Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Generally only final or dispositive orders can be appealed as a right. All other appeals are a rarely granted privilege. Decision by the court of not assigning counsel to you is not a final order, nor does it fall in the very narrow list of things that can be appealed before the case is over.
So, if I'm following, once the judge issues the final order on sanctions he can then appeal that along with his "because they didn't give me counsel." whine.

Looks like Stebbins now owes the court the status brief for being DENIED and they'll probably push the order to show cause hearing out a couple weeks.

Oh, wait, he could still petition for an En Banc review, and take it to the Supreme Court... Maybe this isn't going to move any time soon.
 
Last edited:
Oh, wait, he could still petition for an En Banc review, and take it to the Supreme Court... Maybe this isn't going to move any time soon.
Maneuvers like that just accelerate the timetable for being under a prefiling order across the entire federal system, not just one or two District Courts.

You don't get to run off to an appeals court the instant you don't like something.
 
Maneuvers like that just accelerate the timetable for being under a prefiling order across the entire federal system, not just one or two District Courts.

You don't get to run off to an appeals court the instant you don't like something.
It seemed to make the judge in the Sebbins v Moon case very happy.

Wait, not happy, that other thing.
 
So, if I'm following, once the judge issues the final order on sanctions he can then appeal that along with his "because they didn't give me counsel." whine.
The former is not a final order in the 9th Circuit, and neither can be appealed until the case is over, unless the former is allowed to be appealed under interlocutory appeal doctrine. See, generally, Gonzales v. Texaco Inc., 344 F. App'x 304 (9th Cir. 2009) (not addressing the second part due to the defect being cured instantly)
 
acerRAGE.webp
Live footage from the mold pit of acerthorn writing his masterpiece of a response.
(ML/AI Generated, Acerthorn could not keep up this level of activity)

Poor acerthorn being handed L after L after L, all he wanted was millions upon millions of dollars from innocent people and harass court staff. Won't he ever win?
 
ok this one I don't understand

Stabby can't appeal the judges decision because the decision isn't final yet? Or is it just that not assigning a pro-bono lawyer isn't something that can be appealed?

man I really hate lawspeak sometimes.
What am I missing here?
It has 2 thinks it says
1. You cant appeal a decision that is not final, he has not been sanctioned yet so he cant appeal that
2. They also rulled on the the getting a free lawyer from the court and the court basically said there is no right to a lawyer in a civil case
 
Oh, wait, he could still petition for an En Banc review, and take it to the Supreme Court... Maybe this isn't going to move any time soon.
He really can't. Because it is not a matter ripe for Appeal. They might take it up once a final order nailing him with Sanctions is issued. (Unlikely. See Stabbins V Null, yesterday, for reasons why.) But no circuit is going to review the rejection of an appeal as "not ripe for appeal" en banc. It's an untimely filing. They've told him go away and come back later.
 
He really can't. Because it is not a matter ripe for Appeal. They might take it up once a final order nailing him with Sanctions is issued. (Unlikely. See Stabbins V Null, yesterday, for reasons why.) But no circuit is going to review the rejection of an appeal as "not ripe for appeal" en banc. It's an untimely filing. They've told him go away and come back later.
When has that ever stopped him before? I believe in him, he can do it.
 
He really can't. Because it is not a matter ripe for Appeal. They might take it up once a final order nailing him with Sanctions is issued. (Unlikely. See Stabbins V Null, yesterday, for reasons why.) But no circuit is going to review the rejection of an appeal as "not ripe for appeal" en banc. It's an untimely filing. They've told him go away and come back later.
does not mean that he wont try. Anything to delay this as long as possible so he can get as much money as possible so he can spend on that money on "ladboys" on onlyfans (i did hear thats where he spents all of his settlement money )
 
Courts should let the defendant beat the accuser with a stick if their lawsuit is dog shit, would save so much time and money.
Going back to having stocks in the public square. With a convenient tub of rotting vegetables would go a long way towards solving these problems. And would probably add some much needed fiber and vitamins to stabby's diet
 
View attachment 6914446
Live footage from the mold pit of acerthorn writing his masterpiece of a response.
(ML/AI Generated, Acerthorn could not keep up this level of activity)

Poor acerthorn being handed L after L after L, all he wanted was millions upon millions of dollars from innocent people and harass court staff. Won't he ever win?
Obviously AI. Looks far too clean to be the were-turkey
 
Maneuvers like that just accelerate the timetable for being under a prefiling order across the entire federal system, not just one or two District Courts.

You don't get to run off to an appeals court the instant you don't like something.
Don't listen to this faggot, David. GO FOR THE HIGH SCORE! GET YOUR JUSTICE!
 
In a surprise to absolutely nobody, Stabby wants a panel rehearing or a rehearing en banc (:shit-eating:please god it would be hilarious) of the dismissal.

It is an uncharacteristically calm and collected motion compared to his usual filings. It also introduces a fantastic new spelling for alternative...
1738269258858.png
 

Attachments

In a surprise to absolutely nobody, Stabby wants a panel rehearing or a rehearing en banc (:shit-eating:please god it would be hilarious) of the dismissal.

It is an uncharacteristically calm and collected motion compared to his usual filings. It also introduces a fantastic new spelling for alternative...
View attachment 6922797
Stabby filing for a Writ of Certiori is so funny to me. does he actually think he will succeed? lmao
 
It is an uncharacteristically calm and collected motion compared to his usual filings.
Maybe he's saving his energy to appeal the rejection of IFP in his case against KF.

he can now add the ninth circuit to the list of those that have ruled that no it isnt fucking appealable kek
He's not capable of analyzing or briefing a circuit split. If this somehow gets accepted, he'll immediately move to get lawyers assigned to him to appeal his motion to have lawyers assigned.
 
Back