black Saga as she does in the original Dragon Ball, she's old enough to be Trunks' grandmother!

I'm sorry, but Toriyama could have easily just introduced some completely new girl for the sole purpose of being Trunks' girlfriend. Why does it have to be someone who just happens to have crossed paths with Goku and Bulma? I'm surprised all of humanity hasn't died out from inbreeding if the universe is that small!"
archive.ph

Why does Trunks' girlfriend have to be Mai? : dbz

archived 3 May 2022 17:59:36 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: moocow, Onni Kalsarikännit and Useful_Mistake
lolwatagain said:
No. Courts are just generally hesitant to restrict a person's access to the courts unless it is absolutely necessary. There isn't any real philosophy on the number of warnings or frivolous filings a person gets. But most people don't want to be slapped with Rule 11 sanctions.

Even if the court declares him vexatious, they'll just require him to take extra steps before he can file IFP. They'll require him to obtain a lawyer before filing; require him to post a bond while filing; or limit the number of suits he can file, etc.
Click to expand...

Useful_Mistake said:
You gotta understand, what you are asking for is very rare, and the courts are very hesitant to limit your rights as such. The "general philosophy" heavily relies on either state law or (in states where there isn't such status in the statutes (like I believe VA) ) on the way appellate courts decided to handle such pests. In places like Nevada or Utah the burden is extremely low. In Nevada one frivolous motion is technically enough (although I have never seen it be lower than 5 lawsuits although even there the plaintiff had been shitting up the courts in literally all the states, and only had started shitting up Nevada. See O'Neal v. Zurich Ins. Co., 2:18-cv-01677-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2021) , where in Utah losing five claims for relief, in 7 years is enough. California (where this lawsuit takes place) requires five lost litigations in seven years. That being said usually the courts try to not attach a vexatious litigant status unless all other alternatives failed.

However, if I were to try to define a "general philosophy" of a annoyed court, it'd be a few warnings, sanctions, and only then the declaration. That being said, such declarations are to be very rare as it does severely limit the Plaintiff's right to the petition the courts.


Or not allow to file IFP at all.

They can do a whole lot with declaration of vexatious litigant, and every state has its favorite method. The most common ones I see is your first and third examples. California (where this lawsuit takes place) favors a bit of a different method. They like to issue a "prefiling order that prohibits a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in California in [propria persona] without first obtaining permission from the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court where the filing is proposed" They even have a list of all vexatious litigants in Cali (updated monthy)
Click to expand...
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Acerthorn already has a limitation on the number of cases he may file annually in at least one Federal Circuit. So some degree of vexatious status is already in effect somewhere.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mister Mint and Useful_Mistake
The first and fourth reddit posts are not that bad. Makes him look kinda normal.
 
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO INTERVENE AND DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White. Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Extension of Time; Denying Motion. Reply due by 6/1/2022.

Screenshot_20220504-021136_Drive.jpg

Judge warns Acer again
 

Attachments

  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Onni Kalsarikännit, GosalynGaming, lolwatagain and 7 others
Useful_Mistake said:
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO INTERVENE AND DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White. Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Extension of Time; Denying Motion. Reply due by 6/1/2022.

View attachment 3244654

Judge warns Acer again
Click to expand...
Uh-oh

1651621244896.png


A reasonable person would accept that this is an obvious typo. Yet somehow, I see Acerthorn using this as a reason as to why this order should be anulled. Incoming REVERSAL OF ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO INTERVENE AND DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE (Dkt. No. 148.), anyone?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: GosalynGaming, Total Annihilation and Mister Mint
Pee Cola said:
Uh-oh

View attachment 3244758

A reasonable person would accept that this is an obvious typo. Yet somehow, I see Acerthorn using this as a reason as to why this order should be anulled. Incoming REVERSAL OF ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO INTERVENE AND DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE (Dkt. No. 148.), anyone?
Click to expand...
You're definitely 100% right on that. He's gonna think he's such a genius too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pee Cola
thismanlies said:
How much trouble would the judge get in if he said “Just drop the fucking suit you crazy cunt.”
Click to expand...
He'd definitely be the next one sued.
Though he has a very good chance of that being the case anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back