Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

Seems like the kind of thing that should be told to a judge, if true.

People who need to be made aware have been made aware.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Seems like the kind of thing that should be told to a judge, if true.

seems like something that would land Stabby in jail if true. If Zell really didn't sign this agreement then shit just went from a simple sanction to possible jail time for a felony as surprisingly the courts don't really cotton to IFP leeches like David lying to the the court let alone forging the other party's signature to try to void a upcoming sanction.

Forging shit before the court to avoid fines? Nah I don't think even Stabby is that stupid. He's been to jail and it was hell on him. He still has trauma lumps from the prison screws getting him to bath and clean his cell. And while David is stupid and evil he's not going to put himself at risk of going back to jail...I think.

Cabbage boy needs to put up or shut up.

 

[TurboNAS]

Here’s hoping the court isn’t ready to let this matter go since their sanction preceded dismissal.

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

Cabbage boy needs to put up or shut up.

Zellzander's signature from Docket 134,

Signature on the Dismissal.

It has unrealistic placement from the signature line, and there's graphical effects around the lines of the signature. Here's it zoomed in on the Motion to Dismiss, if you're unable to see, it's blocky pixelations of the document that do not match the background white. It is slightly off.

And this is a zoomed in signature on Docket 134,

You can see how Acerthorn cut around the lines to lift it from the original document to his. Yes, I know I've de-evolved this into a "BUT LOOK AT THE PIXELS!!!" argument, and Zell is generally shocked. He woke up to the motion to dismiss filed to the court instead of inside of his inbox from David waiting to be signed.

 

[Catgirls are Love]

That signature from ZellZander is a forgery.
Edit: It's lifted from the previous document that Zellzander filed, dkt 132

While I cannot yet confirm that ZellZander didn't sign the thing, it's absolutely the exact same signature from the last filing by ZellZander with a bit more JPEG artifacting thrown in. With the signatures overlaid:


If a filing by Zell shows up saying "I didn't agree to or sign this" then we'll know.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Zellzander's signature from Docket 134,
View attachment 7724861

Signature on the Dismissal.
View attachment 7724863

It has unrealistic placement from the signature line, and there's graphical effects around the lines of the signature. Here's it zoomed in on the Motion to Dismiss, if you're unable to see, it's blocky pixelations of the document that do not match the background white. It is slightly off.

View attachment 7724866

And this is a zoomed in signature on Docket 134,

View attachment 7724876

You can see how Acerthorn cut around the lines to lift it from the original document to his. Yes, I know I've de-evolved this into a "BUT LOOK AT THE PIXELS!!!" argument, and Zell is generally shocked. He woke up to the motion to dismiss filed to the court instead of inside of his inbox from David waiting to be signed.

God I hope this is true.

I would love to see Stabby hoisted by his own petard but I've been on the Farms too long to hope something this easy ends a lowcow and "look at the pixels" has fooled me before.

If this is a fake get Zell to file shit asap then we can celebrate until then doubt and verify I say.

 

[Redline of Sanity]

Even by Stebbins' standards, it would be pretty insane to forge a signature in a legal filing.

Devil's advocate: Since they live on opposite sides of the country, is it possible that Jones just keeps a .jpg (or similar) of his signature to use for digital signings? I admit, I speak from personal experience on this one - my employer has a thing for doing our credentialing digitally.

In any event, if this is a forgery, Jones can easily make that known to the Court. I do think it's a bit unusual that he went from "I'd like to suspend payments because of some unexpected hardships" to "yeah I'll just pay the whole thing off right now." I also question why he wouldn't just let Stebbins continue flailing against this Show Cause order that he clearly has no real response to.

And furthermore, I agree with others that the spirit of "you lied to this Court, why shouldn't we sanction you?" probably doesn't (or at least, shouldn't) just disappear with Stebbins cobbling together this case-ending settlement and trying to Zoidberg-scuttle away from sanctions. Stebbins' pre-emptive "uhhh just so you know this ends the case and the show cause order byeeeee!" is nevertheless quite funny and suggests to me that he is worried.

 

[Seria]

Well, you are right.
View attachment 7724374
Stebbins v Cmdr ImperialSalt have come to an agreement that terminates the case. Stebbins alleges that this moots the sanction.
View attachment 7724367

Spoiler: Full Images

View attachment 7724387View attachment 7724388View attachment 7724389View attachment 7724390View attachment 7724391View attachment 7724392

So, does this moot the sanctions.
In the case cited it was a show cause as to why the parties should not both be held in contempt.
This time it's Rule 11. And these statements appear back in ECF 112.
View attachment 7724405View attachment 7724404
I am of the opinion that this does not "un-ring" the false motion that was submitted. He submitted a false statement, it doesn't go away because the case is over if by court order or mutual agreement of the parties. And this sanction was NOT requested by the defendant but by the court.
Now, I'm sure some legal Kiwi will be along shortly to tell me why I'm wrong. Obviously the court may just say "Fuck this, it's over." and not bother with it. But I'm hopeful they'll simply go "No valid cause was shown, the court hereby implements a $1500 sanction."

i lett you in on a secret. Apparently Jarrod has never seen this document .. david lied that him and jarrod are dismissing the case.
Edit. I see cabage already spilled the beans hehe .

 

[HackerX]

Not gonna lie. The Wereturkey forging a signature on a legal document AND getting caught would be obscenely entertaining.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Not gonna lie. The Wereturkey forging a signature on a legal document AND getting caught would be obscenely entertaining.

Obscenely entertaining?

Fuck I'd need to change my pants I would jizz so hard.

Seeing David send himself back to jail over a measly 1500 buck fine that came from him lying to the court while trying to extort an extra 15 fucking dollars from Zell?

That is the karma of legend son

 

[Poogers]

I'm not a forensic photoshop analyst or anything, but does the image of the $900 payment appear to be doctored? I'm assuming these are screenshots, so are there other possible reasons explaining the missing portions of the indicated text?

Edit: Please disregard, i suck cocks. Should've checked the source document.

 

[Seria]

Also specter just confirmed at around 32:15 https://rumble.com/v6x0e7e-perjurys-a-fcking-crime-david.html with his own admission that it seems that the claims from

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/david-...binsd-fayettevillesdavid.116370/post-21527063

appledude are true .. David had a jobb and got fired but it seems from his own filing he hides why he got fired. He actually confirmed he worked at the company. So looks like david did indeed steal nudes from customers phones
at around 55 minutes specter shows Exibit B where it shows david has been fired from the same company appledude claimed david worked at . Though david left clearly out why he was fired .. almost seems to me david tries to claim he was fired without reason

also at 39 minuts in specters stream i am pretty sure david did lie to the court again when he said that jarrod lied when (and thats a lie david made up) "jarrod claimed he never shared the stream" .. as far as i can remember jarrod never refused that he claimed he used youtube to download his videos

 

[Seria]

I'm not a forensic photoshop analyst or anything, but does the image of the $900 payment appear to be doctored? I'm assuming these are screenshots, so are there other possible reasons explaining the missing portions of the indicated text?

View attachment 7725058

looked at the origina on courtlisner .. seems fine there to me

 

[Poogers]

looked at the origina on courtlisner .. seems fine there to me View attachment 7725132

My eagerness to find fault betrays how desperately i want this to be true.

 

[James done did it]

This is *almost* too fucking funny to be true. Almost. But I can see the turkey-logic in trying to do this. Other than the $1,500 sanction on the horizon what consequence has he ever suffered from fucking around with the legal system? None whatsoever. So why not forge a signature? There's even a chance they let him get away with it because the court system is that fucking gay and retarded. In a just society they would have sent someone to his hovel to break his fingers after the 10th frivolous lawsuit.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

So instead of just admitting that he lied, he's fabricating another lie to avoid even having to speak about it?

Even though the guy he was meeting and conferring with harassing has actually paid up and probably would've been willing to sign the document anyway?

He thinks that by fraudulently dismissing it with prejudice, the court is just going to accept that he used them as a vehicle to defraud somebody?

Man, I feel like just getting a job and shutting the fuck up is more lucrative and less stressful than being a vexatious litigant.

 

[thegunbuilderguy]

Stebbins v Cmdr ImperialSalt have come to an agreement that terminates the case. Stebbins alleges that this moots the sanction.

Man finding this case on courtlistener was a PAIN, i had zero results for this one on google from courtlistener, and had to find the link from doc savage's video about ECF 139, having the link of every stabbins lawsuit in the description: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68923062/stebbins-v-cmdr-imperialsalt
The video:

Even by Stebbins' standards, it would be pretty insane to forge a signature in a legal filing.

Devil's advocate: Since they live on opposite sides of the country, is it possible that Jones just keeps a .jpg (or similar) of his signature to use for digital signings? I admit, I speak from personal experience on this one - my employer has a thing for doing our credentialing digitally.

In any event, if this is a forgery, Jones can easily make that known to the Court. I do think it's a bit unusual that he went from "I'd like to suspend payments because of some unexpected hardships" to "yeah I'll just pay the whole thing off right now." I also question why he wouldn't just let Stebbins continue flailing against this Show Cause order that he clearly has no real response to.

And furthermore, I agree with others that the spirit of "you lied to this Court, why shouldn't we sanction you?" probably doesn't (or at least, shouldn't) just disappear with Stebbins cobbling together this case-ending settlement and trying to Zoidberg-scuttle away from sanctions. Stebbins' pre-emptive "uhhh just so you know this ends the case and the show cause order byeeeee!" is nevertheless quite funny and suggests to me that he is worried.

Speaking of this video; someone in the replies, that's probably in the discord, said Sid, Jarrod, cree and others know with imperialSalt that he didn't sign that and that it indeed is stebbins forging a signature and they can't believe he'd go that far


Truly it is the endgame for stebbins.

 

[Fishmalk Observer]

this shit is primed to blow

I am fucking ready and eager for monday

edit: @Null your friend acerthon might have done something very funny, i think you'll enjoy it

 

[DavidS877]

Man finding this case on courtlistener was a PAIN, i had zero results for this one on google from courtlistener

Go here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/

Type: david stebbins
into the party name field.
Choose: Search Results Order: Newest Documents First.

And voila, newest Stabby, along with a few other cases with a party named David and a party named Stebbins.

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

Go here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/

Type: david stebbins
into the party name field.
Choose: Search Results Order: Newest Documents First.

And voila, newest Stabby, along with a few other cases with a party named David and a party named Stebbins.

Click on the Juridictions button and select, W.D Arkansas, Texas, E.D. Arkansas, N.D California, and C.D California for our turkey boy exclusively.

Edit: I have word that Zell has gone to three letter agencies too about this.