- Joined
- Jun 15, 2017
Oh my god "Madame Web" is awful. Stronk wamen aside, the wikipedia plot summary reads like something a teenage girl trying to be a "serious writer" would write after reading a Stephen King book. (Surprisingly all three writers are male, one a gay shitskin and two white (((?))) men also responsible for Morbius.) Nothing cool nothing superherouc happens in the movie.Should Sony spider-man movies be counted as Disney news?
This is a bad poster! Who are all these people? They look like "sexy" asshole HR chick, nasty seductress / drug dealer, conscientious black lady (played by a they/them pooner), and "some guy" (police officer or gang enforcer).
But the lady in the center is attractive, they could've made her a biker chick or female Snake Plissken and not made much money but have crowds of lesbians demanding a sequel every comc convention. (Also, troons would declare her a troon.)
But what do they do? They leave her BLIND and PARAPHLEGIC at the end of the movie. WHY? Women would only accept a blind and paraphlegic heroine at the end of some tearjerker romance (where her love interest cares for her) or a "serious", preferably based on a true story, Oscar bait thing. What are they going to do with an action movie protagonist who's disqualified from being an action movie protagonist?
And yet this thing beat a Henry Cavill movie in whose trailer a guy (who may be Henry Cavill, I'm face-blind) throws a cat from a building. What a splendid way to market to women, everyone knows women hate cats and no man in history ever got himself a tinder date fluffing up a cat in his profile photo. This is replicant behavior. Writers and marketers aren't human, they should not have human rights.
This faggot?This can be traced back to a Facebook poll that one of the comic companies did that told them that ~50% of comic book readers were women.
1. It includes web comics.
2. It includes mango.
3. It considers comic readers (well, "Facebook fans") but not comic sales.