Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[ConSluttant]

Meanwhile even he knows he's a lying sack of shit or he wouldn't consciously try to deceive the court by misquoting and misrepresenting things and contradicting his previous lies, as if they've never seen a mentally retarded vexatious litigant before.

Oh that's the funny parts to me. I just really can't get over people that write legal briefs that sound like a Ralph Retort blog post or a googleshng. It harshes my legal funny bone.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

It hashes my legal funny bone.

Sorry if this is a common phrase that I don't know, but what does this mean?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Sorry if this is a common phrase that I don't know, but what does this mean?

It's an actual spot on a bone in your arm (with a sensitive nerve, so it tingles or hurts when hit) but it can also be used idiomatically, as a metaphor for sense of humor.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

https://archive.ph/Bh2Pn

https://archive.ph/1Fja4

https://archive.ph/9o87U

https://archive.ph/ejI61

https://archive.ph/g8Y4K

https://archive.ph/kprUs

https://archive.ph/n67B9

https://archive.ph/7RKi2

https://archive.ph/j4Xm0

https://archive.ph/EiXY4

Found some old metal cans of tuna. Over a year old, but never been op…

archived 7 Aug 2022 13:40:08 UTC

archive.ph

 

[ZellZander]

View attachment 3573409

Found some old metal cans of tuna. Over a year old, but never been op…

archived 7 Aug 2022 13:40:08 UTC

archive.ph

Ew....

David, since you read this.. You should be fine. I worked with a dude who ate a 22 year old can of tuna that he found while remodeling a store. It was tucked under the bottom shelf where all of the rats lived, IIRC he said it tasted odd, but hs's still alive and kicking.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

David, look around the room you're in. Do you really think a can of tuna with an unknown expiry date is going to hurt you?

 

[RodgerDodger]

Oh that's the funny parts to me. I just really can't get over people that write legal briefs that sound like a Ralph Retort blog post or a googleshng. It harshes my legal funny bone.

I remain amazed that Ralph hasn't wandered down the rabbit hole of filing Vexatious Pro Se litigation yet.

 

[ConSluttant]

Sorry if this is a common phrase that I don't know, but what does this mean?

Not your fault for misunderstanding. First I misspelled harshes. Damn autocorrrupt. Then I was making a portmanteau of sorts. Combining "harshing my mellow" with "tickling your funny bone". So basically his crap takes away my joy.

 

[Mister Mint]

I remain amazed that Ralph hasn't wandered down the rabbit hole of filing Vexatious Pro Se litigation yet.

He'd have to admit he's poor. Pretending like he's on easy street living the good life is part of his whole kayfabe.

 

[Adr1anD]

I have learnt that "fayettevilledavid" may not be Acerthorn's alt alias despite also being made by the dude named David Stebbins.

Because i found out there was a completely different, unrelated David Stebbins who lived in Fayetteville, AR. With a degree in Technology there's a chance he could've had an online presence of sorts.

 

[Mister Mint]

I have learnt that "fayettevilledavid" may not be Acerthorn's alt alias despite also being made by the dude named David Stebbins.

Because i found out there was a completely different, unrelated David Stebbins who lived in Fayetteville, AR. With a degree in Technology there's a chance he could've had an online presence of sorts.

Interesting. Since the "fayettevillesdavid" thing never really turned up a lot of nectar anyway I'll remove it from the OP. If we dig up more on it I'll put it back.

 

[Bloitzhole]

Not even in a document submitted by Russell Greer, which I had hitherto considered the height of filing tantrums, have I read this much seething in a single paragraph. Amazing.

 

[ConSluttant]

View attachment 3578083
Not even in a document submitted by Russell Greer, which I had hitherto considered the height of filing tantrums, have I read this much seething in a single paragraph. Amazing.

He doesn't get that because he filed pro se the judge could have dismissed his complaint because he didn't like the typeface on his document. The judge didn't HAVE to consider all his ramblings. Frankly if the judge had then yeah, he might have developed personal animus towards Stabbins. I know I would have.

 

[That Guy From The Thing]

As with most lolcows with deep mental issues, I was hesitant to laugh at Acerthron immediately. Same with pedo accusations, I don't want to point the finger too quickly. Don't want to call someone a boy toucher without proof, and I don't want to point and laugh at people who lack the capacity to know better. It stops being fun quick. Like laughing at a blind person for not knowing what colour is. It's just mean.

Acerthorn is not one of those people. Reading this thread shows me he understands the world he lives in and chooses to let his base emotions dictacte all actions. Seething at shit on the internet and acting like a literal manchild. Tantruming on the ground as a baseline response. He's mentaly unhinged, but not in a way that excuses his behaviour. This is the kind of man Ethan Ralph is. The fatty layers of whitetrash grand standing hide a manlet on the same level as Acerthorn. The similarities have been shocking and enjoybale to discover. This thread has been a very nice trip. I'm watching the SidAlpha doc as I type. Very diagetic.

Thank you all for this wonderful thread. I hope he never figures out he needs to leave the internet. And I hope he finds his ladyboy.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

He's definitely not a pedophile due to the fact that he lives in a dumpster and doesn't do much of anything, but I can say that he is a fat bitch who has emotional problems. He should go to Thailand if he wants a quality ladyboy. Also, do we wish him a happy Thanksgiving before putting the turkey in the oven?

 

[Vinluv Handesbukia]

This is the hardest I've laughed at a singular person in the longest time whew.
"The next chris chan" gets thrown around alot but this guy is funnier per video to me in the end.

The only thing that truly reminds me of the "accidental stream" is the Shmorky argument. A traumatic culmination of mental illness juxtaposed with the goofiest nutjob around waddling about.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Lmao, Acerthorn can no longer appeal.

Rule 4 of Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure states that you have 30 days to file a notice to appeal. It's been more than that (his two cases were dismissed on July 11th). He did file a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion to set aside courts ruling, but as the appellate court noted in Hostler v. Groves, 912 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1990) rule 60(b) motions or motions for reconsideration (both of which he filed correction, he only filed rule 60(b) motion, but he did request leave to file motion for reconsideration) does not stop the requirement that he file his notice of appeal on time.

Acerthorn fucked himself over.

Edit: Am stupid. Here's why:

Actually, he still has time to appeal. FRAP 4(a)(4)(vi) was amended in 2009 in order to accommodate Rule 60 motions that could have been filed as Rule 59 motions. The notes to the 2009 amendment state:

Spoiler: tl;dr

Lawyers sometimes move under Civil Rule 60 for relief that is still available under another rule such as Civil Rule 59. Subdivision (a)(4)(A)(vi) provides for such eventualities by extending the time for filing an appeal so long as the Rule 60 motion is filed within a limited time. Formerly, the time limit under subdivision (a)(4)(A)(vi) was 10 days, reflecting the 10-day limits for making motions under Civil Rules 50(b), 52(b), and 59. Subdivision (a)(4)(A)(vi) now contains a 28-day limit to match the revisions to the time limits in the Civil Rules.

Unfortunately, Stebbins filed his motions before the 28-day limit, so his time to appeal would be tolled under FRAP 4(a)(4)(vi).

 

[DiggieSmalls]

Lmao, Acerthorn can no longer appeal.

Rule 4 of Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure states that you have 30 days to file a notice to appeal. It's been more than that (his two cases were dismissed on July 11th). He did file a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion to set aside courts ruling, but as the appellate court noted in Hostler v. Groves, 912 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1990) rule 60(b) motions or motions for reconsideration (both of which he filed correction, he only filed rule 60(b) motion, but he did request leave to file motion for reconsideration) does not stop the requirement that he file his notice of appeal on time.

Acerthorn fucked himself over.

Fuck that goblin. Sick of retards claiming in forma pauperis then shitting in their own mouths. Leave it for when people have a legit grievance.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

Fuck that goblin. Sick of retards claiming in forma pauperis then shitting in their own mouths. Leave it for when people have a legit grievance.

Guess that the turkey has to sue another person in this thread.

 

[lolwatagain]

Lmao, Acerthorn can no longer appeal.

Rule 4 of Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure states that you have 30 days to file a notice to appeal. It's been more than that (his two cases were dismissed on July 11th). He did file a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion to set aside courts ruling, but as the appellate court noted in Hostler v. Groves, 912 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1990) rule 60(b) motions or motions for consideration (both of which he filed) does not stop the requirement that he file his notice of appeal on time.

Acerthorn fucked himself over.

Actually, he still has time to appeal. FRAP 4(a)(4)(vi) was amended in 2009 in order to accommodate Rule 60 motions that could have been filed as Rule 59 motions. The notes to the 2009 amendment state:

Spoiler: tl;dr

Lawyers sometimes move under Civil Rule 60 for relief that is still available under another rule such as Civil Rule 59. Subdivision (a)(4)(A)(vi) provides for such eventualities by extending the time for filing an appeal so long as the Rule 60 motion is filed within a limited time. Formerly, the time limit under subdivision (a)(4)(A)(vi) was 10 days, reflecting the 10-day limits for making motions under Civil Rules 50(b), 52(b), and 59. Subdivision (a)(4)(A)(vi) now contains a 28-day limit to match the revisions to the time limits in the Civil Rules.

Unfortunately, Stebbins filed his motions before the 28-day limit, so his time to appeal would be tolled under FRAP 4(a)(4)(vi).

(4) Effect of a Motion on a Notice of Appeal.

(A) If a party files in the district court any of the following motions under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—and does so within the time allowed by those rules—the time to file an appeal runs for all parties from the entry of the order disposing of the last such remaining motion:

(vi) for relief under Rule 60 if the motion is filed no later than 28 days after the judgment is entered.