Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Fascinating listen. I had not realized quite how insane the University of Arkansas stuff was. When Stabbins finally shoots up a Walmart or Federal Courthouse you just know Gamers and White people will be to blame. When every possible warning sign has been blaring for years. How many second chances do you have to give an obviously dangerous nutcase? And a better question to ask the State and Federal Courts is How The Fuck Does He Keep Getting Past the In Forma Pauperis Pro Se review process?
 
Lol asscorn filed in the two lawsuits he recently lost, citing that the judge has a grudge against him because of a sliiiiiiight corruption scandal.
 
Stebbins v. Rebolo et al:
MOTION to Set Aside Judgment pursuant to Rule 60 filed by David A. Stebbins. Motion Hearing set for 9/2/2022 10:00 AM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only before Judge Jeffrey S. White. Responses due by 8/8/2022. Replies due by 8/15/2022.
CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING. Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration and to Recuse set for 8/19/2022 09:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor before Judge Jeffrey S. White. Motion for Relief of Judgment set for 9/2/2022 09:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor before Judge Jeffrey S. White.
Screenshot 2022-07-26 020811.png
Stebbins v. Polano:
MOTION to Set Aside Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60 filed by David A. Stebbins. Motion Hearing set for 9/2/2022 10:00 AM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only before Judge Jeffrey S. White. Responses due by 8/8/2022. Replies due by 8/15/2022. (Stebbins, David) (Filed on 7/25/2022) (Entered: 07/25/2022)
CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING. Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration and to Recuse set for 8/19/2022 09:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor before Judge Jeffrey S. White. Motion for Relief of Judgment set for 9/2/2022 09:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor before Judge Jeffrey S. White. (dts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
Screenshot 2022-07-26 021035.png
Lol asscorn filed in the two lawsuits he recently lost, citing that the judge has a grudge against him because of a sliiiiiiight corruption scandal.
Post docs next time
 

Attachments

pic1.png

Third time's the charm? Maybe this time you will get Judge White to recuse himself? You'll get a videoconference call to prove your point.
I hope you prepared some objections and cleaned your hands so you can tell everyone in the call how corrupt they are
pic2.png


Shame he didn't cover the one against Texas, that one is truly mind-boggling.
Shame he says "I will cover lawsuits in chronological order" but covered Microsoft/Walmart first, and then the Tech University incident.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3529790

Third time's the charm? Maybe this time you will get Judge White to recuse himself? You'll get a videoconference call to prove your point.
I hope you prepared some objections and cleaned your hands so you can tell everyone in the call how corrupt they are
View attachment 3529786


Shame he says "I will cover lawsuits in chronological order" but covered Microsoft/Walmart first, and then the Tech University incident.
To be copyrightable, a work need only contain minimal creativity, not creative choices.
If you made no creative choices, how were you being creative in the first place?
 
He argues that the camera placement, camera angle & room 'refurbishing' used as background for his face were expressions of his creativity, along side the facial expressions he made
Fucking crazy, man.

Also, I don't recall the dismissal saying that Acer's future copyright filings are nullified. Did I miss something, or is Acer trying to make stuff up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant
Fucking crazy, man.

Also, I don't recall the dismissal saying that Acer's future copyright filings are nullified. Did I miss something, or is Acer trying to make stuff up?
What the dismissal of the second case said was because Acer had misrepresented information regarding the accidental livestream to the copyright board, the court would no longer take Acers presentation of a registered copyright as a presumption of valid copyright. Which in Acers eyes means they've been invalidated. Because he now must defend theem beyond filling out the form.
 
What the dismissal of the second case said was because Acer had misrepresented information regarding the accidental livestream to the copyright board, the court would no longer take Acers presentation of a registered copyright as a presumption of valid copyright. Which in Acers eyes means they've been invalidated. Because he now must defend theem beyond filling out the form.
A copyright registration is prima facie evidence of ownership, and the sort of evidence that creates a presumption of legal ownership. However, it is the sort of presumption called a rebuttable presumption. Usually it is the adverse party who carries the burden of rebutting that presumption, but this dipshit rebutted it himself with his obvious lies.

All he had to do was present the registration and shut the fuck up and it would have been the job of the other party to present evidence calling the registration and the copyright into question. Instead, he offered a bunch of completely unnecessary lies that torpedoed his own claim. That's part of why pathological liars are pathological. They lie with no purpose, whether it helps them or not, or in this case, actually harms them.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think he realizes admitting to being a lazy fat fuck living in absolute squalor doesn't exactly come off the same way as admitting you have a drug problem or a drinking problem.

The idea is you admit this and then make changes to your life to fix it David. It's not a badge of honor it's a red flag telling people to stay away.
 
I don’t think he realizes admitting to being a lazy fat fuck living in absolute squalor doesn't exactly come off the same way as admitting you have a drug problem or a drinking problem.

The idea is you admit this and then make changes to your life to fix it David. It's not a badge of honor it's a red flag telling people to stay away.
Imagine going to an AAA meeting and going "Hello my name is David, I'm an alcoholic and I'm damn proud of it". You're just wasting every ones time that wants help.
 
Back