Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.5%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,087 68.9%
  • Total voters
    1,577
It looks like shit.
It's creativity bankrupt.
It'll make a ton of money.
People will defend Disney not trying and making awful movies because their kids eat up anything.


The original Moana was cliched and boring and I don't care what they do with it, but do we think they can make it through one of these without some stupid "I'm sooooo much smarter than the people I'm standing on the shoulders of!" moment, a la "o'hana means fuck you"? Any guesses for stupid twists we might see?
 
Purple fur Pomeranian said:
and there's people defending this garbage. Many of them on facebook are saying its mostly adults crying about a kids movie.
Click to expand...
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that people still use the "It's for kids" Defense, but it always comes across as cynical, lopsided, and even a bit negligent. Kids may not often express concern over good stories, and that is why parents should decide which works are best for them.

These films are products that people pay money to watch, so if quality really doesn't matter here, you might as well just save a few bucks by leaving your child to watch YouTube Kids brainrot.
 
The Hunchback of Notre Dame is Gyppo power fantasy, the good ending would be the population of Paris pogroming the Gyppos and everyone living happily every after.
In that regard, the original story is better.
 
Kari Kamiya said:
I will defend HTTYD because they handled the separation of a duo the best, although it still could've easily gone a different route without feeling the need to be contrived or to have their cake and eat it too. Even though the franchise wasn't doing the same things as the books, the first book does open with the line "There were dragons when I was a boy", and therefore put a set time limit on the dragons, and I think the movies wanted to be more subtle about that. Maybe the TV show put into force that foreshadowing, I'll have to watch it again.
Click to expand...
Late but I like HTTYD and I don't get to sperg about it often.

I wouldn't call it worse than Ralph 2 (that movie is actual garbage), but HTTYD 3 trying to shoehorn the book's ending doesn't make sense when the relationship between vikings and dragons is completely different. The vikings in the books abuse the dragons and treat them as slaves, while in the movies they respect and depend on each other, it doesn't make sense to use the same ending for both. The movie tried to justify it by showing that it was to protect the dragons from dragon hunters, but that's the vegan logic of "no one should be allowed to own pets because some people abuse theirs" (which granted, I somewhat agree with, but most people don't).

The TV shows only made it worse by introducing dragons that physically can't reach the hidden world (cavern crashers and speed stingers can't fly nor swim), or are adapted to their islands, like the lava-eating dragon that prevents its island from being destroyed by a volcano.

Tootsie Bear said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=QKYFfYLe5rs
Click to expand...
The fact that these new remakes are so similar to the originals is almost making me appreciate Maleficent. I know it's a bad movie with a shoehorned rape allegory, but at least I can respect the fact that it tried to tell a different story and wasn't just a 1 to 1 remake of Sleeping Beauty.
 
Disney plans to release a short film to accompany the release of Zootopia 2 on 26 November 2025 titled Versa, It depicts a young couple trying to start a family following mental trauma of the loss of their first child, with the visual storytelling utilizing a cosmic and astrological backdrop. It is based on the life of the short's director Malcon Pierce (Moana, Frozen), of which Pierce and his wife Keely went through numerous struggles following the loss of their infant son Cooper.

versa_3.jpg ​
versa_2.jpg ​
versa_5.jpg ​
versa_4.jpg ​
versa_6.jpg ​
versa_7.png ​

Of course, the online LGBTQ+ Tumblrista community is outraged because Disney portrayed a straight couple which means pushing for heteronormative oppression. When people noticed that they are seething, the fags literally go full Tomlinson, "no straight breeder, you are the seether, we are just satirically posting!"

x_2.png x_7.png x_5.png x_4.png x_1.png x_3.png x_9.png x_8.png x_6.png

The time where tumblristas lose all power having to see straight families in animated media brings me joy.

In a way, Versa reminds me of the short film Duet done by Disney legend Glen Keane.

 
Last edited:
Romeo said:
It depicts a young couple trying to start a family following mental trauma of the loss of their first child
Click to expand...
Now THIS is animated therapy done right. Why? Because it's an experience that the average Joe might've actually gone through at some point.
Romeo said:
Of course, the online LGBTQ+ Tumblrista community is outraged because Disney portrayed a straight couple which means pushing for heteronormative oppression.
Click to expand...
And of course the faggots are like "but how can I make this about ME?!" NIGGERS, EVERYTHING HAS BEEN CENTERED AROUND YOU FOR AT LEAST THE PAST 10 YEARS, LET US HETEROES HAVE AT LEAST ONE THING.
 
Tumblr retards seething about a normal, straight couple trying to start a family warms my heart. Because they literally can't reproduce the way God has intended for us humans.
 
I'm suprised the movie isn't about faggot trash. No wonder why the rainbow menace is throwing a tantrum. This is what happens when you pander to them.

It's still Wokney so they can never be trusted. I bet the rainbow Goblins working at Disney also protested.
 
Romeo said:
Of course, the online LGBTQ+ Tumblrista community is outraged because Disney portrayed a straight couple which means pushing for heteronormative oppression. When people noticed that they are seething, the fags literally go full Tomlinson, "no straight breeder, you are the seether, we are just satirically posting!"
Click to expand...

Even as a 'joke', it feels particularly heinous to be doing this in response to a short about coping with the loss of a child.
 
That backlash just shows the LGP community's racism against niggers and pajeets whose primary pastime is producing babies.
 
GaryStu56 said:
https://youtu.be/PypDSyIRRSs?si=uATf2l0U1CYXOdP9

That one offhand Avatar reference wasn't a joke; this movie is literally it but with cartoon animals. Though, it does seem a tad bit smarter since the beaver girl still sympathizes with the humans, unlike Blue Tarzan who killed a bunch of miners/whalers without breaking a sweat.
Click to expand...
Saw someone on twitter say that the main theme of the story seems to be that resistance movements are incredibly vulnerable to being taken over by violent psychopaths who are looking for a reason to kill innocent people. Considering how it seems that the butterfly takes over the girl's anti-development movement with the "KILL HUMANS" rhetoric partway through the movie and the climax seems focused on her trying to stop the woodland animals from murdering everyone, they appear to be right. Weirdly based of Disney.
 
Last edited:
Mr. ShadowCreek said:
One thing I've noticed about the teaser is the same problem that Shrek 5 has. The characters look to clean. Yes, Andy and Bonnie take care of their toy but many of them are old. Many of Andy's toys are supposed to be about 20+ and Woody, Jessie, and Bullseye are supposed to be over 50. Even if Andy and Bonnie keep them in good condition they will still have wear and wear to them.
Click to expand...
Going back to this, it's likely for the sake of merchandising, since toy manufacturers want to sell characters that look clean and brand new while also being accurate to the films. I still think they should have found a compromise, though. Seeing these characters wear and scratch would reinforce the themes of mortality discussed in Toy Story 2 and hint at the wisdom that characters like Woody might possess, having lived for more than half a century.

Benny from The LEGO Movie became an icon despite being a spaceman with a busted helmet and damaged torso printing. It fit his character as a neglected rocket schizo who's clearly been leaking oxygen too long.
 
Something makes me wonder is if in twenty years or less that Disney will bought out by some foreign conglomerate whether Chinese, Arab, or even Indian? I only ponder because all the major video game publishers are facing that right now and videa is bigger than TV and films and you can only produce crap so long until it becomes unsustainable.
 
Not that I have time to go to the movies all that much these days, but if I did, I would avoid Zootopia 2 for the "Versa" short.

Just read the plot for it, and ... Yeah. It's going to make me ugly cry, isn't it?

And I'm sure I'm not alone in those sentiments. A lot of parents at the movies this coming weekend are going to get emotionally sucker punched by this while their kids will be all like "Whatever man, where are the silly talking animals now?" lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom