Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.4%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,088 68.9%
  • Total voters
    1,578
Wish was dead in the water the moment the stronk independed wonym didn't need a man.

Disney 's bread and butter in most of their iconic princess movies were the well presented romances.

Disney-Couples-Crest-WDI-Pin-Release.jpeg

Even in the "dark ages" with Snow White/Cinderella/Aurora, the princesses had great chemistry with their romantic leads. Both designs are well thought out and invoke great chemistry and atmosphere despite their limited time together, like a fairy tale :woah:

Beauty and the Beast and the Little Mermaid are entirely driven by the romance. You end up with lesser films without it. (Oops, the remakes killed that.)

Even in the projects were romance isn't the focus (Alladin, Mulan, Hercules, Tarzan etc.), there was still effort to make the romance engaging and fulfilling. You never walked out of the film feeling like the characters are better off without each other. (Except in Pocahontas, with the sequel hilariously confirming it.) The only reason Tangled Vs. Frozen is even a thing is because Rapunzel and Eugene work so well together as opposed to Anna and Kristoff.

Even the most hardcore TERF will melt at the "kiss the girl" or the "once upon a dream" sequence. Ask millennial women about their ideal man and watch them answer Prince Eric 60% of the time.

How did they miss the point so bloody bad.
 
Mac Monster said:
Modern Disney doesn't like straight relationships anymore, all they care about is fags and homos.
Click to expand...
Then do furries like Robin Hood but in a way that one or both of the lovebirds are gender ambiguous. Barring that, many gay people are more then capable of putting themselves in the shoes of the opposite gender .
 
Betonhaus said:
Then do furries like Robin Hood but in a way that one or both of the lovebirds are gender ambiguous. Barring that, many gay people are more then capable of putting themselves in the shoes of the opposite gender .
Click to expand...
Can we make Robin Hood a rodent? We can call the movie Robin Hoodrat.
 
Duck & Cover said:
You never walked out of the film feeling like the characters are better off without each other. (Except in Pocahontas, with the sequel hilariously confirming it.)
Click to expand...
I do genuinely kinda feel bad for the natives that by far their most well known character (probably the only many people worldwide even know) is this weird version directly based on a real tragic little girl, and the movie isn't even good and the extremely forced love story sucks ass like ouch

Even in this pin thing she and john are not even included despite coming out somewhere in the middle of them

The funniest part is that 90s disney afaik was soooo jacking themselves off over this movie while the lion king was the b project and has done more for real diversity than pocohantos ever has since that live stage musical featured a lot of actual african stuff, made big money and is one of the most beloved disney movies for boys and girls alike, while pocahontas just gets more and more left out

Shouldve just made their native movie based off of that girl they used in night at the museum if they wanted a real person
 
Last edited:
Mac Monster said:
If true, this would make Meg the first redhead that Disney didn't blackwash.
Click to expand...
Instead we would get a wannabe.

Personally, I am 50/50 on Arianna being Meg. If given the choice, I would have had Disney pursue her fiend Liz for the role as Liz Gillies has a similar demeanor and voice to Meg that would make her much more of a fit. They are clearly trying to get the Victorious crowd, which makes it baffling they didn’t pick the older looking woman who already played a similar character to Meg.

Ewan McGregor said:
They'll make Herc an utter moron and Hades an unfunny Trumplica, won't they
Click to expand...
Herc already was a not to bright in the first. Hades will definitely be soiled as an F-you to James Woods, the evil Republican.

X-avier cuck said:
A lot of rumors about this film have been floating around for a long time, and the one that I heard is that it's a tick tok musical.
Click to expand...
Arianna always seems to be a constant. The other casting choices seem new. If true, Hugh Jackman and Bale seem like very odd picks. Apparently Michael B Jordan was supposed to be Herc at some point.
 
Basic Blond Boy said:
View attachment 5551178
I have so many thoughts on these choices, if true.
Click to expand...
With how these remakes are usually shit, I have no faith in this doing good.

It's a shame because Bale could probably pull off a good Hades if he channeled part of his Patrick Bateman performance into it. But I doubt he'd take the role unless the money is really good or if he has relatives who'd want him to do it.

But the chances of this being good are in the negatives.
 
Grumpy Pickle Rick said:
I agree.

Although, I wish they would stop with superheroes and focus on villains. Truthfully, I like supervillains and anti-heroes more than superheroes.

Superheroes are just lame.
Click to expand...
I just want a show about evil people who do evil things. Whenever Disney gives a villian a spinoff they puss out like a bitch and hero the villian up. That's just bullshit right there.
 
Grumpy Pickle Rick said:
I agree.

Although, I wish they would stop with superheroes and focus on villains. Truthfully, I like supervillains and anti-heroes more than superheroes.

Superheroes are just lame.
Click to expand...
Except you can't have a villian that seems Jewish or black or gay or transgender or have any other personality other then generic white man.
 
Betonhaus said:
Except you can't have a villian that seems Jewish or black or gay or transgender or have any other personality other then generic white man.
Click to expand...
Been like increasingly like this since at least WWII propaganda films started being made. Nowadays all that's left is the last vestiges of anybody other than white men being the antagonist nevermind an actual villain being snuffed out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom