Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Echo’s emails with Acerthorn.
4797018B-9C88-448A-A021-132757F20796.png
DAB127D2-0148-4FE7-80D6-455965EA5ABC.jpeg
13B265D0-9E37-444E-9DFC-9D62DDCE588F.jpeg
0EE6D498-6C12-4D1A-858E-0C7C070B15D8.jpeg
65BE516C-6EC4-4500-827A-4021AD5CB541.jpeg
99859E1A-3BCC-40B3-BB3D-4B535FA89FDB.jpeg
8EE47FEF-C309-4D2C-A85E-30D792765B45.jpeg
861C0F23-9237-4934-943F-C35AAEE535B8.jpeg
3E7A718B-056B-4224-8FF8-50F0977AA09F.jpeg
C8391E82-F0CE-4AC8-8871-73451C59CCE0.jpeg
6C04318E-5F9B-4E46-A136-9FD8478B0B13.jpeg
6412EA5F-166B-45EC-A5C3-F9CAC5DD1C0A.jpeg
A97C149C-CF0C-41AA-8D76-2422B119EF27.jpeg
B640EAD1-EC35-4BC0-B034-E3D23A78CFDA.jpeg
1922F1FC-E0C6-4E83-A160-101A7FDB1B98.jpeg
1A025A47-04D3-49F6-94C4-0CDD5B4C545C.jpeg
75C4FE04-1CCE-4E5A-AB44-F1927889FE3F.jpeg
60623894-BDB6-4435-AFDE-21BA372209A4.jpeg
545B4277-6F2A-4374-865C-24BF0D70D17B.jpeg
 
The only thing this proves is that Acer is incapable of reading his own citations, most written in pretty simple english. As is, nothing he said is correct, and a few citations actually work against his own case.

Edit: @Enclave Emily if you post screenshots of new docs, please post the fucking docs too. I attached it to this post
 

Attachments

Imagine such a lack of responsibilities in your life that you can just write up 28 page emails to people and complain that you have to adjust your sleep schedule because you committed to playing video games in two days. I'd say every day is Saturday but I have more to do than that on my Saturdays.

Maybe he's on to something and being in poverty, worthless, and playing the lawttery is the way to go.
 
Accusing a parody account of destroying evidence and being an impostor. (oh sorry, an "imposter" who destroyed "the proofs")

View attachment 3257709


This is document 148 of just the Polano case, by the way...
I'm not sure the judge will appreciate this casual accusation of criminal wrongdoing by the opposing attorneys. Especially when the process for video deletion is automatic and not under the control over the corporate attorneys. Is this guy capable of having even a single interaction where he comes off as pleasant or professional?

1651946074434.png
 
Accusing a parody account of destroying evidence and being an impostor. (oh sorry, an "imposter" who destroyed "the proofs")

View attachment 3257709


This is document 148 of just the Polano case, by the way...
Hello there. I am actually behind the Acerthorn The True Acerthorn parody account. I've obviously been following this thread for sometime now.
Anyways, upon reading the full fucking document, he claims that intervenors somehow "sabotaged" evidence by maliciously taking it down.

1651956377359.png

1651956782273.png


1651957477914.png


1651956606504.png

Yeah...do you mind explaining this, obesity smurf? You took it down. This is an irrefutable lie, lol.
 
He’s got that Russell Greer understanding of the law. For Acerthorn, fair use means “being fair to my feelings”. He doesn’t seem to grasp that comment and especially criticism is the bedrock of fair use.

The demands to patrol a comment section and remove anything that might hurt his feelings is especially laughable.
 
I like how in his email he goes long and wide before getting to the point. He's such a bully he doesn't even understand how to explain himself without shoving his opinion as fact and accepting no substitutes.

He never ever mention that criticism is a valid form of fair use, even though it's constantly been upheld by courts around the US. Not a spec of mention of that.

He goes on and on how in the law, abusing fair use to harass or doxx someone makes fair use invalid. I can grant Harassment, but doxxing? Publicly-available information being mentioned is not doxxing.

Now for the harassment claim. I feel that this term has been abused since a few years ago and means absolutely nothing when mentioned here. Harassment is repeated, unwanted contact. It can be aggressive, flirty, or civil, but it's defined trait is that it's repeated beyond request for it to stop. One video is not harassment, nor is one comment. And especially if those videos or comments are not directly sent to the person. If he googles his name to find all the criticism videos, he can't then claim they're harassing him, he willingly searched for them!

But the main issue in his email: he has to prove maliciousness. It's not enough to claim the videos are harassment, he has to take the legal definition of harassment and then explain how the video willingly falls in that category. He won't be able to because they aren't. Criticism isn't harassment. Even if 5 000 people make one video repeating the same character flaws that Acer has, it's still not harassment, unless Acer can prove there'a conspiracy to band together and harass him.
 
He’s got that Russell Greer understanding of the law. For Acerthorn, fair use means “being fair to my feelings”. He doesn’t seem to grasp that comment and especially criticism is the bedrock of fair use.

The demands to patrol a comment section and remove anything that might hurt his feelings is especially laughable.
Worse, Acerthorn is in some aspects like Jonathan Yaniv, Cyraxx, Andrew Dobson, DarkSydePhil, etc.
 
He goes on and on how in the law, abusing fair use to harass or doxx someone makes fair use invalid. I can grant Harassment, but doxxing? Publicly-available information being mentioned is not doxxing.
Neither is true. Harassment or doxing have nothing to do with validity of your fair use claim.
 
Neither is true. Harassment or doxing have nothing to do with validity of your fair use claim.
Plus with in the case of Echo's video, it wasn't even the video it's self that he is claiming was "harassing/Doxing" him it was her comment section.

On top of that Echo had no idea about the situation with the copyright abuse unit after she upload her video.
 
Neither is true. Harassment or doxing have nothing to do with validity of your fair use claim.
I don't think there has been one copyright suit that won because of "harassment" anywhere.
There's one paper I can cite though that a feminist claims that, and I'm paraphrasing this "copyright is a male tool to keep women down"
 
Maybe EULA, "if you play this game, you agree to our terms and conditions."
This was his "legal theory" for the Microsoft case also so you are likely right. Basically I am amending the xbox live EULA you have with me and if you don't say anything I assume you agree. Since you didn't say anything I am now activating the clause that says I can sue and win half a trillion instantly.
 
Back