GosalynGaming
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
Echo’s emails with Acerthorn.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only thing this proves is that Acer is incapable of reading his own citations, most written in pretty simple english. As is, nothing he said is correct, and a few citations actually work against his own case.Echo’s emails with Acerthorn.
View attachment 3257623View attachment 3257624View attachment 3257631View attachment 3257632View attachment 3257633View attachment 3257634View attachment 3257635View attachment 3257636View attachment 3257637View attachment 3257638View attachment 3257640View attachment 3257641View attachment 3257642View attachment 3257643View attachment 3257644View attachment 3257655View attachment 3257656View attachment 3257659View attachment 3257660
I'm not sure the judge will appreciate this casual accusation of criminal wrongdoing by the opposing attorneys. Especially when the process for video deletion is automatic and not under the control over the corporate attorneys. Is this guy capable of having even a single interaction where he comes off as pleasant or professional?Accusing a parody account of destroying evidence and being an impostor. (oh sorry, an "imposter" who destroyed "the proofs")
View attachment 3257709
This is document 148 of just the Polano case, by the way...
I could go through this and try to explain how everything in it is wrong but I think it's just easier to say this.Echo’s emails with Acerthorn.
View attachment 3257623View attachment 3257624View attachment 3257631View attachment 3257632View attachment 3257633View attachment 3257634View attachment 3257635View attachment 3257636View attachment 3257637View attachment 3257638View attachment 3257640View attachment 3257641View attachment 3257642View attachment 3257643View attachment 3257644View attachment 3257655View attachment 3257656View attachment 3257659View attachment 3257660
Hello there. I am actually behind the Acerthorn The True Acerthorn parody account. I've obviously been following this thread for sometime now.Accusing a parody account of destroying evidence and being an impostor. (oh sorry, an "imposter" who destroyed "the proofs")
View attachment 3257709
This is document 148 of just the Polano case, by the way...
Worse, Acerthorn is in some aspects like Jonathan Yaniv, Cyraxx, Andrew Dobson, DarkSydePhil, etc.He’s got that Russell Greer understanding of the law. For Acerthorn, fair use means “being fair to my feelings”. He doesn’t seem to grasp that comment and especially criticism is the bedrock of fair use.
The demands to patrol a comment section and remove anything that might hurt his feelings is especially laughable.
Neither is true. Harassment or doxing have nothing to do with validity of your fair use claim.He goes on and on how in the law, abusing fair use to harass or doxx someone makes fair use invalid. I can grant Harassment, but doxxing? Publicly-available information being mentioned is not doxxing.
Plus with in the case of Echo's video, it wasn't even the video it's self that he is claiming was "harassing/Doxing" him it was her comment section.Neither is true. Harassment or doxing have nothing to do with validity of your fair use claim.
I don't think there has been one copyright suit that won because of "harassment" anywhere.Neither is true. Harassment or doxing have nothing to do with validity of your fair use claim.
Maybe EULA, "if you play this game, you agree to our terms and conditions."Reading an email isn't the same as accepting a contract. Where the fuck does he learn this bullshit from?
A email disclaimer has as much credibility as a mattress tag.
That only works for software, they're also not legally binding.Maybe EULA, "if you play this game, you agree to our terms and conditions."
We are talking about AcerthornThat only works for software, they're also not legally binding.
This was his "legal theory" for the Microsoft case also so you are likely right. Basically I am amending the xbox live EULA you have with me and if you don't say anything I assume you agree. Since you didn't say anything I am now activating the clause that says I can sue and win half a trillion instantly.Maybe EULA, "if you play this game, you agree to our terms and conditions."