- Joined
- May 25, 2020
It'd be pretty easy for you to come up with a single example of where the game sings its praises, right? Or where it harps on the fallacies of the other ones, then, right?The post was a fraction of a dozens of hour game. It doesn't prove shit since the more important thing is what happens in the other 99.9% of the game.
Oh, wait. When it makes fun of fascists by calling you a dumb idiot who hates women and change, when it makes fun of moderates by saying you're a pussy-ass bitch who doesn't actually want to do anything at all to let someone else handle it, when it makes fun of ultraliberals by saying you're out to scam everyone out of all their money... those are all also snippets in a game that trails on for hours and hours.
'kay, let's take a look here. It's their blurb about all of them. They make fun of the individual. If you want to say the line about "it's all kipts and women" is making fun of the ideology, I fail to see how that's any different from "Evil child-murdering billionaires still rule the world with a shit-eating grin" mocking reductive communist takes.And even the quotes you made were entirely about the average commie who rewrites history and "not real communism" rather than about the ideology itself. And don't you dare say "you didn't read it properly" to try to excuse it.
So, again, what are you talking about? Not a one of the fascist/traditionalist characters do a damn thing in endangering the lives of anyone in the story. The Lorry driver drives a lorry. Measurehead guards a door. Gary is looking for a magical bug with his friends. Pierre complains.
The socialist risks the entire port in a gambit. The liberal loses control of contract killers who were going to crush the workers. The communist starts the entire chain of events that could blow the whole place up. The Sunday Friend doesn't give a shit about any of this, nor does the Coalition. oh im sorry did they need to tell you that outright
You can chastise the soldier about his adherence to the ideology, and you can also debate Evrart on socialism more broadly. The soldier is a little barebones - but this largely helps your case because the only thing to conclude from interacting with him is that his adherence to communism is retarded and the strict adherence it forced on people was wrong.It doesn't really support your point if, out of all politics, only communism doesn't have an ingame "face" that you can debate with.
You don't really "debate" the Lorry driver, but you can Measurehead and Joyce. You can also get into an argument with the Sunday Friend, though not Pierre as much as I recall. Oh, you can also agree with all of these people, including the lorry driver, and the punishment is that Kim doesn't like you as much. Wow, I thought he'd be cool with being called subhuman. Kim also thinks you're a fucking moron if you go the socialist route, because he's moralist.
Weak point? Lol dude maybe for closeted racists on the internet.And racism is probably the game's weakpoint since it's presented as 100% evil and unjustified while also being linked to the right wing pretty regularly.
I just went on a spiel about how Measurehead and Gary contrast directly with the Lorry driver to show that different people, even good or disciplined people, are drawn to it for different reasons. In showing Measurehead as a buff guy who at least tries to form a coherent ideology and Gary as a kind but awkward closeted racist, it goes miles above any other presentation.
Or were you looking for a game to say HATING NIGGOS IS SOMETIMES JUSTIFIED? Did you even fucking interact with Gary, the guy who owns the mug? Give him that mug.
I don't care how much interference you try to run with whataboutism, xenophobia and racism are tethered much more to the right wing than to the left wing. You can rag on the right wing for racism while you rag on the left wing for massive loss of human life and environmental devastation or any number of other things. Is your qualm that they aren't going "they're all equally as bad!" despite the fact that they never outright state that one is right or one is wrong?
Strawman? Nah man, when I say "you are saying things happened that did not happen in the game," and when people dredge up examples that only go so far as the very first set of interactions with the lorry driver, I'm pretty sure it's less a strawman and more me calling a spade a spade. But subtext and metanarrative does seem to sail right over your head, judging by the discussion wayyyy way earlier.You are making a strawman to try to get away from having an actual argument. Also at least in the context of "nobody is looking good" it's the most smooth brain deep thunk that exists and it is neither deep nor new.
There's so much more to it than "nobody is looking good," but it wooshed on by. You might've missed how all this shit is going on completely peripheral to Harry's own inner turmoil, how you don't actually choose a 'winner' in the end and you don't get everyone to come together and agree, how most endings don't result in anything happening to the status quo, how Harry can nevertheless find fulfillment and redemption despite the political questions and elements not having resolution or answers... Almost like there's a metanarrative there that it isn't going to spoonfeed you. How could it be that getting over a bad breakup and questioning various political ideologies could coexist as plot elements in the same game if I don't beat the game by picking the right one?
are you unironically calling kiwi farms a liberal sjw bubble websiteWe see this crap with SJWs all the time. If you live in a bubble and aren't challenged you seem like the smartest person in the room.
I think this game is above your reading level dude, get a refund