- Joined
- May 31, 2021
My reading on it was it started as a way for the white settler forces, first British and French, then later independent US soldiers, to humiliate natives they captured or had killed.Good question, one I've never really considered before. If I were to assume, just based on my own cultural knowledge, I would think it's likely a status thing. A hunter keeps and uses pelts to honor the game he hunts. The best hunter has the most pelts, right? So, the guy with the most pelts leads the hunt. Logically, the same would apply to warriors and scalps. Except, rather than honoring the previous "owner" of the scalp it would be an act of humiliation. A sort of "I beat you, now I own a piece of you and that brings me renown." thing.
It's never really been a thing I've brought up or discussed, to be honest.
They believed that the hair of the native warriors was an important symbol to them.
Later it appeared to have been adopted by the natives as they seemed to think it must be something that the white men found to be humiliating, which was why they did it to native warriors.
Of course this may be something that has been conflated from various accounts by several different people from different periods.