🌟 Internet Famous David Steel / LazerPig / Ricewynd / Malquistion - Pathological Liar, Reddit Historian, Femboy Thirster, and Vore Connoisseur

Barrett MARS xTech 20241014-SSRS copy.jpg
Lazy piggy just angry that his country is not developed. A real life bolter. You cannot be a Space Marine in the British military. But the US military has them now. Yes, I'm aware of the bolt gun is technically rocket propelled and. Also primer propelled.
 
View attachment 8848364
Lazy piggy just angry that his country is not developed. A real life bolter. You cannot be a Space Marine in the British military. But the US military has them now. Yes, I'm aware of the bolt gun is technically rocket propelled and. Also primer propelled.
The coping and SEETHING from Piggy that the fat dumb religious Americans developed the gun from the UK's biggest and most enduring cultural export in the last 20+ years must be off the charts
 
Part 2 of the T-72 rant is out.

The T-72 Sucks (Part 2): Morozov's P1mp wagon




For the record, no, he still does not talk about the T-72 at all. Among other things, he:
- very badly plagiarizes a Limmy bit for an ad read
- talks about the T-34, again
- tries to explain how society works as if only the soviet union has personal connections for no particular reason
- talks about the T-64 instead
- uses "I made it the fuck up" as a source unironically while sperging out about T-64 engine maintenance for 15 minutes
- mistakes the T-80 for a femboy and gets at least a half-chub
- dances past the six day war
- teases actually talking about the T-72 in the last seconds of the video
No, there is nothing worth watching this for. This is turning out to be The Hobbit of series, where you can cut 2 of the 3 videos entirely and not lose anything.
 
For the record, no, he still does not talk about the T-72 at all. Among other things, he:
- very badly plagiarizes a Limmy bit for an ad read
- talks about the T-34, again
- tries to explain how society works as if only the soviet union has personal connections for no particular reason
- talks about the T-64 instead
- uses "I made it the fuck up" as a source unironically while sperging out about T-64 engine maintenance for 15 minutes
- mistakes the T-80 for a femboy and gets at least a half-chub
- dances past the six day war
- teases actually talking about the T-72 in the last seconds of the video
No, there is nothing worth watching this for. This is turning out to be The Hobbit of series, where you can cut 2 of the 3 videos entirely and not lose anything.
Tune in next time as Lazernig somehow talks about the T-90 and T-14 instead.
 
For the record, no, he still does not talk about the T-72 at all. Among other things, he:
- very badly plagiarizes a Limmy bit for an ad read
- talks about the T-34, again
- tries to explain how society works as if only the soviet union has personal connections for no particular reason
- talks about the T-64 instead
- uses "I made it the fuck up" as a source unironically while sperging out about T-64 engine maintenance for 15 minutes
- mistakes the T-80 for a femboy and gets at least a half-chub
- dances past the six day war
- teases actually talking about the T-72 in the last seconds of the video
No, there is nothing worth watching this for. This is turning out to be The Hobbit of series, where you can cut 2 of the 3 videos entirely and not lose anything.
In fairness to the six day war those were T54/55s.
 
Tune in next time as Lazernig somehow talks about the T-90 and T-14 instead.
Given how much of a sperg he is, he might talk about the BT series instead. Or go on a rant about Chinese tanks or might even talk about the BMP.

God bless those Kiwis that decided to watch that piece of shit. :semperfidelis:

- dances past the six day war
What's the relevancy of the Six Day War in that video? If anything he should have brought up the Yom-Kippur War given that he ranted about the T-62 in the previous part. And the T-62, despite Arab crews, performed quite well against the Israelis.
 
For the record, no, he still does not talk about the T-72 at all. Among other things, he:
- very badly plagiarizes a Limmy bit for an ad read
- talks about the T-34, again
- tries to explain how society works as if only the soviet union has personal connections for no particular reason
- talks about the T-64 instead
- uses "I made it the fuck up" as a source unironically while sperging out about T-64 engine maintenance for 15 minutes
- mistakes the T-80 for a femboy and gets at least a half-chub
- dances past the six day war
- teases actually talking about the T-72 in the last seconds of the video
No, there is nothing worth watching this for. This is turning out to be The Hobbit of series, where you can cut 2 of the 3 videos entirely and not lose anything.
How can The Pigger fuck up a video about why the T-72 has aged like shit, TWICE?
nevermind I defenitely can, it's because his brain has been Trainspotted

1777599076552.png
Embed related and mandatory trainspotting reference for whenever scotland gets brought up
 
What's the relevancy of the Six Day War in that video? If anything he should have brought up the Yom-Kippur War given that he ranted about the T-62 in the previous part. And the T-62, despite Arab crews, performed quite well against the Israelis.
What is the relevancy of literally 90% of the video in that video? Very little of it actually connects to anything, it's just rant after disconnected rant as the B-plot to the A-plot of an overstretched designer-focused history lesson that, after an hour, still hasn't actually got to the point, which is supposed to be the T-72. It doesn't help that he comes in with the goal of shitting on every single Soviet tank (except the T-80DU for some reason) so he can't admit that any of them actually did well in some cases.
I think the only reason he wedged the six day war in there after talking about the arabs is because he wanted to shoehorn in his mandatory Animarchy cameo in which he's le heckin funny antisemite man. Other than to cocktease about actually talking about the T-72 since, according to him, the six day war lead to its development as a replacement to the T-54/T-55 for export in a stripped down T-64? Which couldn't be explained without a fat commie australian jumpscare?
 
You know, I generally enjoy long form and multi-part YouTube videos, especially when the additional length is in the service of building context for the thesis or ultimate argument of the video/series. I generally don't mind side tangents and the occasional non-sequitur or digression if they are well done. I am generally a patient man and can tolerate a lot of BS so long as the content is entertaining or the argument/thesis is a good one. But even a man like me has his limits. Like, I get LardzerFag is attempting to create content for his thesis, but surely he should have been able to do that by now. I'm sure he could have been able to make his argument on why the T-72 sucks with plenty of context built-in without having to make it three videos long and include a massive rant about the entirety of Soviet tank development since the T-34, including re-tracing ground he already covered on his dedicated video on that particular tank. At this point it's just narcissistic fart-huffing and self-aggrandizement because he loves to hear the sound of his own voice.
 
(except the T-80DU for some reason)
Because it's Ukrainian. (if you're retarded)
Which really shows you how much of a grifter and retard he is. The T-80UD which is an Ukrainian variant, the major change in this variant is replacing the gas turbine with a diesel engine, giving the T-80UD (and the subsequent more indigenous variant, the T-84) the same pitiful reverse speed found in the T-72 and T-90, one of the major criticism of both tanks.

He also seems to disparage the T-64 for the mere reason it is a Soviet design, completely ignoring the fact that it is the most combat effective tank in the Ukrainian arsenal, from the Donbass war in 2014 all the way to the invasion of 2022, given that only it was the most numerous tank in Ukrainian service at the start of the war (now its the T-72, sourced from other nations, Ukraine didn't had a lot in their initial stocks, much to LazerPig's and other NAFOtards chagrin, I'm sure, if they even acknowledge the fact), it was also the tank that they had the industrial and technological base to maintain, repair and upgrade. Plus, it was also the tank that Ukrainians had the most experience with, it formed the backbone of their armored corps.

Which begs the question for the Pig, did the Ukrainians halted the invasion in spite of the T-64 or were the Ukrainian T-64s marvelous machines that destroyed hordes of Russian tanks?

LazerPig is the kind of nigger that preaches to the world than a tank is good or bad because he read the infobox on Wikipedia, despite supposedly using other sources.
 
the major change in this variant is replacing the gas turbine with a diesel engine, giving the T-80UD (and the subsequent more indigenous variant, the T-84) the same pitiful reverse speed found in the T-72 and T-90, one of the major criticism of both tanks.
Another major change is the welded turret, and commanders remote machine gun. The T-84 (both the base T-84, and BM Oplot) also features a reversable gear box which allows 30+ kph in reverse.
given that only it was the most numerous tank in Ukrainian service at the start of the war
What's funny is Ukraine actually had a lot of T-80s post collapse of the USSR, they modernised, and sold Pakistan 300+ T-80UDs with thermals simply because they were too expensive to maintain, the T-80UD was a disgustingly expensive tank by soviet standards (You could buy 4 T-72B for the price of 1 T-80UD).
 
Need to make a bingo card for his videos, because why the fuck is he taking about the fighter mafia AGAIN. Was Sprey one of his old boyfriends who broke up with him?

edit - Damn nvm he beat me too it
 
Funny someone posted a vid he did a few pages back and no one cared, lol.

Anyways, a thread from piggy which he got community note'd in but the first post was seemingly deleted (likely from backlash).
Screenshot 2026-05-04 103648.pngScreenshot 2026-05-04 103332.png Screenshot 2026-05-04 104015.png
Also fairly certain his insistence on being allowed to own firearms in the UK is a giant technicality due to the paperwork involved and the amount of time it takes before finally obtaining one. Also people are sperging about the community note "missing context" but it is correct as I am fairly certain every TV sold in the UK by law needs an iBBC player therefore you need a license for any TV.

Ani observations about leftist terrorism as well:
Screenshot 2026-05-04 102949.pngScreenshot 2026-05-04 103247.png
 
Also fairly certain his insistence on being allowed to own firearms in the UK is a giant technicality due to the paperwork involved and the amount of time it takes before finally obtaining one.
The other thing that he fails to mention is that it's may issue, not shall issue. You could jump through every hoop, fill out every form, speak to every authority, and still get rejected (spoiler: you almost certainly will be rejected) and also lol no refunds. Also also even if you do get accepted and issued a permit there is absolutely nothing socially, politically, or legally to protect that permit or the property you purchased with that permit. It can (and likely will) be taken away at any time for any reason with no recourse open to you as a permit holder.
 
The other thing that he fails to mention is that it's may issue, not shall issue. You could jump through every hoop, fill out every form, speak to every authority, and still get rejected (spoiler: you almost certainly will be rejected) and also lol no refunds. Also also even if you do get accepted and issued a permit there is absolutely nothing socially, politically, or legally to protect that permit or the property you purchased with that permit. It can (and likely will) be taken away at any time for any reason with no recourse open to you as a permit holder.
Well thats how it is done today. Full ban usually causes too much of backlash. So apparatchiks will just regulate it out of existence instead. So if you want gun you will be forced to spend lot of time and money for chance that may give you license. And if you have gun you are under heavy restrictions what you can use it for. In many places you are not even allowed to carry it on you in public spaces for self-defence.
Also lol did he really try to defend media loicense?
 
Also lol did he really try to defend media loicense?
There are two things that every single Bri'ish will absolutely always defend to the death if anyone ever dares to even insinuate something mildly negative about them:

>The BBC and Telly Loicense
>The NHS
 
Back
Top Bottom