Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Fishmalk Observer]

View attachment 7749289

You caught me so I fixed it, you must drop it now

What do you mean, multiple felonies don't just go away if you walk them back after getting caught?

 

[DavidS877]

View attachment 7749287

Acerthorn, the professional:

"Bruh"
"what was I supposed to do?"

I also want Acerthorn to terminate the settlement (if he can do that) then get raped by the court. It would be extremely funny.

Imagine if filing the thing closed the file. Defendants everywhere would be just filing "We've reached an agreement, please dismiss this case with prejudice."

 

[Harvey Danger]

Big kudos to whoever wrote this for Jarrod, this is very nicely laid out justification for risking both the Court's and Acerthorn's ire.

Spoiler: Actually decent pro se writing

In providing a document purported to be signed by Defendant, Plaintiff places Defendant
in a precarious position. It is clear on its face that the purpose of the Motion is to stop the
Court's Order to Show Cause and the ensuing sanction for $1,500, as that is specifically
mentioned in the Motion. While Defendant is in no way trying to tell the Court what it has the
authority to do, Plaintiff has placed Defendant in a position where he must explain his reasoning
for drawing attention to this fact.

Should the Court decide that Mr. Stebbins's action is specifically to escape a decision for
his infraction, the Court could rightfully conclude that Defendant is an accomplice and accessory
to this act. The defendant has worked diligently to communicate with Mr. Stebbins and provide
meaningful dialogue and not burden the Court's valuable and limited resources with a buried
docket. If the Court were to decide that Mr. Stebbins should be further sanctioned for this
inappropriate conduct, the Court could likewise determine that sanctions should similarly issue
to Defendant for supporting this action.

Defendant stipulates that he has no issue with the dismissal itself, because the terms of
the settlement have been met. However, Defendant takes issue with how it was handled, and the
attempt by Plaintiff to escape court sanctions. More to the point, Defendant takes issue with Mr.
Stebbins attempting to rope him into what could be seen as legal gamesmanship to evade a
negative ruling against him, something that he has done before. see Stebbins v. Polano, 4:21-cv-
04184, (N.D. Cal.), at Dkt. 128 (in which Mr. Stebbins voluntarily dismissed the "corporate
defendants" including Google/Alphabet/YouTube mere minutes before they could file their
Motion to Dismiss and overturn his default judgment against individual defendants in the case
who had not entered appearances.)

Defendant has no standing with regards to the Order to Show Cause, as that was a sua
sponte decision. This conduct reflects Plaintiff's unclean hands and continued procedural
gamesmanship, which cannot be imputed to Defendant or used to draw him into Plaintiff's
improper tactics. He should stand on his own, as the sanctions are from his own making.
Defendant had no part in that.

Acerthorn is going to seethe harder than he's ever seethed before when he sees this. Jarrod's inbox is going to be swamped with rage and threats.

 

[GaryGray]

What do you mean, multiple felonies don't just go away if you walk them back after getting caught?

Stabby addressed that calling is "harmless error" a simple bizzare goof to quote another pro se litegator. He harmlessly opened up an old doctument, accidentally used the snipping tool, and then somehow dropped a hotdog on his keyboard which caused the signature to get pasted into the document then emailed to the clerk. Sadly knowing how nothing ever happens the judge will agree it was a harmless error, dismiss the case, and drop the sanction. Thus rewarding Stabby abuse of the system.

 

[Seria]

Stabby addressed that calling is "harmless error" a simple bizzare goof to quote another pro se litegator. He harmlessly opened up an old doctument, accidentally used the snipping tool, and then somehow dropped a hotdog on his keyboard which caused the signature to get pasted into the document then emailed to the clerk. Sadly knowing how nothing ever happens the judge will agree it was a harmless error, dismiss the case, and drop the sanction. Thus rewarding Stabby abuse of the system.

i would not call that an error LOOOOOL


the judge will see right trough it.

but i think this treat makes it even way worse, this is actually blackmail at this point

i wonder if Hope he will now try to terminate the settlement and re open the case?

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

View attachment 7749289



View attachment 7749295

If you don’t let me get away with blatantly illegal shit, I’m going to hurt you again.

Spoken like a man who stabbed his father in the face and sued him for it.

 

[East_Clintwood]

Assburgers on full display again. "We agreed to never interact again so you can't complain about me using your signature without permission"


Better understanding of the rules than (technically) trained paralegal, and self described legal professional, Russell Greer. That's something at least I guess.


That's not how that works you fucking retard. I'd love to see him try though, because that would give the court more time and excuses to slap him down.

 

[Allied-Mastercomputer]

Wow, everyday I’m dumbfounded by the depths of human evil I witness on this site. There’s so much hate and malice seething from those emails.

 

[DavidS877]

That's not how that works you fucking retard. I'd love to see him try though, because that would give the court more time and excuses to slap him down.

In the funniest possible timeline the court would simply go "Well, if a party files a sanction it requires 21 days. If we do it, it doesn't. Order to Show Cause as to why the court shouldn't sanction David Stebbins for $1,500 payable to Jarrod Jones for his false representations as to the dismissal."

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Ah, the old two crimes do make a right and if you say something I'll commit more crimes argument.
Stebbins out there making compelling arguments that retards don't deserve equal access to anything.

 

[thegunbuilderguy]

Jarrods Response is out ! And its jucy!

I'm a bit bummed he hasn't gone harder on the fact that acer forged his signature

i would not call that an error LOOOOOL


the judge will see right trough it.

but i think this treat makes it even way worse, this is actually blackmail at this point
View attachment 7749365

i wonder if Hope he will now try to terminate the settlement and re open the case?

good to see that on top of forgery he now has done extortion by threatening legal action
I hope the rumors that jarrod sent the proof of forgery to the FBI are true

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

Big kudos to whoever wrote this for Jarrod, this is very nicely laid out justification for risking both the Court's an

Zellzander has a team of proofreaders he's gathered across the internet.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

ok, kudos to the ghostwriters for sneaking in a "unclean hands" claim.

very nice!

 

[anliteralidiot]

The fact that forging the signature was so retarded, that people just couldn't believe it makes this so much funnier.
Never lose faith in how retarded stabby can be.

 

[WarJams]

I really hope Null shared this unfolding clusterfuck with Hardin, I think he would appreciate this turkey shoot.

 

[ICanLurkNoMore]

God I love lolcow lawsuits

 

[Harvey Danger]

I really hope Null shared this unfolding clusterfuck with Hardin, I think he would appreciate this turkey shoot.

I hope he shared it with Ty Beard.

 

[DavidS877]

I really hope Null shared this unfolding clusterfuck with Hardin, I think he would appreciate this turkey shoot.

I have to imagine we'll be seeing another update on a large* law YouTuber's stream soon.

* I'm not trying to imply that he has a lot of viewers.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Stabby doesn't seem to understand that filing a motion to terminate a settlement has to be approved by the court, it's not automatic. If it is done for a clearly malicious purpose against someone who is reporting a fraud upon the court, I doubt the court has any interest in approving said motion. Plus, unless I am mistaken. the court would be highly reluctant to terminate a settlement that has indeed been settled in its entirety. I can see potential reconsideration if the settlement was still in repayment, but since it is completed, the plaintiff is considered "whole." What impetus does the court have to open a fully settled case for further litigation at the request of the plaintiff, especially when the defendant has fulfilled their obligation and the person who has committed a fraud upon the court is the plaintiff?

 

[Harvey Danger]

Stabby doesn't seem to understand that filing a motion to terminate a settlement has to be approved by the court, it's not automatic. If it is done for a clearly malicious purpose against someone who is reporting a fraud upon the court, I doubt the court has any interest in approving said motion. Plus, unless I am mistaken. the court would be highly reluctant to terminate a settlement that has indeed been settled in its entirety. I can see potential reconsideration if the settlement was still in repayment, but since it is completed, the plaintiff is considered "whole." What impetus does the court have to open a fully settled case for further litigation at the request of the plaintiff, especially when the defendant has fulfilled their obligation and the person who has committed a fraud upon the court is the plaintiff?

There's some really foundational legal concepts at play here, which would be violated if Acerthorn tries this. I hope he does, and the judge gets to write a textbook explanation of basics they haven't had to bring up since undergrad pre-law courses.

I know it's optimistic to expect thoughtful treatises from federal judges in lolsuits, but this would be the right time for one.