Defendant: Ethan Oliver Ralph - Ethan Ralph's Documented Legal Troubles & Other Court Docs

[Polyboros2]

I think he was just going to go to help his odds when he still had a lawyer and wasn't too much of a scaredy coward to set foot on American soil. So he won't be physically or mentally present for this one it seems.

I was under the impression that the court told him the next hearing was going to have to be in person, as it was an actual hearing on the merits, not just procedural and leading up to the case stuff they allowed Ralph to do remotely.

Either way, no Ralph will not be heading to the US for the 17th. If he has to be there is person, he'll either feign ignorance about it and request a delay, request another delay before hand due to loss of council, or straight up ghost it thinking he's untouchable in Mexico.

Considering he can't drive to Cancun with out losing a piece of his Nissan, there is no way it'll survive a drive to Cali.

 

[joshua moon nigger monkey]

I was under the impression that the court told him the next hearing was going to have to be in person, as it was an actual hearing on the merits, not just procedural and leading up to the case stuff they allowed Ralph to do remotely.

Either way, no Ralph will not be heading to the US for the 17th. If he has to be there is person, he'll either feign ignorance about it and request a delay, request another delay before hand due to loss of council, or straight up ghost it thinking he's untouchable in Mexico.

Considering he can't drive to Cancun with out losing a piece of his Nissan, there is no way it'll survive a drive to Cali.

He already admitted to defaulting on his loan for his Nissan. He can't bring it to America without risking it being repossessed.

 

[Polyboros2]

He already admitted to defaulting on his loan for his Nissan. He can't bring it to America without risking it being repossessed.

I missed that, I thought he just let his insurance and registration lapse.

We really need a Ralphamale happenings threads that is like the community one with no commentary, just links to relevant threads

 

[.iota.]

He may bring the meigh with him to California.

There are a few steps that are needed to force a person to answer questions they don't want to. They could be taken in these cases, but under "normal" circumstances it wouldn't even be considered. I could easily see all the steps being taken and meigh possibly sanctioned by the court for it in this circus. I can't tell you if it will have any real teeth behind it or if the judge would even sanction a wife of one of the parties with an infant.

The fact will remain that money is the deciding factor if the parties against ralph want to try and force meigh to testify. In almost all cases not involving the Gunt it would be looked at as trying to get blood from a stone.

This case is almost qualified as a stone being bleed. So let's see how much money these retards want waste, to bleed from a xanaxed stone.

if the court considers her written declaration to be testimony, meigh has already forfeited her right to spousal privilege under california law. she can choose not to respond, but faith will have the right to cross examine.

regardless, this isn't about money. this isn't a civil case; the vickers are not suing the ragepig. they are asking the court to enforce family court (faith) and criminal court (faith and mr. vickers) orders that have been repeatedly violated. there is no financial settlement to be reached. the only money that faith or mr. vickers will be awarded is whatever the court decides the ragepig owes to compensate them for their legal expenses when he is found guilty of the violations that the vickers had to pay to bring to the courts' attention. the goal is not money; the goal is to constrain a convicted criminal from committing furthers crimes against them.

Ralph isn’t going to California for his next hearing. He decided to do it over zoom.

I was under the impression that the court told him the next hearing was going to have to be in person, as it was an actual hearing on the merits, not just procedural and leading up to the case stuff they allowed Ralph to do remotely.

Either way, no Ralph will not be heading to the US for the 17th. If he has to be there is person, he'll either feign ignorance about it and request a delay, request another delay before hand due to loss of council, or straight up ghost it thinking he's untouchable in Mexico.

it's my understanding that he has two separate court appearances on march 17th:

the first is the arraignment for faith to show cause that the dvro issued in relation to the distribution of images conviction has been violated. this is scheduled for the morning, and he (and meigh) are allowed to appear by zoom. granger was meant to be his attorney, and she had indicated that he would appear in person, though this is also the case in which the ragepig foolishly stated that he would not be testifying. obviously, everything has changed since then, but given that faith is also representing herself, i doubt that the court will allow a continuance just because the ragepig decided to rage against his attorney.

the second is the arraignment for mr. vickers to show cause that the restraining order that he has against the ragepig has been violated. this is scheduled for the afternoon, and last it was discussed by mr. vickers, both parties must appear in person. mr. vickers has an attorney. the ragepig was appointed counsel by the court, but he refused to submit a financial statement, and instead informed the court that he would be representing himself. i believe that this is also the case in which the ragepig has been charged with contempt for failure to appear and/or failure to notify the court regarding his previous appearances.

 

[Beef Elemental]

So let's say Ralph no shows at the trial. I'm assuming the Judge will issue an arrest warrant. How does that affect his travel? Does he just need to stay out of Cali?

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

So let's say Ralph no shows at the trial. I'm assuming the Judge will issue an arrest warrant. How does that affect his travel? Does he just need to stay out of Cali?

They check for warrants at the border when you cross back into the US. If Gunt has a warrant out and he tries to come back into the US at any point they’ll arrest him and hold him until Nevada Co., CA Sheriffs come pick him up.

He really is in a no-win scenario since he doesn’t have the $15k for a competent LOLyer. Show up and take the L, or stay home and take the L.

 

[Preacher ✝]

They check for warrants at the border when you cross back into the US. If Gunt has a warrant out and he tries to come back into the US at any point they’ll arrest him and hold him until Nevada Co., CA Sheriffs come pick him up.

He really is in a no-win scenario since he doesn’t have the $15k for a competent LOLyer. Show up and take the L, or stay home and take the L.

Imagine being the poor Sheriff's Deputy who has to ride in a car with the Gunt all the way back to Cali from the border...

 

[AnOminous]

This case is almost qualified as a stone being bleed. So let's see how much money these retards want waste, to bleed from a xanaxed stone.

They don't want money, they want this worthless fuck out of Xander's life for good and preferably him in jail if they can arrange it.

They check for warrants at the border when you cross back into the US. If Gunt has a warrant out and he tries to come back into the US at any point they’ll arrest him and hold him until Nevada Co., CA Sheriffs come pick him up.

I believe they only check NCIC so a bench warrant wouldn't just automatically (immediately) show up. They're supposed to, but they don't always.

A court can ultimately have your passport revoked for unpaid child support, or even enforce it in the foreign country if there's a treaty providing for it or a unilateral agreement. Mexico some time in the past few years passed such a law so the U.S. and Mexico have reciprocity on the enforcement of unpaid child support.

California courts really often like to wait until it gets to felony nonpayment, then haul your ass out of wherever you are, and if you can't pay, you can rot behind bars for all they give a shit. Short of a pissed-off IRS, a California family court is about the last thing I'd want after me, especially if I was enjoying "globetrotting" around Third World shitholes.

 

[Beef Elemental]

They check for warrants at the border when you cross back into the US. If Gunt has a warrant out and he tries to come back into the US at any point they’ll arrest him and hold him until Nevada Co., CA Sheriffs come pick him up.

He really is in a no-win scenario since he doesn’t have the $15k for a competent LOLyer. Show up and take the L, or stay home and take the L.

Oh dear. America privileges revoked.

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

Oh dear. America privileges revoked.

Yeah. Punished Gunt. A Gunt denied by the country his Ronneh gave him.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

Oh dear. America privileges revoked.

Ralph already has his America privileges removed. He’s a felon who can’t own or even handle a firearm.

 

[MeltyTW]

Oh dear. America privileges revoked.

Which is funny because null can come back to America and ralph tried to make it out like he couldn't and tried to paint that as the benchmark that made Ralph's life awesome and nulls an unbearable hell

 

[Telemeter]

He already admitted to defaulting on his loan for his Nissan. He can't bring it to America without risking it being repossessed.

If the lienholder declares it as stolen, that could actually mean serious fucking trouble even while in Mexico.

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

When’s Gunt’s next court date? It’s next week sometime, I’m pretty sure. Over/Under on whether he makes the trip?

 

[Bassomatic]

Ralph already has his America privileges removed. He’s a felon who can’t own or even handle a firearm.

You know, Ralph, is a bitch nigger like Null pointed out he's never sky dived, he doesn't own a motorcycle.

I bet he won't even TRY to buy a gun or have his horse straw buy him one. What kind of faggot lets the LIBTARD LEFT take away the rights he has from the country his daddy gave him?

Pussy ass Ralph is no guns. Let's all point and laugh at him for it. He's too poor and too much a bitch.

 

[Preacher ✝]

If Ralph had any real balls he'd embrace the outlaw life and tell the US Legal system to go fuck itself. Pack the horse and piglet up in the truck and head south of Mexico to someplace like Ecuador that doesnt have extradition.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

When’s Gunt’s next court date? It’s next week sometime, I’m pretty sure. Over/Under on whether he makes the trip?

I think it was the 17th. ChristorianX/PVS was chased away again because of his cringe gayops and had a hand up Vicker’s ass but he’d know for sure. This is for a 2 court special for a violation of restraining order and custody hearing, both of which will be Ralph representing himself.

He’s probably going to push for a continuance because he’s still trying to find a lolwer to take his cases

 

[Hambubger]

If Ralph had any real balls he'd embrace the outlaw life and tell the US Legal system to go fuck itself. Pack the horse and piglet up in the truck and head south of Mexico to someplace like Ecuador that doesnt have extradition.

He will when Nick tells him to go fuck himself

 

[.iota.]

i was watching mr. vickers' stream from last week while i was cleaning today, and i realized that i was mistaken about the ragepig being ordered to be present for one of his appearances on march 17th.

at 1:09:49 of this stream, responding to a comment from a disgraced salesman, mr. vickers stated:

pvs: oh snap, wait, he has both of the court events on the same date?

vickers: yes. march 17th, at nine a.m. in department three, family court, is the, uh, what is currently scheduled to be the trial for faith's contempt charges, uh, or, faith's contempt complaint in the, uh, court ordering ... and at one o'clock, in department six, he has the hearing that's mine. he is allowed to appear at both via zoom.

mr. vickers is also under the impression that the only way that the judge will allow a continuance for faith's trial is if the ragepig can provide evidence that granger decided to no longer provide counsel of her own accord, rather than that he simply refused to pay her, with only three weeks left before the trial.

he also indicated that the judge in his case is irritated with the delays, especially after appointing an attorney because the ragepig claimed he couldn't find one, only for the ragepig to then refuse to submit the financial statement necessary for the appointment. this is meant to be the final hearing prior to a trial date being set regarding the contempt of mr. vickers' restraining order. from the judge's previous statements, mr. vickers is under the impression that they both will be ordered to appear in person for that trial.

edited: for some reason, i kept writing "mr. morris" instead of "mr. vickers".

 

[Pentamidine]

mr. morris is also under the impression that the only way that the judge will allow a continuance for faith's trial is if the ragepig can provide evidence that granger decided to no longer provide counsel of her own accord, rather than that he simply refused to pay her, with only three weeks left before the trial.

Vickers gave an explanation for this a few weeks ago - I forget the details but the judge basically told him scheduling is happening Mar 17 pretty much no matter what. I think the only condition he was given for a further continuance is if he got a new lawyer before the hearing and the new lawyer would need time to catch up.

And yes - Vickers said Ralph HAS to be physically present for Faith's trial, but not for Vickers' hearing. But they're both in the same day so why not just waddle over to the Vickers' scheduling hearing?

Regarding the financial statement - I originally thought Ralph didn't want us all to know that he's poor. I now believe it's the opposite - he doesn't qualify for a court appointed attorney because he made 6 figures last year. Sure, he doesn't have any of it left, but that doesn't really matter. Maybe secondly, he hasn't been paying taxes so he's afraid to give financial statements.

The only thing that doesn't make sense with that theory, is he would probably just lie on the financial declaration anyway. So I don't know. Maybe it really IS just pride, and he can't admit he's destitute.