I've seen it on the Farms and even exposed users for it. Very odd of you to deny it...
People fall under three camps
Comfy melons or variety of it
Legit lolifags/shotafags/cubfurs who join to trollshield
People with overactive apophenia and association fallacy
They see sexualization everywhere after seeing a "Loli" eg a melon with a bib eg
@Lidl Drip
Who never consider the following

Akin to spergs who see furfaggotry in everything from Don Bluth movies, Burbank films to Animal Crossing and Sanrio universe.
These people see everything as black and white, if you encounter one these individuals, do not touch and cut all ties they refuse to listen to reason and have the spine to admit that there is some innocence left in this world
Third camp lolicons of any other paraphilia for that matter, these people have sexual attraction to their specific fetish or interest.
If lolis looked like watermelon sheep then it would be a much less problematic genre.
Sir, this isn't Australia, people there have sheep genes after generations of sheep shagging, of course it wouldn't be problem there. For rest of the world who do not eat mutton however would see that as problematic. It would be fucking hilarious to hear someone call watamelon zoophile material because it's a sheep