Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,255 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,238
holy shit these "songs" are all less then 20 seconds long?

I see what Stabby is planning. Each "song" can be sued for individually so he wants to cram as many songs into each of his shit video's so that he can then sue anyone who reacts to it for copyright infringement 10 times per video for a kool 1.5 million per video.

So he pays some dude on Fiver to crank out some, I'm guessing lame, 20 second music clips for $50 and now he's a set to become the world richest Father Stabber. I mean it's a plan...not a good one not a moral one for sure, but at least it's an idea. Too bad for Stabby chances are most judges will see this for exactly what it is; a get rich quick scheme via lawsuit.

David continues to think that Judges are nothing more then robots who have to rule exactly according to the statues of the law. No Stabby judges are human for a reason, they use human judgment to understand the law and apply it to the situation. So you trying to bait people into using your crappy content just so you can then sue them for millions because your a greedy fast slob it's pretty damn apparent to anyone, let alone a judge experienced in copyright law.

It's that assburgers autistic combo; he just cannot see other people as...well people.
 
Tomorrow's hearing in Stebbin's v. Baz was cancelled.
Stebbins v. Baz 45
StebbinsvBaz45_1.webp
StebbinsvBaz45_2.webp
Hahaahahhaha. Yes. the dedicated A-LOGs of the Kiwifarms can show up in person at the courthouse to watch his videos without giving him that sweet sweet ad revenue. Huge W for the farms /sneed
 
Tomorrow's hearing in Stebbin's v. Baz was cancelled.
Stebbins v. Baz 45
View attachment 7646145
View attachment 7646146
Hahaahahhaha. Yes. the dedicated A-LOGs of the Kiwifarms can show up in person at the courthouse to watch his videos without giving him that sweet sweet ad revenue. Huge W for the farms /sneed
i would not be surprised David files altered videos to the court. Not the first time he fakes evidence if its helps him
 
Hahaahahhaha. Yes. the dedicated A-LOGs of the Kiwifarms can show up in person at the courthouse to watch his videos without giving him that sweet sweet ad revenue. Huge W for the farms /sneed
Sadly, the courthouse is in San Francisco, and though I do go to California from time to time that's not a place I'll be.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Broken Cuddles
In Docket 39 of Stebbins v. Baz the court requested video evidence of Baz's alleged infringement.
Courts evaluating a motion for default judgment take the factual allegations of a plaintiff’s complaint as true except as to damages, which must be shown by evidence... Stebbins here seeks statutory damages, which may require an exercise of the Court’s discretion, informed by the nature of the alleged infringement. The purportedly infringing videos are key to Stebbins’s claims, and thus are likely to be important evidence.
...
The Court will therefore require Stebbins to file copies of any videos at issue that purportedly infringe his copyright, to the extent such copies are available. Stebbins may also wish to file copies of his own videos that Garcia Baz allegedly infringed.

Docket 46 Stebbins has failed to comply with this request in spectacular fashion and instead submitted 207 video exhibits meticulously cutting out anytime Baz criticized Acerthorn in his allegedly infringing video.
01a - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Acerthorn Channel Icon #6.png
01b - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - First Racist Video.mp4
01c - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - First Stormcloaks Video.mp4
01d - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Ducking Video.mp4
01e - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Aaron Video.mp4
01f - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Incest Video.mp4
01g - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Fractions Video.mp4
01h - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Trauma Video.mp4
01i - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Nirvgorilla Video.mp4
01j - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Civility Video.mp4
01k - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Elden Ring VIdeo.mp4
01v - Plaintiff's Original Copyrighted Work - Second Stormcloaks Video.mp4
02a - Defendant's Infringing Videos - First Racist Response Part 1.mp4
02b - Defendant's Infringing Videos - First Racist Response Part 2.mp4
02c - Defendant's Infringing Videos - First Racist Response Part 3.mp4
02d - Defendant's Infringing Videos - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1.mp4
02e - Defendant's Infringing Videos - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2.mp4
02f - Defendant's Infringing Videos - First Stormcloaks Response Part 3.mp4
02g - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Civility Response Part 1.mp4
02h - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Civility Response Part 2.mp4
02i - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Elden Ring Response.mp4
02j - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Victim Video.mp4
02k - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1.mp4
02l - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2.mp4
02m - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3.mp4
02n - Defendant's Infringing Videos - Censorship Video.mp4
03 First Racist Response Part 1 Clip 02.mp4
03 First Racist Response Part 1 Clip 04.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 02.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 04.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 06.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 08.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 10.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 12.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 14.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 16.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 18.mp4
04 - First Racist Response Part 2 Clip 20.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 02.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 04.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 06.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 08.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 10.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 12.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 14.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 16.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 18.mp4
05 - First Racist Response Part 3 Clip 20.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 02.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 04.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 06.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 08.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 10.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 12.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 14.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 16.mp4
06 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 18.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 02.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 04.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 06.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 08.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 10.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 12.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 14.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 16.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 18.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 20.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 22.mp4
07 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 24.mp4
08 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 02.mp4
08 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 04.mp4
08 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 06.mp4
08 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 08.mp4
08 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 10.mp4
08 - First Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 12.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 02.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 04.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 06.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 08.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 10.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 12.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 14.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 16.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 18.mp4
09 - Civility Response Part 1 Clip 20.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 02.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 04.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 06.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 08.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 10.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 12.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 14.mp4
10 - Civility Response Part 2 Clip 16.mp4
11 - Elden Ring Response Clip 02.mp4
11 - Elden Ring Response Clip 04.mp4
11 - Elden Ring Response Clip 06.mp4
11 - Elden Ring Response Clip 08.mp4
11 - Elden Ring Response Clip 10.mp4
11 - Elden Ring Response Clip 12.mp4
11 - Elden Ring Response Clip 14.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 02.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 04.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 06.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 08.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 10.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 12.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 14.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 16.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 18.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 20.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 22.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 24.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 26.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 28.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 30.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 32.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 34.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 36.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 38.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 40.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 42.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 44.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 46.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 48.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 50.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 52.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 54.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 56.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 58.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 60.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 62.mp4
12 - Victim Video Clip 64.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 02.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 04.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 06.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 08.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 10.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 12.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 14.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 16.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 18.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 20.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 22.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 24.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 26.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 28.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 30.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 32.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 34.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 36.mp4
13 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 1 Clip 38.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 02.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 04.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 06.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 08.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 10.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 12.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 14.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 16.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 18.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 20.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 22.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 24.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 26.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 28.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 30.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 32.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 34.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 36.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 38.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 40.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 42.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 44.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 46.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 48.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 50.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 52.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 54.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 56.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 58.mp4
14 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 2 Clip 60.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 02.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 04.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 06.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 08.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 10.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 12.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 14.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 16.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 18.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 20.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 22.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 24.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 26.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 28.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 30.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 32.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 34.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 36.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 38.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 40.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 42.mp4
15 - Second Stormcloaks Response Part 3 Clip 44.mp4
16 - Censorship Video 02.mp4
16 - Censorship Video 03.mp4
16 - Censorship Video 04.mp4
16 - Censorship Video 05.mp4
stebbinvbaz46.webp
I suspect Acerthorn cut up Defendant's video because he doesn't want the Court to see the defendant's criticism as that would be a factor in favor of fair use (and also very embarrassing for him).
The clerk and Judge are going to be so confused when they see 207 videos.
 

Attachments

One can only hope the judge will see through this lame attempt to rewrite history and ask for the full videos rather then Stabbys curated version
Court says "Please upload the videos so we have accurate evidence that can't be tampered with or deleted." Stabby: "Here's some evidence I've already tampered with."
 
Acertard the zoophile.webp

Good thing he didn't try to stick all that music under a half-blown seal. I hear they're pretty cranky.

This is the most delightfully autistic malicious compliance I've seen in a while. Fucking LOL, Stabby!
All that work just to be a dick to the court who handed him a lackluster win. If only he could do something, like, good with all that industriousness.
 
I did notice that Stabby is still asking for the Thunderlord channel to be deleted and Baz forever banned from Jew Tube

This dude man, he's such a vengeful piece of shit isn't he? It's not enough to sue for 1.5 million bucks and bankrupt a dude for life but he also needs that last bit of edge knowing Baz cannnot come back to Jew Tube after Stabby is done with him. You must pay if you dare cross the Father Stabber!

Hey David, I know you read this so go play in traffic please. The world will be better off without your fly eating, mold covered ass in it.
 
This fat fucking retard is basically trying to defraud the court, and the most horrifying part of it is that there's no party in any position to oppose it.
 
I'm gonna offer a guess and say that the judge will probably wonder why Stabby is offering 200+ 10 to 20 second clips of a hour long video rather then just the video itself. Hopefully he's curious enough to ask for the whole video.

Baz really is an idiot for not fighting this. He could just pro se it and dump the original video and case over pretty much as it's clearly fair use. Instead he's going to risk ending up owing Stabby who knows how much money and having to deal with that vexatious little goblin trying to collect each and every single penny for the rest of his life.

There is a lesson here kids, besides not being a Jew Tuber, is that being lazy in the short run can really bite you in the ass in the long run.
 
Docket 46 Stebbins has failed to comply with this request in spectacular fashion and instead submitted 207 video exhibits meticulously cutting out anytime Baz criticized Acerthorn in his allegedly infringing video.
I think he submitted the entirety of the video in these little chunks and is just asking for the clips listed to be the ones that are viewable only in the court terminals or whatever the semi-sealed arrangement was.
Paragraph 4 said:
Notice that I am not including the odd-numbered clips which I have uploaded. As I explain in the First Amended Complaint when I discuss these playlists of clips, the odd-numbered clips are where he provides criticism and commentary. The defendant has the right under the First Amendment to publish this content as long as he isn't making an unfair use infringement on my copyright. So these odd-numbered clips can be made publicly available to the greatest extent possible, and the public can request copies of them from the Clerk's Office if they are so inclined.
I do feel like the court would have rather had the whole unedited video, but that magnanimous turkey goblin (no relation) took it upon himself to split it up into chunks so that the court and Baz can both know which parts should be allowed for reposting.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
  • Agree
Reactions: WarJams and Fetch!
Come on Thiago, there are fatal errors like admission that the videos contain your commentary Stebbins clipped out. He’s made this relatively easy to defend against. Don’t let him win by default.
 
I do heavily doubt the judge will award Stabby everything he's asking for.

We never seen a judge rule that because of copyright someone has to be banned from a service, I'm pretty sure Google would step in if Stabby presented them with a judgment that tried to force them to permanently ban someone from using their services. Nor will he, as if he could, force Baz to hand over all his computer gear for a 3rd party to inspect and delete shit.

Stabby may get the default judgment but I'd bet my eyeteeth that it won't be for 150K per pop like Stabby is asking. David will have to prove income loss before the judge starts handing out 1.5 million dollar judgments against a no show defendant and good luck showing your videos that make cents per year are worth that kind of payout Stabby.

I kinda want to see a default judgment but one that awards Stabby like $25 bucks because that all his copyrights are worth. I can taste the meltdown from here when Stabby gets news like that. Then he gets hit by Google as a intervene'er when Stabby demands they hit Baz with the banhammer and everything gets tossed out.

That's my ideal end for this case.
 
My guess is unless it's a few thousand or more it's likely to cost more to attempt to collect from someone in Brazil than he won, assuming the Brazilian courts even allow it.

a large part of me wants to see David get his default judgment just so we can revel in his futile rage as he tries to extort the monies from Baz.

the other part of me wants David to get smushed once again by the courts because he's a vexatious retard who thinks this is the way to become a millionaire.
 
a large part of me wants to see David get his default judgment just so we can revel in his futile rage as he tries to extort the monies from Baz.

the other part of me wants David to get smushed once again by the courts because he's a vexatious retard who thinks this is the way to become a millionaire.
While it would be funny to see him try and collect, I would rather not have court precedent to support what Stebbins is doing. That just puts the next person he falsely files against in a position where they have to go back and undo the thing that was already judged on to fight his next frivolous case
 
Come on Thiago, there are fatal errors like admission that the videos contain your commentary Stebbins clipped out. He’s made this relatively easy to defend against. Don’t let him win by default.
He stated that his father is a lawyer and he's the one deciding if Baz is to respond.
dd.webp

dc.webp
db.webp
da.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: TurboNAS
Back