i particularly appreciate that the judge knew that he needed to reiterate this:
also, just as a reminder, there are still multiple cases pending ...
- when the ragepig filed to amend the visitation order with faith, while claiming that iziah was a pedophile (which was immediately dismissed), he also filed an order to show cause against mr. vickers regarding their no-contact order, while claiming that mr. vickers calling his dumb dead mama a dumb dead whore was a violation. that filing has yet to be accepted by the court, though it's been almost three months.
- faith filed another order to show cause for the ragepig's many violations of the dvro. her original case was dismissed because she failed to provide evidence at the trial (she instead rested her case, claiming that her declaration spoke for itself, while failing to submit the contents of her declaration as evidence). she cannot file the same order to show cause again, but the ragepig continued to provide her with enough content for another filing, which will allow her to reintroduce the prior violations in another trial.
- mr. vickers will certainly file for attorney's fees for the case that the ragepig just lost.
- mr. vickers will also likely file a civil lawsuit for defamation, citing the ragepig's claims in this case that the vickers are pedophiles, and that the vickers stole their coin shop from another man; claims for which the ragepig has just been found guilty of contempt. the court was clear in stating that it was not ruling that the ragepig's claims were defamatory, only that he violated the law by making those claims.
there is no end to the litigation in sight. the vickers can afford it (for now). the ragepig cannot.